Advertisement

Multidimensional Mapping and Spatial Communication Through the Virtual Umwelt

  • Trevor M. HarrisEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

People live in a multidimensional, sensuous, and spatially complex world. Cartographic mapping and geographic information systems (GIS) have striven to capture, record, and communicate the spatial components of this lived world through representations of spatial data primarily in the form of 2D map products. Such images have significant implications for representing and communicating spatial knowledge. Recent technological advances in GIS, 3D mapping, stereo-enabled virtual immersion, scenting and tactile devices, and serious gaming engines now enable powerful multisensory spatial platforms to be created. These interactive virtual platforms immerse the user in a sensuous 3D environment capable of recreating elements of the lived world – the Umwelt. Additional geosensory inputs contribute substantially to enhancing and experiencing a greater sense of space and place than possible through a visucentric focus on 2D maps. These experiential GIS environments enable the spatial analytic aspects of space to be communicated within a collaborative setting alongside the cognitive, experienced, emotional, and associative qualities of place.

Keywords

Maps Deep mapping Virtual Umwelt (lifeworld) Virtual reality Geosensory Immersive geography CAVE Multidimensional mapping 

References

  1. Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of semiology. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Bodenhamer, D., Corrigan, J., & Harris, T. M. (Eds.). (2015). Deep mapping and spatial narratives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bright, W. (2004). Native American place names of the United States. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  4. Byrne, E. (2011). The past laugh. BBC History Magazine, July 22. Retrieved 16 June 2017 from http://www.historyextra.com/blog/pronounced-how
  5. Casti, E. (2000). Reality as representation. Bergamo: Bergamo University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Craig, W., Harris, T. M., & Weiner, D. (Eds.). (2002). Community participation and geographic information systems. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  7. Crampton, J. W. (2001). Maps as social constructions: Power, communication, and visualization. Progress in Human Geography, 25, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crampton, J. W., & Krygier, J. (2006). An introduction to critical cartography. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geosciences, 4(1), 11–33.Google Scholar
  9. Cruz-Neira, C., Sandin, D. J., DeFanti, T. A., Kenyon, R. V., & Hart, J. C. (1992). The CAVE: Audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Communications of the ACM, 35(6), 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, R. H. (1904). Bits of gossip. Cambridge: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, R. H. (1985). Life in the iron-mills and other stories. New York: CUNY, Feminist Press.Google Scholar
  12. de Blij, H. J. (1996). Foreword. In M. Monmonier (Ed.), How to lie with maps (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (trans: Rendall, S.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Debord, G. (1955). Introduction to a critique of urban geography. Reprinted in K. Knabb (Ed.) (2006). Berkeley: Situationist International: Anthology, Bureau of Public Secrets.Google Scholar
  15. Deely, J. (2001). Umvelt. Semiotica, 134(1/4), 125–135.Google Scholar
  16. Foote, K. E., & Crum, S. (1995). The Geographer’s Craft Project. Retrieved 10 May 2017 from http://www.colorado.edu/geography/gcraft/notes/cartocom/cartocom.html#1.0
  17. Grimshaw, M. (Ed.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of virtuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Guelke, L. (Ed.). (1977). The nature of cartographic communication. Cartographica Monograph 19.Google Scholar
  19. Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harrington, J. (1916). The ethnogeography of the Tewa Indians. Annual Report of the Bureau of American Ethnology, No. 29. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
  21. Harris, T. M. (2015). Deep geography – Deep mapping: Spatial storytelling and a sense of place. In D. Bodenhamer, J. Corrigan, & T. M. Harris (Eds.), Deep mapping and spatial narratives (pp. 28–53). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harris, T. M. (2017). Deep mapping and sensual immersive geographies. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayshi, W. Liu, & R. A. Marston (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of geography: People, the Earth, environment, and technology. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, T. M., & Hodza, P. (2011). Geocollaborative soil boundary mapping in an experiential GIS environment. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 38(1), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harris, T. M., & Weiner, D. (1996). GIS and Society: The social implications of how people, space and environment are represented in GIS. Scientific Report for NCGIA Initiative #19 Specialist Meeting, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, T. M., Lafone, H. F., & Bonenberger, D. (2016). Beyond mapping text in space to experiencing text in place: Exploring literary virtual geographies. In D. Cooper, C. Donaldson, & P. Murrieta-Flores (Eds.), Literary mapping in the digital age (pp. 221–239). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  26. Harvie, J. (2005). Staging the UK. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hoskins, W. G. (1955). The making of the English landscape. Leicester: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  28. Kraak, M.-J., & Ormeling, F. (2002). Cartography: Visualization of spatial data. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  29. Kull, K. (1998). On semiosis, Umwelt, and semiosphere. Semiotica, 120(3/4), 299–310.Google Scholar
  30. Kwan, M.-P., & Ding, G. (2008). Geo-narrative: Extending geographic information systems for narrative analysis in qualitative and mixed-method research. The Professional Geographer, 60(4), 443–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Least Heat-Moon, W. (1992). PrairyErth: A deep map. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company.Google Scholar
  32. Lin, H., & Batty, M. (Eds.). (2009). Virtual geographic environments. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
  33. McLucas, C. (n.d.). Deep mapping. http://cliffordmclucas.info/deep-mapping.html. Accessed May 2017.
  34. Monmonier, M. (1996). How to lie with maps (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mori, M. (2012). The uncanny valley. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, June, pp. 98–100.Google Scholar
  36. Pearson, M., & Shanks, M. (2001). Theater/archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Robinson, A. H. (1953). Elements of cartography. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Robinson, A. H., & Petchenik, B. (1977). The map as communication system. Cartographica, 19, 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sebeok, T. A. (1976). Contributions to the doctrine of signs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sharov, A. (2001). Umvelt theory and pragmatism. Semiotica, 134, 211–228.Google Scholar
  41. Skocz, D. E. (2006). Ecology, technology, and wilderness management: A clash of eco-spatial paradigms. In G. Backhaus & J. Murungi (Eds.), Ecoscapes: Geographical patternings of relations (pp. 115–138). Idaho Falls: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  42. Skocz, D. (2009). Environmental management in the age of the world picture. In L. McWhorter & G. Stenstad (Eds.), Heidegger and the Earth: Essays in environmental philosophy (pp. 123–143). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  43. Slocum, T. (2003). Thematic cartography and geographic visualization. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Thornton, T. F. (1997). Anthropological studies of native American place naming. American Indian Quarterly, 21(2), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tuan, Y. F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes and values. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Tuan, Y.-F. (2001). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  47. Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol: O’Reily Media.Google Scholar
  48. Ubikcan. (2006). The map communication model and critical cartography. Retrieved 27 May 2017 from http://ubikcan.blogspot.com/2006/08/map-communication-model-and-critical.html
  49. von Uexküll, J. (1934). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans with a theory of meaning (trans: O’Neil, J. D., 2010). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  50. Warren, A. (2004). International forum on indigenous mapping for indigenous advocacy and empowerment. Cited in Rambaldi G. (2005) Who owns the map legend? URISA Journal, 17, 5–13.Google Scholar
  51. Wilson, R. A. (1983). Prometheus rising. Grand Junction: Hilaritas Press.Google Scholar
  52. Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geology and GeographyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA

Personalised recommendations