Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging

Living Edition
| Editors: Danan Gu, Matthew E. Dupre

Successful Aging 2.0

  • Clemens Tesch-RömerEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_479-1
  • 3 Downloads

Synonyms

Definition

Successful aging can be defined as the optimal solution of challenges tied to the process of growing old as an individual. The term comprises concepts like longevity, functional health, independence, active engagement with life, societal participation, personal growth, life satisfaction, and happiness (Moody 2005). In contrast, the term successful aging 2.0 refers to the societal contexts fostering successful aging on the individual level (Rowe and Kahn 2015).

Overview

Successful aging has been one of the most successful concepts of aging research in the last 60 years. Since Robert Havighurst introduced the term (Havighurst 1961, 1963), attempts to uncover the truth of successful aging have resembled the quest for the Golden Fleece. In a seminal paper, Rowe and Kahn set out a definition of successful aging that has been highly influential ever since (Rowe and Kahn 1987). Rowe and Kahn’s (1987)...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adelman RD, Tmanova LL, Delgado D, Dion S, Lachs MS (2014) Caregiver burden: a clinical review. JAMA 311(10):1052–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anand S, Sen A (1997) Concepts of human development and poverty: a multidimensional perspective. In: United Nations Development Programme (ed) Poverty and human development: human development papers 1997. UNDP, New York, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  3. Ardelt M, Gerlach KR, Vaillant GE (2018) Early and midlife predictors of wisdom and subjective well-being in old age. J Gerontol Ser B.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby017
  4. Baltes MM, Wahl H-W, Reichert M (1991) Successful aging in long-term care institutions. Annu Rev Gerontol Geriatr 11:311–337Google Scholar
  5. Baltes PB, Lindenberger U, Staudinger UM (2006) Life span theory in developmental psychology. In: Damon W, Lerner RM (eds) Theoretical models of human development. Handbook of child psychology, vol 1. Wiley, New York, pp 569–664.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beard JR, Bloom DE (2015) Towards a comprehensive public health response to population ageing. Lancet 385(9968):658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61461-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beard JR, Petitot C (2010) Ageing and urbanization: can cities be designed to foster active ageing? Public Health Rev 32(2):427.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonvin J-M (2008) Activation policies, new modes of governance and the issue of responsibility. Soc Policy Soc 7(3):367–377.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746408004338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calasanti T (2016) Combating ageism: how successful is successful aging? Gerontologist 56(6):1093–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrera F, Pavolini E, Ranci C, Sabbatini A (2013) Long-term care systems in comparative perspective: care needs, informal and formal coverage, and social impacts in European countries. In: Ranci C, Pavolini E (eds) Reforms in long-term care policies in Europe. Springer, New York, pp 23–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4502-9_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho J, Martin P, Poon LW, Study GC (2014) Successful aging and subjective well-being among oldest-old adults. Gerontologist 55(1):132–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Council of the European Union (2010) Council conclusions on active ageing. European Council, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  13. de São José JM, Timonen V, Amado CAF, Santos SP (2017) A critique of the active ageing index. J Aging Stud 40:49–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2017.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Depp CA, Jeste DV (2006) Definitions and predictors of successful aging: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 14(1):6–20.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JGP.0000192501.03069.bcCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diener E, Lucas R, Schimmack U, Helliwell J (2009) Well-being for public policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195334074.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erikson EH (1982) The life cycle completed. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission (2002) Proposal for a council decision on guidelines for member states’ employment policies for the year 2002 (2002/C 75 E/01). European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  18. Feng Q, Straughan PT (2017) What does successful aging mean? Lay perception of successful aging among elderly Singaporeans. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 72(2):204–213.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foster L, Walker A (2015) Active and successful aging: a European policy perspective. Gerontologist 55(1): 83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Med Sci 56(3):M146–M157.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fries JF, Bruce B, Chakravarty E (2011) Compression of morbidity 1980–2011: a focused review of paradigms and progress. J Aging Res 2011:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/261702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fung HH, Jiang D (2016) Cross-cultural psychology of aging. Handbook of the psychology of aging, 8th edn. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  23. Gatz M, Zarit SH (1999) A good old age: paradox or possibility. In: Bengtson VL, Schaie KW (eds) Handbook of theories of aging. Springer, New York, pp 396–416Google Scholar
  24. Gaugler JE (2015) Innovations in long-term care. In: George LK, Ferraro KF (eds) Handbook of aging and the social sciences, 8th edn. Academic, London, pp 419–438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-417235-7.00020-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. George LK (2010) Still happy after all these years: research frontiers on subjective well-being in later life. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 65B(3): 331–339.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbq006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gopinath M (2018) Thinking about later life: insights from the capability approach. Ageing Int 43(2):254–264.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-018-9323-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gu D, Feng Q, Sautter JM, Yang F, Ma L, Zhen Z (2017) Concordance and discordance of self-rated and researcher-measured successful aging: subtypes and associated factors. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 72(2):214–227Google Scholar
  28. Hakim AB (2016) Historical introduction to philosophy. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Havighurst RJ (1961) Successful aging. Gerontologist 1(1):8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Havighurst RJ (1963) Successful aging. In: Williams RH, Tibbits C, Donanue W (eds) Processes of aging: social and psychological perspectives. Atherton Press, New York, pp 299–320Google Scholar
  31. Johnson JK, Sarkisian N, Williamson JB (2015) Using a micro-level model to generate a macro-level model of productive successful aging. Gerontologist 55(1): 107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jopp DS, Wozniak D, Damarin AK, De Feo M, Jung S, Jeswani S (2015) How could lay perspectives on successful aging complement scientific theory? Findings from a U.S. and a German life-span sample. Gerontologist 55(1):91–106.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kane RA (2001) Long-term care and a good quality of life: bringing them closer together. Gerontologist 41(3):293–304.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.3.293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karasawa M, Curhan KB, Markus HR, Kitayama SS, Love GD, Radler BT, Ryff CD (2011) Cultural perspectives on aging and well-being: a comparison of Japan and the United States. Int J Aging Hum Dev 73(1):73–98.  https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.73.1.dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kunzmann U, Little TD, Smith J (2000) Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychol Aging 15:511–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee JE, Kahana B, Kahana E (2017) Successful aging from the viewpoint of older adults: development of a brief Successful Aging Inventory (SAI). Gerontology 63(4):359–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leichsenring K, Billings J, Nies H (eds) (2013) Long-term care in Europe: improving policy and practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.  https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moody HR (2005) From successful aging to conscious aging. In: Wykle M, Whitehouse P, Morris D (eds) Successful aging through the life span: intergenerational issues in health. Springer, New York, pp 55–68Google Scholar
  39. OECD/European Commission (2013) A good life in old age? Monitoring and improving quality in long-term care. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  40. Olshansky SJ, Perry D, Miller RA, Butler RN (2007) Pursuing the longevity dividend. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1114(1):11–13.  https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1396.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pasupathi M, Carstensen LL (2003) Age and emotional experience during mutual reminiscing. Psychol Aging 18(3):430–442.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.3.430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ronch JL, Weiner AS (eds) (2003) Culture change in elder care. Health Professions Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  43. Rothgang H, Iwansky S, Müller R, Sauer S, Unger R (2010) Barmer GEK Pflegereport 2010. Schwerpunktthema: Demenz und Pflege BARMER GEK Schriftenreihe zur Gesundheitsanalyse 5.  https://doi.org/10.4126/FRL01-006401480
  44. Rowe JW, Kahn RL (1987) Human aging: usual and successful. Science 237(4811):143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rowe JW, Kahn RL (1997) Successful aging. Gerontologist 37(4):433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rowe JW, Kahn RL (2015) Successful aging 2.0: conceptual expansions for the 21st century. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 70(4):593–596.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roy C (2011) Extending the Roy adaptation model to meet changing global needs. Nurs Sci Q 24(4):345–351.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318411419210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ryff CD (1982) Successful aging: a developmental approach. Gerontologist 22(2):209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ryff CD (1989) In the eye of the beholder: views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychol Aging 4(2):195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Salomon JA, Wang H, Freeman MK, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Lopez AD, Murray CJ (2013) Healthy life expectancy for 187 countries, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380(9859):2144–2162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61690-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schilling O (2006) Development of life satisfaction in old age: another view on the “paradox”. Soc Indic Res 75(2):241–271.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-5297-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sen A (1993) Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum MC, Sen A (eds) The quality of life. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 30–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stephens C (2017) From success to capability for healthy ageing: shifting the lens to include all older people. Crit Public Health 27(4):490–498.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2016.1192583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stephens C, Breheny M (2018) Healthy aging. A capability approach to inclusive policy and practice. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stone RI, Bryant NS (2013) Successful state leadership models for cultural change. In: Ronch JL, Weiner AS (eds) Culture change in elder care. Health Professions Press, Baltimore, pp 209–235Google Scholar
  56. Tesch-Römer C, Wahl H-W (2017) Toward a more comprehensive concept of successful aging: disability and care needs. J Gerontol Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 72(2):310–318.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Torres S (2018) Cultural values and the nature of successful aging. In: Braddick O (ed) Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford University Press, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tronto JC (2010) Creating caring institutions: politics, plurality, and purpose. Ethics Soc Welf 4(2):158–171.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2010.484259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walker A, Maltby T (2012) Active ageing: a strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. Int J Soc Welf 21:S117–S130.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2012.00871.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. WHO (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  61. Yee-Melichar D, Flores C, Cabigao E (eds) (2014) Long-term care administration and management: effective practices and quality programs in eldercare. Springer, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2015.1065305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zaidi A, Gasior K, Zolyomi E, Schmidt A, Rodrigues R, Marin B (2017) Measuring active and healthy ageing in Europe. J Eur Soc Policy 27(2):138–157.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716676550CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.German Centre of GerontologyBerlinGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Qiushi Feng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore