India’s Cultural Architecture and Society’s Role in Shaping It
Language is not just the one that is spoken or written; language is how the thought that appears on one’s mind’s eye. Language could be visual and suggestive. Language could be a pattern that is hidden. One such language is the language of architectural forms driven by society and culture, which does not make noise, humbly sits as evidence of the past and spectator of the future. Indian architectural language is so unique and states everything that happened throughout the country’s past, change, growth, and destruction. India always had a very sensitive and constructively established society and architecture. Many religions, caste systems, and much diversity were always present in the country. Though many social evils prevailed at different eras, religions and their philosophies made sure that they would reestablish the society from time to time. Spirituality, as a background process, these changes have always acted throughout its history. All these consequences created India that was there before the British rule. The chapter takes the readers through all the aspects of what shaped India as a country, through its evolution, toward the current state where drastic changes occurred from the perspective of sociology and architecture. The patterns helped guide society without being in the forefront and which helped people in establishing a country called India. Architecture will be shown as the outcome of all of these processes as an unspoken language rather than as a visual language.
KeywordsIndian society Indian sociology Indian political systems Indian architecture British India Mauryan rule in India
Understanding architecture could be tricky sometimes. The architectural activity of any country involves a lengthy background. Buildings always are an outcome of all the processes that precede them. To understand architecture, one needs to peep into historical, physiological, geographical, and sociopolitical conditions. Only if we understand all these dynamics could we understand the physical structures standing in front of our eyes. We fail to understand the greatness of any structure without all these background networks and processes. This holds true especially in a country like India. India is a country with so many religions, languages, cultures, and so many tales, myths, and speculations that to imagine a singular kind of architectural character throughout the country is very hard. A society with so many diversities, complex social structures, and still retaining a single spirit is more like a dream. To call it the only country in the entire world to go through so many transformations and variations and still holding it all together would not be an exaggeration. India has not always been the same country that we see on the map today. Its frontiers changed greatly, so did the political structures. Still the spirit continued. India, at one point of time, included parts of present-day Iran or Persia and some of the Central Asian countries as well. And at some other point, it was largely under the rule of Greeks and Scythians. In later stages British, French, and Dutch colonization were part of the Indian political system. When the British ruled the country, many changes happened in the systems. With all these changing cultural and political conditions, one very important issue is what place is to be called India when the scenario was continuously changing? How to impose continuity to the unacknowledged cultural language? How to define its boundaries, and if there is no single boundary to be called as a country, how to define its architectural activity? These are among the issues discussed in this chapter.
A Spirit Called India and Its Background
Indian boundaries and demographics kept continuously changing until 1947, the year in which the country received its independence from the British raj. There was never one king who ruled the entire country, and it was never under one province until that year. So if we need to refer to the word India, then it has to be that of modern-day India. Though this is debatable, one feature is certain, which though the frontiers kept changing, the spirit of oneness has always been present. This oneness came from various factors like geography, culture, religion, language, and political unity of major parts at some point of time in its history.
The country is bounded by the Himalayas to the north and by seas on all the other sides. More or less, natural features define the boundaries. Though there are mountains to the north, there are a few passes that allowed trade and cultural exchange. The northwestern region was a little loose in terms of natural boundaries and allowed more exchange. Most of the trade and invasions happened from this area in the early ages. Rivers and their behavior played a very important role in the internal changes and settlement patterns. There are so many rivers that are both snow-fed and monsoon-fed in the northern and eastern regions of the country that made the land alluvial and favorable for settlement. Many cities in the early periods, especially the political capitals, were located along these rivers. The pattern that is woven in terms of town planning is all because of the rivers and their behavior. The plain in the northeastern part of the country is called the Gangetic plain. This region, because of its advantages in environmental geography, became one of the very rich regions in all the senses for many years. However, the earliest settlements were more in the Himalayan foothill region which is slightly to the north of the Gangetic plain because of the ease in clearing forests for settlement and rivers being narrow and easy to cross. Within the subcontinent, though there are so many mountains and rivers, they are not insurmountable. Though they were barriers, human mobility allowed for cultural and economic exchange. The towns that emerged have subconsciously taken these factors into consideration to develop (Sharma 2016).
The First Development and Collapse
The Indian subcontinent was one of the first civilizations in human history that we are aware of, that is, the Indus valley civilization flourished mostly from the seventh millennium BC to third millennium BC (Joshi 2008). It was spread through many parts of current-day Afghanistan, Balochistan, Pakistan, and parts of northern and northwestern India. This civilization was vast and more progressive for its time compared to all the other contemporary civilizations. A well-organized sociopolitical structure prevailed then. There were rulers who laid out the political structure, but it is not very clear whether it was a democratic, feudalist, or monarchy (Hasnain 2016). Villages and cities were given equal importance and made self-sustainable. The economic structure followed was akin to socialism, but it would be safe to call it a mix, as there were also industrial towns. There was one single religion and cultural system that prevailed throughout the region, even when one ruler was not in charge of the whole civilization (Hasnain 2016).
Architecturally, the subcontinent witnessed one of its apex stages at the time of burnt brick structures, mounds, granaries, baths, and many other building types as well as well-organized drainage and sewage systems. Each region in the Indus valley had different architectural features, but there were many similar ones as well. The houses were typically two to three storied, built in brick. Cities show traces of two types of development: organic and planned. The designed cities mostly followed a gridiron pattern as clear demarcations for residential, commercial, and agricultural areas could be seen. Two main roads ran in cardinal directions, which were wide enough to accommodate two bullock carts, the existing transport system. Other roads were narrower near the main doors of houses. Common baths, wells for domestic purposes, private bathrooms and toilets, and mounds that contained all the important buildings were a few of the very typical features of all the cities in the valley. There were special cities like Lothal, which were industrial. Dockyards, a bead factory, and workers’ quarters have been discovered by archeologists. There was neither palatial scale architecture nor huge religious structures. This style establishes their lifestyle as being more or less egalitarian both among the communities and gender. Though there was gods’ sculptures found, architecturally, that did not play a major role. They might not have great belief in the afterlife, as their burials were simple unlike contemporary societies (Joshi 2008).
With all of this memory, structures, and development, India would have been a very progressive country. But there was a gap of almost 800 years in the history because a drought hit the civilization in the second millennium BC (recently archeologists found this phenomenon and identified it as the reason for the decline of Indus valley civilization). Everything collapsed and people had to start afresh (Sharma 2016).
Early Vedic, Later Vedic Periods
After the decline of the great Indus valley civilization, people who were living in Indus valley were said to move southward in search of life, while populations from Central Asia slowly started migrating in. These groups were called Aryans. This new group was nomadic in nature. Though at first they preferred the Himalayan foothills, owing to their nomadic nature, they continued moving further east until they found the most productive alluvial Gangetic plain. They started settling down there, as natural resources were abundantly available. This settlement happened around 1200 BC (Havell 1915). The whole movement happened due to the geographical and climatic factors, which made people act in a certain way. These people who were professionals in constructing temporary settlements started constructing their houses in a very primitive and temporary manner. This period is popularly known as early Vedic period. These temporary dwelling units were constructed using thatch, timber, and mud. The plan forms were mostly circular and rectangular, typically of a single room type. The shapes also have a profound meaning. Circular was considered to be god made and rectangular to be human made. These two shapes were used in combination with each other throughout architectural history. Climatic factors like earthquakes and floods, which are common to that region, might also have played a role in choice of shapes. After the residents settled down, they started constructing more permanent structures in timber. This was the time when their society slowly started taking shape. Slowly the caste system (varna system) started developing, kingship came into existence, mainly because their society was growing and the availability of abundant land and resources in the settling down period gave cause for fights for land and resource ownership. In the beginning, agriculture and hunting were their major occupations. The new society needed a person who was very strong to control the society, which was how kingship started emerging. But the political system was not to rule or suppress people; it was more to lead people and maintain harmony within the society.
This is the same period where very important varied fields of knowledge emerged and took shape in the form of Vedas and Puranas (scriptures, epics, and mythologies). People started believing in a larger force called God and started worshipping nature. They had written conditions for everything. This included the way of life, a code of conduct, punishments, etc., with the main motto behind the Indian way of living always being freedom (Hasnain 2016). There were no slaves in Indian social division. That did not mean that everybody was treated equally. People were living in peace. There were four major castes. This division was mostly based upon occupations: Brahmins, people who handled religious rituals; Kshatriyas, kings and army men; Vaishyas, the trading community; and shudras, working class. These four varnas were further divided into smaller groups that later formed a very elaborate caste system (Havell 1915). Endogamy maintained the introversion of the group. These changes led to changes in architecture such as regularization of town plans, development of certain open spaces for common meetings, development of squares, recreational and common areas, shared community living for poor, etc. A courtyard being a very predominant feature of Indian civic architecture was shared among two to three families depending upon the economic conditions. The concept of Ekshala (courtyard with built spaces on one side), Dwishala (courtyard with built spaces on two sides or a shared courtyard among two houses), Trishala and chatusshala (courtyard that have built spaces on three or four sides or shared by three or four families, respectively) was present.
The Indian way of living back in the early Vedic period was simple, freedom-based, and non-violent (Havell 1915). They were also against cutting trees and ruining nature. This instilled a concept of sustainable cohabitation with flora and fauna. The early Vedic period was followed by a more complicated later Vedic phase. The life of the later Vedic period is elaborately discussed by Megasthenes in his Indika. Usage of iron in India started in this phase leading to many changes in societal conditions as well. In the early Vedic period, women enjoyed equal status in the society, but in the later period, working with iron required additional strength to work, and men, with a culture providing them a biological advantage, started to rule the society. Though not in a very serious case, gender discrimination started in this phase. This also split up the house plan. Separate spaces formed for men and women. Town plans became more introverted with houses opening toward sub-streets. This could also be from the influence of Greek homes.
Society slowly started leaning toward upper classes. Kings started controlling people and sovereign government took the front seat (Hasnain 2016). Town plans started showing traces of defined boundaries for different communities. A description about gods is provided in the Vedas, and the conditions of the society that Vedas expressed turned into stringent rules. Brahmins enjoyed the upper level in the society and, in some conditions, outsmarted kings. They enjoyed wealth, landownership, and gifts from the kings. They were considered to be messengers of gods. Trade and commerce were happening with Central Asia and some other countries in the Asian continent due to convenience in geography. Water routes again became very famous for trade. Cities started growing slowly. Kaushambi, Kushinagar, Varanasi, Vaishali, Pataliputra, Rajgir, and Champa are some cities that emerged in the Indo-Gangetic plane (Brown 1999). Taxes were levied on import and export goods. This obviously needed a barrier, which was provided by city walls and gates. Mostly a socialistic lifestyle was followed. Farmers or husbandmen (according to Megasthenes) (McCrindle 1876) did not own any land. The state used to maintain common granaries where food was stored and distributed during emergencies. Villages worked on a self-sustained system. There would be a village administration working under the king. An appointed committee managed tax collection and all other activities. In villages, apart from agriculture and hunting, many other occupations came into existence. With the increased use of iron, it was the source for making all agricultural tools. This made working on the field less strenuous, allowing people to have ample time to pursue other activities. As women were restrained from physical activities, they started taking up arts and crafts as their job. All the needs of people were taken care of within the village system. This system was followed for many centuries and proved to be very successful. The education system was confined to Brahmin males. The position of women in society had fallen as low as that of the Shudras by the end of the later Vedic period (Hasnain 2016). All these consequences placed a stress on a society that gave birth to new religions (Sharma 2016).
Religion, from the very beginning of civilization in the Indian subcontinent, has played a major role in shaping the society. There never was a single religion prevailing in the country. It was always a multi-religious culture. The complexity of the society always ensured it would remain. The main attribute of any religion that was born and spread in the country was that it loosened up society somewhat to eradicate social evils of that particular period. Without a ruling class, a religion never diffused to other areas. Though there were as many as 64 religions during the sixth to fifth centuries BC, Jainism and Buddhism became the strongest because of this one factor: kings and especially Mauryan rulers converted to these religions, and they helped in spreading such religions and their beliefs. Almost two centuries after the birth of these belief systems, they took shape into a proper religion with many followers. Architecture also gave a major contribution in their spread. Many different plan forms, styles, and languages of Indian architecture emerged due to the religious differences (Sharma 2016).
By the end of the later Vedic period, the varna system had become tighter and rules were imposed on the lower classes; people were never at peace. The two upper classes, Brahmins and Kshatriyas, could bend the rules, but that was not the case with lower classes naturally building stress. Another reason was the economic imbalance that persisted so many cattle were killed in the name of rituals, there were very few left for agriculture. Land availability became abundant as iron usage eased the process of cutting and clearing up the forests. This way the ground was set for the religious transformation. Architectural transformation also happened alongside the religious transformation (Sharma 2016).
The birth of Mahavira, the founder of Jainism, brought new changes in the society. He propagated five very important doctrines (Dharmasutras) against violence, lies, stealing, and hoarding and suggested observing continence. These became very important because of the prevailing conditions. Low-class people were attracted toward the ideology of Mahavira, as his teachings loosened up the clutches of stringent rules imposed upon them. He was associated with the two famous rulers of the Mauryan dynasty, Chandragupta Maurya (founder of Mauryan dynasty) and Bindusara (son and successor of Chandragupta Maurya). Jainism being a very liberal religion did not spread through much of the country; it never challenged the varna system, but tried to encourage people to attain the highest stage of knowledge, although it did challenge the violence happening upon people and cattle and tried to take the then-restricted knowledge to lower classes. Chandragupta Maurya in his last stages converted into Jainism and started living the life of an ascetic. At the end of his life, he was said to have travelled to Karnataka, a South Indian state, and observed fast until death according to Jain rituals. Jainism spread to South India in this way (Sharma 2016).
Slowly from this period, Jain architecture started building up. Though Jainism never established a separate language of architecture of its own and always went along with the conditions and styles of the regions that it was established at, but due to the variations in belief systems, one could easily identify the difference between Buddhist or Hindu buildings and Jain buildings. Jainism believed in a Guru system that contained 24 tirthankaras (teachers). Early stages of Jain architecture contained a prayer hall kind of structure later in temple buildings; Jain temples were dedicated to one or many of these tirthankaras. Sanctum of Jain architecture, unlike many Hindu temples, is of open type. Sometimes, openings to the sanctum are provided on all four sides.
Gautama, the Buddha, contemporary of Mahavir Jain, was born into a Kshatriya family and led a life similar to that of Mahavira. Buddhist ideology was also very similar to Jain ideology, but Buddhism became a huge religion by the end of the third century BC owing to many factors. Buddha never preached ultimate knowledge to people. Instead he taught them how to live peacefully in and with their own self. He taught that desire is the root of all misery and sought to lead people out of their painful lives into happiness. He never discussed philosophy with his followers, but supported them to lead their lives freely. He challenged the varna system and treated Brahmins, Shudras, men, and women equally. This thinking led to a revolution in the lower-class societies. He also preached non-violence. He encouraged all classes to attain an education. He led society toward egalitarian beliefs. He started sanghas, where people had to become ascetics, give away all their materialistic lifestyles, and live on charity given by others, which was open to women as well. However, this thinking was not recommended to everybody. Everybody, in whatever lifestyle they were in, could attain salvation; this was the ideology that attracted masses. These belief systems were very important as that is what shaped Buddhist architecture. Language also played an important role in spreading Buddhism in the society as most of the Buddhist texts used, Prakrit, the language of commoners, instead of Sanskrit, the language used by Brahmins. In addition to this development, Asoka, the third emperor in the Mauryan dynasty, converted and helped spread Buddhism widely (Sharma 2016). Though this happened two centuries after the death of Buddha, the original beliefs of Buddhism were kept intact. After Asoka’s death, the face of Buddhism changed, and toward the end of the twelfth century, Buddhism ended by existing in India. Buddha denied idol worship during his lifetime. Asoka continued to encourage the same, but after Asoka’s death, due to political changes and other factors, idol worship came into existence in Buddhism. A new sect called Mahayana Buddhism had started. This sect accepted much wealth from kings, while the original simple life that Buddha had propagated was lost. Buddhism remains intact today in some parts of South, Southeast, and East Asia (Brown 1999).
Mauryan Dynasty and Impact
Before the advent of Mauryan rule, India was divided into many small provinces and tribal societies. That was the era between the early and later Vedic periods. During that period, Alexander led his campaign into Central Asia, conquered almost the entire area including India as well. He conquered the then king Porus, but because of Porus’s knowledge and greatness, Alexander made Porus his satrap (provincial governor). After Alexander’s death, Seleukos Nikator ruled the province in the west border of India. During the same time, a great ruler emerged in India conquering almost all parts of India except some southern and western provinces, which were ruled by very strong kings, Chandragupta Maurya, contemporary to both Gautama Buddha and Mahavira, who established the Mauryan Dynasty and started ruling the country from Pataliputra (McCrindle 1876). This in history marks a very prominent era, as this was the beginning of the era where the ideology of one country had started. Seleukos Nikator tried to attack the Mauryan Empire, but he lost the battle to the king, giving him some of his province and his daughter in alliance, which established friendly relations between Greeks and Indians. This was the zenith of the Mauryan Empire, which included a large part of Central Asia where the Buddhist architecture spread. Chandragupta implemented unified rule everywhere in his province (Sharma 2016). This was the time when Megasthenes visited India and wrote a text called Indika. The name India also came during the same period. Then, it was very common to identify nations with the names of major rivers that flow in the land. Indus or Sindh being the most famous river, the name of the country was coined from this. Though almost the entire subcontinent had come under one rule, there were so many tribes dwelling around the region, and there were many myths about the people living there. They were considered to have superhuman abilities, some having ears large enough to sleep in, some having necks of snakes, and some having a human body and an animal head (McCrindle 1876). These myths contributed largely in the iconography that spread throughout the subcontinent almost until the seventeenth century AD (Gupta 2004). After idol worship started existing, there are groups of gods, demigods, and rakshasa (devils), which symbolize these myths and stories. These developments show that India maintained an interesting and strong continuity with its past. Within these tribes, the republican rule was followed.
Later came Bindusara, who had maintained the legacy of his father and expanded the province slightly toward the south. He could not capture all of South India. After him was the rule of the most influential king, Asoka, who followed a very strict rule. This was the last stage of the later Vedic period. Asoka waged the famous battle of Kalinga (the eastern Indian region which remained unconquered by Chandragupta Maurya and Bindusara) during the third century BC and won it. This period marked the pinnacle of the Mauryan Empire where almost the whole subcontinent was under the rule of the dynasty. The war had also changed Asoka. In the war, it is said that millions of people died, which lead Asoka to repent of his doings. After the war, he adopted Buddhism and introduced major changes in the political, economic, and social systems. He not only converted but also largely propagated Buddhism. He had erected rock edicts written in Prakrit throughout his expansive realm and strictly insisted people follow non-violence and peace. He started treating all classes of the society equally, which invited much opposition from upper classes. He was also successful in getting the tribes to follow the beliefs of Buddhism, and they readily followed owing to the open-minded egalitarian ideology of the religion (McCrindle 1876).
After Asoka’s death, because of the lack of strong rulers, the lack of wealth with the government due to Asoka’s type of political system and the rise of anti-Buddhist and anti- egalitarian forces, the Mauryan dynasty declined.
Division of Country and Later Developments
After the Asokan rule ended, many satraps appointed by Asoka declared independence which leads to unrest in the country. Many kings from Central Asia conquered the province leading to Bactrian, Scythian, and Greek rule in most of the western parts of the country. In all the other regions, Brahmins came to rule which lead to major changes in art and architecture of the country (Hasnain 2016). Though Brahmanism prevailed in most parts, they mostly followed a similar government as prescribed by Asoka but resuming to their old ritual systems.
Era of Guptas, Chalukyas, and Later
Parallel to the Guptas, another Kingdom of Early Chalukyas rule was emerging. This dynasty also had contributed much to the advances in architecture. Chalukyas were feudal lords from the south. During this period, when guilds of rich traders travelled the world, their province became a source of much wealth. The societal evils such as untouchability prevailed here as well. There were three sites, Badami, Aihole, and Pattadakal, where unique architectural labs were established and live experiments developed into two very distinct languages of architecture, the Nagara (North Indian) and the Dravidian (South Indian) styles. During these two periods, details like column orders, moldings, sculpture, and scrolls emerged and also related details (Hardy 2007).
By the seventh century, the country was divided into further smaller divisions, but the “oneness” was maintained thanks to the Asokan rule. Some conditions were still the same, but some were strikingly different. Huge wars were waged, but a strange condition managed to maintain society and keep the architecture intact. Though the rulers and the boundary conditions of governance changed greatly, none of the rulers tried to change how people were living. Wars were mostly waged on open grounds. Whoever won would take over the land, but without changing much of its conditions where people lived. This condition might have developed because feudalism was being followed throughout the country and more or less with similar governance and economical systems intact.
The guilds of builders, who were there during Mauryan times, still existed but had become nomads travelling from place to place. Architecture had almost become a parallel track. Kings promoted and commissioned building activities. Regardless of the dynasty that commissions the building, the guilds, under the leadership of their Shilpi or Sthapati (architect), go there and construct the buildings, mostly temples. Owing to the previously developed plan form and spaces, as many as 12–15 languages of architecture were established in the northern and southern halves of the country with many elements and details (Brown 1999).
Related to the sculpture of Dravidian style, we learn that by the era of Pandyas, the sculpture that contained gods and demigods as predominant was slowly starting to show up the social conditions and wars (Brown 1999).
All the influences from other countries, as for the cultural exchange happened during trade, were limited to larger buildings commissioned by kings. Civic architecture was purely conventional. Climate, function, social class, ritual system, and family structure were given greater importance in this area. Local materials were used and very sensitive architectural elements such as separate courtyards for men and women, earthquake-resistant structures at points of greater sensitivity using very small techniques, space for cattle, storage for grains, gathering areas at village and town centers as part of administration activity, and many more functions. Nature was given importance in planning. Specific types of trees that improve health were prescribed. Though there was this elaborate architecture, humility prevailed in the subject. Architects never revealed their names. It was architecture that was very important to them more than self. They always used the mystic names as explained previously to mask themselves.
During the seventh century AD, a great philosopher called Sankaracharya was born. Before him, there existed many religions and belief systems, which caused splits in the society. He travelled throughout the country, debated with heads of all systems, defeated them, and created a religious unity. These developments resulted in major changes within Hinduism. They also resolved many prevalent social evils and spread peace within the society.
There were and are many philosophers in India from antiquity who worked hard to advance society. Spirituality and religion have acted as two parallel forces that have shaped much of the country. Both concepts might appear similar, but are not. Religion, though started by great philosophers, had changed significantly. This change in ideologies created many unresolved social issues. All the religions, or rather people following them, at some point or the other, were bound by staunch systems which resulted in some problems within society. Though they started as objects of social change and equality, they could never continue what they started. Spirituality in turn, silently spreads through the society. With its main motto being to awaken the inner self, spirituality always encouraged detachment, release from material life, non-violence, and living in peace. Temple architecture and scriptures have stated that buildings could pave way for spiritual growth. This is a very unique ideology in India. There are mystic mathematical diagrams called mandalas, which serve as base of vastu a profound system followed by Indians seeking a healthy built environment. Traditional vastu seems to consider geographic, climatological, and sociopolitical conditions as the basis for designing what could help people grow spiritually (Tadgell 1994).
Islam and Change
The next major change that happened to India was the advent of the Islamic rulers from Middle East. Islamic invasions happened for the first time around the eighth century AD. Muhammad Ghori and Muhammad Ghazni continuously attacked the subcontinent for many years and finally established their rule toward the end of the twelfth century AD. During their attacks, they destroyed many temples. They burned the very famous Nalanda library, which meant the country lost its very ancient scriptures. All these outraged the locals. Even after their establishment in the country, they faced much opposition, which they never had previously. Islamic kings ruled from Delhi for so long and spread their rule throughout the land. They could not conquer the southern part due to its strong Hindu rulers. The administration and political systems were changed to some extent, but the invaders could not change the core essence of what the country was.
India, during the British rule, was destroyed progressively and strategically. Around the seventeenth to eighteenth centuries, the British, Dutch, French, and Portuguese started establishing colonies in India in the name of trade. The last to colonize were the British, who later conquered the whole country to establish their rule. This period proved to be the darkest part of India’s history. One basic difference between all the other rules that prevailed in the country and the British was that they never came to settle and merge into India. Their main motto was to exploit the resources and to develop their own country (Chandra 2017).
At first, the British treated India as any other country and tried to establish their rule, but they faced tremendous opposition from the Sepoy mutiny (a revolt that happened in 1857) where even upper classes participated in opposing the new government. The enlightened British brought sociologists from their country to understand the Indian society (Chandra 2017). The complex model of India that they understood was slowly being destroyed. The British introduced the “caste” entry into the census. Hence, such thinking proved to be a very slow yet successful way to break up the integrity of Indian society. The caste system being considered was the most stringent and established system with many people fighting to be identified as members of upper classes. Village administration systems, which were led by the Brahmins or Kshatriyas previously, were questioned and dissolved in many cases. This policy destroyed the most profound Indian political system. The British had an advantage and could rule the villages as well.
The next strategic step was to develop railways and to import foreign goods. The British had reduced the taxation on imports so that more machine-made, cheap goods could be imported and distributed throughout the country with the help of railways. This distribution reached even the interior parts of the country reducing the usage of local arts and crafts. When the cheaper foreign goods took over the production of handmade local goods, many craftsmen lost their jobs and had to depend on agriculture, which increased pressure on land. The tax systems of the British further added to the misery. Peasants who could not afford to pay such huge taxes had to either take loans or sell their lands. Already rich upper classes were supported by the British to take over the land. This made the rich, richer and the poor, poorer. The most famous divide and rule policy was strategically implemented. The socialistic feudal government was replaced by a capitalistic imperial rule. At the same time, drought struck most of the country taking many lives (Chandra 2017).
Though the British have strategically destroyed each aspect of India, they have accomplished a few good things as well. After the British administration took over, they established colleges and universities (Lang et al. 1997), which spread education to all the classes. They commissioned efforts to revive a few sacred texts and knowledge systems, which helped the development of research and understanding of the country. They introduced new subjects such as sociology, anthropology, etc., constructed religious convents in the Indian society, encouraged women to understand their own importance, and encouraged them to come out and work for their own betterment. Sati and some other social evils were abolished. Owing to the changing world’s consequences, India needed to change. But the change was too quick and harsh upon the Indian society that the country could never really return to its original shape.
With newly imparted education came a greater understanding of the evil strategies of the British. A few great leaders emerged from within who would lead India toward freedom and independence. Calcutta was the first capital of the British. Because of this, most of the freedom movements took place in Calcutta. Apart from the revolts happening, Indian art also contributed to the freedom struggle. The Bengal School of Art had produced a few eminent personalities like Abanindranath Tagore and Rabindranath Tagore (Tagor 1914). After the denial of Indian art by the British, the former had researched and written on proportions and detail of sculpture. Abanindranath Tagore painted Bharath Mata, portraying India as a mother, which quickly became a symbol of the freedom movement. The latter stimulated literary contributions. Many local newspapers were established to spread the awareness. People like Mahatma Gandhi decried the violent way of fighting and adopted a new peaceful way. All of this and many more struggles gifted India and led to the much-needed independence on 15 August 1947. This was the time when the country that we now see on the map was born. The British rule had unified the country, but at the same time ruthlessly had divided some parts of it.
Post-Independence and Conclusions
40 million years BC
Emergence of Indian subcontinent
Indus valley civilization (as discovered by archeologists so far)
Successive groups of Vedic people enter India
1200 BC onward
Iron use in Gandhara area, Balochistan, Eastern Punjab
8th century BC
Iron was commonly used
End of the 6th century BC
Habitations in mid-Gangetic planes
Birth of Buddha
Birth of Mahaveer Jain
Death of Mahaveer Jain
6th–5th century BC
Cities like Kaushambi, Shravasti, Varanasi, Vaishali, and Rajagriha were established, establishment of Magadha empire
4th century BC onward
Sanskrit as state language
Spread of Buddhism in Karnataka owing to Chandragupta Maurya’s celibacy
3rd century BC–
Prakrit established as common language, famine, and Jain migration from Magadha to South India
Asoka gave up administration
Greeks invaded India
2nd century BC
Chaityas and Viharas were built in Western Ghats
Spread of Buddhism from India to Burma, China, Central Asia, and Afghanistan
1st century AD onward
Buddhists practiced idol worship
3rd century AD
Mathura school of art flourished
Beginning of Gupta era
4th–6th century AD
Establishment of Nalanda and Taxila universities
6th century AD
Early Chalukyas establish their kingdom
7th century AD
Emergence of Pallavan rule
Temple building in Aihole, Badami, and Pattadakal
7th century AD
Key role played by landlords in shaping society, Rajput kings became important elements
7th–8th century AD
Regional architectural styles emerged
Establishment of Rashtrakuta empire
Birth of Shankaracharya
Establishment of Chola empire
Slave dynasty established, beginning of Islamic architecture
Establishment of Vijayanagara empire
Vasco da Gama’s first voyage from Europe to India and back
East India Company gets exclusive trading rights with India
Rabindranath Tagore’s birth
1947 AD onward
- Brown, P. (1996). Indian architecture (Islamic periods). Mumbai: D.B.Taraporevala Sons & Co.Google Scholar
- Brown, P. (1999). Indian architecture (Buddhist and Hindu periods). Mumbai: D.B.Taraporevala Sons & Private Ltd.Google Scholar
- Chandra, B. (2017). History of modern India. India: BB Press.Google Scholar
- Gupta, S. P. (2004). Elements of Indian art. Delhi: D.K.Print World Ltd.Google Scholar
- Hardy, A. (2007). The temple architecture of India. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hasnain, N. (2016). Indian society and culture. New Delhi: Jawahar Publishers.Google Scholar
- Havell, E. B. (1915). The ancient and medieval architecture of India: A study of Indo-Aryan civilization. London: Cornell University Library.Google Scholar
- Joshi, J. P. (2008). Harappan architecture and civil engineering. Kolkata: Rupa & Co.Google Scholar
- Kramrisch, S. (2015). The Hindu temple. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass publishers.Google Scholar
- Lang, J., Desai, M., & Desai, M. (1997). Architecture and independence: The search for identity-India 1880–1980. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- McCrindle, J. W. (1876). Ancient India Megasthenes and Arrian. Mumbai: Education Society’s Press.Google Scholar
- Raz, R. (1834). Essay on the architecture of Hindus. London: Publication for the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland.Google Scholar
- Sharma, R. S. (2016). India’s ancient past. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Tadgell, C. (1994). The history of architecture in India. London: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
- Tagor, A. (1914). Some notes on India’s artistic anatomy. Kolkata: Indian Society of Oriental Art.Google Scholar