Advertisement

Composite Nanofibers for Removing Water Pollutants: Fabrication Techniques

  • Daniel S. CorreaEmail author
  • Luiza A. Mercante
  • Rodrigo Schneider
  • Murilo H. M. Facure
  • Danilo A. Locilento
Reference work entry

Abstract

The world has been facing severe problems regarding air, land, and water contamination by several hazardous chemicals released in the environment, including those arising from industry activities, automobiles exhaustion, food production and consumption, and population growth. Such contaminants, including heavy metals, dyes, and emerging pollutants, can be highly hazardous for human health and terrestrial and aquatic environment. In this context, novel technologies aiming to mitigate or reduce water pollution have been sought, such as those based on filtering- and adsorption-based techniques, in which the choice and/or combination of distinct materials plays a crucial role. Polymer nanofibers have been shown to be highly suitable for such purpose, because of their attractive properties, including small diameters (at the micro- and nanoscale), large porosity, and wide surface area available for chemical functionalization. Among available fiber-forming techniques, electrospinning is capable of producing long and porous fibers of small diameters and wide surface area suitable for removing water pollutants, particularly if their surfaces are functionalized with specific chemicals, aiming at increasing adsorption capability. Solution Blow Spinning (SBS) is a more recent fiber forming technique used for producing nanofibers with properties comparable to electrospinning, but presenting several advantages such as the greatly higher output rate and no requirement of a high-voltage source, once it employs a highly pressurized dragging gas source to produce the nanofibers. Therefore, in this book chapter we will make a comprehensive text on electrospinning and solution blow spinning methods as a valuable tool to produce diverse composite micro- and nanofibers aiming at applications in water pollutants removal.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the financial support from FAPESP (2015/13140-0, 2017/12174-4, 2014/16789-5), CNPq, CAPES (PNPD20131474 - 33001014004P9), MCTI-SisNano and Rede Agronano-EMBRAPA from Brazil.

References

  1. 1.
    Santhosh C, Velmurugan V, Jacob G, Jeong SK, Grace AN, Bhatnagar A (2016) Role of nanomaterials in water treatment applications: a review. Chem Eng J 306:1116–1137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Qu X, Brame J, Li Q, Alvarez PJJ (2013) Nanotechnology for a safe and sustainable water supply: enabling integrated water treatment and reuse. Acc Chem Res 46(3):834–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thavasi V, Singh G, Ramakrishna S (2008) Electrospun nanofibers in energy and environmental applications. Energy Environ Sci 1:205.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b809074mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thenmozhi S, Dharmaraj N, Kadirvelu K, Kim HY (2017) Electrospun nanofibers: new generation materials for advanced applications. Mater Sci Eng B 217:36–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2017.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gautam RK, Chattopadhyaya MC (2016) Nanomaterials for wastewater remediation. Elsevier, Amsterdam.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804609-8.00005-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lockwood DJ, yu BDJ (2015) Electrospun nanofibers for energy and environmental applications. Springer, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54160-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kenry LCT (2017) Beyond the current state of the syntheses and applications of nanofiber technology. Prog Polym Sci 70:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stojanovska E, Canbay E, Pampal ES, Calisir MD, Agma O, Polat Y, Simsek R, Gundogdu NAS, Akgul Y, Kilic A (2016) A review on non-electro nanofibre spinning techniques. RSC Adv 6:83783–83801.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA16986DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Homaeigohar S, Elbahri M (2014) Nanocomposite electrospun nanofiber membranes for environmental remediation. Materials (Basel) 7:1017–1045.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7021017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ma W, Zhang Q, Hua D, Xiong R, Zhao J, Rao W, Huang S, Zhan X, Chen F, Huang C (2016) Electrospun fibers for oil–water separation. RSC Adv 6:12868–12884.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA27309ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peng S, Jin G, Li L, Li K, Srinivasan M, Ramakrishna S, Chen J (2016) Multi-functional electrospun nanofibres for advances in tissue regeneration, energy conversion & storage,and water treatment. Chem Soc Rev 45:1225–1241.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00777ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scampicchio M, Bulbarello A, Arecchi A, Cosio MS, Benedetti S, Mannino S (2012) Electrospun nonwoven nanofibrous membranes for sensors and biosensors. Electroanalysis 24:719–725.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201200005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Noruzi M (2016) Electrospun nanofibres in agriculture and the food industry: a review. J Sci Food Agric:4663–4678.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang M, Zhao X, Zhang G, Wei G, Su Z (2017) Electrospinning design of functional nanostructures for biosensor applications. J Mater Chem B 5:1699–1711.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TB03121HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Migliorini FL, Sanfelice RC, Pavinatto A, Steffens J, Steffens C, Correa DS (2017) Voltammetric cadmium(II) sensor based on a fluorine doped tin oxide electrode modified with polyamide 6/chitosan electrospun nanofibers and gold nanoparticles. Microchim Acta:2–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2082-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oliveira JE, Scagion VP, Grassi V, Correa DS, Mattoso LHC (2012) Modification of electrospun nylon nanofibers using layer-by-layer films for application in flow injection electronic tongue: detection of paraoxon pesticide in corn crop. Sensors Actuators B Chem 171–172:249–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.03.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ray SS, Chen S-S, Li C-W, Nguyen NC, Nguyen HT (2016) A comprehensive review: electrospinning technique for fabrication and surface modification of membranes for water treatment application. RSC Adv 6:85495–85514.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA14952ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mercante LA, Scagion VP, Migliorini FL, Mattoso LHC, Correa DS (2017) Electrospinning-based (bio)sensors for food and agricultural applications: a review. Trends Anal Chem 91:91–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2017.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Daristotle JL, Behrens AM, Sandler AD, Kofinas P (2016) A review of the fundamental principles and applications of solution blow spinning. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:34951–34963.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b12994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Medeiros ES, Glenn GM, Klamczynski AP, Orts WJ, Mattoso LHC (2009) Solution blow spinning: a new method to produce micro- and nanofibers from polymer solutions. J Appl Polym Sci 113:2322–2330.  https://doi.org/10.1002/appCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Formhals A (1934) Process and apparatus for preparing artificial threads. U.S. Patent 1975504, 1934Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doshi J, Reneker DH (1993) Electrospinning process and applications of electrospun fibers. In: Industry applications society annual meeting, 1993, conference record of the 1993 IEEE. IEEE vol 3, pp 1698–1703. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.1993.299067
  23. 23.
    Wang X, Hsiao BS (2016) Electrospun nanofiber membranes. Curr Opin Chem Eng 12:62–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2016.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taylor GI (1969) Electrically driven jets. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 313:453–475.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1983.0054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mercante L, Facure M, Locilento D, Sanfelice R, Migliorini F, Mattoso LH, Correa D (2017) Solution blow spun PMMA nanofibers wrapped with reduced graphene oxide as efficient dye adsorbent. New J Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NJ01703KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen SH, Chang Y, Lee KR, Lai JY (2014) A three-dimensional dual-layer nano/microfibrous structure of electrospun chitosan/poly(d,l-lactide) membrane for the improvement of cytocompatibility. J Membr Sci 450:224–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Correia DM, Clarisse Ribeiro J, Ferreira CC, Botelho G, Jos LGRSL-M, Endez VS (2014) Influence of electrospinning parameters on poly(hydroxybutyrate) electrospun membranes fiber size and distribution daniela. Polym Eng Sci 54:1608–1617.  https://doi.org/10.1002/penCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kao T-H, Cheng C-C, Huang C-F, Chen J-K (2015) Using coaxial electrospinning to fabricate core/shell-structured polyacrylonitrile–polybenzoxazine fibers as nonfouling membranes. RSC Adv 5:58760–58771.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA09232ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang Y, Ding W, Jiao X, Chen D (2014) Electrospun flexible self-standing silica/mesoporous alumina core-shell fibrous membranes as adsorbents toward Congo red. RSC Adv 4:30790–30797.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA03912BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Baji A, Mai YW, Wong SC, Abtahi M, Chen P (2010) Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers: effects on oriented morphology, structures and tensile properties. Compos Sci Technol 70:703–718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu Y, Zhang X, Xia Y, Yang H (2010) Magnetic-field-assisted electrospinning of aligned straight and wavy polymeric nanofibers. Adv Mater 22:2454–2457.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200903870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Subramanian A, Krishnan UM, Sethuraman S (2011) Fabrication of uniaxially aligned 3D electrospun scaffolds for neural regeneration. Biomed Mater 6:25004.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/6/2/025004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang N, Burugapalli K, Song W, Halls J, Moussy F, Zheng Y, Ma Y, Wu Z, Li K (2013) Tailored fibro-porous structure of electrospun polyurethane membranes, their size-dependent properties and trans-membrane glucose diffusion. J Membr Sci 427:207–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ren LF, Xia F, Shao J, Zhang X, Li J (2017) Experimental investigation of the effect of electrospinning parameters on properties of superhydrophobic PDMS/PMMA membrane and its application in membrane distillation. Desalination 404:155–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.11.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hardick O, Stevens B, Bracewell DG (2011) Nanofibre fabrication in a temperature and humidity controlled environment for improved fibre consistency. J Mater Sci 46:3890–3898.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5310-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fashandi H, Karimi M (2012) Pore formation in polystyrene fiber by superimposing temperature and relative humidity of electrospinning atmosphere. Polymer (Guildf) 53:5832–5849.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen H, Yu D (2010) An elevated temperature electrospinning process for preparing acyclovir-loaded PAN ultrafine fibers. J Mater Process Technol 210:1551–1555.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yang G, Li H, Yang J, Wan J, Yu D (2017) Influence of working temperature on the formation of electrospun polymer nanofibers. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1824-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Camerlo A, Bühlmann-Popa A-M, Vebert-Nardim C, Rossi RM, Fortunato G (2014) Environmentally controlled emulsion electrospinning for the encapsulation of temperature-sensitive compounds. J Mater Sci 49:8154–8162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8524-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nezarati RM, Eifert MB, Cosgriff-hernandez E (2013) Effects of humidity and solution viscosity on electrospun fiber morphology. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 19:810–819.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2012.0671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hansen CM (1999) Hansen solubility parameters: a user’s handbook. In: CRC Presss LLCGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Casasola R, Thomas NL, Trybala A, Georgiadou S (2014) Electrospun poly lactic acid (PLA) fibres: effect of different solvent systems on fibre morphology and diameter. Polymer (Guildf) 55:4728–4737.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.06.032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Erdem R, Usta I, Akalin M, Atak O, Yuksek M, Pars A (2015) The impact of solvent type and mixing ratios of solvents on the properties of polyurethane based electrospun nanofibers. Appl Surf Sci 334:227–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Moomand K, Lim L (2015) Effects of solvent and n-3 rich fish oil on physicochemical properties of electrospun zein fibres. Food Hydrocoll 46:191–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.12.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Formenti S, Castagna R, Momentè R, Bertarelli C, Briatico-vangosa F (2016) The relevance of extensional rheology on electrospinning: the polyamide/iron chloride case. Eur Polym J 75:46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Monteiro APF, Rocha CMSL, Oliveira MF, Gontijo SML, Agudelo RR, Sinisterra RD, Cortés ME (2017) Nanofibers containing tetracycline/β-cyclodextrin: physicochemical characterization and antimicrobial evaluation. Carbohydr Polym 156:417–426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Casasola R, Thomas NL, Georgiadou S (2016) Electrospinning of poly(lactic acid): theoretical approach for the solvent selection to produce defect-free nanofibers. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 54:1483–1498.  https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Liu J, Huang J, Wujcik EK, Qiu B, Rutman D, Zhang X, Salazard E, Wei S, Guo Z (2015) Hydrophobic electrospun polyimide nanofibers for self-cleaning materials. Macromol Mater Eng 300:358–368.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201400307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mi H-Y, Palumbo S, Jing X, Turng L-S, Li W-J, Peng X-F (2014) Thermoplastic polyurethane/hydroxyapatite electrospun scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: effects of polymer properties and particle size. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 102:1434–1444.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Essalhi M, Khayet M (2014) Self-sustained webs of polyvinylidene fluoride electrospun nano-fibers: effects of polymer concentration and desalination by direct contact membrane distillation. J Membr Sci 454:133–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shao H, Fang J, Wang H, Lin T (2015) Effect of electrospinning parameters and polymer concentrations on mechanical-to-electrical energy conversion of randomlyoriented electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride) nanofiber mats. RSC Adv 5:14345–14350.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra16360eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Klairutsamee W, Supaphol P, Jangchud I (2015) Electrospinnability of poly(butylene succinate): effects of solvents and organic salt on the fiber size and morphology. J Appl Polym 42716:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.42716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Li R, Tomasula P, de Sousa A, Liu S-C, Tunick M, Liu K, Liu L (2017) Electrospinning pullulan fibers from salt solutions. Polymers (Basel) 9:32.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9010032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Roque AP, Mercante LA, Scagion VP, Oliveira JE, Mattoso LHC, De Boni L, Mendonca CR, Correa DS (2014) Fluorescent PMMA/MEH-PPV electrospun nanofibers: investigation of morphology, solvent, and surfactant effect. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 52:1388–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.23574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Suslu A, Albayrak AZ, Urkmez AS, Bayir E, Cocen U (2014) Effect of surfactant types on the biocompatibility of electrospun HAp/PHBV composite nanofibers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 25:2677–2689.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5286-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zheng J-Y, Zhuang M-F, Z-J Y, Zheng G-F, Zhao Y, Wang H, Sun D-H (2014) The effect of surfactants on the diameter and morphology of electrospun ultrafine nanofiber. J Nanomater 2017:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/689298Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Shan X, Li F, Liu C, Gao Q (2014) Electrospinning of chitosan/poly(lactic acid) nanofibers: the favorable effect of nonionic surfactant. J Appl Polym Sci 131:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.41098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Oliveira JE, Mattoso LHC, Orts WJ, Medeiros ES (2013) Structural and morphological characterization of micro and nanofibers produced by electrospinning and solution blow spinning: a comparative study. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2013:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/409572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Medeiros ES, Glenn GM, Klamczynski AP, Orts WJ, Mattoso LHC (2014) US Patent 8,641,960: Solution Blow SpinningGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Oliveira JE, Zucolotto V, Mattoso LH, Medeiros ES (2012) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes and poly(lactic acid) nanocomposite fibrous membranes prepared by solution blow spinning. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12:2733–2741.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2012.5730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bonan RF, Bonan PRF, Batista AUD, Perez DEC, Castellano LRC, Oliveira JE, Medeiros ES (2017) Poly(lactic acid)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) membranes produced by solution blow spinning: structure, thermal, spectroscopic, and microbial barrier properties. J Appl Polym Sci 44802:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tverdokhlebov SI, Stankevich K, Bolbasov E, Khlusov I, Kulagina I, Zaitsev K (2013) Nonwoven polylactide scaffolds obtained by solution blow spinning and the in vitro degradation dynamics. Adv Mater Res 872:257–262.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.872.257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Martínez-Sanz M, Bilbao-Sainz C, W-X D, Chiou B-S, Williams TG, Wood DF, Imam SH, Orts WJ, Lopez-Rubio A, Lagaron JM (2015) Antimicrobial poly(lactic acid)-based nanofibres developed by solution blow spinning. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15:616–627.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2015.9160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tao X, Zhou G, Zhuang X, Cheng B, Li X, Li H (2015) Solution blowing of activated carbon nanofibers for phenol adsorption. RSC Adv 5:5801–5808.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA10897CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Silva TH, de Oliveira JE, de Medeiros ES (2015) Obtenção de micro e nanofibras de PVC pela técnica de Fiação por Sopro em Solução. Polímeros 25:229–235.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.1694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Oliveira JE, Moraes EA, Marconcini JM, Mattoso LHC, Glenn GM, Medeiros ES (2013) Properties of poly(lactic acid) and poly(ethylene oxide) solvent polymer mixtures and nanofibers made by solution blow spinning. J Appl Polym Sci 129:3672–3681.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.39061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Polat Y, Pampal ES, Stojanovska E, Simsek R, Hassanin A, Kilic A, Demir A, Yilmaz S (2016) Solution blowing of thermoplastic polyurethane nanofibers: a facile method to produce flexible porous materials. J Appl Polym Sci 133:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.43025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Oliveira JE, Moraes EA, Costa RGF, Afonso AS, Mattoso LHC, Orts WJ, Medeiros ES (2011) Nano and submicrometric fibers of poly(D,L-lactide) obtained by solution blow spinning: process and solution variables. J Appl Polym Sci 122:3396–3405.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.34410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lou H, Han W, Wang X (2014) Numerical study on the solution blowing annular jet and its correlation with fiber morphology. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:2830–2838.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie4037142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    da Silva Parize DD, Foschini MM, de Oliveira JE, Klamczynski AP, Glenn GM, Marconcini JM, Mattoso LHC (2016) Solution blow spinning: parameters optimization and effects on the properties of nanofibers from poly(lactic acid)/dimethyl carbonate solutions. J Mater Sci 51:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9778-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Souza MA, Oliveira JE, Medeiros ES, Glenn GM, Mattoso LHC (2015) Controlled release of linalool using nanofibrous membranes of poly(lactic acid) obtained by electrospinning and solution blow spinning: a comparative study. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15:5628–5636.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2015.9692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ali I, Gupta VK (2007) Advances in water treatment by adsorption technology. Nat Protoc 1:2661–2667.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Dabrowski A (2001) Adsorption – from theory to practice. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 93:135–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Largitte L, Pasquier R (2016) A review of the kinetics adsorption models and their application to the adsorption of lead by an activated carbon. Chem Eng Res Des 109:495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sleijko FL (1985) Adsorption technology: a step-by-step approach to process evaluation and application. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Do DD (1998) Adsorption analysis: equilibria and kinetics. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bode-aluko CA, Pereao O, Ndayambaje G, Petrik L (2017) Adsorption of toxic metals on modified polyacrylonitrile nanofibres: a review. Water Air Soil Pollut 228:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3222-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Kampalanonwat P, Supaphol P (2010) Preparation and adsorption behavior of aminated electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats for heavy metal ion removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:3619–3627.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am1008024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Egodawatte S, Greenstein KE, Vance I, Rivera E, Myung NV, Parkin GF, Cwiertny M, Larsen SC (2016) Electrospun hematite nanofiber/mesoporous silica core/shell nanomaterials as an efficient adsorbent for heavy metals. RSC Adv 6:90516–90525.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra19876gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kolbasov A, Sinha-ray S, Yarin AL, Pourdeyhimi B (2017) Heavy metal adsorption on solution-blown biopolymer nano fiber membranes. J Membr Sci 530:250–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ren J, Huang X, Wang N, Lu K, Zhang X, Li W (2016) Preparation of polyanilinecoated polyacrylonitrile fiber mats and their application to Cr(VI) removal. Synth Met 222:255–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.10.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Zhao R, Wang Y, Li X, Sun B, Wang C (2015) Synthesis of β-cyclodextrin-based electrospun nanofiber membranes for highly efficient adsorption and separation of methylene blue. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:26649–26657.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b08403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Rieger KA, Thyagarajan R, Hoen ME, Yeung HF, Ford DM, Schiffma JD (2016) Transport of microorganisms into cellulose nanofiber mats. RSC Adv 6:24438–24445.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra01394eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Li X, Chen S, Fan X, Quan X, Tan F, Zhang Y, Gao J (2015) Adsorption of ciprofloxacin, bisphenol and 2-chlorophenol on electrospun carbon nanofibers: in comparison with powder activated carbon. J Colloid Interface Sci 447:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Yang B, Cao Y, Qi F, Li X, Xu Q (2015) Atrazine adsorption removal with nylon6/polypyrrole core-shell nanofibers mat: possible mechanism and characteristics. Nanoscale Res Lett 207:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-0903-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Borkowski A, Szala M, Tomasz C (2015) Adsorption studies of the gram-negative bacteria onto nanostructured silicon carbide. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 175:1448–1459.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1374-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mondal K, Sharma A (2016) Recent advances in the synthesis and application of photocatalytic metal–metal oxide core–shell nanoparticles for environmental remediation and their recycling process. RSC Adv 6:83589–83612.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA18102CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Yue D, Qian X, Zhao Y (2015) Photocatalytic remediation of ionic pollutant. Sci Bull 60:1791–1806.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-015-0918-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wu W, Jiang C, Roy VAL (2014) Recent progress in magnetic iron oxide semiconductor composite nanomaterials as promising photocatalysts. Nanoscale 7:38–58.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR04244ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Fresno F, Portela R, Suárez S, Coronado JM (2014) Photocatalytic materials: recent achievements and near future trends. J Mater Chem A 2:2863–2884.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA13793GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Chatterjee D, Dasgupta S (2005) Visible light induced photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 6:186–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2005.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Lee H, Kim M, Sohn D, Kim H, Oh S, Im S, Kim IS (2017) Decorated with palladium oxide nanoparticles exhibiting enhanced photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv 7:6108–6113.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA24935CCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Wang H, Zhang L, Chen Z, Hu J, Li S, Wang Z, Liu J, Wang X (2014) Semiconductor heterojunction photocatalysts: design, construction, and photocatalytic performances. Chem Soc Rev 43:5234–5244.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00126eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    An X, JC Y (2011) Graphene-based photocatalytic composites. RSC Adv 1:1426.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ra00382hCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Osterloh FE (2008) Inorganic materials as catalysts for photoelectrochemical splitting of water. Chem Mater 20:35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zhang L, Zhang Q, Xie H, Guo J, Lyu H, Li Y, Sun Z, Wang H, Guo Z (2017) Electrospun titania nanofibers segregated by graphene oxide for improved visible light photocatalysis. Appl Catal B Environ 201:470–478.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Zhong Y, Qiu X, Chen D, Li N, Xu Q, Li H, He J, Lu J (2016) Flexible electrospun carbon nanofiber/tin(IV) sulfide core/sheath membranes for photocatalytically treating chromium(VI)-containing wastewater. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:28671–28677.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b10241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Panthi G, Park SJ, Kim TW, Chung HJ, Hong ST, Park M, Kim HY (2015) Electrospun composite nanofibers of polyacrylonitrile and Ag2CO3 nanoparticles for visible light photocatalysis and antibacterial applications. J Mater Sci 50:4477–4485.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8995-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Friehs E, AlSalka Y, Jonczyk R, Lavrentieva A, Jochums A, Walter JG, Stahl F, Scheper T, Bahnemann D, Bahnemann D (2016) Toxicity, phototoxicity and biocidal activity of nanoparticles employed in photocatalysis. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 29:1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2016.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Li CJ, Li YJ, Wang JN, Cheng J (2013) PA6@FexOy nanofibrous membrane preparation and its strong Cr (VI)-removal performance. Chem Eng J 220:294–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kumar PS, Sundaramurthy J, Sundarrajan S, Babu VJ, Singh G, Allakhverdiev SI, Ramakrishna S (2014) Hierarchical electrospun nanofibers for energy harvesting, production and environmental remediation. Energy Environ Sci 7:3192–3222.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE00612GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Lee JA, Krogman KC, Ma M, Hill RM, Hammond PT, Rutledge GC (2009) Highly reactive multilayer-assembled TiO2 coating on electrospun polymer nanofibers. Adv Mater 21:1252–1256.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200802458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Di Paola A, García-López E, Marcì G, Palmisano L (2012) A survey of photocatalytic materials for environmental remediation. J Hazard Mater 211–212:3–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Qu X, Alvarez PJJ, Li Q (2013) Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res 47:3931–3946.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Sudha D, Sivakumar P (2015) Review on the photocatalytic activity of various composite catalysts. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 97:112–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2015.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Mohamed A, El-Sayed R, Osman TA, Toprak MS, Muhammed M, Uheida A (2016) Composite nanofibers for highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes from contaminated water. Environ Res 145:18–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.09.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Kumar SG, Devi LG (2011) Review on modified TiO2 photocatalysis under UV/visible light: selected results and related mechanisms on interfacial charge carrier transfer dynamics. J Phys Chem A 115:13211–13241.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp204364aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Xia Y, Wang J, Chen R, Zhou D, Xiang L (2016) A review on the fabrication of hierarchical ZnO nanostructures for photocatalysis application. Crystals 6:148.  https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst6110148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Ranjith KS, Senthamizhan A, Balusamy B, Uyar T (2017) Nanograined surface shell wall controlled ZnO–ZnS core–shell nanofibers and their shell wall thickness dependent visible photocatalytic properties. Cat Sci Technol 7:1167–1180.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CY02556KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Li L, Kang W, Li F, Li Z, Shi J, Zhao Y, Cheng B (2015) Coaxial solution blowing of modified hollow polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber Fe complex (Fe-AO-CSB-HPAN) as a heterogeneous Fenton photocatalyst for organic dye degradation. RSC Adv 5:68439–68445.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA09953FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Malwal D, Gopinath P (2016) Fabrication and applications of ceramic nanofibers in water remediation: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:500–534.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2015.1109913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Mohamed A, Osman TA, Toprak MS, Muhammed M, Yilmaz E, Uheida A (2016) Visible light photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) by surface modified CNT/titanium dioxide composites nanofibers. J Mol Catal A Chem 424:45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2016.08.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Zhang X, Li X, Shao C, Li J, Zhang M, Zhang P, Wang K, Lu N, Liu Y (2013) One-dimensional hierarchical heterostructures of In2S3 nanosheets on electrospun TiO2 nanofibers with enhanced visible photocatalytic activity. J Hazard Mater 260:892–900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Zhang Y, Lee MW, An S, Sinha-Ray S, Khansari S, Joshi B, Hong S, Hong JH, Kim JJ, Pourdeyhimi B, Yoon SS, Yarin AL (2013) Antibacterial activity of photocatalytic electrospun titania nanofiber mats and solution-blown soy protein nanofiber mats decorated with silver nanoparticles. Catal Commun 34:35–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2013.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Liu L, Liu Z, Bai H, Sun DD (2012) Concurrent filtration and solar photocatalytic disinfection/degradation using high-performance ag/TiO2 nanofiber membrane. Water Res 46:1101–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Yousef A, Barakat NAM, Amna T, Al-Deyab SS, Hassan MS, Abdel-Hay A, Kim HY (2012) Inactivation of pathogenic Klebsiella Pneumoniae by CuO/TiO2 nanofibers: a multifunctional nanomaterial via one-step electrospinning. Ceram Int 38:4525–4532.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.02.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Patel S, Hota G (2016) Iron oxide nanoparticle-immobilized PAN nanofibers: synthesis and adsorption studies. RSC Adv 6:15402–15414.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA20345GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Kampalanonwat P, Supaphol P (2010) Preparation and adsorption behavior of aminated electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanofiber mats for heavy metal ion removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:3619–3627.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am1008024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Liu Q, Bin ZL, Zhao QB, Frear C, Zheng YM (2015) Synthesis of Fe3O4/Polyacrylonitrile composite electrospun nanofiber mat for effective adsorption of tetracycline. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:14573–14583.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b04598CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel S. Correa
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Luiza A. Mercante
    • 1
    • 3
  • Rodrigo Schneider
    • 1
    • 2
  • Murilo H. M. Facure
    • 1
    • 2
  • Danilo A. Locilento
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Nanotechnology National Laboratory for Agriculture (LNNA)Embrapa InstrumentaçãoSão CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.PPGQ, Department of Chemistry, Center for Exact Sciences and TechnologyFederal University of São Carlos (UFSCar)São CarlosBrazil
  3. 3.PPG-CEM, Department of Materials EngineeringFederal University of São Carlos (UFSCar)São CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations