Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging

Living Edition
| Editors: Danan Gu, Matthew E. Dupre

Age-Based Stereotype Threat

  • Ruth A. LamontEmail author
  • Hannah J. Swift
  • Dominic Abrams
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_585-1

Definition

Age-based stereotype threat is an identity threat that is experienced in situations when someone perceives that they will be evaluated negatively against age stereotypes associated with their age group. This can happen when a person’s age is a salient factor in the context or when age stereotypes provide expectations around performance or behavior. This threat has been shown to result in worse performance outcomes on negatively stereotyped tasks.

Overview

In many societies, older people are stereotyped as less competent than younger people‚ but more warm, friendly, and moral (Abrams et al. 2011). These age stereotypes, when negative, put people at risk of experiencing age-based stereotype threat (ABST). ABST is specific to contexts where age stereotypes present a threat to someone’s positive sense of self or identity (Tajfel and Turner 1979). ABST arises from anxiety about being judged or treated negatively due to one’s age, as well as a fear of confirming negative age stereotypes (Steele and Aronson 1995). Within research, the experience of ABST can either be self-reported by an individual (von Hippel, Kalokerinos and Henry 2013) or evidenced through the negative effects it has on performance outcomes, known as ABST effects. The majority of research and this chapter focus on ABST experienced by older people and the contexts in which they are negatively stereotyped.

Key Research Findings and Applications

Older people are often the focus of ABST research due to culturally embedded stereotypes and expectations that memory, cognitive, and physical ability decline with age (Cuddy, Norton and Fiske 2005). While patterns of age-related decline have been identified in some areas of functioning in later life (e.g., Harada et al. 2013; Shipstead et al. 2016), stereotypes exaggerate what is experienced and are overgeneralized to people perceived to be old. For instance, in the UK the most common response for when people think old age starts was ‘60’ (Abrams et al. 2011). People in their 60s, who are much less likely to show signs of cognitive or physical decline, are therefore likely to be the target of these negative old-age stereotypes and are at risk of experiencing ABST. Indeed, a recent meta-analysis combined the results of 32 ABST lab studies and provides robust evidence that ABST, in the form of being reminded of age comparisons or age stereotypes before a testing situation, has a detrimental (worsening) effect on participants’ memory and cognitive performance (Lamont et al. 2015). In these studies participant’s age typically ranged from 55 to 75.

Showing its relevance within medical settings, ABST can lead to worse performance on tests indicative of dementia (Mazerolle et al. 2017) and frailty (Swift et al. 2012). ABST can lead people to appraise their abilities, such as hearing, more negatively (Barber and Lee 2015) and lead people to place greater dependence on others (Coudin and Alexopoulos 2010). Relevant to organizational contexts, older workers reporting ABST in the workplace also report greater job dissatisfaction, worse well-being, and stronger intention to resign (von Hippel et al. 2013, 2019).

The mechanisms that underpin ABST effects are less well evidenced than its negative consequences. Some research has shown that underperformance, as a result of ABST, is due to changes in people’s motivation and how they approach a task (Barber et al. 2015), while other research argues that negative thoughts and feelings about stereotype-based judgment deplete cognitive resources needed for the task at hand (Schmader et al. 2008).

In the Risks of Ageism Model‚ ABST is highlighted as one pathway through which negative age stereotypes can impact on an individual’s potential for active and healthy aging. This is because of its potential to impact outcomes within health and social care, in the workplace, and in social and personal domains (Swift et al. 2016, 2017). Interventions within these settings, such as promotion of meaningful intergenerational contact and supporting people from an early age to develop healthy views of aging, have been shown to reduce ABST effects (Abrams et al. 2008; Crawford 2015).

Summary

ABST research highlights how people can be disadvantaged by their own awareness of‚ and reaction to negative age stereotypes. In formal test settings, particularly those looking at the cognitive and physical competencies of older people, cues to age and age stereotypes should be minimized and considered as a risk factor for underperformance. In the workplace and more widely, age differentials and a culture of negative stereotyping should be discouraged and efforts made to promote intergenerational cooperation and balanced views of aging.

Cross-References

References

  1. Abrams D, Crisp RJ, Marques S, Fagg E, Bedford L, Provias D (2008) Threat inoculation: experienced and imagined intergenerational contact prevents stereotype threat effects on older people’s math performance. Psychol Aging 23(4):934–939.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams D, Russell PS, Vauclair M, Swift H (2011) Ageism in Europe: findings from the European Social Survey. Age UK, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber SJ, Lee SR (2015) Stereotype threat lowers older adults’ self-reported hearing abilities. Gerontology 62(1):81–85.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000439349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber SJ, Mather M, Gatz M (2015) How stereotype threat affects healthy older adults’ performance on clinical assessments of cognitive decline: the key role of regulatory fit. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 70(6):891–900.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coudin G, Alexopoulos T (2010) ‘Help me! I’m old!’ How negative aging stereotypes create dependency among older adults. Aging Ment Health 14(5):516–523.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13607861003713182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crawford PA (2015) Focus on elementary: rock of ages: developing healthy perspectives of ageing in the elementary grades. Child Educ 91(5):395–401.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2015.1090858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuddy AJC, Norton MI, Fiske ST (2005) This old stereotype: the pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. J Soc Issues 61(2):267–285.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2005.00405.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harada CN, Love MCN, Triebel KL (2013) Normal cognitive aging. Clin Geriatr Med 29(4):737–752.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2013.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lamont RA, Swift HJ, Abrams D (2015) A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychol Aging 30(1):180–193.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mazerolle M, Régner I, Barber SJ, Paccalin M, Miazola AC, Huguet P, Rigalleau F (2017) Negative aging stereotypes impair performance on brief cognitive tests used to screen for predementia. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 72(6):932–936.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmader T, Johns M, Forbes C (2008) An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychol Rev 115(2):336–356.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shipstead Z, Harrison TL, Engle RW (2016) Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence: maintenance and disengagement. Perspect Psychol Sci 11(6): 771–799.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Steele CM, Aronson J (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J Pers Soc Psychol 69(5):797–811.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Swift HJ, Lamont RA, Abrams D (2012) Are they half as strong as they used to be? An experiment testing whether age-related social comparisons impair older people’s hand grip strength and persistence. Br Med J Open 2(3):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Swift HJ, Abrams D, Drury L, Lamont RA (2016) Briefing paper: the perception of ageing and age discrimination. British Medical Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Swift HJ, Abrams D, Lamont RA, Drury L (2017) The risks of ageism model: how ageism and negative attitudes toward age can be a barrier to active aging. Soc Issues Policy Rev 11(1):195–231.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1979) An integrative theory of social conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, pp 33–47Google Scholar
  18. von Hippel C, Kalokerinos EK, Henry JD (2013) Stereotype threat among older employees: relationship with job attitudes and turnover intentions. Psychol Aging 28(1):17–27.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. von Hippel C, Kalokerinos EK, Haanterä K, Zacher H (2019) Age-based stereotype threat and work outcomes: stress appraisals and rumination as mediators. Psychol Aging 34(1):68–84.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth A. Lamont
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hannah J. Swift
    • 2
  • Dominic Abrams
    • 2
  1. 1.REACH: The Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive HealthUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St. Luke’s CampusExeterUK
  2. 2.Centre for the Study of Group Processes, School of Psychology, Keynes CollegeUniversity of KentCanterburyUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sheri R. Levy
    • 1
  1. 1.Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA