Advertisement

Development of Binderless Composites from Different Nonwood Lignocellulosic Materials: Overview

  • Ireen Parvin Nitu
  • Md Iftekhar Shams
  • Md Nazrul IslamEmail author
  • Sourav Bagchi Ratul
  • Md Ashaduzzaman
Reference work entry

Abstract

Studies about manufacturing of synthetic adhesive-free binderless particleboards from nonwood lignocellulosic materials have come under limelight as a consequence of wood supplies reduction along with the demand for formaldehyde-free panels. The overview of binderless particleboard’s development from different agricultural waste using an assorted range of manufacturing processes and their self-bonding mechanisms are presented in this chapter. Also, the features of different manufacturing parameters of binderless particleboards, such as pressing temperature and pressure, pressing time, particle size, mixing ratio and additional substances, are discussed. The physical, mechanical, and biological properties of every binderless particleboard are typically evaluated. This chapter provides a big picture of previous researches of binderless particleboards from different lignocellulosic agricultural waste with better understanding of their self-bonding mechanisms, contributing factors, and the manufacturing processes in favor of future value-added environmental friendly binderless particleboards.

References

  1. 1.
    Alvarez C, Rojano B, Almaza O, Rojas OJ, Ganan P (2011) Self-bonding boards from plantain fiber bundles after enzymatic treatment: adhesion improvement of lignocellulosic products by enzymatic pre-treatment. J Polym Environ 19(1):182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aisyah HA, Paridah MT, Sahri MH, Anwar UMK, Astimar AA (2013) Properties of medium density fiberboard (MDF) from kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) core as function of refining conditions. Compos Part B 44(1):592–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Angles M, Ferrando F, Farriol X, Salvado J (2001) Suitability of steam exploded residual softwood for the production of binderless panels. Effect of the pre-treatment severity and lignin addition. Biomass Bioenergy 21(3):211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashori A, Noubakhsh A (2008) Effect of press cycle time and resin content on physical and mechanical properties of particleboard panels made from the underutilized low-quality raw materials. Ind Crop Prod 28:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bahari SA, Jamaludin MA, Ahmad M, Subardi SA, Saad MJ, Nordin K (2008) Characterization on bending strength of self-bonded bamboo fiberboard, in BBF). In: Proceeding of 9th Pacific rim bio-based composites symposium, CSIRO and SCION, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baskaran M, Hashim R, Said N, Raffi SM, Balakrishnan K, Sudesh K, Mori Y (2012) Properties of self-bonded particleboard from oil palm trunk with addition of polyhydroxyalkanoates. Compos Part B 43(3):1109–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boon JG, Hashim R, Sulaiman O, Hiziroglu S, Sugimoto T, Sato M (2013) Influence of processing parameters on some properties of oil palm trunk self-bonded particleboard. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 71(5):583–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cuff DJ, Young W (1980) US energy atlas. Free Press/McMillan Publishing Co, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fahmy TYA, Mobarak F (2013) Advanced self-bonded board-like green nanocomposites from undebarked cotton stalks and mechanism of self-bonding. Cellulose 20(3):1453–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment country report, Bangladesh, FRA 2010/017, Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Farrokhpayam SR, Teymour V, Ehsan S (2016) Thin particleboard quality : effect of particle size on the properties of the panel. Journal of the Indian Academy of Wood Science 13(1):38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frybort S, Mauritz R, Teischinger A, Muller U (2008) Cement bonded composites – a mechanical review. J Bioresour Technol 3:602–626Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glowacki R, Wijck J, Van Chaowana P, Wageningen R (2012) The use of coconut husk in high pressure laminate. Journal of Tropical Forest Science 24(1):27–36Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Halvarsson S, Edlund H, Norgren M (2009) Manufacture of non-resin wheat straw fibreboards. Ind Crop Prod 29:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han G (2001) Development of reed and wheat straw composite panels. Wood Research Institute, Kyoto UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hashim R, Saari N, Sulaiman O, Sugimoto T, Hiziroglu S, Sato M, Tanaka R (2010) Effect of particle geometry on the properties of self-bonded particleboard manufactured from oil palm trunk. Mater Des 31(9):4251–4257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hashim R, WNAW N, Sulaiman O, Sato M, Hiziroglu S, Kawamura F et al (2012) Properties of self-bonded particleboard panels manufactured from oil palm biomass. Bioresources 7(1):1352–1365Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hidayat H, Keijsers ERP, Prijanto U, van Dam JEG, Heeres HJ (2014) Preparation and properties of self-bonded boards from Jatropha curcas L. seed cake. Ind Crop Prod 52:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hubbe MA (2006) Bonding between cellulosic fibers in the absence and presence of dry-strength agents-a review. Bioresources 1(2):281–318Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    JIS – A 5908 (2003) Particleboards. Japanese standards association. Tokyo, Japan. pp 1–24Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laemsak N, Okuma M (2000) Development of boards made from oil palm frond II: properties of self-bonded boards from steam-exploded fibers of oil palm frond. J Wood Sci 46(4):322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lamaming J, Sulaiman O, Sugimoto T, Hashim R, Said N, Sato M (2013) Influence of chemical components of oil palm on properties of binderless particleboard. Bioresources 8(3):3358–3371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lee CM, Hunt JF (2013, February 1) Self-bonded panel made from wood particles and cellulosic fibers. Google PatentsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luo P, Yang CM (2011) Self-bonded particleboard from steam exploded wheat straw. In: Advanced materials research, vol 179. Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luo P, Yang CM (2012) Production of self-bonded particleboard using rice straw pretreated with liquid hot water. In: Applied mechanics and materials, vol 200. Trans Tech Publications, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mancera C, Ferrando F, Salvado J (2008) Cynara Cardunculus as raw material for the production of binderless fiberboards: optimization of pretreatment and pressing conditions. J Wood Chem 28:207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mancera C, Mansouri NEE, Ferrando F, Salvado J (2011) The suitability of steam exploded Vitis Vinifera and alkaline lignin for the manufacture of fiberboard. Bioresources 6(4):4439–4453Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mobarak F, Fahmy Y, Augustin H (1982) Self-bonded lignocellulose composite from bagasse and mechanism of self-bonding. Holzforschung-International Journal of the Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Technology of Wood 36(3):131–136Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mohanty AK, Misra M, Hinrichsen G (2000) Biofibers, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview. Macromol Mater Eng 276(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moslemi AA (1974) Particleboard. Volume1: materials. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, p 244Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nemli G, Aydin I, Zekovic E (2007) Evaluation of some of the properties of particleboard as function of manufacturing parameters. Master Des 26:1169–1176Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nonaka S, Umemura K, Kawai S (2013) Characterization of bagasse binderless particleboard manufactured in high-temperature range. J Wood Sci 59:50. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10086-012-1302-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Okuda N, Sato M (2004) Manufacture and mechanical properties of self-bonded boards from kenaf core. J Wood Sci 50(1):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Okuda N, Hori K, Sato M (2006) Chemical changes of kenaf core self-bonded boards during hot pressing (I): influence of the pressing temperature condition. J Wood Sci 52(3):244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Panyakaew S, Fotios S (2011) New thermal insulation boards made from coconut husk and bagasse. Energ Buildings 43(7):1732–1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Philippou JL, Zavarin E, Johns WE, Nguyen T (1982) Bonding of particleboard using hydrogen peroxide, lignosufonates, and furfural alcohol, the effect of process parameters. Forest Prod J 32(3):27–32Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Quintana G, Velasquez J, Betancourt S, Ganan P (2009) Binderless fiberboard from stem exploded banana bunch. Ind Crop Prod 29(1):60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rayner CA (1969) Amine formaldehyde resins. In: Mitlin L (ed) Particleboard manufacture and applications. Press Books Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rowell RM (1996) Composites from agri-based resources. In Proceedings of use of recycled wood and paper in building applications, Medison, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Saari N, Hashim R, Sulaiman O, Hiziroglu S, Sato M, Sugimoto T (2014) Properties of steam treated self-bonded particleboard made from oil palm trunks. Compos Part B 56:344–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Salvado J, Velasquez JA, Ferrando F (2003) Binderless fiberboard from steam exploded Miscanthus Sinensis: optimization of pressing and pretreatment conditions. Wood Sci Technol 37:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Shao S, Jin Z, Wen G, Iiyama K (2009) Thermo characteristics of steam-exploded bamboo (Phyllostachys Pubescens) lignin. Wood Sci Technol 43(7–8):643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shen KC (1986) Process for manufacturing composite products from lignocellulosic materials. Google PatentsGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Suzuki S, Shintani H, Park S-Y, Saito K, Laemsak N, Okuma M, Iiyama K (1998) Preparation of self-bonded boards from steam exploded pulps of oil palm (Elaeis guneensis Jaxq.) fronds and structural characteristics of lignin and wall polysaccharides in steam exploded pulps to be discussed for self-bindings. Holzforschung-International Journal of the Biology, Chemistry, Physics and Technology of Wood 52(4):417–426Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tajuddin M, Ahmad Z, Ismail H (2016) A review of natural Fibers and processing operations for the production of self-bonded boards. Bioresources 11(2):5600–5617Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Umemura K, Nonaka S, Kawai S (2013) Characterization of bagasse binderless particleboard manufactured in high-temperature range. J Wood Sci 59:50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Van Dam JEG, van den Oever MJA, Wouter T, Keijsers ERP, Peralta AG (2004a) Process for production of high density/high performance self-bonded boards from whole coconut husk: part 1: lignin as intrinsic thermosetting binder resin. Ind Crop Prod 19(3):207–216Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Van Dam JEG, van den Oever MJA, Keijsers ERP (2004b) Production process for high density high performance self-bonded boards from whole coconut husk. Ind Crop Prod 20(1):97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Velasquez JA, Ferrando F, Salvado J (2002) Binderless fiberboard from steam exploded Miscanthus sinensin: the effect of grinding process. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff 60(4):297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Widyorini R, Higashihara T, Xu J, Watanabe T, Kawai S (2005a) Self-bonding characteristics of self-bonded kenaf core composites. Wood Sci Technol 39(8):651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Widyorini R, Xu J, Watanabe T, Kawai S (2005b) Chemical changes in steam-pressed kenaf core self-bonded particleboard. J Wood Sci 51(1):26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Widyorini R, Satiti DA (2011) Characteristics of binderless particleboards made from heat-treated wood species. Forestry Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta. The 3rd INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM of INDONESIAN WOOD RESEARCH SOCIETY (IWoRS) pp 125–129Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wu T, Wang X, Kito K (2015) Engineering in agriculture, environment and food effects of pressures on the mechanical properties of corn straw. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food 8(3):123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Xu J, Han G, Wong ED, Kawai S (2003) Development of self-bonded particleboard from kenaf core using steam-injection pressing. J Wood Sci 49(4):327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xu J, Widyorini R, Kawai S (2005) Properties of kenaf core self-bonded particleboard reinforced with kenaf bast fiber-woven sheets. J Wood Sci 51(4):415–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Xu J, Widyorini R, Yamauchi H, Kawai S (2006) Development of self-bonded fiberboard from kenaf core. J Wood Sci 52(3):236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yan H, Cao Z, Guo W (1996) Study on bonding mechanism of dry-process self-bonded fiberboards, I. Chemical changes and effects in self-bonded fiberboard manufacture. China Wood Ind 10(4):3–11Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang D, Zhang A, Xue L (2015) A review of preparation of binderless fiberboards and its self-bonding mechanism. Wood Sci Technol 49:661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dungani R, Khalil HPSA, Sumardi I, Suhaya Y, Sulistyawati E, Islam MN, Aprilia NAS (2014) Non-wood renewable materials: properties improvement and its application, in Biomass and Bioenergy, Springer, pp. 1–29Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ireen Parvin Nitu
    • 1
  • Md Iftekhar Shams
    • 1
  • Md Nazrul Islam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sourav Bagchi Ratul
    • 1
  • Md Ashaduzzaman
    • 1
  1. 1.Forestry and Wood Technology DisciplineKhulna UniversityKhulnaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations