Life on Land

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Amanda Lange Salvia, Tony Wall

Agricultural Practices and Sustainable Management in South Asia

  • Ahmad Nawaz
  • Muhammad FarooqEmail author
Living reference work entry


Allelopathy is an ecological phenomenon by which plants and/or microorganisms release organic chemicals (allelochemicals) into the environment influencing the growth and survival of other organisms (Cheema et al. 2013).

Conservation agriculture involves the maintenance of soil cover (permanent), minimum soil disturbance, planned crop rotations, and weed management (Kassam 2020).

Precision agriculture involves the use of temporal, spatial, and individual data in management decisions for efficient use of input resources, and profitability and sustainability of agricultural production systems.

Zero-till wheat corresponds to wheat crop directly sown in the residues of previous crops, without seedbed preparation (Nawaz et al. 2017). Direct seeded aerobic rice is rice direct seeding and water application as per crop requirement without maintaining of flooded conditions throughout the crop season (Farooq et al. 2011).


South Asia comprises Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, which covers 11.71% (5.2 million km2) of Asian continent (Arnall 2010), and encompasses high diversity in soil types, climate, and crop production systems. Table 1 shows data on total population, labor force engaged in agriculture, the share of agriculture in national gross domestic product, and land use in South Asian countries. The increasing human population has worsened the scenario of agricultural practices and sustainable management in the region. Furthermore, the sustainability of crop production systems is threatened by changing rainfall patterns, heatwaves, the outbreak of diseases (e.g., wheat rust), insect-pests (e.g., locust swarms), and conventional crop management practices (e.g., excessive tillage, indiscriminate use of agrochemicals).
Table 1

Total population, labor force engaged in agriculture, share of agriculture in GDP, and land use in South Asian countries


Population (million)

Labor force in agriculture (%)

Share of agriculture in GDP (%)

Area (Million hectares)

Total area

Agricultural area

Arable land

Permanent crops

Permanent pasture

Forest and woodland

Irrigated crop land


































Sri Lanka












































Sources: Faqeerzada et al. (2018);; Srinivasarao et al. (2019)

GDP = Gross domestic products

By 2050, the world population is predicted to exceed 2 billion by 2050 of which 30% increase will be in South and Southeast Asia (UN 2019). The impacts of climate change, as erratic rains, heatwaves and extreme flooding, will also be more severe in this region (Thornton et al. 2014). According to the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT 2018), rice (Oryza sativa L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yields may decrease by 30% over next century if farmers will not adopt sustainable innovations to mitigate the impact of changing climate.

Sustainable farming practices include direct seeding of rice, zero tillage in wheat, laser land leveling, and bed/ridge sowing of maize and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), high-efficiency irrigation system, integrated use of organic and synthetic fertilizers, and crop diversification with the legumes. Application of nanotechnology for efficient use of inputs and the use of allelopathic extracts and powders for pest management are emerging components of sustainable farming. Such practices are eco-friendly, help to economize the use of water, to maintain the health of the soil, to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases, and to improve the productivity and profitability of crop production systems (Table 2; Pandey and Koirala 2017; Nawaz et al. 2019). Sustainable farming practices together with the use of improved crop seeds contribute to increasing the yield gains; however, these practices have not been adopted at large scale (Farooq and Pisante 2019). Policy interventions and institutional support, ensuring access to the no-till machinery, laser land leveler, and bed shapers, may help increase the adoption of sustainable farming practices (CIMMYT 2018).
Table 2

Benefits of sustainable agricultural practices over traditional practices in South Asia

Traditional farming practices

Sustainable farming practices

Benefits of sustainable practices over traditional farming practices

Puddling and flooding in transplanted rice

Direct seeded aerobic rice

Water saving

Labor saving

Energy saving

Reduction in methane emission

Saving in production cost

Post rice crops perform better after direct seeded rice than transplanted rice

Plough tillage in wheat

Zero tillage in wheat

Saving of production cost

Timely planation of wheat in rice-wheat system

Reduction in soil erosion

Improvement in soil properties

Manual land leveling

Laser land leveling

Improvement in water use efficiency and grain yield

Flood irrigation

Drip and sprinkler irrigation

Increase in water use efficiency

Flat sowing of crops

Bed and ridge sowing

Water saving

Plough tillage in rainfed areas

Conservation agriculture

Saving of production cost

Reduction in soil erosion on sloppy lands

Improvement in soil properties

Use of synthetic fertilizers

Combine use of organic and inorganic sources of fertilizers, use of green manures

Improvement in soil water holding capacity

Improvement in soil biological health

Better nutrient recycling

Improvement in water use efficiency of crops

Unwise use of synthetic fertilizers

Use of nanotechnology

Very useful for applying the exact amount of nutrient to the crops

Improvement in nutrient use efficiency


Crop diversification with legumes and other crops

Suppress the pest outbreaks

Reduces the pathogen transmission

Buffer the crop production from the negative consequences of climatic variations

Improved soil fertility

Use of synthetic pesticides to control insect-pests and weeds

Use of allelopathic water extracts and powders

Organic and eco-friendly management of agricultural pests

Soil Management

Total arable area (39%, 2.03 million square kilometers) of South Asia comprises of three topographical regions viz., (i) the Hindu Kush, the Himalayas, and the Karakorum mountain ranges and their southern slopes, (ii) Indus and Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP), and (iii) Deccan Plateau and other uplands. Land degradation has become a serious threat to the sustainability of current crop production practices in all arable areas. The main drivers to land/soil degradation include intensive cropping and nutrient mining (north India, mid-altitude of Nepal), water erosion (riverbank erosion in major flood plains of rivers, Himalaya foothills), wind erosion [western Rajasthan, coastal regions of India, dry regions (Thal and Thar) of Pakistan], waterlogging (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh), soil salinization (IGP plains, Indus river basin, southern coastal lines of Sri Lanka), agrochemical pollution (especially Pakistan), overgrazing, removal of vegetative cover, sedimentation, and poor soil management practices (e.g., puddling and flooding in rice in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nepal) (Cook et al. 2016; Dahal 2017).

Wise management of soil resources supported by government policies can interpose soil degradation. For example, the contour plowing, terracing, strip cropping, mulching, and agro-forestry may be useful to control water erosion in hilly areas. Construction of small dams in hilly areas (e.g., potohar regions in Pakistan) may help to harvest water and reduce soil erosion. Afforestation may help to reduce the soil losses by wind erosion. Retention of previous crop residues also provides soil cover, which helps to not only reduce soil losses associated with wind erosion but also improve the soil organic matter and the soil water holding capacity.

Waterlogging is severe on heavy soils and can be mitigated by the lining of water canals and regulating the water flow in canals. Waterlogging at field levels can be managed by re-scheduling the irrigation, namely using higher efficient irrigation systems. An efficient surface and/or subsurface drainage system may also help (Bhattacharyya et al. 2015).

Soil salinization can be controlled by ponding freshwater that is highly useful to remove excess salts toward the deep soil layers; water ponds can also be used for fish farming. Sodic soils can be reclaimed by application of some chemical amendments, such as calcium chloride, gypsum, and other acid-forming compounds, for example, iron/aluminum sulfate, sulfuric acid, calcium and pyrite salt, lime sulfur (Shahid et al. 2018). Salt tolerant crops (e.g., Chenopodium quinoa W.), have been successfully introduced in saline areas (Iqbal et al. 2019); farmers need guidance and training on reclamation of saline and sodic soils. The promotion and marketing of these crops will contribute to use of saline soils for profitable crop production.

Nutrient mining mitigation can be addressed by incorporating the manure-based organic fertilizers in the crop nutrition program rather than using synthetic fertilizers. The manure-based organic fertilizers not only provide the plant nutrients but also improve the soil health by improving the nutrient retention, and physical and biological properties. The agrochemical pollution can be reduced through the cultivation of insect-pest and disease resistance crop cultivars. The soil losses due to intensive cropping may be minimized through the adoption of a complete set of components of conservation agriculture. This will also help improve soil health and crop yields (Fig. 1). The use of allelopathy is increasingly emerging as an eco-friendly option for managing weeds, insect pests, and diseases in crops (Cheema et al. 2013) which may help reduce soil pollution associated with the use of synthetic pesticides.
Fig. 1

Principles and associated benefits of conservation agriculture

The current rice and wheat production practices (i.e., puddling and flooding in rice followed by excessive tillage for wheat), which deteriorate the soil health, increase production cost, and are also the source of greenhouse gases (i.e. methane), can be replaced by the adoption of resource conservation technologies such as rice direct seeding (Fig. 2) and promotion of zero-till wheat farming (Fig. 3) in rice-wheat farming systems (Nawaz et al. 2019). Direct seeding in rice reduces methane emission, decreases the production cost, and saves water. Likewise, zero tillage in wheat improves soil health, reduces greenhouse emission, and improves resource use efficiency and profitability (Nawaz et al. 2017). Zero tillage also helps to reduce the turnover time between rice harvest and planting of the following crop, which ensures timely wheat sowing, especially in the rice-wheat cropping system. However, strong policy support, incentives, and an extensive extension campaign are needed to promote rice direct seeding and zero tillage in wheat in South Asia.
Fig. 2

Zero-till wheat at a farmer field in Punjab, Pakistan

Fig. 3

Direct seeded rice in a farmer field in Punjab, Pakistan

Water Management

South Asia is surrounded by three main water bodies viz. the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, and the Indian Ocean, and spans through two major river basins, that is, Ganges River Basin and Indus River Basin. There are three distinct rainfall systems in the region, namely, (i) southwestern monsoon system in summer (which contributes 80% annual rainfall in whole South Asia), (ii) northeastern monsoon system during winter (in Bangladesh and adjoining areas), and (iii) western weather system (in Pakistan and other parts of the region) in winter. The summer monsoon rains are intensive and cause a flood in rivers and the areas adjoining to rivers. The winter rainfalls are less intensive but effective and are a major source of water for winter crops in rainfed areas (Hanif 2003).

The Indus Basin irrigation systems of Pakistan and India are considered as one of the best irrigation systems in the world. However, most of the irrigation canals and field channels are not lined, which results in water losses as seepage, percolation, and evaporation. The lining of irrigation canals and field water channels may help reduce these losses to a greater extent. Flood irrigation is the most common method of irrigation, which results in great loss of water through gravity in deep soil layers. For sustainable management of water, the century-old system of flood irrigation should be replaced with high-efficiency irrigation systems, for example, drip and sprinkler irrigation. Drip irrigation has been widely adopted for irrigating the fruit and some vegetable crops. The sprinkler method of irrigation is getting momentum in the water-limited areas, for example, thal and Potowar region in Pakistan. However, institutional support and credit facility are required for the promotion of high-efficiency irrigation system to economize water use. Most of the agronomic crops grown on flat land are irrigated by flooding. Adoption of raised bed sowing and ridges in wheat, rice, maize, and cotton may save a surplus quantity of water for our future generation.

Half of the extracted groundwater is used for irrigation in the region. The withdrawal of groundwater at excessive rates has also threatened the long-term availability of ground water for household and agriculture purposes (Yang et al. 2011). For example, Suneja (2018) reported that groundwater in most of the capital cities of the region, for example, Kabul, Islamabad, New Delhi, Dhaka, Kathmandu, has declined at an alarming rate. The increase of heavy metals load, for example, arsenic, in groundwater also requires serious attention due to the impact on plant and human health. Water policies to regulate the withdrawal of groundwater and the prevention of heavy metal load in water are needed. Rainwater harvesting and storage in small and mini dams is an attractive option (Fig. 4). This stored water can later be used for crop production. This stored water is also used as drinking water by the farm animals, which is an integral component of farming systems of rainfed regions. Promotion of laser-assisted land leveling at farmer field with incentives from the government to the farmers might be useful to improve the water use efficiency.
Fig. 4

A mini dam in Potohar, Punjab, Pakistan

Nutrient Management

South Asia is the second-largest fertilizer user region of the world (FAO 2015), with nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) fertilizer consumption of 24.5%, 31.3%, and 19.3%, respectively. The synthetic fertilization varies among the South Asia regions. For example, the average in fertilizer consumption is ~12 kg ha−1 in Afghanistan and ~ 200 kg ha−1 in Bangladesh compared with the world average of 120 kg ha−1 (Mujeri et al. 2013). Although intensive use of synthetic fertilizers after the green revolution contributed to several folds increase in yield, the productivity of many crops (including rice and wheat) has become stagnant for the last few years (Cook et al. 2016). Intensive cropping has caused higher removal of macro- (N, P, K, sulfur) and micronutrients (zinc, boron) from the soil, as they did not return to soil in the same proportions (Dahal 2017). The ideal ratio for NPK application is 4:3:1; it is 6.5:2.4:1.1. Imbalanced fertilizer application reduces the nutrient use efficiencies with high cost of production and environmental (Rehman et al. 2019) and human health risks (Ahmed et al. 2017).

Sustainable nutrient management involves the integrated use of organic (farmyard manure, compost, poultry manure, green manures) and inorganic sources (synthetic fertilizers) and will build long-term effects to improve the soil physical, biological, and chemical health (Dey et al. 2018). The crop residues are often removed from the fields and maybe fed to livestock in some parts of the region. Retention of crop residues in the field as surface mulch or incorporating into the soil may help build up the soil structure and improve soil nutrient status (Hiel et al. 2018). However, as a policy note, the alternate forage systems must be introduced to provide the farmer with an alternate of crop residues. The legumes are rarely part of a cropping sequence. The inclusion of legumes in crop rotation, for example, green manure, intercrop, or cover crop, will be highly beneficial to improve the nutrient cycling and nutrient reserves (Fig. 5; Chibarabada et al. 2017) with substantial improvement in soil physical and biological properties. Inoculation of legume seeds with biofertilizers will further add the benefits, which are expected by legume incorporation in cropping sequence. Most of the farmers in this region use the blank recommendations for fertilizer use without having any soil tests. Thus, the farmers should apply fertilizers based on soil tests to rationalize the use of fertilizers. The government of Pakistan recently announced a subsidy for sesbania green manuring in the rice-wheat cropping system for sustainable nutrient management, which may help the farmers to boost their crop yields. This type of support may also be introduced in other countries of South Asia.
Fig. 5

Sesbania green manuring for improving soil fertility

Precision agriculture can be effectively used for site-specific nutrient management (Dahal 2017). The use of nanotechnology may also be useful in decreasing the field losses of fertilizers and improve use efficiencies (Usman et al. 2020). Both precision agriculture and nanotechnology require institutional support.

Crop Pests and Disease Management

Insect-pests and diseases are the main potential threats to global food security in terms of qualitative and quantitative losses in agriculture (Tenzin 2013). Climate change has detrimental effects on crop health, and a range of insect pests and diseases have been expanding toward higher latitude with increasing temperature every year (Rosenzweig et al. 2001). The increase of 1 °C may cause up to 10–20% loss in major staple crops – rice, wheat, and maize (Deutsch et al. 2018).

Farmers typically combat insect-pests with chemical insecticides. However, many insect biotypes have developed resistance against the chemical insecticides owing to continuous and excessive use of these insecticides all over the world (Praneetvatakul et al. 2013) including South Asia. This situation has forced farmers to adopt alternative control measures of pest management safer to ecosystems and human-animal health. Governments are also encouraged on integrated pest management (IPM) measures to tackle the increase of disease and insect-pests in agriculture (Gautam et al. 2017). The term IPM is applied in the pest management system using all possible control measures, with minimum reliance on synthetic pesticides, to maintain the pest population below the economic threshold level (ETL). Several microbial pesticides have been registered and widely used against several insect pests, namely, Bacillus thuringiensis, entomopathogenic fungi (EPFs), entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), and Trichoderma (Sinha and Biswas 2009). Biopesticides are available commercially in Pakistan (Iqbal 2013), but less accessible in Sri Lanka and Afghanistan; Nepal has registered 54 microbial products of 10 pathogens to control important agricultural insect pests.

Genetically modified crops (GMOs) have also been contributing to the extension in controlling insect-pests. Although South Asians are in strong opposition of GMOs, maize, cotton, and eggplant (Solanum trongum Poir.), GMO are flourishing in India and some areas of Pakistan.

Biological control has been used for decades. In 1968, biological control was initiated in Pakistan; since then, about ~750 natural enemies were used to control insect pests, among predators, parasites, parasitoids, and pathogens. Several success stories of biological control have been reported from India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and Maldives with biological control (Irshad and Stephen 2014; Alam et al. 2018). It is further needed to explore and deploy indigenous biocontrol agents (insects and pathogens) in IPM programs to reduce reliance on chemical insecticides.

Locust swarms have emerged as a serious threat to future food production in South Asia, especially in Pakistan and India. Vast crop losses have been reported in different pockets of both countries. Measures being undertaken to address ongoing locust outbreak merit every support irrespective of jurisdictional boundaries. Particular attention should be paid to the affected areas for a thorough treatment. Governments should also maintain the necessary funds to compensate for the affected rural populations. Cross-country cooperation is crucial to control the severe pests.

Wheat rust has also emerged as a severe disease in the year during the last few years in the region. This disease caused significant yield losses in the year 2019–20. Conducing environment, light rains, cloud cover, high humidity, and mild temperature, during the reproductive stage of wheat crop, triggered the spread of this disease. Rust-susceptible wheat varieties should be banned for general cultivation. Farmers should be advised to treat wheat seeds with board-spectrum fungicides before planting. Breeding programs to develop rust-resistant wheat genotypes should be strengthened.

Weed Management

Weeds are a serious threat to profitable crop production in South Asia. However, weed management component of crop husbandry practices is often ignored in minor crops. Weed infestation varies across cropping systems and agroecological zones. While switching from the conventional crop production systems to the conservation crop production systems, weed infestation often increases during initial years of adaptation. There are three major groups of weeds, namely, grasses, sedges (grass-like), and broad-leaved weeds. Grassy weeds are difficult to control in most of the cropping systems. The most important grassy weeds in South Asian cropping systems include wild oat (Avena fatua L.), littleseed canarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz.), jungle rice (Echinochloa colona (L.) Link), barnyard grass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv), and crowfoot grass (Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd.). The major sedges reported in South Asia include purplenut sedge (Cyperus rotundus L.), rice flatsedge (Cyperus iria L.), and small flower umbrella-sedge (Cyperus difformis L.). The important broad-leaved weeds found in field crops of South Asia are horse purslane (Trianthema portulacastrum L.), field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.), wild onion (Asphodelus tenuifolius CAV.), Digera species (Digera muricata (L.) Mart. and Digera arvensis Forssk.), wild safflower (Carthamus oxyacantha [M.] Bieb.), common lambsquarter (Chenopodium album L.), swine cress (Cronopus didymus (L.) Sm.), sweet clover (Melilotus indica (L.) Pall.), and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.).

Most of these weeds can be effectively controlled by the use of chemical herbicides. However, excessive and continuous use of chemical herbicides is polluting the soil and aerial environment and may cause health issues. Moreover, many weed biotypes (e.g., littleseed canarygrass) have developed resistance against many herbicides due to repetitive and indiscriminate (Heap 2014). Although cultural and physical weed controls had been popular for weed control in the region, their use is limited due to labor requirement and increasing labor cost. In this scenario, the phenomenon of allelopathy may be an attractive option for eco-friendly weed management. The use of allelopathic water extracts alone, in combination, or with lower doses of herbicides can provide effective weed control in a range of field crops (Cheema et al. 2013). Likewise, the incorporation of allelopathic crops [especially sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) and brassica species], use of mulch of allelopathic crops, intercropping with allelopathic crops, and incorporation of residues of allelopathic crops are pragmatic options to reduce weed pressure in a range of field crops.

Another concern is the recent Parthenium weed that invaded many fields in Pakistan (Bajwa et al. 2019) and additional regions in South Asia. Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI) in Pakistan (REF) is working on a pilot project for biological control of parthenium through Mexican beetle (Zygogramma bicolorata). This type of biological control methods should be optimized for complex weed flora to lessen the reliance on chemical herbicides.

Crop Diversification for Optimizing the Soil and Water Management

Diversification of cropping systems increases the resilience of the agricultural systems by (i) suppressing the pest outbreaks, (ii) damping the pathogen transmission, and (iii) buffering the crop production from climate adverse effects (Lin 2011; Paul et al. 2016). Unfortunately, farmers in the South Asia region are using monocultures of the same crops for decades, namely, the rice-wheat and cotton-wheat cropping systems in India and Pakistan, respectively. The continuous rotation of rice and wheat with century-old production practices has caused the deterioration of soil as well as the emergence of new weed biotypes, herbicide-resistant weeds, and aerial contamination via greenhouse gases. In these scenarios, new diversification of rice-wheat systems are recommended, namely through the inclusion of legumes, for example, Sesbania spp., chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), Phaseolus spp., lentil (Lens cularis L.), and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), green gram (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek), and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.), to promote productivity and health of the ecosystems (Choudhary et al. 2018; Nawaz et al. 2019). The legumes can be included within existing cropping systems and be used as a green manure crop (Nawaz et al. 2019) or as an intercrop. A recent study in India, conducted over 13 years by Hazra et al. (2019), showed that diversification of the maize-wheat system with legumes contributed to increasing the carbon sequestration and the soil macro-aggregates. The same study concluded carbon indices were higher for pigeon pea-wheat and maize-wheat-mungbean rotations. In another long-term study, Nath et al. (2019) found that the inclusion of legumes in rice-wheat crop rotation increased water-stable macroaggregates in surface and subsurface.

A severe attack of insect-pests in the cotton-wheat system has lowered the profits margins of many Pakistani farmers. Cotton is a summer crop and can be easily replaced by other crops like peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) or sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), with the perspective of improving farmers livelihood and sustainability in soil processes. The introduction of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) and other oilseeds and food legume crops may be also highly successful in marginal areas where water is scarce, since these crops require less water than cereals. The intercropping of legume crops, for example, mungbean, sesame, in cotton is another option to diversify the cotton-wheat cropping system. Some cucurbits, like watermelon (Citrullus lanatus (Thunberg) Matsumura & Nakai) and musk melon (Cucumis melo L.), intercropped in the cotton system act as cover crops and thus an efficient profitable product that conserves soil moisture. The availability of certified quality seed of cotton may help improve its production. Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is also an important cash crop of the South Asia region. The intercropping of lentil and chickpea in sugarcane improves net income and water productivity (Kanchannainwal 2014); soybean can also be a good option for the rainfed areas.

Future Prospects

Looming water crisis, deteriorating soil health owing to unwise cultivation practices, an outbreak of pests and diseases, the emergence of new weed biotypes, development of herbicide resistant weeds, increasing post-harvest losses, and monocultures are threatening the long-term sustainability of crop production systems in South Asian countries. As a management scheme, the soil losses from soil degradation can be lessened through adopting the resource conservation technologies (rice direct seeding, zero-till wheat, and laser land leveling), construction of mini dams in sloppy areas, use of straw mulching, contour farming, and afforestation. From a nutrient perspective, soil nutrient cycling can be improved by adding organic/green manures, retention of crop residues, use of fertilizer at right time with the right dose and right method, site-specific nutrient management, and use of nano-fertilizers. For the management of insect pests, weeds, and diseases in an eco-friendly manner, the phenomenon of allelopathy may be quite effective. For the management of water, adopting bed/ridge sowing in field crops and high-efficiency irrigation system in water scare and rainfed areas should be advocated. Crop diversification through the inclusion of legumes crops is a viable option to suppress the pest outbreaks, reduce the pathogen transmission, and buffer the crop production from the negative consequences of climatic variations with improved soil fertility. For the management of locust swarms, cross-border cooperation is crucial. Measures being undertaken to address ongoing locust outbreak merit every support irrespective of jurisdictional boundaries. For the management of wheat rust, rust-susceptible wheat varieties should be banned for general cultivation. Breeding programs to develop rust-resistant wheat genotypes should be strengthened. The availability of certified quality seeds is central for profitable crop production and requires institutional support. From a policy perspective, immediate steps are needed to review, reform, and develop policies (related to taxes, price incentives, subsidies, laws, and provision of technical services), which support sustainable soil, water, and post-harvest management. Policies are needed to ensure easy access to soil and fertilizer testing facilities for site-specific fertilizer application. Switching to sustainable intensification of agriculture requires an effective agricultural extension, research, education, and capacity building. More investment is also needed to improve rural infrastructures, road connectivity, and market access.


  1. Ahmed M, Rauf M, Mukhtar Z, Saeed NA (2017) Excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers: an unawareness causing serious threats to environment and human health. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:26983–26987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam SN, Sarkar MA, Pandey PR, Bokhtiar SM (2018) SAARC regional training on integrated pest management. SAARC Agriculture Center, Dhaka, p 171Google Scholar
  3. Arnall A (2010) Adaptive social protection: mapping the evidence and policy context in the agriculture sector in South Asia. IDS Working Papers 345:1–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bajwa AA, Farooq M, Nawaz A, Yadav L, Chauhan BS, Adkins S (2019) Impact of invasive plant species on the livelihoods of farming households: evidence from Parthenium hysterophorus invasion in rural Punjab, Pakistan. Biol Invas 21:3285–3304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhattacharyya R, Ghosh BN, Mishra PK, Mandal B, Rao CS, Sarkar D, Das K, Anil KS, Lalitha M, Hati KM, Franzluebbers AJ (2015) Soil degradation in India: challenges and potential solutions. Sustainability 7:3538–3570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheema ZA, Farooq M, Wahid A (2013) Allelopathy: current trends and future applications. Springer-Verlag, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chibarabada TP, Modi AT, Mabhaudhi T (2017) Expounding the value of grain legumes in the semi-and arid tropics. Sustainability 9:60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choudhary KM, Jat HS, Nandal DP, Bishnoi DK, Sutaliya JM, Choudhary M, Sharma PC, Jat ML (2018) Evaluating alternatives to rice-wheat system in western Indo-Gangetic Plains: crop yields, water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Res 218:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CIMMYT (2018) Innovation leads South Asia’s new green revolution. Available via
  10. Cook S, Henderson C, Kharel M, Begum A, Rob A, Piya A (2016) Collaborative actions on soil fertility in South Asia: experiences from Bangladesh and Nepal. Working paper, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, p 48Google Scholar
  11. Dahal H (2017) Land and soil management for sustainable agriculture in South Asia. Policy Brief 34:1–8Google Scholar
  12. Deutsch CA, Tewksbury JJ, Tigchelaar M, Battisti DS, Merrill SC, Huey RB, Naylor RL (2018) Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate. Science 361:916–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. FAO (2015) World fertilizer trends and outlook to 2018. Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Annual Report 14Google Scholar
  14. Faqeerzada MA, Rahman A, Joshi R, Park E, Cho BK (2018) Postharvest technologies for fruits and vegetables in South Asian countries: a review. Kor J Agric Sci 45:325–353Google Scholar
  15. Farooq M, Pisante M (2019) Innovations in sustainable agriculture. Springer Nature, BaselCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farooq M, Siddique KHM, Rehman H, Aziz T, Lee D-J, Wahid A (2011) Rice direct seeding: experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil Tillage Res 111:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gautam S, Schreinemachers P, Uddin MN, Srinivasan R (2017) Impact of training vegetable farmers in Bangladesh in integrated pest management (IPM). Crop Prot 102:161–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanif M (2003) Management of water resources in South Asia. Available via Downloads\Documents\Vol7No3&4_1_Management_of_Water_MHanif_3.pdfGoogle Scholar
  19. Hazra KK, Nath CP, Singh U, Praharaj CS, Kumar N, Singh SS, Singh NP (2019) Diversification of maize-wheat cropping system with legumes and integrated nutrient management increases soil aggregation and carbon sequestration. Geoderma 353:308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heap I (2014) International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Available online at Accessed 19 Mar 2020
  21. Hiel MP, Barbieux S, Pierreux J, Olivier C, Lobet G, Roisin C, Garré S, Colinet G, Bodson B, Dumont B (2018) Impact of crop residue management on crop production and soil chemistry after seven years of crop rotation in temperate climate, loamy soils. Peer J 6:e4836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Iqbal J (2013) Extent and potential use of bio-pesticides for crop protection in Pakistan. In: Gurung TR, Azad AK (eds) Extent and potential of bio-pesticides for crop protection in SAARC countries. The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation Agriculture Centre, Dhaka, pp 119–132Google Scholar
  23. Iqbal S, Basra SM, Afzal I, Wahid A, Saddiq MS, Hafeez MB, Jacobsen SE (2019) Yield potential and salt tolerance of quinoa on salt-degraded soils of Pakistan. J Agron Crop Sci 205:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Irshad M, Stephen E (2014) Review: pollination, pollinated, and pollinators interactions in Pakistan. J Biores Manag 1:19–25Google Scholar
  25. Kanchannainwal (2014) Intercropping in sugarcane: a better option for increasing profitability for the farmers. Available via
  26. Lin BB (2011) Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: adaptive management for environmental change. Bioscience 61:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nath CP, Hazra KK, Kumar N, Praharaj CS, Singh SS, Singh U, Singh NP (2019) Including grain legume in rice–wheat cropping system improves soil organic carbon pools over time. Ecol Eng 129:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dey P, Srivastava S, Lenka NK, Shinogi KC, Vishwakarma AK, Patra AK (2018) Integrated nutrient management for improving soil health and crop productivity, A SAARC training manual, ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal, India, p 124Google Scholar
  29. Mujeri MK, Shahana S, Chowdhury TT, Haider KT (2013) Improving the effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of fertilizer use in South Asia. South Asia. Working Paper No. 67, Global Development Network, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  30. Nawaz A, Farooq M, Lal R, Rehman A, Rehman H (2017) Comparison of conventional and conservation rice-wheat systems in Punjab, Pakistan. Soil Tillage Res 169:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nawaz A, Farooq M, Nadeem F, Siddique KHM, Lal R (2019) Rice–wheat cropping systems in South Asia: issues, options, and opportunities. Crop Pasture Sci 70:395–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pandey PR, Koirala KB (2017) Best practices of maize production technologies in South Asia. SAARC Agriculture Centre, Dhaka, p 145Google Scholar
  33. Paul S, Laha A, Kuri PK (2016) Crop diversification and its implications to food security: a case study of India with special reference to West Bengal. Asia-Pacific J Rural Develop 26:61–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Praneetvatakul S, Schreinemachers P, Pananurak P, Tipraqsa P (2013) Pesticides, external costs and policy options for Thai agriculture. Environ Sci Pol 27:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rehman A, Ullah A, Nadeem F, Farooq M (2019) Sustainable nutrient management. In: Farooq M, Pisante M (eds) Innovations in sustainable agriculture. Springer Nature, Basel, pp 167–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenzweig CIRC, Boote K, Hollinger S, Iglesias A, Phillips J (2001) Impacts of the El Niño-southern oscillation on agriculture: guidelines for regional analysis. In: Cynthia R (ed) Impacts of El Niño and climate variability on agriculture. Crop Science Society of America, Madison, pp 21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shahid SA, Zaman M, Heng L (2018) Salinity and sodicity adaptation and mitigation options. In: Zaman M, Shahid SA, Heng L (eds) Guideline for salinity assessment, mitigation and adaptation using nuclear and related techniques. Springer, Cham, pp 55–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sinha B, Biswas I (2009) Potential of biopesticide in Indian agriculture vis-a-vis rural development. Available via
  39. Srinivasarao C, Kundu S, Lakshmi CS, Rani YS, Nataraj KC, Gangaiah B, Laxmi JM, Babu MVS, Rani U, Nagalakshmi S, Manasa R (2019) Soil health issues for sustainability of South Asian Agriculture. Available via
  40. Suneja V (2018) 5 ways to fix South Asia’s water crisis. Available via
  41. Tenzin J (2013) Status of integrated pest management in Bhutan. In: Gurung TR, Azad AK (eds) Extent and potential of bio-pesticides for crop protection in SAARC Countries. SAARC Agriculture Centre, Dhaka, pp 78–93Google Scholar
  42. Thornton PK, Ericksen PJ, Herrero M, Challinor AJ (2014) Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review. Glob Chang Biol 20:3313–3328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kassam A (2020) Advances in conservation agriculture volume 2: practice and benefits. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Sawston, p 498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. UN (United Nations) (2019) Growing at a slower pace, world population is expected to reach 9.7 billion in 2050 and could peak at nearly 11 billion around 2100. Available via
  45. Usman M, Farooq M, Wakeel A, Nawaz A, Cheema SA, Rehman H, Ashraf I, Sanaullah M (2020) Nanotechnology in agriculture: current status, challenges and future opportunities. Sci Total Environ 721:137778. Scholar
  46. Yang YE, Yu W, Brown CM, Savitsky A (2011) Sustainable water management in the major basins of South Asia. Available via

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of AgricultureBahauddin Zakariya UniversityBahadur Sub-Campus, LayyahPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine SciencesSultan Qaboos UniversityMuscatOman

Section editors and affiliations

  • Anabela Marisa Azul
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Neuroscience and Cell BiologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal