Zero Hunger

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökcin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Conservation and Sustainable Use of Plant and Animal Genetic Resources for Better Human Health

  • Peterson Weru Wambugu
  • Desterio Ondieki NyamongoEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69626-3_68-1

Definition

Gene banks are biorepositories of genetic material. They are organizational units which are involved in the conservation and management of genetic resources. Gene banks are routinely involved in the conservation of different types of genetic material, among them seeds, pollen, embryos, meristems, cells, DNA, semen, ova, and even entire plants and animals. This entry mainly focuses on the conservation and use of plant genetic resources and to a small extent highlights the conservation of animal genetic resources.

Introduction

The right to health is enshrined in the World Health Organization constitution as a fundamental right of every human being (WHO 2006). While some medical practitioners define human health simply as the absence of diseases, the World Health Organization gives health a broader definition as “… a state of physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” (WHO 2006, p. 1). In this entry, we adopt this latter...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Akrofi S, Brouwer ID, Price LL et al (2010) Home gardens contribute significantly to dietary diversity in HIV/AIDS afflicted households in rural Ghana. J Hum Ecol 31:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson MF, Lepczyk CA, Evans KL et al (2017) Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front Ecol Environ 15:189–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bioversity International (2006) Crop wild relatives. Bioversity International, Rome, p 25Google Scholar
  4. Castañeda-Álvarez NP, Khoury CK, Achicanoy HA et al (2016) Global conservation priorities for crop wild relatives. Nat Plants 2:16022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castiñeiras L, Mayor ZF, Shagarodsky T et al (2002) Contribution of home gardens to in situ conservation of plant genetic resources in farming systems – Cuban component. In: Watson JW, Eyzaguirre PB (eds) Proceedings of the second international home gardens workshop, Witzenhausen, Federal Republic of Germany, 17–19 July 2001Google Scholar
  6. Convention on Biological Diversity (2011) Conference of the parties decision X/2: strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020. https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268
  7. Cox DTC, Shanahan DF, Hudson HL et al (2017) Doses of neighborhood nature: the benefits for mental health of living with nature. Bioscience 67(2):147–155.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eilers EJ, Kremen C, Greenleaf SS et al (2011) Contribution of pollinator-mediated crops to nutrients in the human food supply. PLoS One 6(6):e21363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis AM, Myers SS, Ricketts TH (2015) Do pollinators contribute to nutritional health? PLoS One 10(1):17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FAO (2007) The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, edited by Barbara Rischkowsky & Dafydd Pilling. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO (2010) Second report on the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO, Rome, p 299Google Scholar
  12. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF et al (2017) The state of food security and nutrition in the world. Building resilience for peace and food security. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  13. Fentahun MT, Hager H (2009) Exploiting locally available resources for food and nutritional security enhancement: wild fruits diversity, potential and state of exploitation in the Amhara region of Ethiopia. Food Sec 1:207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-009-0017-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freedman B, Stoilova T (2015) Home gardens bolstered by diversity from indigenous, semi-domesticated and wild vegetable species for improved health and income. 1102 edn. International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, pp 239–244Google Scholar
  15. Greyling M, Potgieter M (2004) Mopane worms as key woodland resource. The use trade and conservation of Imbrasia belina. In: Lawes MJ, Ealey HAC, Shackleton CM et al (eds) Indigenous forests and woodlands in South Africa: policy people and practice. University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg, pp 575–589Google Scholar
  16. Hawkins B (2008) Plants for life: medicinal plant conservation and botanic gardens. Botanic Gardens Conservation International, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  17. Heywood V (2013) Overview of agricultural biodiversity and its contribution to nutrition and health. In: Fanzo J, Hunter D, Borelli T et al (eds) Diversifying food and diets: using agricultural biodiversity to improve nutrition and health. Issues in agricultural biodiversity. Earthscan, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  18. Ives CD, Lentini PE, Threlfall CG et al (2016) Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacon VE (2011) Crowdsourcing crop improvement in Sub-Saharan Africa: a proposal for a scalable and inclusive approach to food security. IDS Bulletin. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
  20. Lambert JD, Ryden PA, Esikuri EE (2005) Capitalizing on the bio-economic value of multi-purpose medicinal plants for the rehabilitation of drylands in Sub-Saharan Africa. Nairobi: Washington, D.C.: Global Environment Facility (GEF), World BankGoogle Scholar
  21. Lepczyk CA, Aronson MFJ, Evans KL et al (2017) Biodiversity in the city: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 67:799–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol 27:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGarry DK, Shackleton CM (2009) Children navigating rural poverty: rural children’s use of wild resources to counteract food insecurity in the eastern cape, South Africa. J child Poverty 15:19–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10796120802677594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Medhammar E, Wijesinha-Bettoni R, Stadlmayr B et al (2012) Composition of milk from minor dairy animals and buffalo breeds: a biodiversity perspective. J Sci Food Agric 92:445–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moctar S, Nora B (2016) Community participation and ecological criteria for selecting species and restoring natural capital with native species in the Sahel. Restor Ecol 24:479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Romanelli C, Cooper D, Campbell-Lendrum D et al (2015) Connecting global priorities: biodiversity and human health: a state of knowledge review. WHO/CBD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  27. Sandifer PA, Sutton-Grier AE, Ward BP (2015) Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosyst Serv 12:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shawn M, Louise S (2016) Seed systems smallholder farmers use. Food Sec 8:179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sujarwo W, Arinasa IBK, Salomone F et al (2014) Cultural erosion of Balinese indigenous knowledge of food and nutraceutical plants. Econ Bot 68:426–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vernooy R, Sthapit B, Galluzzi G et al (2014) The multiple functions and services of community seedbanks. Resources 3:636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wambugu PW, Ndjiondjop MN, Furtado A et al (2018) Sequencing of bulks of segregants allows dissection of genetic control of amylose content in rice. Plant Biotechnol J 16(1):100–110.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. WHO (2006) Constitution of World Health Organization, forty-fifth edition supplement as adopted by the fifty-first world health assembly, October 2006. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_constitution_en.pdf
  33. Wood S, Ehui S, Alder J et al (2005) Food. In: Ecosystems and human well-being. vol 1. Current state and trends. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 209–241. http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Condition.aspx
  34. Zhang W, Kato E, Bianchi F et al (2018) Farmers’ perceptions of crop pest severity in Nigeria are associated with landscape, agronomic and socio-economic factors. Agric Ecosyst Environ 259:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peterson Weru Wambugu
    • 1
  • Desterio Ondieki Nyamongo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Genetic Resources Research InstituteKenya Agricultural and Livestock Research OrganizationKikuyuKenya

Section editors and affiliations

  • Vincent Onguso Oeba

There are no affiliations available