Advertisement

Mechanical Testing of Vascular Grafts

  • Martin StoiberEmail author
  • Christian Grasl
  • Francesco Moscato
  • Heinrich Schima
Living reference work entry
  • 1 Downloads
Part of the Reference Series in Biomedical Engineering book series (RSBE)

Abstract

Beside other requirements, the mechanical behavior plays an important role in the success of vascular grafts. For the development, quality control, and assessment of vascular grafts, precise and predictive mechanical characterization is essential. Today’s technology offers a wide range of mechanical tests for various applications. The selection of the proper test method out of these numerous options is a challenging task, because different scientific questions and issues require different testing methods. In this chapter, an overview and review of important methods with numerous relevant references for the mechanical characterization of vascular grafts is given. In addition, a classification of the testing methods according to the measurement purpose is presented. Special attention is paid to dynamic measurement techniques, which are more close to the target application. Challenges and possibilities of these measurement methods are demonstrated and discussed. This shall form a basis to assess one’s own needs and to help at the selection process to find the most suitable testing methods.

References

  1. ASTM Standard D1388-96 (1996) Standard test method for stiffness of fabrics. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM Standard D2290-00 (2000) Standard test method for apparent hoop tensile strength of plastic or reinforced plastic pipe by split disk method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D2290-08.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM Standard D3039-00 (2000) Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D3039_D3039M-08CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM Standard D2290-01 (2001) Standard test methods for tensile, compressive, and flexural creep and creep-rupture of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D2990-09.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM Standard D5026-01 (2001) Standard test method for plastics: dynamic mechanical properties: in tension. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D5026-06R14.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM Standard D1938-02 (2002) Tear-propagation resistance of plastic film and thin sheeting by a single-tear method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D1922-15.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM Standard D638-02a (2002) Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D0638-14.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ASTM Standard D882-02 (2002) Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D0882-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ASTM Standard F1980-02 (2002) Standard guide for accelerated aging of sterile medical device packages. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D7102-10.CopyrightCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ASTM Standard F2150-13 (2013) Standard guide for characterization and testing of biomaterial scaffolds used in tissue-engineered medical products. ASTM International, West Conshohocken.  https://doi.org/10.1520/F2150-07.CopyrightCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Avril S, Evans S (2017) Material Parameter Identification and Inverse Problems in Soft Tissue Biomechanics [Internet]. Springer International Publishing, pp 37–67. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-45071-1
  12. Awad NK, Niu H, Ali U et al (2018) Electrospun fibrous scaffolds for small-diameter blood vessels: a review. Membranes (Basel) 8:1–26.  https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8010015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bäck M, Gasser TC, Michel J-B, Caligiuri G (2013) Biomechanical factors in the biology of aortic wall and aortic valve diseases.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvt040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baxter J, Buchan KG, Espino DM (2017) Viscoelastic properties of mitral valve leaflets: an analysis of regional variation and frequency-dependency. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 231:938–944.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411917719741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bensch M, Müller M, Bode M, Glasmacher B (2016) Automation of a test bench for accessing the bendability of electrospun vascular grafts. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 2:3–7.  https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2016-0068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bergmeister H, Schreiber C, Grasl C et al (2013) Healing characteristics of electrospun polyurethane grafts with various porosities. Acta Biomater 9:6032–6040.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bernal M, Urban MW, Rosario D et al (2011) Measurement of biaxial mechanical properties of soft tubes and arteries using piezoelectric elements and sonometry. Phys Med Biol 56:3371–3386.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/11/012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Biemans JMA, Van Den Berg JC, Moll FL (2002) Beware the kinking bypass – a hidden cause of graft reocclusion. EJVES Extra 3:88–90.  https://doi.org/10.1053/ejvx.2002.0145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bode M, Mueller M, Zernetsch H, Glasmacher B (2015) Electrospun vascular grafts with anti-kinking properties. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 1:524–528.  https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2015-0125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brandt-Wunderlich C, Schwerdt C, Behrens P et al (2016) A method to determine the kink resistance of stents and stent delivery systems according to international standards. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 2:289–292.  https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2016-0064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brown RP (2002) Handbook of polymer testing: short-term mechanical tests. Rapra Technology, ShrewsburyGoogle Scholar
  22. Browning MB, Dempsey D, Guiza V et al (2012) Multilayer vascular grafts based on collagen-mimetic proteins. Acta Biomater 8:1010–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Burton HE, Freij JM, Espino DM (2017) Dynamic viscoelasticity and surface properties of porcine left anterior descending coronary arteries. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 8:41–56.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-016-0288-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Caro-Bretelle AS, Gountsop PN, Ienny P et al (2015) Effect of sample preservation on stress softening and permanent set of porcine skin. J Biomech 48:3135–3141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.07.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Carson MW, Roach MR (1990) The strength of the aortic media and its role in the propagation of aortic dissection. J Biomech 23:579–588.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(90)90050-DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chaparro FJ, Matusicky ME, Allen MJ, Lannutti JJ (2016) Biomimetic microstructural reorganization during suture retention strength evaluation of electrospun vascular scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 104:1525–1534.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chirinos JA (2012) Arterial stiffness: basic concepts and measurement techniques. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 5:243–255.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-012-9359-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chuong CJ, Fung YC (1983) Three-dimensional stress distribution in arteries. J Biomech Eng 105:268.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Claramunt R, Álvarez-Ayuso L, García-Páez JM et al (2013) Changes in the mechanical properties of chemically treated bovine pericardium after a short uniaxial cyclic test. Artif Organs 37:183–188.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2012.01538.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Collins MJ, Li X, Lv W et al (2012) Therapeutic strategies to combat neointimal hyperplasia in vascular grafts. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 10:635–647.  https://doi.org/10.1586/erc.12.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Czichos H, Saito T, Smith LR (2006) Springer handbook of materials measurement methods. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. David SJ (1999) Dynamic mechanical analysis of polymeric systems of pharmaceutical and biomedical significance. Int J Pharm 179:167–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00337-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. de Gelidi S, Tozzi G, Bucchi A (2017) The effect of thickness measurement on numerical arterial models. Mater Sci Eng C 76:1205–1215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. De Korte CL, Van Der Steen AFW (2002) Intravascular ultrasound elastography: an overview. Ultrasonics 40:859–865.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(02)00227-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Diamantouros SE, Hurtado-Aguilar LG, Schmitz-Rode T et al (2013) Pulsatile perfusion bioreactor system for durability testing and compliance estimation of tissue engineered vascular grafts. Ann Biomed Eng 41:1979–1989.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-013-0823-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Disney CM, Lee PD, Hoyland JA et al (2018) A review of techniques for visualising soft tissue microstructure deformation and quantifying strain Ex Vivo. J Microsc 00:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dobrin PB, Hodgett D, Canfield T, Mrkvicka R (2001) Mechanical determinants of graft kinking. Ann Vasc Surg 15:343–349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Duprey A, Khanafer K, Schlicht M et al (2010) In vitro characterisation of physiological and maximum elastic Modulus of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms using uniaxial tensile testing. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39:700–707.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.02.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fulcher GR, Hukins DWL, Shepherd DET (2009) Viscoelastic properties of bovine articular cartilage attached to subchondral bone at high frequencies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fung YC (Yuan-cheng) (1993) Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Garcia JR, Lamm SD, Han HC (2013) Twist buckling behavior of arteries. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 12:915–927.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-012-0453-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA (2006) Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface 3:15–35.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2005.0073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gauvin R, Sc M, Ahsan T et al (2010) A novel single-step self-assembly approach for the fabrication of tissue-engineered. Tissue Eng Part A 16:1737–1747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gleason RL, Gray SP, Wilson E, Humphrey JD (2004) A multiaxial computer-controlled organ culture and biomechanical device for mouse carotid arteries. J Biomech Eng 126:787.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1824130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenwald SE, Berry CL (2000) Improving vascular grafts: the importance of mechanical and haemodynamic properties. J Pathol 190:292–299.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(200002)190:3<292::AID-PATH528>3.0.CO;2-SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Haslach HW, Siddiqui A, Weerasooriya A et al (2018) Fracture mechanics of shear crack propagation and dissection in the healthy bovine descending aortic media. Acta Biomater.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hemmasizadeh A, Darvish K, Autieri M (2013) Characterization of changes to the mechanical properties of arteries due to cold storage using nanoindentation tests. Ann Biomed Eng 40:1434–1442.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0506-z.CharacterizationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hinnen JW, Rixen DJ, Koning OHJ et al (2007) Development of fibrinous thrombus analogue for in-vitro abdominal aortic aneurysm studies. J Biomech 40:289–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Holzapfel GA (2006) Determination of material models for arterial walls from uniaxial extension tests and histological structure. J Theor Biol 238:290–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.05.006MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Holzapfel GA, Ogden RW (2010) Constitutive modelling of arteries. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 466:1551–1597.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2010.0058MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast 61:1–48.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010835316564MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Stadler M (2002) A structural model for the viscoelastic behavior of arterial walls: continuum formulation and finite element analysis. Eur J Mech A Solids 21:441–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hosseini SM, Wilson W, Ito K, van Donkelaar CC (2013) How preconditioning affects the measurement of poro-viscoelastic mechanical properties in biological tissues. Biomech Model Mechanobiol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0511-2
  54. Hosseini SM, Wilson W, Ito K, Van Donkelaar CC (2014) How preconditioning affects the measurement of poro-viscoelastic mechanical properties in biological tissues. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 13:503–513.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-013-0511-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hsu FPK, Liu AMC, Downs J et al (1995) A triplane video-based experimental system for studying axisymmetrically inflated biomembranes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 42:442–450.  https://doi.org/10.1109/10.376148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Huang AH, Niklason LE (2014) Engineering of arteries in vitro. Cell Mol Life Sci 71:2103–2118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1546-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. International Standard ISO 5840-3 (2013) Cardiovascular implants – cardiac valve prostheses – part 3: heart valve substitutes implanted by transcatheter techniques. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  58. International Standard ISO 7198:2016 (2016) Cardiovascular implants – tubular vascular prostheses. International Organization Standards, GenèveGoogle Scholar
  59. ISO/DIS 6721-1:2018 (2018) Plastics – determination of dynamic mechanical properties – part 1: general principlesGoogle Scholar
  60. James BA, Sire RA (2010) Fatigue-life assessment and validation techniques for metallic vascular implants. Biomaterials 31:181–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kanapathy M, Kalaskar D, Mosahebi A, Seifalian AM (2016) Development of a tissue-engineered lymphatic graft using nanocomposite polymer for the treatment of secondary lymphedema. Artif Organs 40:E1–E11.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Konig G, McAllister TN, Dusserre N et al (2009) Mechanical properties of completely autologous human tissue engineered blood vessels compared to human saphenous vein and mammary artery. Biomaterials 30:1542–1550.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Koop BE, Lewis JL (2003) A model of fracture testing of soft viscoelastic tissues. J Biomech 36:605–608.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00435-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. L’Heureux N, Dusserre N, Marini A et al (2007) Technology insight: the evolution of tissue-engineered vascular grafts – from research to clinical practice. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 4:389–395.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Laterreur V, Ruel J, Auger FA et al (2014) Comparison of the direct burst pressure and the ring tensile test methods for mechanical characterization of tissue-engineered vascular substitutes. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 34:253–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.02.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lee J-H, Lee S-S, Chang J-D et al (2013) A novel method for the accurate evaluation of Poisson’s ratio of soft polymer materials. Sci World J 2013:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/930798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Li GY, Cao Y (2017) Mechanics of ultrasound elastography. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 473.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Loy C, Pezzoli D, Candiani G, Mantovani D (2018) A cost-effective culture system for the in vitro assembly, maturation, and stimulation of advanced multilayered multiculture tubular tissue models. Biotechnol J 13:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Macrae RA, Miller K, Doyle BJ (2016) Methods in mechanical testing of arterial tissue: a review. Strain 52:380–399.  https://doi.org/10.1111/str.12183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mahmood B, Ewertsen C, Carlsen J, Nielsen M (2016) Ultrasound vascular elastography as a tool for assessing atherosclerotic plaques – a systematic literature review. Ultrasound Int Open 02:E106–E112.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-115564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mariappan YK, Glaser KJ, Ehman RL (2010) Magnetic resonance elastography: a review. Clin Anat 23:497–511.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Marra SP, Kennedy FE, Kinkaid JN, Fillinger MF (2006) Elastic and rupture properties of porcine aortic tissue measured using inflation testing. Cardiovasc Eng 6:123–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-006-9021-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Maurel W, Thalmann D, Wu Y et al (1998) Biomechanical models for soft tissue simulation. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. McClure MJ, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL (2012) Tri-layered vascular grafts composed of polycaprolactone, elastin, collagen, and silk: optimization of graft properties. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 10:48–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.02.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Menard KP, Menard N (2017) Dynamic mechanical analysis. Encycl Anal Chem Online 2–25.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318.a2007.pub3
  76. Mugnai D, Tille JC, Mrówczyński W et al (2013) Experimental noninferiority trial of synthetic small-caliber biodegradable versus stable vascular grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Natasha G, Tan A, Gundogan B et al (2015) Tissue engineering vascular grafts a fortiori: looking back and going forward. Expert Opin Biol Ther 15:231–244.  https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2015.980234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nerem RM (2000) Tissue engineering a blood vessel substitute: the role of biomechanics. Yonsei Med J 41:735–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nezarati RM, Eifert MB, Dempsey DK, Cosgriff-Hernandez E (2014) Electrospun vascular grafts with improved compliance matching to native vessels. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ng BH, Chou SM, Krishna V (2005) The influence of gripping techniques on the tensile properties of tendons. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 219:349–354.  https://doi.org/10.1243/095441105X34239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Nieponice A, Soletti L, Guan J et al (2008) Rotational vacuum seeding technique. Glass 29:825–833.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.044.DevelopmentCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. O’Brien FJ (2011) Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14:88–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. O’Leary SA, Doyle BJ, McGloughlin TM (2014) The impact of long term freezing on the mechanical properties of porcine aortic tissue. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 37:165–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.04.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Obaid N, Kortschot MT, Sain M (2017) Understanding the stress relaxation behavior of polymers reinforced with short elastic fibers. Materials (Basel) 10:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10050472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pensalfini M, Meneghello S, Lintas V et al (2018) The suture retention test, revisited and revised. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 77:711–717.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Peterson DR, Bronzino JD (2008) Biomechanics: principles and applications. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  87. Purslow PP (1983) Measurement of the fracture toughness of extensible connective tissues. J Mater Sci 18:3591–3598.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rectors T, Madrid MGV, General TS et al (2003) Biomechanics of soft tissue in cardiovascular systems. Springer, WienGoogle Scholar
  89. Roeder RK (2013) Mechanical characterization of biomaterials. Elsevier, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Romo A, Badel P, Duprey A et al (2014) In vitro analysis of localized aneurysm rupture. J Biomech 47:607–616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sacks MS (2000) Biaxial mechanical evaluation of planar biological materials. In: Cardiovascular soft tissue mechanics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 199–246Google Scholar
  92. Sarkar S, Hillery C, Seifalian A, Hamilton G (2006) Critical parameter of burst pressure measurement in development of bypass grafts is highly dependent on methodology used. J Vasc Surg 44:846–852.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.07.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sarvazyan A, Hall TJ, Urban W et al (2011) An overview of elastography-an emerging branch of medical imaging. Curr Med Imaging Rev 7:255–282.  https://doi.org/10.2174/157340511798038684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Schindler HJ (2005) On quasi-non-destructive strength and toughness testing of elastic-plastic materials. Int J Solids Struct 42:717–725.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.06.029CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  95. Shah RG, Pierce MC, Silver FH (2017) Morphomechanics of dermis-A method for non-destructive testing of collagenous tissues. Skin Res Technol 23:399–406.  https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.12349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Soffer L, Wang X, Zhang X et al (2009) Silk-based electrospun tubular scaffolds for tissue-engineered vascular grafts. J Biomater Sci Polym 19:653–664.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156856208784089607.Silk-BasedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sokolis DP (2007) Passive mechanical properties and structure of the aorta: segmental analysis. Acta Physiol 190:277–289.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01661.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Soletti L, Hong Y, Guan J et al (2011) A bi-layered elastomeric scaffold for tissue engineering of small-diameter vascular grafts. Acta Biomater 6:110–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.026.ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Stineman MR et al (2007) Mechanics of fresh, refrigerated, and frozen arterial tissue. J Surg Res 139:236–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Stoiber M, Messner B, Grasl C et al (2015) A method for mechanical characterization of small blood vessels and vascular grafts. Exp Mech 55:1591–1595.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-015-0053-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sun W, Sacks MS, Scott MJ (2005) Effects of boundary conditions on the estimation of the planar biaxial mechanical properties of soft tissues. J Biomech Eng 127:709.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1933931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Takmakov P, Ruda K, Phillips KS et al (2017) Rapid evaluation of the durability of cortical neural implants using accelerated aging with reactive oxygen species. J Neural Eng 12:1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/2/026003.RapidCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tanzi MC, Farè S (2017) Characterization of polymeric biomaterials. Woodhead Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  104. Theron JP, Knoetze JH, Sanderson RD et al (2010) Modification, crosslinking and reactive electrospinning of a thermoplastic medical polyurethane for vascular graft applications. Acta Biomater 6:2434–2447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Thubrikar MJ, Labrosse M, Robicsek F et al (2001) Mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall. J Med Eng Technol 25:133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0309190011005780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tian L, Henningsen J, Salick MR et al (2014) Stretch calculated from grip distance accurately approximates mid-specimen stretch in large elastic arteries in uniaxial tensile tests. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 47:107–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.03.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tonge TK, Murienne BJ, Coudrillier B et al (2013) Minimal preconditioning effects observed for inflation tests of planar tissues. J Biomech Eng 135:114502.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Vaesken A, Heim F, Chakfe N (2014) Fiber heart valve prosthesis: influence of the fabric construction parameters on the valve fatigue performances. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 40:69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.08.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Valdez-Jasso D, Bia D, Zócalo Y et al (2011) Linear and nonlinear viscoelastic modeling of aorta and carotid pressure-area dynamics under in vivo and ex vivo conditions. Ann Biomed Eng 39:1438–1456.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-0236-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. van Haaften EE, Wissing TB, Rutten M et al (2018) Decoupling the effect of shear stress and stretch on tissue growth & remodeling in a vascular graft. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 24:ten.TEC.2018.0104.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2018.0104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. VanBavel E, Siersma P, Spaan J a E (2003) Elasticity of passive blood vessels: a new concept. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 285:H1986–H2000.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00248.2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Virues Delgadillo JO, Delorme S, El-Ayoubi R et al (2010) Effect of freezing on the passive mechanical properties of arterial samples. J Biomed Sci Eng 03:645–652.  https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2010.37088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Vorp DA, Severyn DA, Steed DL, Webster MW (1996) A device for the application of cyclic twist and extension on perfused vascular segments. Am J Phys 270:H787–H795Google Scholar
  114. Waldman SD, Lee JM (2005) Effect of sample geometry on the apparent biaxial mechanical behaviour of planar connective tissues. Biomaterials 26:7504–7513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wan W, Dixon JB, Gleason RL (2012) Constitutive modeling of mouse carotid arteries using experimentally measured microstructural parameters. Biophys J 102:2916–2925.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.04.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wang XT, Ker RF, Alexander RM (1995) Fatigue rupture of wallaby tail tendons. J Exp Biol 198:847–852.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBIOMECH.2007.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wang F, Mohammed A, Li C et al (2014) Degradable/non-degradable polymer composites for in-situ tissue engineering small diameter vascular prosthesis application. Biomed Mater Eng 24:2127–2133.  https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-141023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Woodrum DA, Romano AJ, Lerman A et al (2006) Vascular wall elasticity measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 56:593–600.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Yu X, Turcotte R, Seta F, Zhang Y (2018) Micromechanics of elastic lamellae: unravelling the role of structural inhomogeneity in multi-scale arterial mechanics. J R Soc Interface 15:20180492.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zou Y, Zhang Y (2011) The orthotropic viscoelastic behavior of aortic elastin. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 10:613–625.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-010-0260-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Stoiber
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Christian Grasl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francesco Moscato
    • 1
  • Heinrich Schima
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical EngineeringMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cardiovascular ResearchViennaAustria
  3. 3.Department for Cardiac SurgeryMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations