Encyclopedia of Engineering Geology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Peter T. Bobrowsky, Brian Marker

Mechanical Properties

  • Robert (H. R. G. K.) HackEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73568-9_197

Definition

Physical properties that determine the behavior of ground that is under mechanical stress.

Mechanical properties of ground determine the behavior of the ground under stress in a mechanical way; for example, settlement of ground under a foundation, subsidence due to underground excavation or extraction of gases and fluids, tunnel and slope stability, and “breaking” of rock or cemented soils. Deformation is the change in volume or shape of ground under stress in which rheology and viscosity may be important. Strength commonly denotes a stress condition at which the ground fails (breaks) when a threshold in stress conditions is exceeded. Constitutive models are the aggregate term for relations that describe the chemical-physical-mechanical behavior of ground.

Ground materials are diverse and may be gases, fluids, solids (i.e., minerals, grains, and aggregates of grains or minerals) and any mixture of these and also include man-made ground, such as fills and waste dump...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alejano LR, Taboada J, García-Bastante F, Rodriguez P (2008) Multi-approach back-analysis of a roof bed collapse in a mining room excavated in stratified rock. Int J Rock Mech Min 45(6):899–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson JC (2010) Rock mass response to coupled mechanical thermal loading. Äspö pillar stability experiment, Sweden; Rocha Medal keynote. In: 6th Asian rock mechanics symposium; advances in rock engineering (ARMS 2010), New Delhi, 23–27 Oct 2010. p 27Google Scholar
  3. Arenson LU, Almasi N, Springman SM (2003) Shearing response of ice-rich rock glacier material. In: Phillips M, Springman SM, Arenson LU (eds) Permafrost: 8th international conference on permafrost, Zürich, Switzerland, 21–25 July 2003. Swets & Zeitlinger, Lisse, pp 39–44Google Scholar
  4. Ashby MF, Jones DRH (2012) Engineering materials 1; An introduction to properties, applications and design, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, WalthamGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM C805/C805M-13 (2013) Standard test method for rebound number of hardened concrete. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM D2936-08 (2008) Standard test method for direct tensile strength of intact rock core specimens. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM D3080M-11 (2011) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  8. ASTM D3967-08 (2008) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of intact rock core specimens. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  9. ASTM D5607-08 (2008) Standard test method for performing laboratory direct shear strength tests of rock specimens under constant normal force. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  10. ASTM D5731-08 (2008) Standard test method for determination of the point load strength index of rock and application to rock strength classifications. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  11. ASTM D5873-14 (2014) Standard test method for determination of rock hardness by rebound hammer method. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  12. ASTM D6467-13 (2013) Standard test method for torsional ring shear test to determine drained residual shear strength of cohesive soils. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  13. ASTM D7012-10 (2008) Standard test method for compressive strength and elastic moduli of intact rock core specimens under varying states of stress and temperatures. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  14. Bamforth P, Chisholm D, Gibbs J, Harrison T (2008) Properties of concrete for use in Eurocode 2; How to optimise the engineering properties of concrete in design to Eurocode 2. A cement and concrete industry publication. Price Group P, The Concrete Centre, CamberleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Barton NR (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterisation and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):185–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bieniawski ZT (1975) The point-load test in geotechnical practice. Eng Geol 9(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications: a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Bodó B, Jones C (2013) Introduction to soil mechanics. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  19. Bosch JW, Broere W (2009) Small incidents, big consequences. Leakage of a building pit causes major settlement of adjacent historical houses. Amsterdam North-South metro line project. In: Kocsonya P (ed) Safe tunnelling for the city and environment. ITA-AITES world tunnel congress 2009 and the 35th ITA-AITES General Assembly, Budapest, Hungary, 23–28 May 2009. Hungarian Tunneling Association, Budapest, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  20. Bräuer V, Eickemeier R, Eisenburger D, Grissemann C, Hesser J, Heusermasnn S, Kaiser D, Nipp H-K, Nowak T, Plischke I, Schnier H, Schulze O, Sönnke J, Weber JR (2011) Description of the Gorleben site; Part 4: geotechnical exploration of the Gorleben salt dome. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe (BGR), HannoverGoogle Scholar
  21. Broch E, Franklin JA (1972) The point-load strength test. Int J Rock Mech Min 9(6):669–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bromhead EN (1979) A simple ring shear apparatus. Ground Eng 12(5):40–44Google Scholar
  23. BS 5930:1981 (1981) Code of practice for site investigations. British Standards Institution, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. BS 5930:1999 (1999) Code of practice for site investigations. British Standards Institution, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Cai M, Horii H (1992) A constitutive model of highly jointed rock masses. Mech Mater 13(3):217–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cekerevac C, Wohnlich A, Bellwald P (2009) Deriner Hydropower Scheme Geotechnical issues and the particular case of the spillway tunnels design and construction. In: Diederichs M, Grasselli G (eds) Rock engineering in difficult conditions; ROCKENG09; Proceedings of the 3rd Canada-US rock mechanics symposium & 20th Canadian rock mechanics symposium, Toronto, Canada, 9–12 May 2009. Canadian Rock Mechanics Association/American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria, pp paper 3997Google Scholar
  27. Chan KF, Stone PC (2005) Back-analysis of monitoring results at Macquarie Park station, Epping to Chatswood Rail Line. In: Gourlay TM, Buys HG (eds) AGS AUCTA mini symposium: geotechnical aspects of tunnelling for infrastructure projects, Sydney, 12 October 2005. The Sydney chapter of the Australian Geomechanics Society, Australian Tunnelling Society (ATS), Sydney, p 10Google Scholar
  28. Chan KF, Kotze GP, Stone PC (2005) Geotechnical modelling of station caverns for the Epping to Chatswood Rail Line project. In: Gourlay T, Buys H (eds) AGS AUCTA mini symposium: geotechnical aspects of tunnelling for infrastructure projects, Sydney, 12 October 2005. The Sydney chapter of the Australian Geomechanics Society. Australian Tunnelling Society (ATS), SydneyGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen LT (2010) Geotechnical aspects of a deep excavation in Doha. In: Geotechnical aspects of deep excavation – 30th annual seminar, Hong Kong, 6 May 2010. Geotechnical division, The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, Hong Kong Geotechnical Society, Hong Kong, pp 67–73Google Scholar
  30. Ciancia M, Heiken G (2006) Geotechnical properties of tuffs at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. In: Heiken G (ed) Tuffs – their properties, uses, hydrology, and resources, vol Special Papers 408. Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 33–89Google Scholar
  31. Coulter S, Martin CD (2004) Ground deformations above a large shallow tunnel excavated using jet grouting. In: Schubert W (ed) EUROCK 2004 & 53rd Geomechanics colloquy; rock engineering. Theory and practice, Salzburg, Austria, 7–9 October 2004. Austrian Society for Geomechanics/Verlag Glückauf VGE, Essen, pp 155–160Google Scholar
  32. Craig RF (2004) Craig’s soil mechanics, 7th edn. Spon Press/Taylor & Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Deere DU, Miller JR (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock, vol AFWL-TR-65-116. Kirtland Air Force BaseGoogle Scholar
  34. Dubey RK (2006) Mechanical response of Vindhyan sandstones under drained and confined conditions (extended abstract). In: Leung CF, Zhou YX (eds) Rock mechanics in underground construction. Proceedings of the ISRM international symposium & 4th Asian rock mechanics symposium, Singapore, 8–10 November 2006. World Scientific, Singapore, p 343Google Scholar
  35. Dusseault MB, Fordham CJ (1993) Time-dependent behaviour of rocks. In: Fairhurst C, Hudson JA (eds) Comprehensive rock engineering: principles, practice & projects, vol 2. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, pp 119–149Google Scholar
  36. Equotip (2018) Equotip hardness tester; Proceq Equotip; Proceq http://www.equotip.com/. Accessed 7 Jan 2018
  37. Gagnon RE, Gammon PH (1995) Triaxial experiments on iceberg and glacier ice. J Glaciol 41(139):528–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hack HRGK (1998) Slope stability probability classification; SSPC; 2nd version. University of Technology Delft/International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences/ITC, DelftGoogle Scholar
  39. Hack HRGK, Huisman M (2002) Estimating the intact rock strength of a rock mass by simple means. In: Van Rooy JL, Jermy CA (eds) 9th congress of the international association for engineering geology and the environment (IAEG); Engineering geology for developing countries, Durban, South Africa, 16–20 September 2002. IAEG & South African Institute for Engineering and Environmental Geologists (SAIEG), Houghton, pp 1971–1977Google Scholar
  40. Hack HRGK, Hingira J, Verwaal W (1993) Determination of discontinuity wall strength by Equotip and ball rebound tests. Int J Rock Mech Min 30(2):151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hack HRGK, Price DG, Rengers N (2003) A new approach to rock slope stability – a probability classification (SSPC). Bull Eng Geol Environ 62(2):167–184Google Scholar
  42. Hoek E (2017) Practical rock engineering. https://www.rocscience.com/documents/hoek/corner/Practical-Rock-Engineering-Full-Text.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2017
  43. Hsu S-C, Nelson PP (2002) Characterization of Eagle Ford Shale. Eng Geol 67(1–2):169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ISO 14689-1:2003 (2003) Geotechnical investigation and testing. Identification and classification of rock. Part 1: identification and description, 1st edn. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  45. Jessberger H-L, Jagow-Klaff R, Braun B (2003) Ground freezing. In: Smoltczyk U (ed) Geotechnical engineering handbook, vol 2. Ernst & Sohn Verlag/Wiley, Berlin, pp 117–164Google Scholar
  46. Karakus M, Fowell RJ (2005) Back analysis for tunnelling induced ground movements and stress redistribution. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 20(6):514–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Karato S-i (2012) Deformation of earth materials; an introduction to the rheology of solid earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  48. Kirsch F, Richter T (2009) Ground freezing for tunnelling under historical structures. In: Hamza M, Shahien M, El-Mossallamy Y (eds) 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering (ICSMGE); the academia and practice of geotechnical engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, 5–9 October 2009. IOS Press, Amsterdam, p 4Google Scholar
  49. Kouokam E (1993) Compilation of all falset data to final report on engineering geological map. ITC, DelftGoogle Scholar
  50. Lee MY, Fossum A, Costin LS, Bronowski D (2002) Frozen soil material testing and constitutive modeling, vol SAND2002-0524. Sandia National Laboratories, AlbuquerqueCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marinos P, Hoek E (2000) GSI: a geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation. In: Littletidd JW, Drinan J, Bucher LR, Hill HZ, Parker TS, Quincey RV (eds) GeoEng 2000; international conference on geotechnical and geological engineering, Melbourne, Australia, 19–24 November 2000. Taylor & Francis/Technomic Publishing Co, Lancaster, pp 1422–1446Google Scholar
  52. Marinos V, Fortsakis P, Prountzopoulos G (2009) Estimation of rock mass properties of heavily sheared flysch using data from tunnelling construction. In: Culshaw MG, Reeves HJ, Jefferson I, Spink TW (eds) Engineering geology for tomorrow’s cities. Proceedings 10th congress international association for engineering geology and the environment, Nottingham, 6–10 September 2006. Geological Society of London, pp paper no. 314 (CD-Rom)Google Scholar
  53. Pells PJN (2004) Substance and mass properties for the design of engineering structures in the Hawkesbury sandstone. Aust Geomech: J News Aust Geomech Soc 39(3):1–22Google Scholar
  54. Pool MA (1981) Rebound methods of accessing rock properties in field and laboratory. University of Technology Delft, Section Engineering Geology, DelftGoogle Scholar
  55. Price DG, De Freitas MH, Hack HRGK, Higginbottom IE, Knill JL, Maurenbrecher M (2009) Engineering geology; principles and practice. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  56. Rusnak J, Mark C (2000) Using the point load test to determine the uniaxial compressive strength of coal measure rock. In: Peng SS, Mark C (eds) 19th international conference on ground control in mining (ICGCM), Morgantown, WV, USA, 8–10 August 2000. Department of Mining Engineering, College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, pp 362–371Google Scholar
  57. Sainsbury DP (2008) Analysis of river bed cracking above longwall extraction panels in the southern coalfield of New South Wales, Australia. In: Potvin Y, Carter J, Dyskin A, Jeffrey R (eds) SHIRMS 2008. Proceedings of the 1st southern hemisphere international rock mechanics symposium, Perth, Australia, 16–19 September 2008. Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), Broadway, Nedlands, pp 325–338Google Scholar
  58. Schmidt E (1951) A non-destructive concrete tester. Concrete 59(8):34–35Google Scholar
  59. Schulson EM (1999) The structure and mechanical behavior of ice. JOM 51(2):21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schultz RA (1995) Limits on strength and deformation properties of jointed basaltic rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 28(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sonnenberg AMC, Al-Mahaidi R, Taplin G (2003) Behaviour of concrete under shear and normal stresses. Mag Concr Res 55(4):367–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stimpson B (1965) Index tests for rock. MSc thesis, Department of Geology, Imperial College of Science and Technology, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Swart PD (1987) An engineering geological classification of limestone material. Delft University of Technology, DelftGoogle Scholar
  64. Thuro K, Scholz M (2004) Deep weathering and alteration in granites – a product of coupled processes. In: Stephanson O, Hudson JA, Jing L (eds) Elsevier geo-engineering book series; coupled Thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical processes in geo-systems – fundamentals, modelling, experiments and applications, vol 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 785–790Google Scholar
  65. UHC (2006) Material property characterization of ultra-high performance concrete, vol NO. FHWA-HRT-06-103. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center/Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), McLeanGoogle Scholar
  66. Ulusay R, Hudson JA (eds) (2007) The Blue Book; The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. Commission on testing methods ISRM. International Society for Rock Mechanics (ISRM), Turkish National Group, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  67. Verwaal W, Mulder A (1993) Estimating rock strength with the equotip hardness tester. Int J Rock Mech Min 30(6):659–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang T-T, Huang T-H (2009) A constitutive model for the deformation of a rock mass containing sets of ubiquitous joints. Int J Rock Mech Min 46(3):521–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wong RCK, Ma SKY, Wong RHC, Chau KT (2007) Shear strength components of concrete under direct shearing. Cem Concr Res 37(8):1248–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang Q, Zhang J-M, Zheng H, Yao Y (eds) (2013) Constitutive modeling of Geomaterials; advances and new applications, Beijing, China, 15–16 October 2012. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  71. Yu C-W (1998) Creep characteristics of soft rock and modelling of creep in tunnel. University of Bradford, BradfordGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang S, Lai Y, Sun Z, Gao Z (2007) Volumetric strain and strength behavior of frozen soils under confinement. Cold Reg Sci Technol 47(3):263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering Geology, ESA, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC)University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands