Climate Action

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Vulnerable Communities: The Need for Local-Scale Climate Change Adaptation Planning

  • Nicole BonnettEmail author
  • S. Jeff BirchallEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71063-1_87-1

Abstract

Recently, humanity has been faced with the complex task of responding to global climate change. Scholars and researchers stress the urgency of climate change mitigation and adaptation, warning decision-makers of the consequences of taking no action. Climate change mitigation is currently grounded in the minds of key actors and well established across the globe. A compelling response to the challenges associated with climate change, however, requires components of both mitigation and adaptation (e.g., Bulkeley and Tuts, Local Environ 18:646–662, 2013). This entry examines global climate change broadly and identifies the contemporary policy approach to highlight the need for adaptation. This necessity is emphasized through the experience of coastal communities which exhibit a heightened vulnerability to climate impacts. Thus, this entry focuses on examining adaptation types and challenges, to provide a thorough analysis of the process of climate change adaptation. Climate change adaptation is stressed throughout the following discourse as it is a critical element that will influence the future of vulnerable communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams H (2016) Why populations persist: mobility, place attachment and climate change. Popul Environ 37:429–448.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-015-0246-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Huq S, Brown K et al (2003) Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog Dev Stud 3:179–195.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993403ps060oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawala S, Bosello F, Carraro C, De Cian E, Lanzi E (2011) Adapting to climate change: costs, benefits, and modelling approaches. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 5:245–284.  https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexander KS, Ryan A, Measham TG (2012) Managed retreat of coastal communities: understanding responses to projected sea level rise. J Environ Plan Manag 55:409–433.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.604193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Betzold C, Mohamed I (2016) Seawalls as a response to coastal erosion and flooding: a case study from Grande Comore, Comoros (West Indian Ocean). Reg Environ Chang 17:1077–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1044-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Binder SB, Baker CK, Barile JP (2015) Rebuild or relocate? Resilience and postdisaster decision-making after Hurricane Sandy. Am J Community Psychol 56:180–196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9727-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birchall J (2014) New Zealands abandonment of the carbon neutral public service programme. Clim Pol 14:525–535.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.877224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birchall SJ, Murphy M, Milne MJ (2015) Evolution of the New Zealand voluntary carbon market: an analysis of CarboNZero client disclosures. Soc Environ Account J 35:142–156.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160x.2015.1061444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Birchall SJ, Murphy M, Milne M (2017) An investigation into the early stages of New Zealand’s voluntary carbon market. Carbon Management 9:71–81.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2017.1418596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birchall SJ, Bonnett N (2018) Local-scale climate change stressors and policy response: The case of Homer, Alaska. Environmental Planning and Management.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1537975
  11. Borsje BW, van Wesenbeeck BK, Dekker F, Paalvast P, Bouma TJ, van Katwijk MM, de Vries MB (2011) How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection. Ecol Eng 37(2):113–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bosello F, Carraro C, Cian ED (2010) Climate policy and the optimal balance between mitigation, adaptation and unavoided damage. SSRN Electron J.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1606222
  13. Bronen R, Chapin FS (2013) Adaptive governance and institutional strategies for climate-induced community relocations in Alaska. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:9320–9325.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210508110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Broto VC, Bulkeley H (2013) A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Glob Environ Chang 23(1):92–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bukvic A, Smith A, Zhang A (2015) Evaluating drivers of coastal relocation in Hurricane Sandy affected communities. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 13:215–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.06.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bulkeley H, Tuts R (2013) Understanding urban vulnerability, adaptation and resilience in the context of climate change. Local Environ 18:646–662.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.788479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheong S-M, Silliman B, Wong PP et al (2013) Coastal adaptation with ecological engineering. Nat Clim Chang 3:787–791.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donner SD, Webber S (2014) Obstacles to climate change adaptation decisions: a case study of sea-level rise and coastal protection measures in Kiribati. Sustain Sci 9:331–345.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0242-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duvat V (2013) Coastal protection structures in Tarawa Atoll, Republic of Kiribati. Sustain Sci 8:363–379.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0205-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geisler C, Currens B (2017) Impediments to inland resettlement under conditions of accelerated sea level rise. Land Use Policy 66:322–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goff M (2010) Evaluating habitat enhancements of an urban intertidal seawall: ecological responses and management implications. Doctoral dissertation, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN (2013) Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ 86:235–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harman BP, Heyenga S, Taylor BM, Fletcher CS (2015) Global lessons for adapting coastal communities to protect against storm surge inundation. J Coast Res 314:790–801.  https://doi.org/10.2112/jcoastres-d-13-00095.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hauer ME, Evans JM, Mishra DR (2016) Millions projected to be at risk from sea-level rise in the continental United States. Nat Clim Chang 6:691–695.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henstra D (2016) The tools of climate adaptation policy: analysing instruments and instrument selection. Clim Pol 16(4):496–521.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1015946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds). IPCC, Geneva, 151ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones HP, Hole DG, Zavaleta ES (2012) Harnessing nature to help people adapt to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2:504–509.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kittinger JN, Ayers AL (2010) Shoreline armoring, risk management, and coastal resilience under rising seas. Coast Manag 38:634–653.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2010.529038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klein RJ, Schipper ELF, Dessai S (2005) Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environ Sci Pol 8:579–588.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krellenberg K, Katrin B (2014) Inter- and transdisciplinary research for planning climate change adaptation responses: the example of Santiago de Chile. Interdiscip Sci Rev 39:360–375.  https://doi.org/10.1179/0308018814z.00000000097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marolla C, Sommer DA (2016) Climate health risks in megacities. CRC Press.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315367323
  32. Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett V, Woodroffe CD, Hay J (2008) Climate change and coastal vulnerability assessment: scenarios for integrated assessment. Sustain Sci 3(1):89–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-008-0050-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Noble IR, Huq S, Anokhin YA, Carmin J, Goudou D, Lansigan FP, Osman-Elasha B, Villamizar A (2014) Adaptation needs and options. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate changeGoogle Scholar
  34. Sovacool BK (2011) Hard and soft paths for climate change adaptation. Clim Pol 11:1177–1183.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.579315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. UNFCC (2015) Paris agreement to the United Nations framework convention on climate change adopted at COP3 in Paris, France, on 12 Dec 2015Google Scholar
  36. Wenger C (2015) Better use and management of levees: reducing flood risk in a changing climate. Environ Rev 23:240–255.  https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2014-0060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wise R, Fazey I, Smith MS et al (2014) Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob Environ Chang 28:325–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Urban and Regional Planning, Department of Earth and Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • S. Jeff Birchall
    • 1
  1. 1.Urban and Regional Planning, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada