The greenhouse condition is unique to protect and nourish plants and helps control plant- and pest-related illnesses. The building conditions in combination with the density of plants, temperature, humidity, and measures to stimulate growth establish an environment in which greenhouse workers may be exposed to high levels of allergens, irritants, and microbes. Work-related skin disorders among greenhouse workers comprise allergic and irritant contact dermatitis, airborne contact dermatitis, protein contact dermatitis, and contact urticaria. In addition, employees are at risk of developing occupational upper and lower respiratory disease.
There are several groups of agents that may elicit work-related problems in greenhouses. First, plants, flower, fruits, and vegetables may have allergenic potency giving rise to immediate or delayed-type reactions of the skin but also to rhinitis and asthma particularly in greenhouse workers who are exposed to pollen and flowers. Second, plants and crops may be infested by pest which can elicit IgE responses leading to contact urticaria and bronchial asthma. Third, chemical and biological agents to control such kinds of pests may be responsible for work-related diseases. Furthermore, molds and microorganisms may lead to respiratory diseases.
This chapter gives an overview of occupational skin diseases, allergens, and irritants in greenhouse. In addition, occupational respiratory disorders will be shortly discussed.
Compositae North European greenhouses Pesticides Molds Greenhouse crops Aeroallergen Occupational dermatitis Sesquiterpene lactones Predatory mites Occupational rhinitis Asthma Bell pepper Chrysanthemum pollen Contact urticaria IgE reactions
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Agarwal KK, D’Souza M (2009) Airborne contact dermatitis induced by parthenium: a study of 50 cases in South India. Clin Exp Dermatol 34:e4–e6PubMedGoogle Scholar
Brouwer R, Marquart H, de Mik G, van Hemmen JJ (1992) Risk assessment of dermal exposure of greenhouse workers to pesticides after re-entry. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 23:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong NW, Vermeulen AM, Gerth van Wijk R, de Groot H (1998) Occupational allergy caused by flowers. Allergy 53(2):204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong NW, Groenewoud GCM, van Ree R (2004) Immunoblot and radioallergosorbent test inhibition studies of allergenic cross-reactivity of the predatory mite Amblyseius cucumeris with the house dust mite. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004;93:281–7Google Scholar
Frenich AG, Aguilera PA, Gonzalez FE, Castro Cano ML, Martinez Galera M, Martinez Vidal JL, Soler M (2002) Dermal exposure to pesticides in greenhouses workers: discrimination and selection of variables for the design of monitoring programs. Environ Monit Assess 80:51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo R, Fausti V, Christana K, Parodi A (2009) Occupational protein contact dermatitis from basil. Ann Ital Dermatol Allergol Clin Sper 63:110–113Google Scholar
Kim YK, Kim YY (2002) Spider-mite allergy and asthma in fruit growers. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2:103–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim TB et al (2006) Association between sensitization to outdoor spider mites and clinical manifestations of asthma and rhinitis in the general population of adults. J Korean Med Sci 21:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamminpaa A, Estlander T, Jolanki R, Kanerva L (1996) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by decorative plants. Contact Dermatitis 34:330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin C, Warshaw E (2008) Protein contact dermatitis: allergens, pathogenesis, and management dermatitis, vol 19, pp 241–251Google Scholar
Liu S et al (2015) Prevalence and risk factors for farmer’s lung in greenhouse farmers: an epidemiological study of 5,880 farmers from Northeast China. Cell Biochem Biophys 71:1051–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malo JL, Lemiere C, Desjardins A, Cartier A (1997) Prevalence and intensity of rhinoconjunctivitis in subjects with occupational asthma. Eur Respir J 10:1513–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minamoto K, Harada K, Wei QJ, Wei CN, Omori S, Ueda A (2007) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from mioga (Zingiber mioga rosc.) in greenhouse cultivators. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 20:31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monsó E, Magarolas R, Badorrey I, Radon K, Nowak D, Morera J (2002) Occupational asthma in greenhouse flower and ornamental plant growers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:954–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsen E, Andersen KE (1993) Compositae dermatitis in a Danish dermatology department in 1 year (II). Clinical features in patients with Compositae contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 29:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsen E, Andersen KE (2013) Sensitization patterns in Compositae-allergic patients with current or past atopic dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 68:277–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsen E, Christensen LP, Andersen KE (2010) Dermatitis from common ivy (Hedera helix L. subsp helix) in Europe: past, present, and future. Contact Dermatitis 62:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsen E, Christensen LP, Andersen KE (2012) Tomato contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 67:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penagos H, Ruepert C, Partanen T, Wesseling C (2004) Pesticide patch test series for the assessment of allergic contact dermatitis among banana plantation workers in Panama. Dermatitis 15:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von der Werth JM, Ratcliffe J, English JS (1999) Compositae mix is a more sensitive test for Compositae dermatitis than the sesquiterpene lactone mix. Contact Dermatitis 40:273–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar