Climate Action

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Their Role in Climate Change Education

  • Paula Bacelar-NicolauEmail author
  • Sandra Caeiro
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71063-1_32-1

Definitions

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are open, scalable eLearning courses, aimed to serve a large number of participants. Because they are open, these courses are intended for all individuals, without the requisition of any entry qualifications, and they provide the experience of a complete, totally free online course (EADTU 2015).

Climate change has been defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as “any change in climate over time, whether due to natural variability or as a result of human activity” (IPCC 2014). Following the fifth IPCC report, the future impacts of climate change, although in different degrees of severity, will affect societies all over the globe (IPCC 2014). Climate change is a key topic of sustainable development, where public awareness, literacy, and education are crucial.

Massive Open Online Courses, Their Impacts, and Challenges

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have, since their origin, received particular attention for their...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barteit S, Depoux A, Sié A et al (2018) Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) on Climate Change and Health: teaching a global audience. In: Azeiteiro U, Leal Filho W, Aires L (eds) Climate literacy and innovations in climate change education. Springer, Cham, pp 169–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckler C, Creech H (2014) Shaping the future we want – UN decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2014). ISBN: 978-92-3-100053-9. http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  3. Chauchan A (2014) Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS): emerging trends in assessment and accreditation. Digit Educ Rev 25: 7–18. http://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/11325. Accessed 12 Dec 2018
  4. Chiappe Laverde A, Hine N, Martinez Silva JA (2015) Literature and practice: a critical review of MOOCs. Comunicar 44:9–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coelho J, Teixeira A, Bacelar-Nicolau P, Caeiro S, Rocio R (2015) iMOOC on climate change: evaluation of a massive open online experience. Int Rev Res Open Dist Learn 16(6):152–173Google Scholar
  6. Cormier D (2010) What is a MOOC? [Youtube video] December 8 2010. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eW3gMGqcZQc. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  7. Daniel J (2012) Making sense of MOOCs: musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. JIME 3. http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2012-18. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  8. Downes S (2012) Creating the connectivist course [Blog post]. Half an hour. Jan 6 2012 http://halfanhour.blogspot.pt/2012/01/creating-connectivist-course.html. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  9. EADTU (2015) Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe. EADTU. Fev 2015. http://eadtu.eu/home/policy-areas/open-education-ans-moocs/news/248-institutional-mooc-strategies-in-europe. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
  10. Ebben M, Murphy JS (2014) Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learn Media Technol 39(3):328–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. García-Peñalvo FJ, Fidalgo-Blanco A, Sein-Echaluce ML (2018) An adaptive hybrid MOOC model: disrupting the MOOC concept in higher education. Telematics Inform 35:1018–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hew KF, Cheung WS (2014) Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): motivations and challenges. Educ Res Rev 12:45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Cambridge. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_frontmatter.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
  14. Jacobson M, Markauskaite L, Portolese LA et al (2017) Designs for learning about climate change as a complex system. Learn Instr 52:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacoby J (2014) The disruptive potential of the massive open online course: a literature review. J Open Flex Dist Learn 18(1):73–85Google Scholar
  16. Kennedy J (2014) Characteristics of massive open online courses (MOOCs): a research review 2009–2012. J Interact Online Learn 13(1):1–16Google Scholar
  17. Mainsah H, Morrison A, Edeholt H (2017) Building networks for knowledge exchange, and design strategies for climate futures. Des J 20(1):S102–S109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milligan C, Littlejohn A (2017) Why Study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. Int Rev Res Open Dist Learn 18(2):93–102.  https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Naunova K (2018) Education for sustainable development for everyone: massive open online courses and global, climate literate, sustainable citizens. Master thesis in sustainable development at Uppsala University, Sweden, No. 2018/9, 44 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Osuna S, y Camarero L (2016) The ECO European project: a new MOOC dimension based on a intercreativity environment. Turkh Online J Educ Technol 15(1):117-125Google Scholar
  21. Otto D, Bollmann A, Becke S, Sander K (2018) It’s the learning, stupid! Discussing the role of learning outcomes in MOOCs. Open Learn J Open Dist e-Learn 33(3):203–220.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1486183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Otto D, Nicolau P, Caeiro S, et al (2019) Can MOOCs empower people to critically thinking about climate change? A learning outcome based comparison of two MOOCs. J Clean Prod 222:12–21Google Scholar
  23. Perkins KM, Munguia N, Moure-Eraso R et al (2018) International perspectives on the pedagogy of climate change. J Clean Prod 200:1043–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pilli O, Admiraal W (2016) A taxonomy of massive open online courses. Contemp Educ Technol 7(3):223–240Google Scholar
  25. Porter S (2015) To MOOC or not to MOOC. How can online learning help to build the future of higher education? Elsevier. eBook ISBN: 9780081000618Google Scholar
  26. Rodriguez CO (2012) MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. Eur J Open Dist e-Learn. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ982976.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
  27. Schuwer R, Gil-Jaurena I, Aydin CH et al (2015) Opportunities and threats of the MOOC movement for higher education: the European perspective. Int Rev Res Open Dist Learn 16(6):20–38Google Scholar
  28. Shapiro HB, Lee CH, Roth NEW et al (2017) Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: an examination of attitudes, motivations and barriers. Comput Educ 110:35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siemens G (2012) MOOCs are really a platform. Elearnspace. http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
  30. Teixeira A, Bacelar-Nicolau P, Caeiro S et al (2012) The challenge of widening citizen participation in climate change education: developing open educational resources on the lived experiences of climate change. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 6(1):66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teixeira A, Mota J (2013) Innovation and Openness through MOOCs: Universidade Aberta’s Pedagogic Model for Non-formal Online Courses. In: Paulsen M, Szűcs A. On behalf of the EDEN (eds). Proceedings of the European Distance and E-Learning Network. Annual Conference, Oslo. The Joy of Learning Enhancing Learning Experience - Improving Learning Quality, pp 479–488Google Scholar
  32. Teixeira AM, Miranda BA, Pinto MCT (2018) MOOC “Digital competences for teachers”: and innovative training practice. Rev Iberoam Educ Dist 21(2):243–261.  https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.19784. Accessed 30 Oct 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Totschnig M, Willems C, Meinel C (2013) openHPI: evolution of a MOOC platform from LMS to SO. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on computer supported education (CSEDU-2013), pp 593–598.  https://doi.org/10.5220/0004416905930598. Accessed 12 Dec 2018
  34. Veletsianos G, Shepherdson P (2016) A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013 – 2015. Int Rev Res Open Dist Learn 17(2):198–221. http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2448/3655. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
  35. Watters A (2012) Top Ed-Tech trends of 2012: MOOCs. Hack Education. http://hackeducation.com/2012/12/03/top-ed-tech-trends-of-2012-moocs. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
  36. Zawacki-Richter O, Bozkurt A, Alturki U et al (2018) What research says about MOOCs – an explorative content analysis. Int Rev Res Open Dist Learn 19(1). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3356/4490. Accessed 15 Nov 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science and TechnologyUniversidade AbertaLisboaPortugal
  2. 2.CFE, Center for Functional EcologyUniversidade de CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.CENSE, Centre of Environment and Sustainability ResearchUniversidade NOVA de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Section editors and affiliations

  • S. Jeff Birchall
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Urban and Regional Planning, Department of Earth and Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada