Quality Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Urban Living Labs: Explorations in a University Setting

  • Usha Iyer-RanigaEmail author
  • Renzo Mori Junior
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69902-8_27-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Living labs may be described as an open innovation ecosystem integrating users, academia, and industry or private organizations in generating innovation and outcomes that align technical and scientific possibilities to derive real solutions on the ground. Living labs result in co-creation through active user involvement by multiple stakeholders in a real-life setting. The labs may be a virtual or physical space where various stakeholders work collectively to co-create solutions, most often in urban areas. This entry focuses more on the link between living labs and sustainable outcomes.

Introduction

Living labs are an empirical phenomenon. In an interconnected and increasingly digitized world, living labs may be used to co-produce and co-create solutions that provide better outcomes and impacts as compared to traditional, siloed approaches to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ballon P, Pierson J, Delaere S (2005) Test and experimentation platforms for broadband innovation: examining European practice. In: 16th international telecommunications society Europe conference, Porto, 4–6 September 2005Google Scholar
  2. Boroff C, Eickmeier J, Eklund K, Garcia C, Miller S, Newton B, Pecka B, Samuelson T, Staab J, Whittaker O (2018) Community, campus, and climate at central community college – 3C initiative. J Green Build 3(1):139–156.  https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.13.1.139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bulkeley H, Coenen L, Frantzeskaki N, Hartmann C, Kronsell A, Mai L, Marvin S, McCormick K, van Steenbergen F, Voytenko Palgan Y (2016) Urban living labs: governing urban sustainability transitions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 22:13–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulkeley H, Marvin S, PalganVoytenko Y, McCormick K, Breitfuss-Loidl M, Mai L, von Wirth T, Frantzeskaki N (2018) Urban living laboratories: conducting the experimental city? Eur Urban Reg Stud 26(4):317–335.  https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764187872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chronéer D, Ståhlbröst A, Habibipour A (2018) Towards a unified definition of Urban Living Labs. The ISPIM innovation conference – innovation, The Name of The Game, Stockholm, 17–20 June 2018Google Scholar
  6. Dadaieh M, El Mahdy D, Maguid D (2018) Living labs as a pedagogical teaching tool for green building design and construction in hot arid regions. Int J Archit Res 12(1):338–355.  https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i1.1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahlander L, Gann D (2010) How open is innovation? Res Policy 39:699–709.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edvardsson B, Kristensson P, Magnusson P, Sundström E (2012) Customer integration within service development – a review of methods and an analysis of in situ and ex situ contributions. Technovation 32(7–8):419–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ENoLL (2019) European network of living labs. https://enoll.org/about-us/. Accessed 15 July 2019
  10. Fortes S, Santoyo-Ramón JA, Palacios D, Baena E, Mora-García R, Medina M, Mora P, Barco R (2019) The campus as a Smart City: university of Málaga Environmental, learning, and research approaches. Sensors 19:1349.  https://doi.org/10.3390/s19061349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Genta C, Favaro S, Sonetti G, Barioglio C, Lombardi P (2019) Envisioning green solutions for reducing the ecological footprint of a university campus. Int J Sustain High Educ 20:423–440.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2019-0039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hossain M, Leminen S, Westerlund M (2019) A systematic review of living lab literature. J Clean Prod 213: 976–988.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hugo H, Espinoza F, Morales I, Ortiz E, Perez S, Salcedo G (2018) Delta project: towards a sustainable campus. Sustainability 10:27.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huizingh E (2011) Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation 31(1):2–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Journal of Institution of Environmental Sciences (2017) Living labs uncovered: universities experiment on students. environmental SCIENTIST 26(4). https://www.the-ies.org/resources/living-labs
  16. Katzy BR (2012) Designing viable business models for living labs. Technol Innov Manag Rev 2(9):19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koch N (2018) Green laboratories: university campuses as sustainability “exemplars” in the Arabian Peninsula. Soc Nat Res Int J 31(5):525–540.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1383546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kokareva A, Kutsenko E, Islankina E (2018) Do living labs live in Russia? NRUHSo Economics, Moscow. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3198806
  19. Kronsell A, Mukhtar-Landgren D (2018) Experimental governance: the role of municipalities in urban living labs. Eur Plan Stud 26(5):20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1435631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leminen S, Westerlund M, Nystrom AG (2012) Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technol Innov Manag Rev 2(9):6–11.  https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leminen S, Rajahonka M, Westerlund M (2018) Third-generation living labs: towards incarnation of collaborative innovation networks. Paper presented to ISPIM innovation conference – innovation, The Name of The Game, Stockholm, 17–20 JuneGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindstrom T, Middlecamp C (2017) Campus as a living Laboratory for Sustainability: the chemistry connection. J Chem Educ 94:1036–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lozano R, Ceulemans K, Alonso-Almeida M, Huisingh D, Lozano FJ, Waas T, Lambrechts W, Lukman R, Hugé J (2014) A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. J Clean Prod 108:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin CJ, Evans J, Karvonen A (2018) Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 133:269–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marvin S, Bulkeley H, Li M, McCormick K, Palgan YV (eds) (2018) Urban living labs experimenting with city futures, 1st edn. Routledge, London.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315230641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mori Junior R, Fien J, Horne R (2019) Implementing the UN SDGs in universities: challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned. Sustain J Rec 12(2):129–133.  https://doi.org/10.1089/sus.2019.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Omar W, Rahman AA, Din MFM, Taib SM, Krishnan S, Zen IS, Hanafi N (2018) Greening campus experience: moving towards living laboratory action plan. Paper presented to IWGM 2018, Cork, EDP Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184802006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. RMIT (2019) About RMIT. https://www.rmit.edu.au/. Accessed 23 Aug 2019
  29. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (2019) Sustainability annual report 2018. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/. https://www.rmit.edu.au/about/our-values/sustainability/sustainability-annual-report. Accessed 31 July 2019
  30. Saebi T, Foss NJ (2015) Business models for open innovation: matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensions. Eur Manag J 33(3):201–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Silva LCP d, Villalva MG, Almeida MC, Brittes JLP, Yasuoka J, Cypriano JGI, Dotta D, Pereira JTV, Salles M, Archilli GB, Campos JG (2018) Sustainable campus model at the University of Campinas – Brazil: an integrated living lab for renewable generation, electric mobility, energy efficiency, monitoring and energy demand management. In: Leal FF, Filho W, Iglecias P, Mülfarth R (eds) Towards green campus operations. World sustainability series. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  32. Steen K, van Bueren E (2017) The defining characteristics of urban living labs. Technol Innov Manag Rev 7(7):21–33.  https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. United Nations Millennium Development Goals (2019) Millennium development goals and beyond 2015. https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/. Accessed 15 July 2019
  34. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (2019a) Knowledge platform. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/. Accessed 15 July 2019
  35. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (2019b) Sustainable development goal 4: ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg4. Accessed 24 Aug 2019
  36. Westerlund M, Leminen S (2011) Managing the challenges of becoming an open innovation company: experiences from living labs. Technol Innov Manag Rev 1(10):19–25.  https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/489CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.One Planet Network Sustainable Buildings and Construction Programme, UN EnvironmentParisFrance
  3. 3.Design and Social Context CollegeRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Umesh Chandra Pandey
    • 1
  1. 1.Indira Gandhi National Open University, Regional CentreBhopalIndia