Good Health and Well-Being

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Tony Wall, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar

Singularity’s Potential for Sustainability and Environmental Health and Well-Being

  • David Courard-HauriEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69627-0_79-1

Definitions

In mathematics, a singularity is a point where a function is not well behaved, for example, because it takes an infinite value or is undifferentiable. In physics, black holes are frequently referred to as singularities, because they represent sites where physical laws break down and gravitation becomes, for practical purposes, infinite. “The Technological Singularity,” to which we will refer here as simply “the singularity,” would be an analogous event in technological development. Authors differ on exactly what would define singularity-type development, but most identify it with either the development of super-human intelligence, machine consciousness, or effectively instantaneous technological advancement.

Sustainabilityis similarly broadly defined, but it is commonly associated with the UN World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission), which, referring specifically to sustainable development, defined it as acting in a way to “…meet the needs...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aksoy MA (2005) The evolution of agricultural trade flows. In: Aksoy MA, Beghin JC (eds) Global agricultural trade and developing countries. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 17–36Google Scholar
  2. Al-allak A, Intabli L, Bertelli G, Lewis P (2018) Artificial intelligence: a new generation of predictive models to guide adjuvant treatment decisions for patients with breast cancer? Eur J Surg Oncol 44:S43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biello D (2011) Plants versus photovoltaics: which are better to capture solar energy? Sci Am. May. Retrieved via https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/plants-versus-photovoltaics-at-capturing-sunlight/
  4. Birchnell T, Hoyle W (2014) 3D printing for development in the global south: the 3D4D challenge. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanke J (2016) Is technological change creating a new global economy? World Economic Forum. Retrieved via https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/is-technological-change-creating-a-new-global-economy/
  6. Boguski MS, Amaout R, Hill C (2009) Customized care 2020: how medical sequencing and network biology will enable personalized medicine. F1000 Biol Rep 1:73.  https://doi.org/10.3410/B1-73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonny SPF, Gardner GE, Pethick DW, Hocquette J-F (2015) What is artificial meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry? J Integr Agric 14:255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boot-Handford ME et al (2014) Carbon capture and storage update. Energy Environ Sci 7:130–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bostrom N (2002) Existential risks: analyzing human extinction scenarios and related hazards. J Evol Technol 9:31–33Google Scholar
  10. Bostrom N (2003) Ethical issues in advanced artificial intelligence. In: Smit I et al (eds) Cognitive, emotive and ethical aspects of decision making in humans and in artificial intelligence, vol 2. International Institute of Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics, Windsor, pp 12–17Google Scholar
  11. Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Brock DC (2006) Understanding Moore’s Law: four decades of innovation. Chemical Heritage Foundation, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Buck BH, Krause G, Rosenthal H (2004) Extensive open ocean aquaculture development within wind farms in Germany: the prospect of offshore co-management and legal constraints. Ocean Coast Manag 47:95–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Celikkol B, DeCew J, Baldwin K (2006) Engineering overview of the University of New Hampshire’s open ocean aquaculture project. Oceans 2006 Conference. September 18–22, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Chirikjian GS, Zhou Y, Suthakorn J (2002) Self-replicating robots for lunar development. ISEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 7:462–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper ML et al (2018) An “off-the-shelf” fratricide-resistant CAR-T for the treatment of T cell hematologic malignancies. Leukemia.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0065-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demirel Y (2016) Energy: production, conversion, storage, conservation, and coupling, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dusetzina S (2016) Drug pricing trends for orally administered anticancer medications reimbursed by commercial health plans, 2000–2014. JAMA Oncol 2:960–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EIA (2017) International energy outlook 2017. US Energy Information Agency. Report number DOE/EIA-0484(2017)Google Scholar
  20. Ellery A (2016) Are self-replicating machines feasible? J Spacecr Rocket 53:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott KC (2014) Risk, precaution, and nanotechnology. In: Sandler RL (ed) Ethics and emerging technologies. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Esteva A et al (2017) Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 452:115–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisk DM (2001) American labor in the 20th Century. Compens Work Cond 6:3–9Google Scholar
  24. Foley JA et al (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freitas RA Jr (2013) Welcome to the future of medicine. In: More M, Vita-More N (eds) The Transhumanist reader. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Gao W et al (2015) Artificial mictromoters in the mouse’s stomach: a step toward in vivo use of synthetic motors. ACS Nano 9:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gargini PA (2017) How to successfully overcome inflection points, or long live Moore’s law. Comput Sci Eng 19:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gentry RR et al (2017) Mapping the global potential for marine aquaculture. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1317–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gillingham K, Rapson D, Wagner G (2016) The rebound effect and energy efficiency policy. Rev Environ Econ Policy 10:68–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Good IJ (1965) Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine. In: Alt FL, Rubinoff M (eds) Advances in computers, vol 6. Academic, New York, pp 31–88Google Scholar
  31. Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Kellner MJ et al (2018) Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6. Science.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gordon R (2016) The rise and fall of American growth. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greening LA, Greene DL, Difiglio C (2000) Energy efficiency and consumption – the reboud effect – a survey. Energy Policy 28:389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hedley C (2014) The role of precision agriculture for improved nutrient management on farms. J Sci Food Agric 95:12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hocquette J-F (2015) Is in vitro meat the solution for the future? Meat Sci 120:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Howarth R, Paerl HW (2008) Coastal marine eutrophication: control of both nitrogen and phosphorus is necessary. PNAS 105:E103.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807266106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huynh T, Iannatonne P, Zhao X, Nguyen PMT (2017) Artificial intelligence to diagnose acute coronary syndromes: insights from a meta-analysis of machine learning. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(17)33409-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report, Working Group III. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Jain KK, Jain V (2006) Impact of nanotechnology on healthcare – applications in cell therapy and tissue engineering. Nanotechnol Law Bus 3:411–418Google Scholar
  40. James AA (2005) Gene drive systems in mosquitoes: rules of the road. Trends Parasitol 21:64–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Joy B (2000) The future doesn’t need us. Wired Magazine. 4 January. Retrieved via https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/
  42. Karlgraad K (2011) 3D printing will revive American manufacturing. Forbes. 26 June. Retrieved via https://www.forbes.com/sites/richkarlgaard/2011/06/23/3d-printing-will-revive-american-manufacturing/#44a93e1d2548
  43. Khan S et al (2016) Role of recombinant DNA technology to improve life. Int J Genomics.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2405954Google Scholar
  44. Kim JK et al (2017) Seaweed aquaculture: cultivation technologies, challenges and its ecosystem services. Algae 32:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. King DL, Babasola A, Rozario J, Pearce JM (2014) Mobile open-source solar-powered 3-D printers for distributed manufacturing in off-grid communities. Chall Sustain 2:18–27Google Scholar
  46. Kurzweil R (2000) The age of spiritual machines. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Kurzweil R (2005) The singularity is near. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Langran R (2010) Technology needs for improved operational efficiency of open ocean cage culture. Mar Technol Soc J 44:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lazard (2017) Lazard’s levelized cost of energy analysis – version 11.0. Available via https://www.lazard.com/media/450337/lazard-levelized-cost-of-energy-version-110.pdf
  50. Lewis NS, Nocera DG (2006) Powering the planet: chemical challenges in solar energy utilization. PNAS 103:15729–15735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lloyd S (2000) Ultimate physical limits to computation. Nature 406:1047–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Longhurst A, Sathyendranath S, Platt T, Caverhill C (1995) An estimate of global primary production in the ocean from satellite radiometer data. J Plankton Res 6:1245–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lunshof J (2015) Regulate gene editing in wild animals. Nature 521:127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ma J, Gans JS, Tourky R (2018) Market structure in Bitcoin mining. NBER working paper, no. 24242. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  55. Manju S, Sagar N (2017) Renewable energy integrated desalination: a sustainable solution to overcome future fresh-water scarcity in India. Renew Sust Energ Rev 73:594–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Medeiros J (2017) Stephen Hawking: ‘I fear AI may replace humans altogether.’ Wired UK magazine. 28 November. Retrieved via http://www.wired.co.uk/article/stephen-hawking-interview-alien-life-climate-change-donald-trump
  57. Moore G (1965) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics 38:114–117Google Scholar
  58. Morstyn T, Hredzak B, Agelidis VG (2016) Control strategies for microgrids with distributed energy storage systems: an overview. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9:3652–3666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. NIH (2010) The Human Genome Project: Education. National Institutes of Health. Retrieved via https://www.genome.gov/education
  60. Pendergrast MTM, Hoek EMV (2011) A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies. Energy Environ Sci 4:1946–1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramchurn SD, Vytelingum P, Rogers A, Jennings NR (2012) Putting the ‘smarts’ into the smart grid: a grand challenge for artificial intelligence. Commun ACM 55:86–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rayna T, Striukova L, Darlington J (2015) Co-creation and user innovation: the role of online 3D printing platforms. J Eng Technol Manag 37:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reilly J et al (2015) Energy and climate outlook, perspectives from 2015. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Climate Change, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  64. Rincon P (2013) Nuclear fusion milestone passed at US lab. BBC News. 7th October. Retrieved via http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-24429621
  65. Schofield D et al (2017) Cost-effectiveness of massively parallel sequencing for diagnosis of paediatric muscle diseases. Genomic Med 2, article #4,  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41525-017-0006-7
  66. Scott A (2018) How CRISPR is transforming drug discovery. Nature 555:S10–S11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Serruya MD (2017) Connecting the brain to itself through an emulation. Front Neurosci 11:373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shanahan M (2015) The technological singularity. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  69. Shores C (2011) Misbehaving machines: the emulated brains of transhumanist dreams. J Evol Technol 22:10–22Google Scholar
  70. Sorrell S (2007) The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy Research Center, Sussex, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  71. Sotala K, Yampolskiy RV (2014) Responses to catastrophic AGI risk: A survey. Phys Scr 90:018001Google Scholar
  72. Theis TN, Wong H-SP (2017) The end of Moore’s Law: a new beginning for information technology. Comput Sci Eng 19:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Topalovic M et al (2017) Artificial intelligence detects lung diseases using pulmonary function tests. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 195:A5678Google Scholar
  74. Track E, Forbes N, Strawn G (2017) The end of Moore’s Law. Comput Sci Eng 19:4–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Trenkmann M (2017) Genetic engineering: on the road to efficient gene drives. Nat Rev Genet 18:704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Troell M et al (2009) Ecological engineering in aquaculture – potential for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) in marine offshore systems. Aquaculture 297:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ulam S (1958) Tribute to John von Neumann. Bull Am Math Soc 64:1–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. UN (2017a) Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform: progress of Goal 6 in 2017. United Nations. Retrieved via https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg6
  79. UN (2017b) Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform: progress of Goal 14 in 2017. United Nations. Retrieved via https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg14
  80. Van Heddeghem W et al (2014) Trends in worldwide ICT electricity consumption from 2007 to 2012. Comput Commun 50:64–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vinge V (1993) The coming technological singularity: how to survive in the post-human era. NASA. Lewis Research Center, Vision 21, pp 11–22. Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19940022856.pdf
  82. Vranken H (2017) Sustainability of bitcoin and blockchains. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 28:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Walsh T (2017) The singularity may never be near. AI Mag 38:58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhou Y, Tol RSJ (2005) Evaluating the costs of desalination and water transport. Water Resour Res 41:W03003.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003749CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Drake UniversityDes MoinesUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Catherine Zeman
    • 1
  1. 1.HRCS/COE and RRTTC/CHASUniversity of Northern IowaCedar FallsUSA