Advertisement

Eco-friendly Nanoparticle Additives for Lubricants and Their Tribological Characterization

  • Laura Peña-ParásEmail author
  • Demófilo Maldonado-Cortés
  • Jaime Taha-Tijerina
Reference work entry

Abstract

Worldwide manufacturing, as well as the transportation industry, is greatly affected by the rising costs of energy, maintenance, replacement of expensive and crucial components, and environmental legislations. Diverse solutions have been proposed to meet these challenges: more efficient processes that minimize energy consumption, weight reductions, as well as achieving longer maintenance periods and longer replacement times for tooling and components. In order to find a solution for these issues, nanoparticles (NPs) have been used as additives in conventional lubricants decreasing the coefficient of friction (COF) and wear of elements working under relative motion and loading. Due to environmental and health concerns, recent studies have focused on utilizing eco-friendly NPs, minimizing the usage of hazardous materials and additives. These NPs have demonstrated to be highly efficient increasing wear resistance and lowering COF through several tribological mechanisms. Furthermore, eco-friendly NPs may also help reduce energy consumption in manufacturing processes, hence reducing carbon footprint. This chapter provides the state of the art of eco-friendly NPs for improving tribological properties in conventional lubricants, their tribological testing and evaluation methods, and tribological mechanisms.

References

  1. 1.
    Latson J (2015) How the American oil industry got its start. Time MagazineGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reeves CJ, Menezes PL, Jen T-C, Lovell MR (2012) Evaluating the tribological performance of green liquid lubricants and powder additive based green liquid lubricants. In: STLE annual meeting & exhibition, St. Louis, USA, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Menezes PL, Reeves CJ, Lovell MR (2013) Fundamentals of lubrication. In: Tribology for scientists and engineers. Springer, New York, pp 295–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nosonovsky M, Bhushan B (2010) Green tribology: principles, research areas and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc London A Math Phys Eng Sci 368:4677–4694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forest V, Leclerc L, Hochepied J-F et al (2017) Impact of cerium oxide nanoparticles shape on their in vitro cellular toxicity. Toxicol In Vitro 38:136–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2016.09.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gu C, Li Q, Gu Z, Zhu G (2008) Study on application of CeO2 and CaCO3 nanoparticles in lubricating oils. J Rare Earths 26:163–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0721(08)60058-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gu C, Zhu G, Li L et al (2009) Tribological effects of oxide based nanoparticles in lubricating oils. J Mar Sci Appl 8:71–76.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-009-8008-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vairamuthu G, Sundarapandian S, Kailasanathan C, Thangagiri B (2015) Experimental investigation on the effects of cerium oxide nanoparticle on Calophyllum inophyllum (Punnai) biodiesel blended with diesel fuel in DI diesel engine modified by nozzle geometry. J Energy Inst 89:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2015.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ng AMC, Guo MY, Leung YH et al (2015) Metal oxide nanoparticles with low toxicity. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 151:17–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.06.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fathima JB, Pugazhendhi A, Venis R (2017) Synthesis and characterization of ZrO 2 nanoparticles-antimicrobial activity and their prospective role in dental care. Microb Pathog 110:245–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2017.06.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charoo MS, Wani MF (2017) Tribological properties of h-BN nanoparticles as lubricant additive on cylinder liner and piston ring. Lubr Sci 29:241–254.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ls.1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taha-tijerina J, Narayanan TN, Avali S, Ajayan PM (2012) 2D structures-based energy management nanofluids. In: ASME 2012 international echanical engineering congress & exposition IMECE 2012. Houston, TX, IMECE 2012–87890Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taha-Tijerina J, Peña-Parás L, Cortés M-D (2016) 2D-based nanofluids: materials evaluation and performance. In: Nayak PK (ed) Two-dimensional materials – synthesis, characterization and potential applications. InTech, Croatia, pp 153–198Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taha-Tijerina J, Narayanan TN, Gao G et al (2012) Electrically insulating thermal nano-oils using 2D fillers. ACS Nano 6:1214–1220.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn203862pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taha-Tijerina J, Peña-Paras L, Narayanan TN et al (2013) Multifunctional nanofluids with 2D nanosheets for thermal and tribological management. Wear 302:1241–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Melchionna M, Fornasiero P (2014) The role of ceria-based nanostructured materials in energy applications. Mater Today 17:349–357.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Venkatasubbu GD, Baskar R, Anusuya T et al (2016) Toxicity mechanism of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles against food pathogens. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 148:600–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.09.042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Colvin VL (2003) The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nat Biotechnol 21:1166–1170.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gebeshuber IC (2016) Ecotribology: development, prospects, and challenges. In: Davim J. (eds) Ecotribology. Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology. Springer, Cham, pp 1–39Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang D, Lin Z, Wang T et al (2016) Where does the toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles come from: the nanoparticles, the ions, or a combination of both? J Hazard Mater 308:328–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wehmas LC, Anders C, Chess J et al (2015) Comparative metal oxide nanoparticle toxicity using embryonic zebrafish. Toxicol Rep 2:702–715.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.03.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmid O, Stoeger T (2016) Surface area is the biologically most effective dose metric for acute nanoparticle toxicity in the lung. J Aerosol Sci 99:133–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abudayyak M, Guzel E (2017) Neurochemistry international nickel oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic to SH-SY5Y neuronal cells. Neurochem Int 108:7–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuint.2017.01.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rajeshkumar S (2016) Anticancer activity of eco-friendly gold nanoparticles against lung and liver cancer cells. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 14:195–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2016.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ema M, Okuda H, Gamo M, Honda K (2017) A review of reproductive and developmental toxicity of silver nanoparticles in laboratory animals. Reprod Toxicol 67:149–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2017.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Remya NS, Syama S, Sabareeswaran A, Mohanan PV (2017) Investigation of chronic toxicity of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles administered orally for one year in wistar rats. Mater Sci Eng C 76:518–527.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vergaro V, Abdullayev E, Lvov YM et al (2010) Cytocompatibility and uptake of halloysite clay nanotubes. Biomacromolecules 11:820–826.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm9014446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vergaro V, Lvov YM, Leporatti S (2012) Halloysite clay nanotubes for resveratrol delivery to cancer cells. Macromol Biosci 12:1265–1271.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201200121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peña-Parás L, Maldonado-Cortés D, García P et al (2017) Tribological performance of halloysite clay nanotubes as green lubricant additives. Wear 376–377:885–892.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2017.01.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li PR, Wei JC, Chiu YF et al (2010) Evaluation on cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the exfoliated silicate nanoclay. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:1608–1613.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am1001162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ajayan PM, Ebbesen TW (1999) Nanometre-size tubes of carbon. Rep Prog Phys 60:1025–1062.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/60/10/001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Magrez A, Kasas S, Salicio V et al (2006) Cellular toxicity of carbon-based nanomaterials. Nano Lett 6:1121–1125.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl060162eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Madani SY, Mandel A, Seifalian AM (2013) A concise review of carbon nanotube’s toxicology. Nanotechnol Rev 4:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.3402/nano.v4i0.21521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Demófilo Maldonado Cortes, Szczerek Marian (2010) Tribotesting, reproducibility and repeatability problems. ITeE-PIB, Radom ISBN 978–83–7204-962-9 11 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Steven S (2016) Characterizing the tribo-system and defining the tribo-test. Tribol Lubr Technol 72:42–50Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dean RB, Dixon WJ (1951) Simplified statistics for small numbers of observations. Anal Chem 23:636–638.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60052a025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    ASTM (2015) ASTM D2266–01 standard test method for wear preventive characteristics of lubricating grease (four-ball method)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    ASTM (2002) ASTM 2596 standard test method for measurement of extreme-pressure properties of lubricating grease (four-ball method)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    ASTM (2003) ASTM D 2783–03 standard test method for measurement of extreme-pressure properties of lubricating fluids (four-ball method)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    ASTM (1999) ASTM 4172 wear preventive characteristics of lubricating fluid (four- ball method).  https://doi.org/10.1520/D4172-94R16.2
  41. 41.
    Piekoszewski W, Szczerek M, Tuszynski W (2001) The action of lubricants under extreme pressure conditions in a modified. Wear 249:188–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00555-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    ASTM (1994) ASTM D-2714 standard test method for calibration and operation of the falex block-on-ring friction and wear testing machine 1.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D2714-94R09.1
  43. 43.
    ASTM (2015) ASTM D 2981 Standard test method for wear life of solid film lubricants in oscillating motion.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D2981-94R09.2
  44. 44.
    ASTM (1996) ASTM D 3704 standard test method for wear preventive properties of lubricating greases using the (falex) block on ring test machine in oscillating.  https://doi.org/10.1520/D3704-96R12.2
  45. 45.
    ASTM (2008) G-77 standard method for ranking resistance of materials to sliding wear using block-on ring wear testGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Method ST (2011) Standard test method for wear testing with a pin-on-disk apparatus 1. Wear 5:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1520/G0099-05R10.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhang M, Wang X, Fu X, Xia Y (2009) Performance and anti-wear mechanism of CaCO3 nanoparticles as a green additive in poly-alpha-olefin. Tribol Int 42:1029–1039.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2009.02.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yu HL, Xu Y, Shi PJ et al (2008) Tribological properties and lubricating mechanisms of Cu nanoparticles in lubricant. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 18:636–641.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60111-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hernández Battez A, González R, Viesca JL et al (2008) CuO, ZrO2 and ZnO nanoparticles as antiwear additive in oil lubricants. Wear 265:422–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2007.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Alves SM, Barros BS, Trajano MF et al (2013) Tribological behavior of vegetable oil-based lubricants with nanoparticles of oxides in boundary lubrication conditions. Tribol Int 65:28–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2013.03.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liu G, Li X, Qin B et al (2004) Investigation of the mending effect and mechanism of copper nano-particles on a tribologically stressed surface. Tribol Lett 17:961–966.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-004-8109-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wu H, Zhao J, Xia W et al (2017) A study of the tribological behaviour of TiO2 nano-additive water-based lubricants. Tribol Int 109:398–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2017.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sia SY, Bassyony EZ, Sarhan AAD (2014) Development of SiO2 nanolubrication system to be used in sliding bearings. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:1277–1284.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5566-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kreivaitis R, Padgurskas J, Rukuiza R et al (2013) Tribological properties of lubricant additives of Fe, Cu and Co nanoparticles. Tribol Int 60:224–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2012.10.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wan Q, Jin Y, Sun P, Ding Y (2015) Tribological behaviour of a lubricant oil containing boron nitride nanoparticles. Procedia Eng 102:1038–1045.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Peña-Parás L, Taha-Tijerina J, Garza L et al (2015) Effect of CuO and Al2O3 nanoparticle additives on the tribological behavior of fully formulated oils. Wear 332–333:1256–1261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2015.02.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Peña-Parás L, Taha-Tijerina J, García A et al (2015) Thermal transport and tribological properties of nanogreases for metal-mechanic applications. Wear 332–333:1322–1326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2015.01.062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Peña-Parás L, Taha-Tijerina J, García A et al (2014) Antiwear and extreme pressure properties of nanofluids for industrial applications. Tribol Trans 57:1072–1076.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2014.933937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chou R, Hernández Battez AH, Cabello JJJ et al (2010) Tribological behavior of polyalphaolefin with the addition of nickel nanoparticles. Tribol Int 43:2327–2332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2010.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zulkifli NWM, Kalam MA, Masjuki HH, Yunus R (2013) Experimental analysis of tribological properties of biolubricant with nanoparticle additive. Procedia Eng 68:152–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.12.161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Huang Y, Han S, Liu S et al (2014) Preparation and tribological properties of surface-modified calcium borate nanoparticles as additive in lubricating oil. Ind Lubr Tribol 66:143–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Li J, Hao L, Xu X, Ren T (2012) Tribological synergism of surface-modified calcium borate nanoparticles and sulfurized olefin. Ind Lubr Tribol 64:217–223.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00368791211232762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ping L, Dongyun W, Yanbin L et al (2014) Preparation and tribological properties of complex nanoparticle styrene/calcium borate with core-shell structure. Ind Lubr Tribol 66:525–532.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-12-2011-0108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hao L, Li J, Xu X, Ren T (2007) Preparation and tribological properties of a kind of lubricant containing calcium borate nanoparticles as additives. Ind Lubr Tribol 64:16–22.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00368791211196853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    KH H, Liu M, Wang QJ et al (2009) Tribological properties of molybdenum disulfide nanosheets by monolayer restacking process as additive in liquid paraffin. Tribol Int 42:33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2008.05.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hu K, Cai Y, Hu X, Xu Y (2013) Synergistic lubrication of MoS2 particles with different morphologies in liquid paraffin. Ind Lubr Tribol 65:143–149.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00368791311311141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tannous J, Dassenoy F, Lahouij I et al (2011) Understanding the tribochemical mechanisms of IF-MoS2 nanoparticles under boundary lubrication. Tribol Lett 41:55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-010-9678-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Abdullah MIHC, Abdollah MFB, Tamaldin N et al (2016) Effect of hexagonal boron nitride nanoparticles as an additive on the extreme pressure properties of engine oil. Ind Lubr Tribol 68:441–445.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-10-2015-0157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kalin M, Kogovšek J, Remškar M (2013) Nanoparticles as novel lubricating additives in a green, physically based lubrication technology for DLC coatings. Wear 303:480–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.03.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zhao J, He Y, Wang Y et al (2016) An investigation on the tribological properties of multilayer graphene and MoS2 nanosheets as additives used in hydraulic applications. Tribol Int 97:14–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nunn N, Mahbooba Z, Ivanov MG et al (2014) Tribological properties of polyalphaolefin oil modified with nanocarbon additives. Diam Relat Mater 54:3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2014.09.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sharma AK, Tiwari AK, Dixit AR et al (2015) Mechanism of nanoparticles functioning and effects in machining processes: a review. Mater Today Proc 2:3539–3544.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Mosleh M, Shirvani KA (2013) In-situ nanopolishing by nanolubricants for enhanced elastohydrodynamic lubrication. Wear 301:137–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2013.01.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Nam JS, Lee P-HH, Lee SW (2011) Experimental characterization of micro-drilling process using nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:649–652.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2011.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Shenderova O, Vargas A, Turner S et al (2014) Nanodiamond-based nanolubricants: investigation of friction surfaces. Tribol Trans 57:1051–1057.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2014.933933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ghaednia H, Jackson RL, Khodadadi JM (2013) Experimental analysis of stable CuO nanoparticle enhanced lubricants. J Exp Nanosci 10:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17458080.2013.778424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Hernández Battez A, Viesca JLL, González R et al (2010) Friction reduction properties of a CuO nanolubricant used as lubricant for a NiCrBSi coating. Wear 268:325–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2009.08.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ghaednia H, Jackson RL (2013) The effect of nanoparticles on the real area of contact, friction, and wear. J Tribol 135:41603.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ghaednia H, Hossain MS, Jackson RL (2015) Tribological performance of silver nanoparticle-enhanced polyethylene glycol lubricants. Tribol Trans 59:585–592.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10402004.2015.1092623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Neuffer H, Ghaednia H, Jackson R (2013) Wear volume analysis using a nano-lubricant for ball-on-disk testing Tribol Lubr Technol 70:22–24 Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Rapoport L, Leshchinsky V, Lapsker I et al (2003) Tribological properties of WS2 nanoparticles under mixed lubrication. Wear 255:785–793.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00044-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Thrush SJ (2012) Investigation of dispersion, stability, and tribological performance of oil-based aluminum oxide nanofluids – Thesis for the degree of masters of scienceGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Thottackkad MV, Rajendrakumar PK, Prabhakaran Nair K (2014) Experimental studies on the tribological behaviour of engine oil (SAE15W40) with the addition of CuO nanoparticles. Ind Lubr Tribol 66:289–297.  https://doi.org/10.1108/ILT-01-2012-0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Lahouij I, Dassenoy F, Vacher B, Martin J-M (2012) Real yime TEM imaging of compression and shear of single fullerene-like MoS2 nanoparticle. Tribol Lett 45:131–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-011-9873-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Zin V, Agresti F, Barison S, et al (2013) Investigation on tribological properties of nanolubricants with carbon nano-horns as additives at different temperatures. In: World Tribology Congress 2013, Torino, Italy, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Cizaire L, Vacher B, Le Mogne T et al (2002) Mechanisms of ultra-low friction by hollow inorganic fullerene-like MoS2 nanoparticles. Surf Coat Technol 160:282–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00420-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lahouij I, Bucholz EW, Vacher B et al (2012) Lubrication mechanisms of hollow-core inorganic fullerene-like nanoparticles: coupling experimental and computational works. Nanotechnology 23:375701.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/37/375701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Lahouij I, Dassenoy F, de Knoop L et al (2011) In situ TEM observation of the behavior of an individual fullerene-like MoS2 nanoparticle in a dynamic contact. Tribol Lett 42:133–140.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-011-9755-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Lahouij I, Vacher B, Martin JM, Dassenoy F (2012) IF-MoS2 based lubricants: influence of size, shape and crystal structure. Wear 296:558–567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2012.07.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Tevet O, Von-Huth P, Popovitz-Biro R et al (2011) Friction mechanism of individual multilayered nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:19901–19906.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106553108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Eswaraiah V, Sankaranarayanan V, Ramaprabhu S (2011) Graphene-based engine oil nanofluids for tribological applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:4221–4227.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am200851zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Spear JC, Ewers BW, Batteas JD (2015) 2D-nanomaterials for controlling friction and wear at interfaces. Nano Today 10:301–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2015.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Mosleh M, Atnafu ND, Belk JH, Nobles OM (2009) Modification of sheet metal forming fluids with dispersed nanoparticles for improved lubrication. Wear 267:1220–1225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.12.074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ni B, Sinnott SB (2001) Tribological properties of carbon nanotube bundles predicted from atomistic simulations. Surf Sci 487:87–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01073-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Joly-Pottuz L, Ohmae N (2008) Carbon-based nanolubricants. In: Martin JM, Ohmae N (eds) Nanolubricants, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester, p 234Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Kalyani JV, Rastogi RB, Kumar D (2015) The investigation of different particle size magnesium-doped zinc oxide (Zn0.92Mg0.08O) nanoparticles on the lubrication behavior of paraffin oil. Appl Nanosci 7(6):275–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-015-0471-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Viesca JLL, Hernández Battez A, González R, et al (2011) Antiwear properties of carbon-coated copper nanoparticles used as an additive to a polyalphaolefin. Tribol Int 44:829–833.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2011.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Song X, Zheng S, Zhang J et al (2012) Synthesis of monodispersed ZnAl 2O 4 nanoparticles and their tribology properties as lubricant additives. Mater Res Bull 47:4305–4310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Zhou Y-H, Harmelin M, Bigot J (1989) Sintering behaviour of ultra-fine Fe, Ni and Fe-25wt%Ni powders. Scr Metall 23:1391–1396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0036-9748(89)90065-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Peng D, Chen C, Kang Y et al (2010) Size effects of SiO2 nanoparticles as oil additives on tribology of lubricant. Ind Lubr Tribol 62:111–120.  https://doi.org/10.1108/00368791011025656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Hwang Y, Lee C, Choi Y et al (2011) Effect of the size and morphology of particles dispersed in nano-oil on friction performance between rotating discs. J Mech Sci Technol 25:2853–2857.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-011-0724-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Muzakkir SM, Hirani H (2015) Is nano size the best choice? In: Recent Advances in Nano Science and Technology 2015, Chennai in Tamil Nadu, India, pp1–5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Peña-Parás
    • 1
    Email author
  • Demófilo Maldonado-Cortés
    • 1
  • Jaime Taha-Tijerina
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de IngenieríaUniversidad de MonterreySan Pedro Garza GarcíaMexico

Personalised recommendations