Advertisement

Semiconductor Eco-materials for Water Treatment

  • Alfredo Gonzalez-PerezEmail author
  • Kenneth M. Persson
  • Lars Samuelson
Reference work entry

Abstract

In the current chapter two semiconductor materials are being assessed as eco-materials of choice for key applications in the water business. Ultraviolet light-emitting diodes, UV-LEDs, based on III-Nitride ultraviolet emitters like GaN, InGaN, and AlGaN and semiconductor oxides like TiO2, ZnO, or WO3 can be used as eco-materials for disinfection and pollutant removal in water, respectively. Looking through the fabrication process, functional life span, as well as their final disposal and recycling, those materials contribute substantially to the reduction of the environmental burden through their whole life cycle. Future trends and development directions as well as their impact on new water market niches, via replacement of old and less environmentally friendly technologies, are suggested and discussed.

Keywords

Semiconductors Ultraviolet light-emitting diodes Semiconductor oxides Water disinfection Pollutant degradation Eco-materials 

References

  1. 1.
    Mishra AK (2016) Smart materials for waste water applications. Scrivener Publishing, Hoboken.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119041214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Werber JR, Osuji CO, Elimelech M (2016) Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nat Rev Mater 1:16018.  https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Le NL, Nunes SP (2016) Materials and membrane technologies for water and energy sustainability. Sustain Mater Technol 7:1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2016.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown PS, Bhushan B (2016) Bioinspired materials for water supply and management: water collection, water purification and separation of water from oil. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 374:20160135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Voisin H, Bergström L, Liu P, Mathew A (2017) Nanocellulose-based materials for water purification. Nano 7:57.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7030057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonzalez-Perez A, Persson KM (2016) Bioinspired materials for water purification. Materials (Basel) 9:447.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9060447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halada K, Yamamoto R (2001) The current status of research and development on ecomaterials around the world. MRS Bull 26:871–879.  https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2001.227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Halada K, Yamada K, Ijima K, Soeno Y (2003) Analysis of the current status of ecomaterials in Japan. Mater Trans 44:1237–1243.  https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.44.1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nie Z, Zuo T (2003) Ecomaterials research and development activities in China. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 7:217–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2003.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shinohara Y (2004) Ecomaterials guideline project in Japan. In: Ist Japan-China symposium on eco-materials, recycling-oriented industry and environmental management, Suzhou, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kiochi Y (2002) Concept and development of ecomaterials. In: Proceedings of international workshop on eco-materials, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crul M, Diehl JC, Ryan C (2009) Design for sustainability: a step by step approach. http://www.d4s-sbs.org/. Accessed 8 Jun 2017
  13. 13.
    Chen J, Loeb S, Kim J-H, Ducoste JJ, Zhang S, Chen J, Liu X, Nakaya Y, Akutagawa M, Kinouchi Y, Stockman SA, Kish FA, Craford MG, Tan TS, Kocot CP, Hueschen M, Posselt J, Loh B, Sasser G, Collins D (2017) LED revolution: fundamentals and prospects for UV disinfection applications. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 3:188–202.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EW00241BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Song K, Mohseni M, Taghipour F (2016) Application of ultraviolet light-emitting diodes (UV-LEDs) for water disinfection: a review. Water Res 94:341–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paidalwar AA, Khediskar IP (2016) Overview of water disinfection by UV technology – a review. Int J Sci Technol Eng 2, 213--219.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schalk S, Adam V, Arnold E, Brieden K, Voronov A, Witzke H-D (2005) UV-lamps for disinfection and advanced oxidation -lamp types, technologies and applications. IUVA News 8:32–37Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sholtes KA, Lowe K, Walters GW, Sobsey MD, Linden KG, Casanova LM (2016) Comparison of ultraviolet light-emitting diodes and low-pressure mercury-arc lamps for disinfection of water. Environ Technol 37:2183–2188.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1144798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oppenländer T (2007) Mercury-free sources of VUV/UV radiation: application of modern excimer lamps (excilamps) for water and air treatment. J Environ Eng Sci 6:253–264.  https://doi.org/10.1139/s06-059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lomaev MI, Sosnin EA, Tarasenko VF (2012) Excilamps and their applications. Prog Quantum Electron 36:51–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2012.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matafonova G, Batoev V (2012) Recent progress on application of UV excilamps for degradation of organic pollutants and microbial inactivation. Chemosphere 89:637–647.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Masoud NM, Murnick DE (2013) High efficiency fluorescent excimer lamps: an alternative to mercury based UVC lamps. Rev Sci Instrum 84:123108.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4842296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahlambi MM, Ngila CJ, Mamba BB (2015) Recent developments in environmental photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants: the case of titanium dioxide nanoparticles – a review. J Nanomater 2015:1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/790173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ameta R, Benjamin S, Ameta A, Ameta SC (2012) Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants: a review. Mater Sci Forum 734:247–272.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.734.247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ameta R, Ameta SC (2016) Photocatalysis: principles and applications, CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khan MM, Adil SF, Al-Mayouf A (2015) Metal oxides as photocatalysts. J Saudi Chem Soc 19:462–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2015.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hernández-Ramírez A, Medina-Ramírez I (2015) Photocatalytic semiconductors: synthesis, characterization, and environmental applications, Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yu PY, Cardona M (2010) Fundamentals of semiconductors : physics and materials properties. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gurnee EF (1969) Fundamental principles of semiconductors. J Chem Educ 46:80.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ed046p80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sze SM, Ng KK (2007) Physics of semiconductor devices. Wiley-Interscience, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sze SM, Lee MK (2012) Semiconductor devices, physics and technology. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Muramoto Y, Kimura M, Nouda S (2014) Development and future of ultraviolet light-emitting diodes: UV-LED will replace the UV lamp. Semicond Sci Technol 29:084004.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/29/8/084004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oturan MA, Aaron J-J (2014) Advanced oxidation processes in water/wastewater treatment: principles and applications. A review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:2577–2641.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.829765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    (2017) WHO | Drinking-water. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs391/en/Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fewtrell L, Bartram J (2001) WHO | water quality: guidelines, standards and health. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    American Water Works Association, Edzwald J (2010) Water quality & treatment: a handbook on drinking water. McGraw Hill Professional, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Boorman GA (1999) Drinking water disinfection byproducts: review and approach to toxicity evaluation. Environ Health Perspect 107(Suppl 1):207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Martinez D, Grellier J, Bennett J, Best N, Iszatt N, Vrijheid M, Toledano MB (2009) Chlorination disinfection by-products in drinking water and congenital anomalies: review and meta-analyses. Environ Health Perspect 117:1486–1493.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zyara A, Torvinen E, Veijalainen A-M, Heinonen-Tanski H (2016) The effect of UV and combined chlorine/UV treatment on coliphages in drinking water disinfection. Water 8:130.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Poepping C, Beck SE, Wright H, Linden KG (2014) Evaluation of DNA damage reversal during medium-pressure UV disinfection. Water Res 56:181–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kneissl M, Rass J (2016) III-nitride ultraviolet emitters : technology and applications, 1st edn. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Almeida PS, Camponogara D, Dalla Costa M, Braga H, Alonso JM (2015) Matching LED and driver life spans: a review of different techniques. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 9:36–47.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2014.2352861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dhivya G, Subaashini K, Shamshudeen J, Rekha G, Pitchiah R (2013) Wirelessly controlled LED fixture with heat sink – design and implementation. In: 2013 I.E. international conference consumer electronics.  Berlin, Germany. IEEE, pp 506–507Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    U.S. Geological Survey (2017) Mineral commodity summaries 2017. U S Govt Printing Office. https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/mcs/
  44. 44.
    Lee HS, Nam CW (1998) A study on the extraction of gallium from gallium arsenide scrap. Hydrometallurgy 49:125–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(98)00016-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wu X, Wu S, Qin W, Ma X, Niu Y, Lai S, Yang C, Jiao F, Ren L (2012) Reductive leaching of gallium from zinc residue. Hydrometallurgy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.11.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Swain B, Mishra C, Kang L, Park K-S, Lee CG, Hong HS (2015) Recycling process for recovery of gallium from GaN an e-waste of LED industry through ball milling, annealing and leaching. Environ Res 138:401–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dodson JR, Hunt AJ, Parker HL, Yang Y, Clark JH (2012) Elemental sustainability: towards the total recovery of scarce metals. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 51:69–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2011.09.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lim S-R, Kang D, Ogunseitan OA, Schoenung JM (2013) Potential environmental impacts from the metals in incandescent, compact fluorescent lamp (CFL), and light-emitting diode (LED) bulbs. Environ Sci Technol 47:1040–1047.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es302886mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lim S-R, Kang D, Ogunseitan OA, Schoenung JM (2011) Potential environmental impacts of light-emitting diodes (LEDs): metallic resources, toxicity, and hazardous waste classification. Environ Sci Technol 45:320–327.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es101052qCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kheyrandish A, Mohseni M, Taghipour F (2017) Development of a method for the characterization and operation of UV-LED for water treatment. Water Res 122:570–579.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Beck SE, Ryu H, Boczek LA, Cashdollar JL, Jeanis KM, Rosenblum JS, Lawal OR, Linden KG (2017) Evaluating UV-C LED disinfection performance and investigating potential dual-wavelength synergy. Water Res 109:207–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Oguma K, Rattanakul S, Bolton JR (2016) Application of UV light? Emitting diodes to adenovirus in water. J Environ Eng 142:04015082.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Oguma K, Kita R, Sakai H, Murakami M, Takizawa S (2013) Application of UV light emitting diodes to batch and flow-through water disinfection systems. Desalination 328:24–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhan L, Xia F, Ye Q, Xiang X, Xie B (2015) Novel recycle technology for recovering rare metals (Ga, In) from waste light-emitting diodes. J Hazard Mater 299:388–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Silvas FPC, Jiménez Correa MM, Caldas MPK, de Moraes VT, Espinosa DCR, Tenório JAS (2015) Printed circuit board recycling: physical processing and copper extraction by selective leaching. Waste Manag 46:503–510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ghosh B, Ghosh MK, Parhi P, Mukherjee PS, Mishra BK (2015) Waste printed circuit boards recycling: an extensive assessment of current status. J Clean Prod 94:5–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Nam S-W, Jo B-I, Yoon Y, Zoh K-D (2014) Occurrence and removal of selected micropollutants in a water treatment plant. Chemosphere 95:156–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.08.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zhang D, Gersberg RM, Ng WJ, Tan SK (2014) Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in aquatic plant-based systems: a review. Environ Pollut 184:620–639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.09.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rivera-Utrilla J, Sánchez-Polo M, Ferro-García MÁ, Prados-Joya G, Ocampo-Pérez R (2013) Pharmaceuticals as emerging contaminants and their removal from water. A review. Chemosphere 93:1268–1287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.07.059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Zambello E (2012) Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in urban wastewater: removal, mass load and environmental risk after a secondary treatment? A review. Sci Total Environ 429:123–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bartrons M, Peñuelas J (2017) Pharmaceuticals and personal-care products in plants. Trends Plant Sci 22:194–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Petrie B, Barden R, Kasprzyk-Hordern B (2015) A review on emerging contaminants in wastewaters and the environment: current knowledge, understudied areas and recommendations for future monitoring. Water Res 72:3–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Geissen V, Mol H, Klumpp E, Umlauf G, Nadal M, van der Ploeg M, van de Zee SEATM, Ritsema CJ (2015) Emerging pollutants in the environment: a challenge for water resource management. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 3:57–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2015.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gavrilescu M, Demnerová K, Aamand J, Agathos S, Fava F (2015) Emerging pollutants in the environment: present and future challenges in biomonitoring, ecological risks and bioremediation. New Biotechnol 32:147–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2014.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Derco J, Dudáš J, Valičková M, Šimovičová K, Kecskés J (2015) Removal of micropollutants by ozone based processes. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 94:78–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2015.03.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Yu F, Li Y, Han S, Ma J (2016) Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from aqueous solution using carbon materials. Chemosphere 153:365–385.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ahmed MB, Zhou JL, Ngo HH, Guo W (2015) Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from water and wastewater: progress and challenges. Sci Total Environ 532:112–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chong MN, Jin B, Chow CWK, Saint C (2010) Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 44:2997–3027.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Pichat P (2013) Photocatalysis and water purification : from fundamentals to recent applications. Wiley-VCH, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kisch H (2015) Semiconductor photocatalysis: Principles and Applications, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Germany.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527673315Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Dionysiou DD, Li Puma G, Ye J, Schneider J, Bahnemann D (2016) Photocatalysis: Applications (Energy and Environment Series). Royal Society of Chemistry, UK.  https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782627104Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Schneider J, Bahnemann D, Ye J, Li Puma G, Dionysiou DD (2016) Photocatalysis: Fundamentals and Perspectives (Energy and Environment Series). Royal Society of Chemistry, UK.  https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782622338Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Nowosielski R, Kania A, Spilka M (2007) Development of ecomaterials and materials technologies. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng, 21, 27--30Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Khaki MRD, Shafeeyan MS, Raman AAA, Daud WMAW (2017) Application of doped photocatalysts for organic pollutant degradation – a review. J Environ Manag 198:78–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kumar SG, Rao KSRK, Kuang Q, Zhou X, Zhang XH, Xu T, Xie ZX, Zheng LS, Shan B, Xie C, Luo L, Cheng HM, Zhang WJ, Bello I, Lee ST (2015) Zinc oxide based photocatalysis: tailoring surface-bulk structure and related interfacial charge carrier dynamics for better environmental applications. RSC Adv 5:3306–3351.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA13299HCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Dong P, Hou G, Xi X, Shao R, Dong F, Whangbo M-H, Cai QY, Ye J, Li H, Räsänen M, Ritala M, Leskelä M (2017) WO3 -based photocatalysts: morphology control, activity enhancement and multifunctional applications. Environ Sci Nano 4:539–557.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6EN00478DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Lee KM, Lai CW, Ngai KS, Juan JC (2016) Recent developments of zinc oxide based photocatalyst in water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 88:428–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Rajeshwar K, Ibanez JG (1997) Environmental electrochemistry: fundamentals and applications in pollution abatement. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Bora LV, Mewada RK (2017) Visible/solar light active photocatalysts for organic effluent treatment: fundamentals, mechanisms and parametric review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:1393–1421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Dahl M, Liu Y, Yin Y (2014) Composite titanium dioxide nanomaterials. Chem Rev 114:9853–9889.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400634pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Fattakhova-Rohlfing D, Zaleska A, Bein T (2014) Three-dimensional titanium dioxide nanomaterials. Chem Rev 114:9487–9558.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500201cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Medina-Ramírez I, Hernández-Ramírez A, Maya-Treviño ML (2015) Synthesis methods for photocatalytic materials. In: Photocatalytic semiconductor. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 69–102Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Rochkind M, Pasternak S, Paz Y (2014) Using dyes for evaluating photocatalytic properties: a critical review. Molecules 20:88–110.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules20010088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Fernández-Ibáñez P, Blanco J, Malato S, Nieves FJ d l (2003) Application of the colloidal stability of TiO2 particles for recovery and reuse in solar photocatalysis. Water Res 37:3180–3188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00157-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Zhang G, Zhang J, Wang L, Meng Q, Wang J (2012) Fouling mechanism of low-pressure hollow fiber membranes used in separating nanosized photocatalysts. J Membr Sci 389:532–543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Gjipalaj J, Alessandri I (2017) Easy recovery, mechanical stability, enhanced adsorption capacity and recyclability of alginate-based TiO2 macrobead photocatalysts for water treatment. J Environ Chem Eng 5:1763–1770.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.03.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Zhai Y, Yin Y, Liu X, Li Y, Wang J, Liu C, Bian G (2017) Novel magnetically separable BiVO4/Fe3O4 photocatalyst: synthesis and photocatalytic performance under visible-light irradiation. Mater Res Bull 89:297–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.01.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Zielińska-Jurek A, Bielan Z, Wysocka I, Strychalska J, Janczarek M, Klimczuk T (2017) Magnetic semiconductor photocatalysts for the degradation of recalcitrant chemicals from flow back water. J Environ Manag 195:157–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Batistela VR, Fogaça LZ, Fávaro SL, Caetano W, Fernandes-Machado NRC, Hioka N (2017) ZnO supported on zeolites: photocatalyst design, microporosity and properties. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 513:20–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.11.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Liang H, Wang Z, Liao L, Chen L, Li Z, Feng J (2017) High performance photocatalysts: montmorillonite supported-nano TiO2 composites. Opt – Int J Light Electron Opt 136:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.02.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Tan P, Chen X, Wu L, Shang YY, Liu W, Pan J, Xiong X (2017) Hierarchical flower-like SnSe2 supported Ag3PO4 nanoparticles: towards visible light driven photocatalyst with enhanced performance. Appl Catal B Environ 202:326–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Montecchio F, Chinungi D, Lanza R, Engvall K (2017) Surface treatments of metal supports for photocatalysis applications. Appl Surf Sci 401:283–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Mohamed MA, Mutalib MA, Hir ZAM, Zain MFM, Mohamad AB, Minggu LJ, Awang NA, Salleh WNW (2017) An overview on cellulose-based material in tailoring bio-hybrid nanostructured photocatalysts for water treatment and renewable energy applications. Int J Biol Macromol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Srikanth B, Goutham R, Badri Narayan R, Ramprasath A, Gopinath KP, Sankaranarayanan AR (2017) Recent advancements in supporting materials for immobilised photocatalytic applications in waste water treatment. J Environ Manag 200:60–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Ismail AA, Bahnemann DW, Nosaka Y, Wu L, Wang X, Li J, Fu X, Miyamoto Z, Majima T, Bein T (2011) Mesoporous titania photocatalysts: preparation, characterization and reaction mechanisms. J Mater Chem 21:11686.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm10407aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Mazierski P, Bajorowicz B, Grabowska E, Zaleska-Medynska A (2016) Photoreactor design aspects and modeling of light. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 211–248Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Sigel A, Sigel H, Sigel RKO, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain) (2011) Metal ions in toxicology: effects, interactions, interdependencies. RSC Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Litter MI, Quici N, Meichtry JM, Senn AM (2016) Chapter 2. Photocatalytic removal of metallic and other inorganic pollutants. In: Photocatalysis. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, pp 35–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Gonzalez V, Vignati DAL, Leyval C, Giamberini L (2014) Environmental fate and ecotoxicity of lanthanides: are they a uniform group beyond chemistry? Environ Int 71:148–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.06.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Gonzalez V, Vignati DAL, Pons M-N, Montarges-Pelletier E, Bojic C, Giamberini L (2015) Lanthanide ecotoxicity: first attempt to measure environmental risk for aquatic organisms. Environ Pollut 199:139–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.01.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Rim KT, Koo KH, Park JS (2013) Toxicological evaluations of rare earths and their health impacts to workers: a literature review. Saf Health Work 4:12–26.  https://doi.org/10.5491/SHAW.2013.4.1.12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Lui GY, Roser D, Corkish R, Ashbolt NJ, Stuetz R (2016) Point-of-use water disinfection using ultraviolet and visible light-emitting diodes. Sci Total Environ 553:626–635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Ibrahim MAS, MacAdam J, Autin O, Jefferson B (2014) Evaluating the impact of LED bulb development on the economic viability of ultraviolet technology for disinfection. Environ Technol 35:400–406.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.829858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Gmurek M, Olak-Kucharczyk M, Ledakowicz S (2017) Photochemical decomposition of endocrine disrupting compounds – a review. Chem Eng J 310:437–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Pirilä M, Saouabe M, Ojala S, Rathnayake B, Drault F, Valtanen A, Huuhtanen M, Brahmi R, Keiski RL (2015) Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater. Top Catal 58:1085–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-015-0477-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Fresno F, Portela R, Suárez S, Coronado JM, Yang P, Pijpers JJH, Nocera DG, Antonietti M, Yan Q, Zamkov M, Tendeloo G, Van Wu D, Cao A (2014) Photocatalytic materials: recent achievements and near future trends. J Mater Chem A 2:2863–2884.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3TA13793GCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Lee S-Y, Park S-J (2013) TiO2 photocatalyst for water treatment applications. J Ind Eng Chem 19:1761–1769.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.07.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Li D, Shi W (2016) Recent developments in visible-light photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics. Chin J Catal 37:792–799.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61054-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Samadi M, Zirak M, Naseri A, Khorashadizade E, Moshfegh AZ (2016) Recent progress on doped ZnO nanostructures for visible-light photocatalysis. Thin Solid Films 605:2–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2015.12.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Pelaez M, Nolan NT, Pillai SC, Seery MK, Falaras P, Kontos AG, Dunlop PSM, Hamilton JWJ, Byrne JA, O’Shea K, Entezari MH, Dionysiou DD (2012) A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl Catal B Environ 125:331–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.05.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Mirzaei A, Chen Z, Haghighat F, Yerushalmi L (2016) Removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds from water by zinc oxide-based photocatalytic degradation: a review. Sustain Cities Soc 27:407–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfredo Gonzalez-Perez
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Kenneth M. Persson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lars Samuelson
    • 3
  1. 1.Sweden Water Research ABLundSweden
  2. 2.Division of Water Resources Engineering TVRL, Faculty of Engineering LTHLund UniversityLundSweden
  3. 3.NanoLund, the Center for NanoscienceLund UniversityLundSweden
  4. 4.Membrane Biophysics Group, Niels Bohr InstituteUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations