Compostable Polymeric Ecomaterials: Environment-Friendly Waste Management Alternative to Landfills

  • Wanda Sikorska
  • Marta Musioł
  • Barbara Zawidlak-Węgrzyńska
  • Joanna RydzEmail author
Reference work entry


Widely used conventional plastics have many advantages; however, their resistance to biological agents have a negative impact on the environment. Therefore, the use of (bio)degradable polymers should become widespread owing to growing interest in sustainability, organic recycling, and environmental issues. This review focuses on compostable polymeric ecomaterials with potential applications in many fields of modern society. The waste management strategy and regulations for polymeric ecomaterials, methods of evaluating the composting process, the biodegradability of polymers, in addition to the basics of composting processes are presented. The most important (bio)degradable polymer applications are discussed with regard to renewable recourses, (bio)degradability, and recycling.


  1. 1.
    Nguyen XH, Honda T, Wang Y, Yamamoto R (2010) Eco-materials. Module-H. University of Tokyo, pp 123–134. Retrieved from
  2. 2.
    The Constructor – Civil Engineering Home (2015) Eco-friendly building materials. Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  3. 3.
    Mulvaney D, Robbins P (eds) (2011) Green energy: An A-to-Z guide. Sage, Thousand Oaks, US, pp 1–533.
  4. 4.
    Francese D (ed) (2016) Technologies for sustainable urban design and bioregionalist regeneration. Routledge, London/New York. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Song JH, Murphy RJ, Narayan R, Davies GBH (2009) Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:2127–2139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hopewell J, Dvorak R, Kosior E (2009) Plastics recycling: Challenges and opportunities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364(1526):2115–2126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aeschelmann F, Carus M (2015) Bio-based building blocks and polymers in the world. Nova-Institut GmbH, Version 2015-05. Retrieved from
  8. 8.
    Milani B (2005) Building materials in a green economy: Community-based strategies for dematerialization. Doctoral thesis of department of adult education, community development and counselling psychology, Ontario institute for studies in education, and the institute for environmental studies of the University of Toronto. Retrieved from
  9. 9.
    Rydz J, Musioł M, Zawidlak-Węgrzyńska B, Sikorska W (2018) Present and future of (bio)degradable polymers for food packaging applications, Chapter 14. In: Grumezescu A, Holban AM (eds) Handbook of food bioengineering, vol 20. Elsevier, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, US, pp 429–465. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matter A, Dietschi M, Zurbrügg C (2013) Improving the informal recycling sector through segregation of waste in the household – The case of Dhaka Bangladesh. Habitat Int 38:150–156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolf O (ed), Crank M, Patel M, Marscheider-Weidemann F, Schleich J, Hüsing B, Angerer G (2005) Techno-economic feasibility of large-scale production of bio-based polymers in Europe. Technical Reports Series EUR 22103 EN. Publications Office of European Communities, SpainGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Statista (2015) Global plastic production 1950–2015. Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  13. 13.
    Gourmelon G (2015) Global plastic production rises, recycling lags. New Worldwatch Institute analysis explores trends in global plastic consumption and recycling. Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  14. 14.
    Grover A, Gupta A, Chandra S, Kumari A, Khurana SMP (2015) Polythene and environment. Int J Environ Sci 6:1091–1105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    PlasticsEurope (2015) Plastics – The material for the 21st century. Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  16. 16.
    Rudnik E (ed) (2010) Compostable polymer materials. Elsevier, Oxford/AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roy PK, Surekha P, Rajagopal C, Chatterjee SN, Choudhary V (2005) Effect of benzil and cobalt stearate on the aging of low-density polyethylene films. Polym Degrad Stab 9:577–585. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    European Commission (2010) Being wise with waste: The EU’s approach to waste management. Accessed 22 Mar 2017
  20. 20.
    Elagroudy S, Warith MA, Zayat ME (2016) Municipal solid waste management and green economy. Available via DIALOG. Accessed 23 Mar 2017
  21. 21.
    Eurostat (2017) Municipal waste statistics. Accessed 21 Mar 2017
  22. 22.
    Martínez-Blanco J, Colón J, Gabarrell X, Font X, Sánchez A, Artola A, Rieradevall J (2010) The use of life cycle assessment for the comparison of biowaste composting at home and full scale. Waste Manage 30:983–994. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    European bioplastics e.V. (2009) Fact sheet industrial composting. Accessed 14 Mar 2017
  24. 24.
    Council Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste (1999) Council of European Union, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Directive 2008/98/EC on waste and repealing certain Directives (2008) European Parliament and Council of European Union, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste (1994) European Parliament and Council of European Union, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Commission staff working document accompanying the green paper on the management of bio-waste in the European Union {COM(2008) 811 final}. SEC/2008/2936 final, EUR-Lex – 52008SC2936. Commission of the European Communities, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Green Paper on the management of bio-waste in the European Union – Council conclusions (2009) Council of European Union, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Towards a thematic strategy for soil protection. COM (2002) 179 final, EUR-Lex – 52002DC0179Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Towards a strategy for soil protection (2002) EU law and publications, EUR-Lex – l28122Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    European Bioplastics e.V. (2015) Accessed 21 Mar 2017
  32. 32.
    Saveyn H, Eder P (2014) End-of-waste criteria for biodegradable waste subjected to biological treatment (compost & digestate): Technical proposals report EUR 26425 ENGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Musioł M, Sikorska W, Adamus G, Kowalczuk M (2016) Forensic engineering of advanced polymeric materials. Part III – Biodegradation of thermoformed rigid PLA packaging under industrial composting conditions. Waste Manage 52:69–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Standard EN 13432:2000 Packaging – Requirements for packaging recoverable through composting and biodegradation – Test scheme and evaluation criteria for the final acceptance of packaging (2000). European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    International Standard ISO 17088:2012(en) (2012) Specifications for compostable plastics. International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 61, Plastics, Subcommittee SC 5, Physical-chemical propertiesGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    ASTM Standard D6400-04 (2004) Standard specification for compostable plastics. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Standard EN 14995 Plastics – Evaluation of compostability – Test scheme and specifications (2006) European Committee for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Horvat P, Kržan A (2012) Certification of bioplastics.
  39. 39.
    Musioł M, Rydz J, Sikorska W, Rychter P, Kowalczuk M (2011) A preliminary study of the degradation of selected commercial packaging materials in compost and aqueous environments. Pol J Chem Technol 13:55–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kupper T, Bürge D, Bachmann HJ, Güsewell S, Mayer J (2014) Heavy metals in source-separated compost and digestates. Waste Manage 34:867–874. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    De Wilde B, Boelens J (1998) Prerequisites for biodegradable plastic materials for acceptance in real-life cornposting plants and technical aspects. Polym Degrad Stab 59:7–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Composting processing technologies, composting Council of Canada. Accessed 22 Mar 2017
  43. 43.
    Musioł M, Sikorska W, Adamus G, Janeczek H, Kowalczuk M, Rydz J (2016) (Bio)degradable polymers as a potential material for food packaging: Studies on the (bio)degradation process of PLA/(R,S)-PHB rigid foils under industrial composting conditions. Eur Food Res Technol 242:815–823. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sikorska W, Adamus G, Dobrzynski P, Libera M, Rychter P, Krucinska I, Komisarczyk A, Cristea M, Kowalczuk M (2014) Forensic engineering of advanced polymeric materials – Part II: The effect of the solvent-free non-woven fabrics formation method on the release rate of lactic and glycolic acids from the tin-free poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nonwovens. Polym Degrad Stab 110:518–528. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sikorska W, Richert J, Rydz J, Musioł M, Adamus G, Janeczek H, Kowalczuk M (2012) Degradability studies of poly(L-lactide) after multi-reprocessing experiments in extruder. Polym Degrad Stab 97:1891–1897. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    ASTM Standard D5338-98 (1999) Standard test method for determining aerobic biodegradation of plastics materials under controlled composting conditionsGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    International Standard ISO 14855:1999 Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability and disintegration of plastic materials under controlled composting conditions – Method by analysis of evolved carbon dioxideGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pagga U, Beimborn DB (1996) Biodegradability and compostability of polymers – Test methods and criteria for evaluation. J Environ Polym Degrad 4:173–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gorrasi G, Pantani R (2013) Effect of PLA grades and morphologies on hydrolytic degradation at composting temperature: Assessment of structural modification and kinetic parameters. Polym Degrad Stab 98:1006–1014. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tabasi RY, Ajji A (2015) Selective degradation of biodegradable blends in simulated laboratory composting. Polym Degrad Stab 120:435–442. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cadar O, Paul M, Roman C, Miclean M, Majdik C (2012) Biodegradation behaviour of poly(lactic acid) and (lactic acid-ethylene glycol-malonic or succinic acid) copolymers under controlled composting conditions in a laboratory test system. Polym Degrad Stab 97:354–357. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gomez RB, Lima FV, Ferrer AS (2006) The use of respiration indices in the composting process: A review. Waste Manage Res 24:37–47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gleadall A, Pan J, Kruft M-A, Kellomäki M (2014) Degradation mechanisms of bioresorbable polyesters. Part 2. Effects of initial molecular weight and residual monomer. Acta Biomater 10:2233–2240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Weng Y-X, Wang Y, Wang X-L, Wang Y-Z (2010) Biodegradation behavior of PHBV films in a pilot-scale composting condition. Polym Test 29:579–587. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rosa DS, Grillo D, Bardi MAG, Calil MR, Guedes CGF, Ramires EC, Frollini E (2009) Mechanical, thermal and morphological characterization of polypropylene/biodegradable polyester blends with additives. Polym Test 28:836–842. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pantani R, Sorrentino A (2013) Influence of crystallinity on the biodegradation rate of injection-moulded poly(lactic acid) samples in controlled composting conditions. Polym Degrad Stab 98:1089–1096. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rydz J, Musioł M, Janeczek H (2015) Thermal analysis in the study of polymer (bio)degradation. In: Tiwari A, Raj B (eds) Reactions and mechanisms in thermal analysis of materials, 1st edn. Wiley Materials Degradation and Failures Series. Wiley-Scrivener Publishing LLC, Beverly, US, pp 103–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rydz J, Wolna-Stypka K, Musioł M, Szeluga U, Janeczek H, Kowalczuk M (2013) Further evidence of polylactide degradation in paraffin and in selected protic media. A thermal analysis of eroded polylactide films. Polym Degrad Stab 98:1450–1457. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    International Standard ISO 14852:1999(en) (1999) Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of plastic materials in an aqueous medium – Method by analysis of evolved carbon dioxide. International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 61, Plastics, Subcommittee SC 5, Physical-chemical propertiesGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    International Standard ISO/DIS 14851(en) (1999) Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of plastic materials in an aqueous medium – Method by measuring the oxygen demand in a closed respirometer. International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 61, Plastics, Subcommittee SC 5, Physical-chemical propertiesGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    International Standard ISO 16929:2013(en) (2013) Plastics – Determination of the degree of disintegration of plastic materials under defined composting conditions in a pilot-scale test. International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 61, Plastics, Subcommittee SC 5, Physical-chemical propertiesGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    International Standard ISO 17556:2012(en) (2012) Plastics – Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of plastic materials in soil by measuring the oxygen demand in a respirometer or the amount of carbon dioxide evolved. International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 61, Plastics, Subcommittee SC 5, Physical-chemical propertiesGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    International Standard ISO 14855-1:2012(en) (2012) Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of plastic materials under controlled composting conditions – Method by analysis of evolved carbon dioxide – Part 1: General method. International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 61, Plastics, Subcommittee SC 5, Physical-chemical propertiesGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    International Standard ISO 14855-2:2007/Cor.1:2009(en) (2007) Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of plastic materials under controlled composting conditions – Method by analysis of evolved carbon dioxide – Part 2: Gravimetric measurement of carbon dioxide evolved in a laboratory-scale test. International Organization for Standardization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 61, Plastics, Subcommittee SC 5, Physical-chemical propertiesGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sadaka SS, Richard TL, Loecke TD, Liebman M (2006) Determination of compost respiration rates using pressure sensors. Compost Sci Util 14(2):124–131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Malińska K (2016) Application of a modified OxiTop® respirometer for laboratory composting studies. Arch Environ Prot 42(1):56–62. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Musiol M, Sikorska W, Kowalczuk M, Adamus G (2016) The development of sustainable bioplastics for new applications in packaging industry. Int J Environ Agr Res 2(2):117–124Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Adani F, Baido D, Calcaterra E, Genevini P (2002) The influence of biomass temperature on biostabilization-biodrying of municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technol 83:173–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Barrena Gomez R, Vazquez Lima F, Gordillo Bolasell M, Gea T, Sanchez Ferrer A (2005) Respirometric assays at fixed and process temperatures to monitor composting process. Bioresource Technol 96:1153–1159. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rada EC, Ragazzi M, Venturi J (2012) Critical analysis of two respirometric methods for solid substrates based on continuous and semi-continuous aeration. Bioremed Biodeg 3:170–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Villaseñor J, Pérez MA, Fernández FJ, Puchalski CM (2011) Monitoring respiration and biological stability during sludge composting with a modified dynamic respirometer. Bioresource Technol 102(11):6562–6568. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sánchez A, Fernández FJ, Rodríguez L, Villaseñor J (2012) Respiration indices and stability measurements of compost through electrolytic respirometry. J Environ Manage 95:134–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Binner E, Böhm K, Lechner P (2012) Large scale study on measurement of respiration activity (AT4) by Sapromat and Oxitop. Waste Manage 32(10):1752–1759. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Barrena R, Canovas C, Sanchez A (2006) Prediction of temperature and thermal inertia effect in the maturation stage and stockpiling of a large composting mass. Waste Manage 26:953–959. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Reid BJ, MacLeod CJA, Lee PH, Morriss AWJ, Stokes JD, Semple KT (2001) A simple 14C-respirometric method for assessing microbial catabolic potential and contaminant bioavailability. FEMS Microbiol Lett 196(2):141–146. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gea T, Barrena R, Artola A, Sanchez A (2004) Monitoring the biological activity of the composting process: Oxygen uptake rate (OUR), respirometric index (RI), and respiratory quotient (RQ). Biotechnol Bioeng 88(4):520–527. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rydz J, Wolna-Stypka K, Adamus G, Janeczek H, Musioł M, Sobota M, Marcinkowski A, Kržan A, Kowalczuk M (2015) Forensic engineering of advanced polymeric materials. Part 1 – Degradation studies of polylactide blends with atactic poly[(R,S)-3-hydroxybutyrate] in paraffin. Chem Biochem Eng Q 29:247–259. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Musioł M, Rydz J, Janeczek H, Radecka I, Jiang G, Kowalczuk M (2017) Forensic engineering of advanced polymeric materials. Part IV: Case study of oxo-degradable polyethene commercial bags – Aging in biotic and abiotic environment. Waste Manage 64:20–27. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Sikorska W, Rydz J, Wolna-Stypka K, Musioł M, Adamus G, Kwiecień I, Janeczek H, Duale K, Kowalczuk M (2017) Forensic engineering of advanced polymeric materials – Part V: Prediction studies of aliphatic-aromatic copolyester and polylactide commercial blends in view of potential applications as compostable cosmetic packages. Polymers 9(257):15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Roig N, Sierra J, Nadal M, Martí E, Navalón-Madrigal P, Schuhmacher M, Domingo JL (2012) Relationship between pollutant content and ecotoxicity of sewage sludges from Spanish wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 425:99–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    OECD (2006) Test no. 208: Terrestrial plant test: Seedling emergence and seedling growth test. OECD Publishing, Paris.
  82. 82.
    Rychter P, Biczak R, Herman B, Smyłła A, Kurcok P, Adamus G, Kowalczuk M (2006) Environmental degradation of polyester blends containing atactic poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Biodegradation in soil and ecotoxicological impact. Biomacromolecules 7:3125–3131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Rychter P, Kawalec M, Sobota M, Kurcok P, Kowalczuk M (2010) Study of aliphatic-aromatic copolyester degradation in sandy soil and its ecotoxicological impact. Biomacromolecules 11:839–847. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    United States Department of Agriculture (2010) Composting, Chapter 2. In: National engineering handbook, part 637. Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  85. 85.
    Bot A, Benites J (2005) The importance of soil organic matter key to drought-resistant soil and sustained crop production. FAO soils bulletin 80:1–78Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Composting – New Technologies. Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  87. 87.
    Eawag. Co-composting of Faecal Sludge and Municipal Organic Waste in Kumasi, Ghana. Accessed 30 Mar 2017
  88. 88.
    Seboa A, Ferrini F (2006) The use of compost in urban green areas – A review for practical application. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4:159–169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Kale G, Auras R, Singh SP, Narayan R (2007) Biodegradability of polylactide bottles in real and simulated composting conditions. Polym Test 26:1049–1061. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Kolstad JJ, Vink ETH, De Wilde B, Debeer L (2012) Assessment of anaerobic degradation of Ingeo polylactides under accelerated landfill conditions. Polym Degrad Stab 97:1131–1141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Seyedbagheri MM (2010) Compost:production, quality, and use in commercial agriculture. University of Idaho. Accessed 14 Mar 2017
  92. 92.
    Haug RT (ed) (1993) The practical handbook of compost engineering. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    CH2M HILL (2013) Composting and anaerobic digestion technology review and evaluation. Accessed 22 Mar 2017
  94. 94.
    Kwiecień M, Musioł M, Sobota M, Marek AA, Zawadiak J, Adamus G (2016) Valorization of polyethylene degradation products by blending with PHB biopolyester. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 91:1623–1628. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    The BIODEGMA principle. Reliability, sustainability and superior quality guaranteed to last. Accessed 22 Mar 2017
  96. 96.
    Denes J, Tremier A, Menasseri-Aubry S, Walter C, Gratteau L, Barrington S (2015) Numerical simulation of organic waste aerobic biodegradation: A new way to correlate respiration kinetics and organic matter fractionation. Waste Manage 36:44–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Lukehurst CT, Frost P, Al Seadi T (2010) Utilisation of digestate from biogas plants as biofertiliser. Accessed 22 Mar 2017
  98. 98.
    Smith SR (2009) A critical review of the bioavailability and impacts of heavy metals in municipal solid waste composts compared to sewage sludge. Environ Int 35:142–156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Rydz J, Sikorska W, Kyulavska M, Christova D (2015) Polyester-based (bio)degradable polymers as environmentally friendly materials for sustainable development. Int J Mol Sci 16(1):564–596. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Applications for bioplastics. Accessed 6 June 2017
  101. 101.
    Langeveld JWA, Dixon J, Jaworski JF (2010) Development perspectives of the biobased economy: A review. Crop Sci 50:S142–S151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Biopolymers with advanced functionalities for high performance applications. Accessed 10 Apr 2017Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Jiménez A, Fabra MJ, Talens P, Chiralt A (2012) Effect of re-crystallization on tensile, optical and water vapour barrier properties of corn starch films containing fatty acids. Food Hydrocolloid 26:302–310. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Rejak A, Wójtowicz A, Oniszczuk T, Niemczuk D, Nowacka M (2014) Evaluation of water vapor permeability of biodegradable starch-based films TEKA. Commission of Motorization and Energetics in Agriculture 14:89–94Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    DR L, Xiao CM, SJ X (2009) Starch-based completely biodegradable polymer materials. Express Polym Lett 6:366–375. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Joseph CS, Prashanth KVH, Rastogi NK, Indiramma AR, Reddy SY, Raghavarao K (2011) Optimum blend of chitosan and poly-(ε-caprolactone) for fabrication of films for food packaging applications. Food Bioproc Technol 4:1179–1185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Ribeiro WX, Filho JFL, Cortes MS, Tadini CC (2015) Characterization of biodegradable film based on zein and oleic acid added with nanocarbonate. Cienc Rural 45:1890–1894. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Oymaci P, Altinkaya SA (2016) Improvement of barrier and mechanical properties of whey protein isolate based food packaging films by incorporation of zein nanoparticles as a novel bionanocomposite. Food Hydrocolloid 54:1–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Pawar PA, Purwar AH (2013) Biodegradable polymers in food packaging. Am J Eng Res 05:151–164Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Navarro-Baena I, Sessini V, Torre FD, Kenny JM, Peponi L (2016) Design of biodegradable blends based on PLA and PCL: From morphological, thermal and mechanical studies to shape memory behavior. Polym Degrad Stab 132:97–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Ma P, Hristova-Bogaerds DG, Goossens JGP, Spoelstra AB, Zhang Y, Lemstra PJ (2012) Toughening of poly(lactic acid) by ethylene-co-vinyl acetate copolymer with different vinyl acetate contents. Eur Polym J 48:146–154. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Zhang M, Thomas N (2011) Blending polylactic acid with polyhydroxybutyrate: The effect on thermal, mechanical, and biodegradation properties. Adv Polym Technol 30:67–79. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Liu H, Zhang J (2011) Research progress in toughening modification of poly(lactic acid). J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 49:1051–1083. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Jamshidian M, Tehrany EA, Imran M, Jacquot M, Desobry S (2010) Poly-lactic acid: Production, applications, nanocomposites, and release studies. Compr Rev Food Sci F 9:552–571. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Khosravi-Darania K, Buccib DZ (2015) Application of poly(hydroxyalkanoate) in food packaging: Improvements by nanotechnology. Chem Biochem Eng Q 29:275–285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Wong J, Tyagi R, Pandey A (eds) (2016) Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering. Solid waste management, 1st edn. Elsevier, Oxford, UK/AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Fontaras G, Zacharof N-G, Ciuffo B (2017) Fuel consumption and CO2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe – Laboratory versus real-world emissions. Prog Energ Combust 60:97–131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Learning Unit-1: M11.1: Engineering applications of composite materials, a project funded by MHRD, Govt. of India. Accessed 6 June 2017
  119. 119.
    Szeteiová K (2010) Automotive materials plastics in automotive markets today. Mater Sci Tech 10:27–33Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Satyanarayana KG (2015) Recent developments in ‘green’ composites based on plant fibers-preparation, structure property studies. J Bioproces Biotech 5(2):12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Włodarczyk J, Sikorska W, Rydz J, Johnston B, Jiang G, Radecka I, Kowalczuk M (2017) 3D processing of PHA containing (bio)degradable materials. In: Koller M (ed) Current advances in biopolymer processing & characterization. Nova Science Publishers, New York, US, in printGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Tang G, Wang X, Xing W, Zhang P, Wang B, Hong N, Yang W, Hu Y, Song L (2012) Thermal degradation and flame retardance of biobased polylactide composites based on aluminum hypophosphite. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(37):12009–12016. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Mohammed L, Ansari MNM, Pua G, Jawaid M, Islam MS (2015) A review on natural fiber reinforced polymer composite and its applications. Int J Polym Sci 243947:15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Retail forum for sustainability (2013) Sustainability of textiles. 11. Accessed 9 June 2017
  125. 125.
    Martinuzzi A, Kudlak R, Faber C, Wiman A (2011) CSR activities and impacts of the textile sector. RIMAS working papers 2:1–26. Sector profile based on a literature review developed in the course of the FP7 Project IMPACT – Impact measurement and performance analysis of CSRGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Behance (2016) Future 3D printing fashion system – ZARA. Accessed 22 May 2017
  127. 127.
    Scott C (2017) Fashion designer Babette Sperling uses WillowFlex filament to 3D print secret messages in natural materials. Accessed 18 June 2017
  128. 128.
    Fomin VA (2001) Biodegradable polymers, their present state and future prospects. Prog Rubber Plast Technol 17(3):186–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Kolybaba LG, Tabil S, Panigrahi WJ, Crerar WJ, Powell T, Wang B (2003) Biodegradable polymers: Past, present, and future. ASAE meeting presentation RRV03-0007, North DakotaGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Puoci F, Iemma F, Spizzirri UG, Cirillo G, Curcio M, Picci N (2008) Polymer in agriculture: A review. Am J Agr Biol Sci 3:299–314. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    SEPPA biodegradable material, environmental friendly plastic additive. Accessed 18 June 2017
  132. 132.
    Râpă M, Popa ME, Cinelli P, Lazzeri A, Burnichi R, Mitelut A, Grosu E (2011) Biodegradable alternative to plastics for agriculture application. Rom Biotechnol Lett 16(6):59–64Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Roy A, Singh SK, Bajpai J, Bajpai AK (2014) Controlled pesticide release from biodegradable polymers. Cent Eur J Chem 12:453–469. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Gunatillake PA, Adhikari R (2003) Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering. Eur Cell Mater 5:1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Maitz MF (2015) Applications of synthetic polymers in clinical medicine. Biosurf Biotribol 1:161–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Melchiorri AJ, Hibino N, Best CA, Yi T, Lee YU, Kraynak CA, Kimerer LK, Krieger A, Kim P, Breuer CK, Fisher JP (2015) 3D-printed biodegradable polymeric vascular grafts. Adv Healthc Mater 4 5:319–325. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Niu X, Feng Q, Wang M, Guo X, Zheng Q (2009) Porous nano-HA/collagen/PLLA scaffold containing chitosan microspheres for controlled delivery of synthetic peptide derived from BMP-2. J Controll Release 134:111–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Bugnicourt E, Cinelli P, Lazzeri A, Alvarez V (2014) Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): Review of synthesis, characteristics, processing and potential applications in packaging. eXPRESS Polym Lett 8:791–808. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Morouço P, Biscaia S, Viana T, Franco M, Malça C, Mateus A, Moura C, Ferreira FC, Mitchell G, Alves NM (2016) Fabrication of poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds reinforced with cellulose nanofibers, with and without the addition of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Biomed Res Int 2016(1596157):10. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Lee JW (2015) 3D nanoprinting technologies for tissue engineering applications. J Nanomater 2015(213521):14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Tiwari G, Tiwari R, Sriwastawa B, Bhati L, Pandey S, Pandey P, Bannerjee SK (2012) Drug delivery systems: An updated review. Int J Pharm Investig 2:2–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Chen GO, Wu O (2005) The application of polyhydroxyalkanoates as tissue engineering material. Biomaterials 26:6565–6578. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Sonia TA, Sharma PC (2011) Chitosan and its derivatives for drug delivery perspective. Adv Polym Sci 243:23–54. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Callens C, Remon JP (2000) Evaluation of starch-maltodextrin-Carbopol 974P mixtures for the nasal delivery of insulin in rabbits. J Control Release 66(2–3):215–220. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Maltais A, Remondetto GE, Subirade M (2009) Soy protein cold-set hydrogels as controlled delivery devices for nutraceutical compounds. Food Hydrocoll 23:1647–1653. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    REP-GB-323 (2017) Biodegradable packaging market: Global industry analysis and opportunity assessment 2014–2020. Accessed 21 June 2017
  147. 147.
    Rohan. Biodegradable plastics market worth 3.4 Billion USD by 2020. Accessed 21 June 2017
  148. 148.
    CH 2736 (2015) Biodegradable plastics market by type (PLA, PHA, PBS, starch-based plastics, regenerated cellulose, PCL), by application (packaging, fibers, agriculture, injection molding, and others) – Global trends & forecasts to 2020. Accessed 21 June 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wanda Sikorska
    • 1
  • Marta Musioł
    • 1
  • Barbara Zawidlak-Węgrzyńska
    • 2
  • Joanna Rydz
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Centre of Polymer and Carbon MaterialsPolish Academy of SciencesZabrzePoland
  2. 2.Zbigniew Religa Foundation of Cardiac Surgery Development, Heart Prostheses InstituteArtificial Heart LaboratoryZabrzePoland

Personalised recommendations