New Literacies: Curricular Implications
This chapter explores the implications of a new literacies perspective for literacy research and practice, focusing on two specific challenges. First, it explores the challenges posed by the increased need to critically evaluate online information. With a diverse set of voices online, the absence of traditional gatekeepers requires an especially sophisticated level of critical evaluation by every reader and thus challenges each of us to read and think more critically. The new chapter addresses perspectives on critical evaluation in online environments, the importance of critically evaluating online texts, and the instructional implications of recent research in this area. Second, it explores challenges posed by the effective use of collaborative online learning projects that cross national and cultural borders. Today, schools are challenged to prepare students who can navigate and participate in a global society. The chapter addresses recent initiatives in online learning, the need for new literacies for successful global communication and collaboration, and the instructional implications of global collaborations. Developing critical users of information who can also interact with others on a global scale requires a focused commitment of schools to ensure that online information is integrated into the literacy and learning curriculum in effective ways.
KeywordsNew literacies Critical evaluation Credibility Collaborative online learning Global learning
- Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (n.d.). The Australian Curriculum, v7.0. Retrieved from www.australiancurriculum.edu.au.
- Camarota, S. A., & Zeigler, K. (2016, March). 61 million immigrants and their young children now live in the United States. Retrieved from Center for Immigration Studies website: http://cis.org/61-Million-Immigrants-and-Their-Young-Children-Now-Live-in-the-United-States.
- Dalton, B., & Proctor, P. (2008). The changing landscape of text and comprehension in the age of new literacies. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on the literacies (pp. 297–324). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Facebook. (2017). Retrieved from https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2017/Facebook-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2016-Results/default.aspx.
- Farmer, L. S. J. (2015). Global literacy at the local school library. Library Media Connection, 33(5), 6–8.Google Scholar
- Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2010). Kids and credibility: An empirical examination of youth, digital media use, and information credibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Forzani, E. (2015, April). Investigating the effects of gender and socioeconomic status on students’ ability to critically evaluate online information in science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Forzani, E. (2016). Individual differences in evaluating the credibility of online information in science: Contributions of prior knowledge, gender, socioeconomic status, and offline reading ability. Retrieved from University of Connecticut Digital Commons. (1242).Google Scholar
- Friedman, T. (2007). The world is flat 3.0: A brief history of the twenty-first century (3rd ed.). New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
- Hogan, N., & Vernhagen, C. (2012). Critical appraisal of information on the web in practice: Undergraduate students’ knowledge, reported use, and behavior. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 38(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
- International Organization for Migration. (2016). 2015 global migration trends factsheet. Berlin: Global Migration Data Analysis Centre. Retrieved from http://gmdac.iom.int/global-migration-trends-factsheet.Google Scholar
- International Society for Technology in Education. (2016). ISTE standards for students. Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/standards/standards/for-students-2016.
- Internet World Stats: Usage and Population Statistics. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
- Kervin, L., Mantei, J., & Leu, D. (in press). Repositioning online reading to a central location in the language arts. To appear in D. Lapp & D. Fischer (Eds.) Handbook of research on teaching the English Language Arts 4th Edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Kiili, C., Leu, D., Marttunen, M., Hautala, J., & Leppänen, P. (2017). Exploring early adolescents’ evaluation of academic and commercial online sources related to health. Reading and Writing. Early online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9797-2
- Kist, W. (2013). The global school: Connecting classrooms and students around the world. Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar
- Kuiper, E., & Volman, M. (2008). The web as a source of information for students in K–12 education. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 241–246). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning. London: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
- Larson, L., & Dwyer, B. (2015). Digging deeper with reader response: Using digital tools to support comprehension of literary texts in online learning environments. In T. Rasinski, K. E. Pytash, & R. E. Ferdig (Eds.), Using technology to enhance reading: Innovative approaches to literacy instruction (pp. 121–130). Bloomington: Solution Tree.Google Scholar
- Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Leu, D. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 743–770). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). Newark: International Reading Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.85. Newark: International Literacy Association. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/media/leu%20online%20reading%20study.pdf.
- Lindsay, J. (2016). The global educator: Leveraging technology for collaborative learning & teaching. Eugene: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
- Lindsay, J. (2016/2017). Online collaboration: How to start. Educational Leadership, 74(4), 37–41.Google Scholar
- Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Mansilla, V. B., & Jackson, A. W. (2014). Educating for global competence: Redefining learning for an interconnected world. In H. H. Jacob (Ed.), Mastering global literacy (pp. 5–29). Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). English language learners in public schools. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgf.asp.
- National Council of Teachers of English. (2008/2013). The NCTE definition of 21st century literacies. Retrieved from http://www.ncte.org/positions/statements/21stcentdefinition.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Global competence for an inclusive world. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf.
- Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2014). Framework for state action on global education. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/Global_Education/P21_State_Framework_on_Global_Education_New_Logo.pdf.
- Richardson, W. (2016/2017). Getting schools ready for the world. Educational Leadership, 74(4), 24–29.Google Scholar
- Ripp, P. (n.d.) Global read aloud: One book to connect the world. Retrieved from https://theglobalreadaloud.com/.
- Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content-source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Stanford History Education Group (November 22, 2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic responsibility. Retrieved from https://sheg.stanford.edu/upload/V3LessonPlans/Executive%20Summary%2011.21.16.pdf.
- Tolisano, S. R. (2014). The globally connected educator: Talking to the world – not just about the world. In H. H. Jacob (Ed.), Mastering global literacy (pp. 31–51). Bloomington: Solution Tree Press.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Education. (2012). Advancing civic learning and engagement in democracy: A road map and call to action. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/road-map-call-to-action.pdf.
- UNESCO. (2014). The state of broadband 2014: Broadband for all. Geneva: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.broadbandcommission.org/documents/reports/bb-annualreport2014.pdf.Google Scholar
- Wallace, K. (April 3, 2017). Is ‘fake news’ fooling kids? New report says yes. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/10/health/fake-news-kids-common-sense-media/.