Decent Work and Economic Growth

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment

  • Yvonne van der MeerEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71058-7_18-1

Definition

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment is a method to quantify the sustainability impact of a product over its entire life cycle.

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA)

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment is a method to report the sustainability performance. Section “Sustainability Assessment” starts with a short introduction to sustainability assessment. All life cycle methods described in this entry use a life cycle approach. Life cycle thinking forms the basis for this approach and is explained in the section “Life Cycle Thinking.” The LCSA method is derived from environmental life cycle assessment (LCA), a widely accepted and used environmental impact assessment method. The LCA method is described in detail in the section “Life Cycle Assessment.” The life cycle methods for the other sustainability dimensions economic impact and social impact are Life Cycle Costing (LCC) and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). Both are described in the section “LCA-Derived Concepts...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S et al (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:156–163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0147-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Elkington J (1998) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers, Gabriola IslandGoogle Scholar
  3. Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:3309–3322.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T et al (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manage 91:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gimenez C, Sierra V, Rodon J (2012) Sustainable operations: their impact on the triple bottom line. Int J Prod Econ 140:149–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guinée JB, Heijungs R, Huppes G et al (2011) Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future †. Environ Sci Technol 45:90–96.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es101316vCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Halog A, Manik Y (2011) Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 3:469–499.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su3020469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heijungs R, Huppes G, Guinée JB (2010) Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Toward a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis. Polym Degrad Stab 95:422–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.11.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hunkeler D, Rebitzer G (2005) The future of life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10:305–308.  https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006a) Environmental management – life cycle assessment: principles and framework. ISO 14040Google Scholar
  11. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006b) Environmental management – life cycle assessment: requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044Google Scholar
  12. Joint Research Center – European Commission. The life cycle data network. http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/LCDN/. Accessed 5 July 2018
  13. Joint Research Center – European Commission – Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2010) International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook – general guide for life cycle assessment – detailed guidance. EUR 24708 EN, 1st edn. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  14. Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R et al (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:324–330.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jørgensen A (2013) Social LCA – a way ahead? Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:296–299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0517-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klöpffer W (2003) Life-cycle based methods for sustainable product development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:157–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klöpffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:89–95.  https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2008.02.376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klöpffer W, Ciroth A (2011) Is LCC relevant in a sustainability assessment? Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:99–101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0249-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee N, Kirkpatrick C (2001) Methodologies for sustainability impact assessments of proposals for new trade agreements. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 03:395–412.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333201000765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthews HS, Hendrickson CT, Matthews DH (2015) Life cycle assessment: quantitative approaches for decisions that matter, E-book. http://www.lcatextbook.com/
  21. Ozbay K, Jawad D (2006) The discount rate in life-cycle cost analysis of transportation projects. In: TRB 85th annual meeting compendium of papers CD-ROM, p 19Google Scholar
  22. Rebitzer G, Hunkeler D (2003) Life cycle costing in LCM: ambitions, opportunities, and limitations. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:253–256.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Santoyo-Castelazo E, Azapagic A (2014) Sustainability assessment of energy systems: integrating environmental, economic and social aspects. J Clean Prod 80:119–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schau EM, Traverso M, Lehmann A, Finkbeiner M (2011) Life cycle costing in sustainability assessment – a case study of remanufactured alternators. Sustainability 3:2268–2288.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su3112268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Swarr TE, Hunkeler D, Klöpffer W et al (2011) Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:389–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0287-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. United Nations Conference on the Human Environment Stockholm Sweden (1973) Report of the United Nations conference on the human environment, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme, ParisGoogle Scholar
  28. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2011) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment. Making informed choices on products. United Nations Environment Programme, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  29. Upham P (2000) An assessment of The Natural Step theory of sustainability. J Clean Prod 8:445–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00012-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Zamagni A (2012) Life cycle sustainability assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:373–376.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0389-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aachen-Maastricht Institute for Biobased MaterialsMaastricht UniversityGeleenThe Netherlands

Section editors and affiliations

  • Wim Lambrechts

There are no affiliations available