ICU Staffing, Models, and Outcomes
As one of the most expensive resources in the healthcare system, the intensive care units (ICUs) are closely monitored for appropriate utilization and adequate staffing. The latter, considered one of the most challenging and controversial, is extensively discussed in this chapter. Optimal staffing of an ICU is highly dependent on multiple factors including, but not limited to availability of trained personnel, educational trainees, acuity of patients, size of ICU, and economic constraints. Therefore, staffing models need to be carefully selected and implemented based on the local setting. The key commodity in ICU staffing is the availability of specialty trained personnel, namely the intensivists and ICU nurses. Thus, in order to efficiently staff the ICU, attracting and retaining the intensivists, requires creative models which may focus on time off and lifestyle factors. The benefits of open versus closed units, high-intensity versus low-intensity models, and the classic academic and 24-h models are explored to provide the reader with a clear understanding of the benefits of these complex options and associated outcomes.
KeywordsICU staffing ICU beds Leapfrog Group ICU models Open ICU Closed ICU Moonlighting Telemedicine Advance practice providers Hospitalists Intensivists
- 3.Schmitz, et al. Needs in pulmonary and critical care medicine. Cambridge, MA: ABT Associates; 1999.Google Scholar
- 6.The Leapfrog Group for Patient Safety. Fact sheet: ICU physician staffing (IPS). Available at http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/Leapfrog-ICU_Physician_Staffing_Fact_Sheet.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2018.
- 7.Lwin AK, Shepard DS. Estimating lives and dollars saved from universal adoption of the Leapfrog safety and quality standards: 2008 update. Washington, DC: The Leapfrog Group; 2008.Google Scholar
- 10.Angus DC, Shorr AF, White A, Dremsizov TT, Schmitz RJ, Kelley MA, Committee on Manpower for Pulmonary and Critical Care Societies (COMPACCS). Critical care delivery in the United States: distribution of services and compliance with the Leapfrog recommendations. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(4):1016–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Duke EM. The study of supply and demand for critical care physicians. Senate Report 108–81, Senate Report 109–103 and House Report 109–143, US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, 2006.Google Scholar
- 13.US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. Report to Congress. The critical care workforce: a study of the supply and demand for critical care physicians. May 2006. http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/reports/studycriticalcarephys.pdf. Accessed 23 Oct 2015.
- 23.Haupt MT, Bekes CE, Brilli RJ, Carl LC, Gray AW, Jastremski MS, Naylor DF, PharmD MR, Md AS, Wedel SK, Md MH, Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines on critical care services and personnel: recommendations based on a system of categorization of three levels of care. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(11):2677–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Checkley W, Martin GS, Brown SM, Chang SY, Dabbagh O, Fremont RD, Girard TD, Rice TW, Howell MD, Johnson SB, O’Brien J, Park PK, Pastores SM, Patil NT, Pietropaoli AP, Putman M, Rotello L, Siner J, Sajid S, Murphy DJ, Sevransky JE, United States Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group Critical Illness Outcomes Study Investigators. Structure, process, and annual ICU mortality across 69 centers: United States Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group Critical Illness Outcomes Study. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(2):344–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Addressing burnout in ICU clinicians: strategies for prevention from a national summit. SSCM 47th Critical Care Congress.Google Scholar
- 37.Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.Google Scholar