Responsible Consumption and Production

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Social Manufacturing and Open Design

  • Minna LanzEmail author
  • Eeva Järvenpää
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71062-4_9-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Do-It-Yourself (DIY) movement is a personal involvement and use of skills to improve one’s living standards by producing personalized goods. Usually the DIY movement is connected, partially overlapping, to the maker movement, which is empowered by open design platforms, communities of practice, and 3D printing possibilities.

3D printing is a general audience and/or commercial term for additive manufacturing technologies.

Social manufacturing is associated with the maker and DIY movement. It appears also as a synonym in certain articles discussing of locally distributed manufacturing.

Social manufacturing is characterized with high level of utilizing the power of communities to the design and manufacture of goods. In general, the social manufacturing is strongly associated with high personalization of goods, point of need manufacturing, and production via additive manufacturing technologies. However, other forms...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Achterhuis H (2002) Borgmann, technology and the good life? And the empirical turn for philosophy of technology. Techné: Res Philos Technol 6(1):64–75Google Scholar
  2. Bonvoisin J, Boujut J-F (2015) Open design platforms for open source product development: current state and requirements. In: International conference on engineering design, ICED15, 27–30 July 2015, Politecnico di Milano, p 10Google Scholar
  3. Business Dictionary. http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/innovation.html. Viewed 4 Mar 2018
  4. Chesbrough H, Bogers M (2014) Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 3–28, quote from p 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahlander L, Gann DM (2010) How open is innovation? Res Policy 39(6):699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deloitte (2013) Manufacturing for Growth Strategies for Driving Growth and Employment Volume 1: Globally Competitive Policy A World Economic Forum Report. In collaboration with Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, Published by World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013Google Scholar
  7. Fox S (2013) Paradigm shift: Do-It-Yourself (DIY) invention and production of physical goods for use or sale. J Manuf Technol Manag 24(2):218–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox S (2016) Domesticating artificial intelligence: expanding human self-expression through applications of artificial intelligence in prosumption. J Consum Cult.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540516659126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geum Y, Jeon H, Lee H (2016) Developing new smart services using integrated morphological analysis: integration of the market-pull and technology-push approach. Serv Bus 10(3):531–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S (2016) A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod 114:11–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gierej S (2017) The framework of business model in the context of industrial Internet of Things, 7th international conference on engineering, project, and production management. Procedia Eng 182:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. GrabCAD community. https://grabcad.com. Viewed 11 Apr 2018
  13. Gurtoo A, Vidosh S, Williams CC (2010) Explaining the do-it-yourself (DIY) retail market in a developing country: preliminary lessons from India. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res 20(3):335–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haier Global. Innovation model. http://www.haier.net/en/about_haier/one_person_alone/. Viewed 9 Apr 2017
  15. Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A (2016) The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 67(9):2047–2059.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayder A, Gao J, Maropoulos P, Cheunf WM (2005) Open standard, open source and peer-to-peer tools and methods for collaborative product development. Comput Ind 56(3):260–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2004.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu SJ (2013) Evolving paradigms of manufacturing: from mass production to mass customization and personalization, forty sixth CIRP conference on manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP 7:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. i.Materialise (2018) https://i.materialise.com/en. Viewed 18 Apr 2018
  19. Jiang P, Ding K, Leng J (2016) Towards a cyber-physical-social-connected and service-oriented manufacturing paradigm: social manufacturing. Manuf Lett 7:15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2015.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 53(1):59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. King AM, Burgess SC, Ijomah W, McMahon CA (2006) Reducing waste: repair, recondition, remanufacture or recycle? Sustain Dev 14(4):257–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kotler P (1986) The prosumer movement: a new challenge for marketers. Adv Consum Res 13:510–513Google Scholar
  23. Lanz M, Tuokko R (2017) Concepts, methods and tools for individualized production. Prod Eng 11(2):205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leider M, Rashid A (2016) Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. J Clean Prod 115:36–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lichtenthaler U (2017) Open innovation: past research, current debates, and future directions. Acad Manag Perspect 25(1):75.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.25.1.75, Articles, Published online: 30 Nov 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Makerbot Thingiverse (2018) https://www.thingiverse.com/. Viewed 18 May 2018
  27. Martin CJ (2016) The sharing economy: a pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecol Econ 121:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin CJ, Upham P, Budd L (2015) Commercial orientation in grassroots social innovation: insights from the sharing economy. Ecol Econ 118:240–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mourtzis D, Doukas M (2014) Design and planning of manufacturing networks for mass customisation and personalisation: challenges and outlook, Robust Manufacturing Conference (RoMaC 2014). Procedia CIRP 19:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nylund H, Toivonen V, Salminen K, Tuokko R (2011) CSM hotel – a new manufacturing concept for small and medium enterprises. In: 44th CIRP international conference on manufacturing systems, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  31. Open Source Ecology, community. https://www.opensourceecology.org. Viewed 11 Apr 2018
  32. Quirky. Invention community. https://quirky.com. Viewed 10 Apr 2018
  33. Rayna T, Striukova L, Darlington J (2015) Co-creation and user innovation: the role of online 3D printing platforms. J Eng Technol Manag 37:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. RepRap Community. http://reprap.org. Viewed 11 Apr 2018
  35. Roberts EB (2007) Managing invention and innovation. Res Technol Manag 50(1):35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Samaddar S, Rabinowitz G, Zhang GP (2005) An experimental analysis of solution performance in a resource sharing and scheduling problem – production, manufacturing and logistics. Eur J Oper Res 165(1):139–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schumpeter JA (2008) Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 3rd edn. HarperCollins Publishers, New York, pp 81–86Google Scholar
  38. Sensorica platform. http://www.sensorica.co/. Viewed 10 Apr 2018
  39. Shapeways (2018) https://www.shapeways.com/. Viewed 18 May 2018
  40. Shleifer A, Wishny RW (1990) Equilibrium short horizons of investors and firms. Am Econ Rev 80(2). Papers and proceedings of the hundred and second annual meeting of the American Economic Association, May 1990, pp 148–153. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2006560
  41. SO SMART (2014) D1.2 Report on key indicators of social sustainability, p 37Google Scholar
  42. Sommarberg M (2016) Digitalization as a paradigm changer in machine-building industry, PhD thesis. https://tutcris.tut.fi/portal/files/8811102/sommarberg_1436.pdf
  43. Sommarberg M, Mäkinen S (2017) Mechanisms of disruptive technological change: case studies in transformation of traditional industries. In: 2017 Proceedings of PICMET ‘17: technology management for interconnected world, p 8Google Scholar
  44. Tao F, Cheng Y, Zhang L, Nee AYC (2017) Advanced manufacturing systems: socialization characteristics and trends. J Intell Manuf 28:1079–1094.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1042-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan 43(2–3):172–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trinckle (2018) URL: https://www.trinckle.com/index.php, last viewed 22 Jan, 2019
  47. Umezawa O, Shinohara Y, Halada K (2017) Growth of ecomaterials and eco-efficiency in major metallic structural materials, handbook of ecomaterials, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  48. Utterback J (1994) Mastering the dynamics of innovation, how companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, p 253Google Scholar
  49. World Economic Forum (2015) Industrial Internet of Things: unleashing the potential of connected products and services. http://reports.weforum.org/industrial-internet-of-things/. Viewed 8 Apr 2018
  50. Zwass V (2010) Co-creation: toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. Int J Electron Commer 15(1):11–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and Natural SciencesTampere UniversityTampereFinland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ulla Saari
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept of Industrial Management, Center for Innovation and Technology ResearchTampere UniversityTampereFinland