Sustainable Cities and Communities

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Building Lifecycle Sustainability Analysis

  • Erin A. HopkinsEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71061-7_11-1

Definition

According to ISO (the International Organization for Standardization), life-cycle analysis (LCA) is a “compilation and evaluation of the inputs, outputs and the potential environmental impacts of a product system throughout its life cycle” (ISO 2006). The life cycle is defined as “consecutive and interlinked stages of a product system, from raw material acquisition or generation from natural resources to final disposal” (ISO 2006).

Introduction

The usage of LCA began in the United States in the late 1960s with Coca Cola being one of the early adopters by examining the effects the materials, energy, and environmental effects throughout the package manufacturing practice (Hunt et al. 1996). Reducing solid waste was the main point of focus of LCAs until the mid-1970s when energy took the main stage due to the energy crisis. In 1987, the idea of considering the future environmental impacts as a whole on future generations gained attention when the United Nations issued the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. AIA (2018) Building life cycle assessment in practice. Retrieved from https://www.aia.org/resources/7961-building-life-cycle-assessment-in-practice
  2. Asif M, Muneer T, Kelley R (2007) Life cycle assessment: a case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Build Environ 42(3):1391–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azhar S, Brown J, Farooqui R (2009) BIM-based sustainability analysis: an evaluation of building performance analysis software. In: Proceedings of the 45th ASC annual conference, vol 1, no 4, pp 90–93Google Scholar
  4. Bayer C, Gamble M, Gentry R, Joshi S (2010) AIA guide to building life cycle assessment in practice. The American Institute of Architects, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonandrini S, Cruz C, Nicolle C (2005) Building lifecycle management. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, Lyon, France, vol 1113Google Scholar
  6. BREEAM (2018) How BREEAM certification works. Retrieved from https://www.breeam.com/discover/how-breeam-certification-works/ on October 13, 2018
  7. Bribián IZ, Usón AA, Scarpellini S (2009) Life cycle assessment in buildings: state-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Build Environ 44(12):2510–2520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper JS, Fava JA (2006) Life-cycle assessment practitioner survey: summary of results. J Ind Ecol 10(4):12–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epstein MJ, Roy MJ (2003) Making the business case for sustainability. J Corp Citizsh 2003(9):79–96Google Scholar
  10. Green E (2016, February 3) BIM 101: what is building information modeling? Retrived from https://www.engineering.com/BIM/ArticleID/11436/BIM-101-What-is-Building-Information-Modeling.aspx on October 13, 2018
  11. Green Building Council Australia (2015) The what and why of certification. Retrieved from https://new.gbca.org.au/green-star/ on October 13, 2018
  12. Home Innovation (2018) Certification: green homes and products. Retrieved from http://www.homeinnovation.com/green on August 27, 2018
  13. Hopkins EA (2015) LEED certification of campus buildings: a cost-benefit analysis. J Sustain Real Estate 7(1):99–111Google Scholar
  14. Huijbregts MA, Gilijamse W, Ragas AM, Reijnders L (2003) Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. Environ Sci Technol 37(11):2600–2608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt RG, Franklin WE, Hunt RG (1996) LCA – how it came about. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(1):4–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. International Institute for Sustainable Development (n.d.) Sustainable development. Retrieved from https://www.iisd.org/topic/sustainable-development. Accessed 28 Sept 2018
  17. ISO (2006) ISO 14040:2006: environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:37456:en. Accessed 21 July 2018
  18. Junnila S, Horvath A (2003) Life-cycle environmental effects of an office building. J Infrastruct Syst 9(4):157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kats G (2006) Greening America’s Schools. American Federation of Teachers, et al. Capital EGoogle Scholar
  20. Kats G, Alevantis L, Berman A, Mills E, Perlman J (2003) The costs and financial benefits of green buildings. A report to California’s sustainable building task force, 134Google Scholar
  21. Kats G, Braman J, James M (2010) Greening our built world: costs, benefits, and strategies. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.shu.edu/eds/detail?vid=2&sid=64bcb6e3-ab1e-4c17-a162-0b3f359e6e54%40sessionmgr112&hid=116&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#db=cat00917a&AN=setoncat.729437. Accessed 13 Apr 2013
  22. Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kucukvar M, Tatari O (2013) Towards a triple bottom-line sustainability assessment of the US construction industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):958–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olinzock MA, Landis AE, Saunders CL, Collinge WO, Jones AK, Schaefer LA, Bilec MM (2015) Life cycle assessment use in the North American building community: summary of findings from a 2011/2012 survey. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(3):318–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Onat NC, Kucukvar M, Tatari O (2014) Integrating triple bottom line input–output analysis into life cycle sustainability assessment framework: the case for US buildings. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1488–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla KK (2013) Life cycle energy analysis of a multifamily residential house: a case study in Indian context. Open J Energy Efficiency 2(01):34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE (2003) Evaluation: a systematic approach. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  28. Scheuer C, Keoleian GA, Reppe P (2003) Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications. Energy Build 35(10):1049–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh RK (2017) Whole building life cycle assessment through LEED v4. http://www.gbci.org/whole-building-life-cycle-assessment-through-leed-v4. Accessed 21 July 2018
  30. Slaper TF, Hall TJ (2011) The triple bottom line: what is it and how does it work. Indiana Bus Rev 86(1):4–8Google Scholar
  31. The Sustainable Development Agenda (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/ on October 13, 2018
  32. U.S. Energy Information Administration (2018) Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=86&t=1 on August 27, 2018
  33. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future (Brundtland report). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang E, Shen Z, Barryman C (2011) A building LCA case study using Autodesk Ecotect and BIM modelGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Apparel, Housing and Resource ManagementVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Erin Hopkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA