Advertisement

Energy Policies in the EU – A Fiscal Federalism Perspective

  • Erik Gawel
  • Sebastian StrunzEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

In this chapter, we apply the theory of Fiscal Federalism to energy policies in the EU. Centralization of decision-making power and homogeneity of policies incur both costs and benefits. We look at the case of renewable energy sources (RES) policies in more detail to specify the relevant pros and cons. Finding that neither full and imminent centralization/homogenization nor complete fragmentation would be desirable, we explore whether bottom-up convergence might offer a feasible way to sensibly balance the trade-off. From an empirical perspective, there is some evidence for (temporary and conditional) convergence of RES policies. Overall, the efforts of the EU Commission to steer national policies more directly promise to reap some more of the possible benefits of cooperation. The analysis, however, also makes clear that there exist not only politico-economic obstacles but also economic rationales against fully harmonizing all aspects of EU energy policy.

Keywords

Centralization Convergence Decentralization Energy Union Fiscal federalism Harmonization Heterogeneity 

References

  1. Andersen, S., Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (Eds.). (2017). Energy Union – Europe’s new Liberal Mercantilism? London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, T. L., & Hill, P. J. (Eds.). (1997). Environmental federalism. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Ania, A., & Wagener, A. (2014). Laboratory federalism: The open method of coordination (OMC) as an evolutionary learning process. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 16(5), 767–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austvik, O. G. (2016). The Energy Union and security-of-gas supply. Energy Policy, 96, 372–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, E. E., & Friedlaender, A. F. (1982). Market structure and multiproduct industries. Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 1024–1048.Google Scholar
  6. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Bausch, C., Görlach, B., & Mehling, M. (2017). Ambitious climate policy through centralization? Evidence from the European Union. Policy Analysis, 17(1), 32–50.Google Scholar
  8. Bennet, C. J. (1991). What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bigerna, S., Bollino, C. A., & Micheli, S. (2016). Renewable energy scenarios for cost reductions in the European Union. Renewable Energy, 96, 80–90.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borrás, S., & Jacobsson, K. (2004). The open method of coordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11, 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brock, W. A., & Taylor, M. (2010). The Green Solow model. Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2), 127–153.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buchan, D., & Keay, M. (2016). Europe’s long energy journey: Towards an energy union? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Burger, C., & Weinmann, J. (2013). The decentralized energy revolution. Business strategies for a new paradigm. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Busch, S., & Ortner, A. (2019). From national to cross-border support of renewable electricity in the European Union. In E. Gawel, S. Strunz, P. Lehmann & A. Purkus (Eds.), The European dimension of Germany’s energy transition – Opportunities and conflicts. Cham: Springer, pp. 207–225.Google Scholar
  15. Callies, C., & Hey, C. (2013). Multilevel energy policy in the EU: Paving the way for renewables. Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law, 10(2), 87–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dalmazzone, S. (2006). Decentralization and the environment. In E. Ahmad & G. Brosio (Eds.), Handbook of fiscal federalism (pp. 459–477). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Dangerman, A. J., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2013). Energy systems transformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, E549–E558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. DiaCore (2016). The impact of risks in renewable energy investments and the role of smart policies. https://www.ecofys.com/files/files/diacore-2016-impact-of-risk-in-res-investments.pdf
  19. European Commission (Ed.) (2007). Eurobarometer 262. Energy technologies: Knowledge, perception, measures. http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_262_en.pdf
  20. European Commission (2014). Communication from the commission: Guidelines on state aid for environmental protection and energy 2014–2020, April 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/energy/eeag_en.pdf
  21. European Commission (2015). Communication from the commission: A framework strategy for a resilient energy union with a forward-looking climate change policy, February 2015. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:1bd46c90-bdd4-11e4-bbe1-01aa75ed71a1.0001.03/DOC_1&format=PDF
  22. European Council (2014). Conclusions on 2030 climate and energy policy framework. Brussels, 23 October 2014. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/145356.pdf
  23. Fialka, J. (2016). China will launch the world’s largest carbon trading market. The Scientific American. May 16, 2016. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/china-will-start-the-world-s-largest-carbon-trading-market/
  24. Fischer, S., & Geden, O. (2015). Die Grenzen der „Energieunion“. SWP-Aktuell 36, April 2015. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
  25. Gallagher, K. S., Grübler, A., Kuhl, L., Nemet, G., & Wilson, C. (2012). The energy technology innovation system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 137–162.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-060311-133915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gawel, E., & Strunz, S. (2014). State aid Disput on Germany’s support for renewables. Is the commission on the right course? Journal of European Environmental and Planning Law, 11, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gawel, E., Strunz, S., & Lehmann, P. (2017). Support policies for renewables – Instrument choice and instrument change from a public choice perspective. In D. Arent, C. Arndt, M. Miller, F. Tarp, & O. Zinaman (Eds.), The political economy of clean energy transitions (pp. 80–99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grams, C., Beerli, R., Pfenninger, S., Staffell, I., & Wernlie, H. (2017). Balancing Europe’s wind-power output through spatial deployment informed by weather regimes. Nature Climate Change, 7(8), 557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hirth, L., Ueckerdt, F., & Edenhofer, O. (2015). Integration costs revisited – An economic framework for wind and solar variability. Renewable Energy, 74, 925–939.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holzinger, K., Jörgens, H., & Knill, C. (2008). State of the art – Conceptualising environmental policy convergence. In K. Holzinger, C. Knill, & B. Arts (Eds.), Environmental policy convergence in Europe (pp. 7–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hübner, M., Schmidt, C. M., & Weigert, B. (2012). Energiepolitik: Erfolgreiche Energiewende nur im europäischen Kontext. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 13(4), 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacobs, D. (2012). Renewable energy policy convergence in the EU: The evolution of feed-in tariffs in Germany, Spain and France. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  33. Kerber, W., & Eckardt, M. (2007). Policy learning in Europe: The open method of co-ordination and laboratory federalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kitzing, L., Mitchell, C., & Mothorst, P. E. (2012). Renewable energy policies in Europe: Converging or diverging? Energy Policy, 51, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klinge Jacobsen, H., Pade, L. L., Schröder, S. T., & Kitzing, L. (2014). Cooperation mechanisms to achieve EU renewable targets. Renewable Energy, 63, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lauber, V., & Schenner, E. (2011). The struggle over support schemes for renewal electricity in the European Union: A discursive-institutionalist analysis. Environmental Politics, 20(4), 508–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leuffen, D., Rittberger, B., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013). Differentiated integration. Explaining variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Lockwood, B. (2006). The political economy of decentralization. In E. Ahmad & G. Brosio (Eds.), Handbook of fiscal federalism (pp. 33–60). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Neuhoff, K., Barquin, J., Bialek, J. W., Boyd, R., Dent, C. J., Echavarren, F., Grau, T., Von Hirschhausen, C., Hobbs, B. F., Kunz, F., et al. (2013). Renewable electric energy integration: Quantifying the value of design of markets for international transmission capacity. Energy Economics, 40, 760–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich.Google Scholar
  42. Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olson, M. (1969). The principle of “fiscal equivalence”. The division of responsibilities among different levels of government. The American Economic Review, 59(2), 479–487.Google Scholar
  44. Ranson, M. R., & Stavins, R. N. (2014). Linkage of greenhouse gas emission trading systems: Learning from experience. FEEM working papers 2014–7. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/101992/1/NDL2014-007.pdf
  45. Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2018). The governance of the European energy union: Efficiency, effectiveness and acceptance of the winter package 2016. Energy Policy, 112, 209–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saam, N. J., & Kerber, W. (2013). Policy innovation, decentralised experimentation, and laboratory federalism. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(1), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schreurs, M., & Tiberghien, Y. (2007). Multi-level reinforcement: Explaining European Union leadership in climate change mitigation. Global Environmental Politics, 7(4), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Söderholm, P. (2008). Harmonization of renewable electricity feed-in laws: A comment. Energy Policy, 36, 946–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Strunz, S., Gawel, E., & Lehmann, P. (2015). Towards a general “Europeanization” of EU Member States’ energy policies? Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 4(2), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strunz, S., Gawel, E., & Lehmann, P. (2016). The political economy of renewable energy policies in Germany and the EU. Utilities Policy, 42, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strunz, S., Gawel, E., Lehmann, P., & Söderholm, P. (2018). Policy convergence as a multi-faceted concept: The case of renewable energy policies in the EU. Journal of Public Policy, 38(3), 361–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tagliapietra, S. (2014). Building tomorrow’s Europe. The role of an “EU Energy Union” (November 13, 2014). Review of Environment, Energy and Economics (Re3). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2529005
  53. Tews, K. (2005). The diffusion of environmental policy innovations: Cornerstones of an analytical framework. European Environment, 15, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tews, K. (2015). Europeanization of energy and climate policy: The struggle between competing ideas of coordinating energy transitions. Journal of Environment & Development, 24(3), 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Unteutsch, M., & Lindenberger, D. (2014). Promotion of electricity from renewable energy in Europe post 2020 – The economic benefits of cooperation. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 38(1), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weimann, J. (2012). Atomausstieg und Energiewende: Wie sinnvoll ist der deutsche Alleingang? Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 62(12), 34–38.Google Scholar
  57. Welsch, H., & Biermann, P. (2014). Electricity supply preferences in Europe: Evidence from subjective Well-being data. Resource and Energy Economics, 38, 38–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Infrastructure and Resources ManagementLeipzig UniversityLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations