Quality Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Educational Outcomes Assessment and Validity Testing

  • Eleonora ConcinaEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69902-8_94-1

Synonyms

Definitions

The assessment of educational outcomes is a multidimensional process which aims to monitor, analyze, and evaluate learners’ performances as a result of their involvement in educational experiences. It is one of the core concepts of the teaching-learning process, and it has a great impact on all the educational paths. Educational assessment has several aims, related both to the promotion of the full development of the individual and of the evaluation and improvement of instructional practices and pedagogical approaches. It applies many strategies that allow to collect data and gather information, in order to express a judgment that could be representative of the educational outcomes and the teaching-learning process that has took place. Assessment strategies may be applied by external evaluators (e.g., teachers, educators, and administrators) in terms of testing and grading; also the learners themselves can take part in assessing...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andrade H, Vatcheva A (2009) Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Pract 48(1):12–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black P, Wiliam D (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assess Educ 5(1):7–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black P, Wiliam D (2012) Assessment for learning in the classroom. In: Gardner J (ed) Assessment and learning, 2nd edn. Sage, London, pp 11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boud D, Molloy E (2013) Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assess Eval High Educ 38(6):698–712.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boud D, Soler R (2016) Sustainable assessment revisited. Assess Eval High Educ 41(3):400–413.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidson EJ (2005) What is evaluation? In: Davidson EJ (ed) Evaluation methodology basics. The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixson DD, Warrell FC (2016) Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory Pract 55(2):153–159.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn KE, Mulvenon SV (2009) A critical review of research on formative assessment: the limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Pract Assess Res Eval 14(7):1–10. https://pareonline.net/pdf/v14n7.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  9. Falchikov N, Goldfinch J (2000) Student peer-assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Rev Educ Res 70(3):287–322.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibels D, Dochy F (2007) Students’ assessment preferences and approaches to learning: can formative assessment make a difference? Educ Stud 32(4):399–409.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690600850354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harlen W (2012) On the relationships between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In: Gardner J (ed) Assessment and learning, 2nd edn. Sage, London, pp 87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. James M (2010) Educational assessment: overview. In: Peterson P, Baker E, McGaw B (eds) International encyclopedia of education, vol 3, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu MF, Carless D (2006) Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teach High Educ 11(3):279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McMillan JH, Hearn J (2008) Student self-assessment: the key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educ Horiz 87(1):40–49Google Scholar
  15. Mezirow J (1996) Contemporary paradigm of learning. Adult Educ Q 46(3):158–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mezirow J (2003) Transformative learning as a discourse. J Transform Educ 1(1):58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Newton PE (2007) Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assess Educ 14(2):149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicol DJ, Macfarlane-Dick D (2006) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ 31(2):199–218.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Orfield G, Wald J (2000) Testing, testing. The Nation, June 5, issue 2000:38–40Google Scholar
  20. Scriven M (1967) The methodology of evaluation. In: Tyler R, Gagne R, Scriven M (eds) Perspectives on curriculum evaluation. AERA monograph series – curriculum Evaluation. Rand McNally, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Scriven M (1981) Evaluation thesaurus, 3rd edn. Edgepress Inverness, ReyesGoogle Scholar
  22. Scriven M (2007) The logic of evaluation. In: Hansen HV et al (eds) Dissensus and the search for common ground, CD-ROM. OSSA, Windsor, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  23. Sterling S (2001) Sustainable education. Re-visioning learning and change. Green Books, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Sterling S (2010) Learning for resilience or the resilient learner? Towards a necessary reconciliation in a paradigm of sustainable education. Environ Educ Res 16(5–6):511–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taras M (2009) Summative assessment: the missing link for formative assessment. J Furth High Educ 33(1): 57–69.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770802638671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor E (2008) Transformative learning theory. New Dir Adult Contin Educ 2008(119):5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tierney RD (2006) Changing practices: influences on classroom assessment. Assess Educ 13(3):239–264.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940601035387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization, UNESCO (2012) Education for sustainable development sourcebook. Learning & Training tools N° 4. UNESCO, Paris. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002163/216383e.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  29. United Nations, UN (1992) Agenda 21. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, June 3–14. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019
  30. United Nations, UN (2016) Transforming our world. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1. United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan 2019
  31. van Zundert M, Sluijsmans D, van Meeriëboe J (2010) Effective peer assessment processes: research findings and future directions. Learn Instr 20:270–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Webber CF, Scott S (2015) Students assessment in a civil society. In: Scott S, Scott DE, Webber CF (eds) Assessment in education: implications for leadership. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Education and Applied Psychology (FISPPA)University of PadovaPadovaItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Theam Foo Ng
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Global Sustainability StudiesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia