Advertisement

Occupational Causes of Cancer

  • Jack SiemiatyckiEmail author
  • Mengting Xu
Living reference work entry
Part of the Handbook Series in Occupational Health Sciences book series (HDBSOHS, volume 1)

Abstract

Many recognized human carcinogens are chemicals or physical agents found in the occupational environment. The present chapter is intended to summarize current information on occupational carcinogens. Most discoveries have been based on epidemiologic research; however, animal experimentation and basic science research have also contributed to this body of knowledge. Establishing a list of occupational carcinogens is not straightforward; since many occupational agents are also found in consumer products and the general environment, it requires judgment as to what should be considered an occupational agent. It is important to synthesize this information for both scientific and public health purposes. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) publishes lists of human carcinogens based on evaluations conducted by expert panels. Based largely on the evaluations published by IARC, and supplemented by our knowledge of the occupations and industries in which they are found, and their target organs, we list 50 definite occupational carcinogens and 51 probable occupational carcinogens. The evidence base for some of these is described. In various countries it has been estimated that between 4% and 14% of all cancer deaths among males are attributable to occupational exposures, and the corresponding range is from 1% to 3% of cancer deaths among females.

Keywords

Occupation Cancer Etiology Epidemiology IARC Monographs 

References

  1. Ashby J, Tennant RW (1988) Chemical structure, Salmonella mutagenicity and extent of carcinogenicity as indicators of genotoxic carcinogenesis among 222 chemicals tested in rodents by US NCI/NTP (MYR 01277). Mutat Res 204(1):17–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attfield MD et al (2012) The diesel exhaust in miners study: a cohort mortality study with emphasis on lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(11):869–883PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boffetta P, Jourenkova N, Gustavsson P (1997) Cancer risk from occupational and environmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [review]. Cancer Causes Control 8(3):444–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boffetta P, Matisane L, Mundt KA, Dell LD (2003) Meta-analysis of studies of occupational exposure to vinyl chloride in relation to cancer mortality. Scand J Work Environ Health 29(3):220–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boffetta P, Adami HO, Cole P, Trichopoulos D, Mandel JS (2009) Epidemiologic studies of styrene and cancer: a review of the literature. J Occup Environ Med 51(11):1275–1287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boffetta P et al (2010) An estimate of cancers attributable to occupational exposures in France. J Occup Environ Med 52(4):399–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bond GG, Bodner KM, Olsen GW, Cook RR (1992) Mortality among workers engaged in the development or manufacture of styrene-based products – an update. Scand J Work Environ Health 18(3):145–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen SM (1995) Human relevance of animal carcinogenicity studies. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 21(1):75–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Creech JL Jr, Johnson MN (1974) Angiosarcoma of liver in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride. J Occup Med 16(3):150–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Doll R (1988) Effects of exposure to vinyl chloride. An assessment of the evidence. Scand J Work Environ Health 14(2):61–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fritschi L, Driscoll T (2006) Cancer due to occupation in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 30(3):213–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garshick E et al (2004) Lung cancer in railroad workers exposed to diesel exhaust. Environ Health Perspect 112(15):1539PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gold LS, Slone TH, Ames BN (1998) What do animal cancer tests tell us about human cancer risk? Overview of analyses of the carcinogenic potency database. Drug Metab Rev 30(2):359–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansen J, Stevens RG (2012) Case-control study of shift-work and breast cancer risk in Danish nurses: impact of shift systems. Eur J Cancer 48(11):1722–1729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huff J, Weisburger E, Fung VA (1996) Multicomponent criteria for predicting carcinogenicity: dataset of 30 NTP chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 104(Suppl 5):1105–1112PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IARC (1976) Cadmium, nickel, some epoxides, miscellaneous industrial chemicals and general considerations on volatile anaesthetics. IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to man, vol 11. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
  17. IARC (1993) Beryllium, cadmium, mercury, and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 58. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
  18. IARC (2000) Ionizing radiation, part 1. X-radiation and g-radiation, and neutrons. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 75. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
  19. IARC (2002) Some traditional herbal medicines, some mycotoxins, naphthalene and styrene. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 82. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
  20. IARC (2012a) A review of human carcinogens, part C: arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 100. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
  21. IARC (2012b) A review of human carcinogens, part F: chemical agents and related occupations. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 100. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
  22. IARC (2013) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer. http://monographs.iarc.fr/. Accessed 27 June 2013
  23. IARC (2014) Diesel and gasoline engine exhausts and some Nitroarenes. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 105. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer, LyonGoogle Scholar
  24. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2006) Preamble to the IARC monographs. https://monographs.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/CurrentPreamble.pdf. Accessed 7 Jan 2019
  25. IPCS (International Programme on Chemical Safety) (1998) Chrysotile asbestos. Environmental health criteria. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobs EJ et al (2015) What proportion of cancer deaths in the contemporary United States is attributable to cigarette smoking? Ann Epidemiol 25(3):179–182. e1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katsouyanni K, Pershagen G (1997) Ambient air pollution exposure and cancer [review]. Cancer Causes Control 8(3):284–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim BS, Margolin BH (1999) Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity utilizing a battery of in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests. Environ Mol Mutagen 34(4):297–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kullberg C, Selander J, Albin M, Borgquist S, Manjer J, Gustavsson P (2017) Female white-collar workers remain at higher risk of breast cancer after adjustments for individual risk factors related to reproduction and lifestyle. Occup Environ Med 74(9):652–658.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-104043PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Labrèche F, Duguay P, Boucher A, Arcand R (2014) Estimating the number of cases of occupational cancer in Quebec. Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), MontréalGoogle Scholar
  31. Nauss KM et al (1995) Critical issues in assessing the carcinogenicity of diesel exhaust: a synthesis of current knowledge diesel exhaust: a critical analysis of emissions, exposure, and health effects. Health Effects Institute, Cambridge, MA, pp 11–61Google Scholar
  32. Nurminen M, Karjalainen A (2001) Epidemiologic estimate of the proportion of fatalities related to occupational factors in Finland. Scand J Work Environ Health 27:161–213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rushton L et al (2012) Occupational cancer burden in Great Britain. Br J Cancer 107(S1):S3PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Selikoff IJ (1990) Historical developments and perspectives in inorganic fiber toxicity in man. Environ Health Perspect 88(Aug):269–276PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Siemiatycki J (2014) Historical overview of occupational cancer research. In: Anttila S, Boffetta P (eds) Occupational cancers. Springer, London, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  36. Silverman DT et al (2012) The diesel exhaust in miners study: a nested case–control study of lung cancer and diesel exhaust. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(11):855–868PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stanaway JD et al (2018) Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 392(10159):1923–1994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steenland K, Burnett C, Lalich N, Ward E, Hurrell J (2003) Dying for work: the magnitude of US mortality from selected causes of death associated with occupation. Am J Ind Med 43(5):461–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Upton ABJBM et al (1991) Asbestos in public and commercial buildings: a literature review and synthesis of current knowledge. Report to: Health Effects Institute – Asbestos Research (HEI-AR). Health Effects Institute, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  40. Winkelstein W Jr (2002) Deadly glow: the radium dial worker tragedy. Am J Epidemiol 155(3):290–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu M et al (2018) Occupational exposures to leaded and unleaded gasoline engine emissions and lung cancer risk. Occup Environ Med 75(4):303–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yuan X, Zhu C, Wang M, Mo F, Du W, Ma X (2018) Night shift work increases the risks of multiple primary cancers in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 61 articles. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark 27(1):25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zahm SH, Blair A (2003) Occupational cancer among women: where have we been and where are we going? Am J Ind Med 44(6):565–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.École de santé publiqueUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Université de Montréal Hospital Research Centre, (CRCHUM)MontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations