Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Peter T. Bobrowsky, Brian Marker

Collapsible Soils

  • Martin Culshaw
  • I. Jefferson
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73568-9_61

Definition

Soils that have the potential to collapse generally possess porous textures with high void ratios and relatively low densities. At their natural moisture content these soils possess high apparent strength but they are susceptible to large reductions in void ratio on wetting, especially under load. In other words, the metastable texture collapses as the bonds between the grains break down as the soil becomes saturated (Culshaw et al. 2018).

Collapse of soils is controlled both microscopically and macroscopically, and both aspects need to be understood if the controls on collapse are to be determined. When collapse takes place, there is a rearrangement of soil particles resulting in densification. Collapse typically takes place rapidly as the soil passes from a metastable condition to a normally consolidated one.

Jefferson and Rogers (2012) defined collapsible soils as: “…soils in which the major structural units are initially arranged in a metastable packing through a suite...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Assadi A (2014) Micromechanics of collapse in loess. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell FG, Culshaw MG, Northmore KJ (2003) The metastability of some gull fill materials from Allington, Kent, UK. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 36:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell FG, Culshaw MG, Skinner HD (2012) Non-engineered fills. In: Burland J, Chapman T, Skinner H, Brown M (eds) ICE manual of geotechnical engineering, volume 1: geotechnical engineering principles, problematic soils and site investigation. ICE Publishing, London, pp 443–461Google Scholar
  4. Culshaw MG, Northmore KJ, Jefferson I, Assadi A, Bell FG (2018) Collapsible soils in the UK. In: Giles DA (ed) Geological Hazards in the UK: their occurrence, monitoring and mitigation. Engineering geology special publication, vol 29. Geological Society, London, p xxx (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Derbyshire E, Mellors TW (1988) Geological and geotechnical characteristics of some loess soils from China and Britain – a comparison. Eng Geol 25:135–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dibben SC (1998) A microstructure model for collapsing soils. Unpublished PhD thesis, Nottingham Trent UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. El-Ruwaih IE, Tourma FT (1986) Assessment of the engineering properties of some collapsible soils in Saudi Arabia. In: Proceedings of the 5th international congress of the International Association of Engineering Geology, Buenos Aires, vol 2. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam. pp 685–693Google Scholar
  8. Fookes PG, Best R (1969) Consolidation characteristics of some late Pleistocene periglacial metastable soils of east Kent. Q J Eng Geol 2:103–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fort S (2017) Case history 1.4 – residential apartment blocks constructed on loess, Volgodonsk, Rostov Oblast, Russia. In: Griffiths JS, Martin CJ (eds) Engineering geology and geomorphology of glaciated and periglaciated terrains. Engineering geology special publication, vol 28. Geological Society, London, p 11Google Scholar
  10. Gregersen O (1981) The quick clay landslide in Rissa, Norway. Norwegian geotechnical publication, vol 135, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  11. Haskins DR, Bell FG, Schall A (1998) The evaluation of granite saprolite as a founding medium at Injaka Dam, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. In: Moore DP, Hungr O (eds) Proceedings of the 8th congress of the International Association of Engineering Geology, Vancouver. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1, pp 461–468Google Scholar
  12. Jefferson I, Rogers CDF (2012) Collapsible soils. In: Burland J, Chapman T, Skinner H, Brown M (eds) ICE manual of geotechnical engineering, volume 1: geotechnical engineering principles, problematic soils and site investigation. ICE Publishing, London, pp 391–411Google Scholar
  13. Jefferson I, Tye C, Northmore KJ (2001) Behaviour of silt: the engineering characteristics of loess in the UK. In: Jefferson I, Murray EJ, Faragher E, Fleming PR (eds) Problematic soils, proceedings of the symposium held at The Nottingham Trent University. Thomas Telford Ltd, London, pp 37–52Google Scholar
  14. Jefferson I, Rogers CDF, Evstatiev D, Karastanev D (2005) Treatment of metastable loess soils: lessons from Eastern Europe. In: Indraratna B, Chu J (eds) Ground improvement – case histories, Elsevier geo-engineering book series, vol 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 723–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lill GO (1976) The nature and distribution of loess in Britain. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of LeedsGoogle Scholar
  16. Northmore KJ, Culshaw MG, Hobbs PRN (1992) Engineering geology of tropical red clay soils: summary findings and their application for engineering purposes. Technical report WN/93/15. British Geological Survey, Keyworth/NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  17. Northmore KJ, Bell FG, Culshaw MG (1996) The engineering properties and behaviour of the brickearth of south Essex. Q J Eng Geol 29:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Northmore KJ, Jefferson I, Jackson PD, Entwisle DC, Milodowski AE, Raines MR, Gunn DA, Boardman DI, Zourmpakis A, Nelder LM, Rogers CDF, Dixon N, Smalley IJ (2008) On-site characterisation of loessic brickearth deposits at Ospringe, Kent, UK. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering 161:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pereira JHF, Fredlund DG, Cardão Neto MP, De Gitirana GFN Jr (2005) Hydraulic behavior of collapsible compacted gneiss soil. J Geotech Geoenviron 131:1264–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Popescu ME (1992) Engineering problems associated with expansive and collapsible soil behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on expansive soils, vol 2, Dallas, pp 25–56Google Scholar
  21. Rankka K, Andersson-Sköld Y, Hultén C, Larsson R, Leroux V, Dahlin T (2004) Quick clay in Sweden. Report no, 65. Swedish Geotechnical Institute, LinköpingGoogle Scholar
  22. Stumpf AJ (2013) Collapsing Soil Hazards. In: Bobrowsky PT (ed) Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Springer, pp 99–105Google Scholar
  23. Waltham AC (2009) Foundations of engineering geology, 3rd edn. Hydraulic Behaviour/Taylor & Francis, Abingdon/OxonGoogle Scholar
  24. White JL, Greenman C (2008) Collapsible soils in Colorado, Engineering geology publication, vol 14. Colorado Geological Survey, Department of Natural Resources, DenverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Culshaw
    • 1
    • 2
  • I. Jefferson
    • 2
  1. 1.British Geological SurveyNottinghamUK
  2. 2.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK