Definition
Biosocial model of disability is the biological identification of genetic risks or traits that would lead to the creation of new social groups based on biological disability.
Overview
Disability and aging are part of the human condition. According to the World Report on Disability (WHO 2011, p. 5), 15% of the world’s population or over one billion people are living with a form of disability, and over 200 million of these people have “difficulties in functioning.” The number of disabilities is only going to increase and will affect older people in particular, as life expectancy globally increases (UNFPA and HelpAge International 2012). Due to innovations in medical technology and ongoing improvements in living conditions and environment, people with disabilities have a...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI) (2018) World Alzheimer’s report: the state of the art of dementia research – new frontiers. ADI, London
Armstrong D (1995) The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociol Health Illn 17(3):393–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10933329
Banks LM, Kuper H, Polack S (2017) Poverty and disability in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One 12(12):e0189996. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204881
Bayen E, Possin KL, Chen Y, de Langavant LC, Yaffe K (2018) Prevalence of aging, dementia, and multimorbidity in older adults with down syndrome. JAMA Neurol 75(11):1399–1406. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2210
Berghs M (2013) The global economy of care. In: Swain J, French S, Barnes C, Thomas C (eds) Disabling barriers-enabling environments. Sage, London, pp 270–276
Berghs MJ, Atkin KM, Graham HM, Hatton C, Thomas C (2016) Implications for public health research of models and theories of disability: a scoping study and evidence synthesis. Public Health Res 4(8)
Berghs M, Atkin K, Graham H, Hatton C, Thomas C (2017) Public health, research and rights: the perspectives of deliberation panels with politically and socially active disabled people. Disabil Soc 32(7):945–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1339588
Berghs M, Atkin K, Hatton C, Thomas C (2019) Rights to social determinants of flourishing? A paradigm for disability and public health research and policy. BMC Public Health 19(1):997. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7334-8
Clark A (2007) Re-inventing ourselves: the plasticity of embodiment, sensing, and mind. J Med Philos 32(3):263–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/03605310701397024
Fleischer DZ, Zames FD, Zames F (2012) The disability rights movement: from charity to confrontation. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
Groce NE (2018) Global disability: an emerging issue. Lancet Glob Health 6(7):e724–e725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30265-1
Groce N, Kett M, Lang R, Trani JF (2011) Disability and poverty: the need for a more nuanced understanding of implications for development policy and practice. Third World Q 32(8):1493–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2011.604520
Hughes B (2009) Disability activisms: social model stalwarts and biological citizens. Disabil Soc 24(6):677–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590903160118
Lippman A (1992) Led (astray) by genetic maps: the cartography of the human genome and health care. Soc Sci Med 35(12):1469–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90049-V
Marmot M (2005) Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet 365(9464):1099–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71146-6
Mikton C, Shakespeare T (2014) Introduction to special issue on violence against people with disability. J Interpers Violence 29(17):3055–3062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514534531
Oliver M (1983) Social work with disabled people. Macmillan, Basingstoke
Oliver M (2013) The social model of disability: thirty years on. Disabil Soc 28(7):1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
Papadopoulos D (2011) The imaginary of plasticity: neural embodiment, epigenetics and ecomorphs. Sociol Rev 59(3):432–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02025.x
Rabinow P (2010) Artificiality and enlightenment: from sociobiology to biosociality. Politix 2:21–46
Rose N, Novas C (2004) Biological citizenship. In: Ong A, Collier SJ (eds) Global assemblages: technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Blackwell, New York, pp 439–463
Shakespeare T (2015) Gene editing: heed disability views. Nature 527(7579):446
Shakespeare T, Zeilig H, Mittler P (2017) Rights in mind: thinking differently about dementia and disability. Dementia 18(3):1075–1088. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301217701506
Singh I, Rose N (2009) Biomarkers in psychiatry. Nature 460(7252):202. https://doi.org/10.1038/460202a
Swaffer K (2015) Dementia and prescribed disengagement™. Dementia 14:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301214548136
Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS) (1976) Fundamental principles of disability. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation, London
United Nations (UN) (2006) Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. UN, New York
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and HelpAge International (2012) Aging in the 21st century: a celebration and a challenge. UNFPA and HelpAge International, New York
World Health Organization (2002) Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF. WHO, Geneva
World Health Organization (2007) The international classification of functioning, disability and health, children and youth version. WHO, Geneva
World Health Organization (WHO) (2001) The international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). WHO, Geneva
World Health Organization (WHO) (2011) World report on disability. WHO, Geneva
Zunzunegui MV, Alvarado BE, Guerra R, Gómez JF, Ylli A, Guralnik JM, IMIAS Research Group (2015) The mobility gap between older men and women: the embodiment of gender. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 61(2):140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2015.06.005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Berghs, M. (2020). Biosocial Model of Disability. In: Gu, D., Dupre, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_483-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_483-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69892-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69892-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences