Good Health and Well-Being

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Tony Wall, Ulisses Azeiteiro, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar

Human Capital, International Standards Of

  • Peter StokesEmail author
  • Tony WallEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69627-0_62-1

Synonyms

Definition

Human capital standards involve the participatory national and international development and codification of norms and guidelines relating to the roles, structures, and processes that guide human and organizational behavior and interactions within, and between, organizations, institutions, and potentially society as a whole. As standards, they are developed for operationalization on a global scale, often through national standards bodies.

Introduction

The drive for progress is a central underlying tenet of the development of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDG), and any form of progress will involve resources, structures, and protocols. Yet it is also recognized that all of these are necessarily driven through human resources, or more generally expressed, people/human beings; thus, it is important to focus attention on the human dimensions that are ultimately the driver of initiatives such as the UN SDG. The establishment...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aba EK, Badar MA, Hayden MA (2016) Impact of ISO 9001 certification on firms financial operating performance. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 33(1):78–89.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2014-0021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker GS (1962) Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. J Polit Econ 70(5, Part 2):9–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger PL, Luckmann T (1991) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Black SE, Lynch LM (1996) Human-capital investments and productivity. Am Econ Rev 86(2):263–267Google Scholar
  5. Boon C, Eckardt R, Lepak DP, Boselie P (2018) Integrating strategic human capital and strategic human resource management. Int J Hum Resour Manag 29(1):34–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BSI (2015) BS 76000:2015 human resource – valuing people – management system – requirements and guidance. British Standards Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan D, Badham R (2008) Power, politics, and organizational change: winning the turf game. Sage, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cai S, Jun M (2018) A qualitative study of the internalization of ISO 9000 standards: the linkages among firms’ motivations, internalization processes, and performance. Int J Prod Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castka P, Balzarova MA (2008) The impact of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 on standardisation of social responsibility – an inside perspective. Int J Prod Econ 113(1):74–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crawford-Lee MS, Wall T (2018, forthcoming) Sustainability 2030: a policy perspective from the University Vocational Awards Council, Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 8(3) forthcomingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  12. Hofstede G, Neuijen B, Ohayv D, Sanders G (1990) Measuring organizational cultures: a qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Adm Sci Q 35:286–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ISO (2015) Using and referencing ISO and IEC standards to support public policy. International Standards Organization and International Electrotechnical Commission, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. ISO (2018a) ISO 26800:2011 ergonomics – general approach, principles and concepts. https://www.iso.org/standard/42885.html. Accessed 19 May 2018
  15. ISO (2018b) ISO 26000 – social responsibility. https://www.iso.org/iso-26000-social-responsibility.html. Accessed 19 May 2018
  16. ISO (2018c) ISO 27500:2016 the human-centred organization – rationale and general principles. https://www.iso.org/standard/64239.html. Accessed 19 May 2018
  17. ISO (2018d) What is a standard? International Standards Organization, p 1. https://www.iso.org/standards.html. Accessed 16 Nov 18
  18. Knights D, Willmott H (1999) Management lives: power and identity in work organizations. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Peršič A, Markič M, Peršič M (2018) The impact of socially responsible management standards on the business success of an organisation. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 29(1–2):225–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rossetti L, Wall L (2017) The impact of story: measuring the impact of story for organisational change. J Work-Appl Manag 9(2):170–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stokes P (2016a) Chapter 2: historical and contemporary contexts: the representation and character of ‘modern’ organizations. In: Stokes P, Moore N, Smith S, Rowland C, Scott P (eds) Organizational management. Kogan Page, London, pp 27–45Google Scholar
  22. Stokes P (2016b) Chapter 3: using critical approaches in managing people and organizations. In: Stokes P, Moore N, Smith S, Rowland C, Scott P (eds) Organizational management. Kogan Page, London, pp 51–66Google Scholar
  23. Stokes P, Liu Y, Smith S, Leidner S, Moore N, Rowland C (2015a) Managing talent across advanced and emerging economies: HR issues and challenges in a Sino-German strategic collaboration. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27:2310–2338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stokes P, Moore N, Mathews M, Moss D, Smith S, Liu Y (2015b) The micro-dynamics of intra-organizational and individual action and their role in organizational ambidexterity. Hum Resour Manag 54(1):63–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stokes P, Baker C, Lichy J (2016a) The role of embedded individual values, belief and attitudes and spiritual capital in shaping everyday postsecular organizational culture. Eur Manag Rev 13(1):37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stokes P, Baker C, Lichy J (2016b) The role of embedded individual values, belief and attitudes and spiritual capital in shaping everyday postsecular organizational culture. Eur Manag Rev 13:37–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stokes P, Smith S, Wall T, Moore N, Rowland C, Ward T, Cronshaw S (2018) Resilience and the (micro-) dynamics of organizational ambidexterity: implications for strategic HRM. Int J Hum Resour Manag 1–36Google Scholar
  28. Su H, Dhanorkar S, Linderman K (2015) A competitive advantage from the implementation timing of ISO management standards. J Oper Manag 37:31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trompenaars F, Hampden-Turner C (1997) Riding the waves of culture: understanding cultural diversity in business. Nicholas Brearley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Wall T (2016a) Provocative education: from Buddhism for busy people® to dismal land®, studies in philosophy and education, MarchGoogle Scholar
  31. Wall T (2016b) Reviving the Ubuntu Spirit in landscapes of practice: evidence from deep within the forest. J Work-Appl Manag 8:95–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wall T (2016c) Žižekian ideas in critical reflection: the tricks and traps of mobilising radical management insight. J Work Appl Manag 8:5–16 (forthcoming)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wall T (2017) A manifesto for higher education, skills and work-based learning: through the lens of the manifesto for work. Higher Educ Skills Work-Based Learn 7(3):304–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wall T, Bellamy L, Evans V, Hopkins S (2017a) Revisiting impact in the context of workplace research: a review and possible directions. J Work-Appl Manag 9(2): 95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wall T, Russell J, Moore N (2017b) Positive emotion in workplace impact: the case of a work-based learning project utilising appreciative inquiry. J Work-Appl Manag 9(2):129–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wall T, Österlind E, Fries J (2018, forthcoming) Arts based approaches to sustainability. In: Leal (ed) The encyclopedia of sustainability in higher education. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  37. Weick K (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  38. Youssef MA, Youssef EM (2018) The synergistic impact of ISO 9000 and TQM on operational performance and competitiveness. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 35(3):614–634.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2016-0024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zinenko A, Rovira MR, Montiel I (2015) The fit of the social responsibility standard ISO 26000 within other CSR instruments. Sustain Account, Manag Policy J 6(4):498–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leicester Castle Business SchoolDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK
  2. 2.International Thriving at Work Research CentreUniversity of ChesterChesterUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Mohamed Walid

There are no affiliations available