Climate Action

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Ulisses Azeiteiro, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Community Planning Priorities

  • Marko D. Petrović
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71063-1_63-1

Synonyms

Definition

Considering there is no uniform and complete definition of the specific term “community planning priorities,” this chapter will provide separate clarifications of the phrases “community planning,” “community development,” “prioritization,” and “community” in order to accomplish the mission of making the meaning of the full syntagma. The UNESCO made one of the first and most holistic definitions of community development or community organization development, by explaining this phrase as “a generic term used to describe the processes by which local communities can raise their own standards of living. These processes include the organization or establishment of services, e.g. for social welfare, health protection, education, improvement of agriculture, development of small-scale industries” (UNESCO 1956). In addition,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen A (2003) Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field. Environ Urban 15(1):135–148.  https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780301500103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beauregard RA (2001) The multiplicities of planning. J Plan Educ Res 20(4):437–439.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0102000405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry JM (1981) Beyond citizen participation: effective advocacy before administrative agencies. J Appl Behav Sci 17(4):463–477.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638101700405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bibri SE (2018) Smart sustainable cities of the future: the untapped potential of big data analytics and context aware computing for advancing sustainability. The urban books series. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogdanov N (2007) Small rural households in Serbia and rural non-farm economy. United Nations Development Programme, BelgradeGoogle Scholar
  6. Cave S (2013) Community planning. In: Northern Ireland assembly research and information service (RaISe). Environmental Committee of the Northern Ireland (UK). Available via RaISe. http://www.niassembly.gov.uk/globalassets/documents/raise/publications/2013/environment/11913.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2018
  7. Collin RW, Beatley T, Harris W (1995) Environmental racism: a challenge to community development. J Black Stud 25(3):354–376.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002193479502500306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demirović D, Radovanović M, Petrović MD, Cimbaljević M, Vuksanović N, Vuković DB (2018) Environmental and community stability of a mountain destination: an analysis of residents’ perception. Sustainability 10(2):70.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Esparza AX, Carruthers JI (2000) Land use planning and exurbanization in the rural mountain west: evidence from Arizona. J Plan Educ Res 20(1):23–36.  https://doi.org/10.1177/073945600128992573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forester J (1989) Planning in the face of power. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Frasso R, Keddem S, Golinkoff JM (2018) Qualitative methods: tools for understanding and engaging communities. In: Cnaan R, Milofsky C (eds) Handbook of community movements and local organizations in the 21st century. Handbooks of sociology and social research. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  12. Hibbard M, Lurie S (2000) Saving land but losing ground: challenges to community planning in the era of participation. J Plan Educ Res 20(2):187–195.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0002000205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hillery G (1955) Definitions of community – areas of agreement. Rural Sociol 20:111–123Google Scholar
  14. Hoch CJ, Dalton LC, So FS (eds) (2000) The practice of local government planning, 3rd edn. International City/County Management Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoover H (1928) A standard city planning enabling act of the American planning association. https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/legacy_resources/growingsmart/pdf/CPEnabling%20Act1928.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2018
  16. Hughes E, Scheyvens R (2018) Development alternatives in the Pacific: how tourism corporates can work more effectively with local communities. Tour Plann Dev.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2018.1478881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. James P, Nadarajah Y, Haive K, Stead V (2012) Sustainable communities, sustainable development: other paths for Papua New Guinea. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. King CS, Feltey KM, Susel BON (1998) The question of participation: toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Adm Rev 58(4):317–326.  https://doi.org/10.2307/977561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knickel K, Renting H (2000) Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development. Sociol Rural 40(4):512–528.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kremen C, Iles A, Bacon C (2012) Diversified farming systems: an agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecol Soc 17(4):44.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05103-170444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maiava S, King T (2007) Pacific indigenous development and post-intentional realities. In: Ziai A., ed. Exploring post-development: Theory and practice, problems and perspectives. London, UK: Routledge, 83–98Google Scholar
  22. McComas K (2001) Theory and practice of public meetings. Commun Theory 11(1):36–55.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00232.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGlasnan DJ, Williams E (2003) Stakeholder involvement in coastal decision-making processes. Local Environ 8(1):85–95.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830306677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meo-Sewabu L, Walsh-Tapiata W (2012) Global declaration and village discourses: Social policy and indigenous wellbeing. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 8(3):305–317.  https://doi.org/10.1177/117718011200800306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (Updated on: 1 January 2018). https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/priorities. Accessed 9 June 2018
  26. Moseley MJ (2003) Rural development: principles and practice. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Norton T, Sadler S (2006) Dialectical hegemony and the enactment of contradictory definitions in a rural community planning process. South Commun J 71(4):363–382.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940601000451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Petrović MD, Blešić I, Vujko A, Gajić T (2017) The role of Agritourism’s impact on the local Community in a Transitional Society: a report from Serbia. Transylvanian Rev Adm Sci 13(50):146–163.  https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.2017.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petrović MD, Vujko A, Gajić T, Vuković DB, Radovanović M, Jovanović JM, Vuković N (2018) Tourism as an approach to sustainable rural development in post-socialist countries: a comparative study of Serbia and Slovenia. Sustainability 10(2):54.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada (2018) Community Development http://www.pdac.ca/priorities/responsible-exploration/e3-plus/toolkits/social-responsibility/community-development. Accessed 12 June 2018
  31. Rakow LF, Belter B, Drystad H, Hallsten J, Johnson J, Indvik K (2003) The talk of movers and shakers: class conflict in the making of a community disaster. South Commun J 69(1):37–50.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940309373277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Renting H, Rossing WAH, Groot JCJ, Van der Ploeg JD, Laurent C, Perraud D, Stobbelaar DJ, Van Ittersum MK (2009) Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. J Environ Manag 90:S112–S123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richards G, Hall D (2000) The community: a sustainable concept in tourism development? In: Richards G, Hall D (eds) Tourism and sustainable community development. Routledge, London, pp 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rothman J, Tropman JE (1987) Models of community organization and macro practice perspectives: their mixing and phasing. In: Cox FM, Erlich JL, Rothman J, Tropman JE (eds) Strategies of community organization: macro practice, vol 4. Peacock, Itasca, pp 3–26Google Scholar
  35. Sargent FO, Lusk P, Rivera JA, Varela M (1991) Rural environmental planning for sustainable communities. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. The Government of Northern Ireland (UK), Department for Communities (2015) Community Planning https://www.communities-ni.gov.uk/articles/community-planning. Accessed 1 June 2018
  37. The Local Government in Scotland Act (2004) The act of community planning (Advice Notes: No. 1–10) http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2004/04/19167/35255. Accessed 6 June 2018
  38. The UNESCO (1956) UNESCO Documents. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001797/179726eb.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2018
  39. The United Nations (2016) Sustainable development goals (SDGs). The Goal 11: make cities inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/. Accessed 7 June 2018
  40. The United Nations (2018) The United Nations Terminology Database. https://unterm.un.org/UNTERM/search?urlQuery=community+development. Accessed 2 June 2018
  41. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2000) Rural–urban relations: an emerging policy priority, interim report, Institutional Development Group, Bureau for Development Policy, UNDP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson B, Kinne S (1990) Social change theory: applications to community health. In: Bracht N (ed) Health promotion at the community level. Sage Publications, Inc., Beverly Hills, pp 45–65Google Scholar
  43. Todorović M (2007) Ruralno društvo i ruralna geografija u prošlosti i budućnosti (rural society and rural geography in the past and in the future). J Geogr Inst “Jovan Cvijić” SASA 57:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI0757045TCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Urry J (1995) Consuming places. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. White B (2012) Agriculture and the generation problem: rural youth, employment and the future of farming. IDS Bull 43:9–19.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00375.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilson GA (2006) Multifunctional agriculture: a transition theory perspective. CABI, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Žežula O, Vasková V (eds) (2009) Community planning – a public matter. Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs of the Czech Republic, Prague. Online: https://www.mpsv.cz/files/clanky/2009/com_plan.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Geography Department, Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić”SASA (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts)BelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Institute of Sport, Tourism and ServiceSouth Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussian Federation

Section editors and affiliations

  • Dragan Nonic
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Forestry Economics and OrganisationUniversity of Belgrade - Faculty of ForestryBelgradeSerbia