Advertisement

The Child-Nature Relationship in Television for Children

  • Åsa PetterssonEmail author
Reference work entry
  • 6 Downloads
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

This Chapter studies how the child-nature relationship is constructed in public service TV for children. TV has a strong position in society, as both a producer and reproducer of norms, notions, and identities for TV audiences. In a Swedish context, public service television is the television provider most used by the youngest audience and has been since the very start of television broadcasts. It is, therefore, a particularly influential institution for the child audience. When studying TV programmes for a child audience, nature content spans all genres, leaving few programmes untouched. By analyzing how children and nature are linked together in TV programmes, societal notions of this relationship can be studied. The vast presence of nature content in TV for children reproduces the discursive notion that children are linked to nature in specific ways. Children are supposed to engage in nature, be interested in nature, learn about nature, as well as want to watch TV programmes containing nature in ways adults are not. This portrays both nature and children as somewhat sweet and harmless, at the same time as the heavy responsibility of saving nature from environmental disaster is placed on the shoulders of children. The Chapter concludes that the child-nature relationship, as it is represented for a child audience, must be questioned, because it leaves children with the responsibility for nature and, moreover, portrays adults as unchangeable and unwilling to shoulder the environmental burden that they have created in the first place.

Keywords

Child-nature relationship Swedish public service TV Children Outdoor life Environmental issues 

References

  1. Ågren, Y. (2008). Uppmärksamhet, makt och föreställningar om barndom: Röster från barn som deltagit i TV. In K. Helander (Ed.), Utsikter och insikter: Barns kulturella liv (pp. 75–104). Stockholm, Sweden: Centrum för barnkulturforskning vid Stockholms universitet.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R. C. (1992). Audience-oriented criticism and television. In R. C. Allen (Ed.), Channels of discourse, reassembled: Television and contemporary criticism (2nd ed., pp. 101–137). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Änggård, E. (2009). Naturen som klassrum, hem och sagovärld. In G. Halldén (Ed.), Naturen som symbol för den goda barndomen (pp. 78–105). Stockholm, Sweden: Carlssons.Google Scholar
  4. Ants in the pants (Myror i brallan) aired on SVT1, 10/4/2007, 18.00–18.30. Produced by SVT.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, S. (2001 [1993]). Picturing the beast: Animals, identity and representation. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bergnéhr, D. (2009). Natur, utomhusmiljö och den goda barndomen i tidningen Förskolan. In G. Halldén (Ed.), Naturen som symbol för den goda barndomen (pp. 59–77). Stockholm, Sweden: Carlssons.Google Scholar
  7. Buckingham, D. (2000). The making of citizens: Young people, news and politics. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Carter, C., & Messenger Davies, M. (2005). ‘A Fresh Peach is Easier to Bruise’: Children, young people and the news. In S. Allan (Ed.), Journalism: Critical issues (pp. 224–238). Maidenhead, England/New York, NY: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. Environmental Education Research, 4(4), 369–382.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462980040402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cronon, W. (Ed.). (1995). Uncommon ground: Toward reinventing nature. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  11. Day-care TV for children (Dagis-TV för barn), aired on SVT1, 1/10/1992, 9.30–9.45. Produced by UR.Google Scholar
  12. deCordova, R. (1994). The Mickey in Macy’s window: Childhood, consumerism, and Disney animation. In E. Smoodin (Ed.), Disney discourse: Producing the magic kingdom (pp. 203–214). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Dysthe, O. (1996). Det flerstämmiga klassrummet: Att skriva och samtala för att lära. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  14. Edin, A. (2000). Den föreställda publiken – programpolitik, publikbilder och tilltalsformer i svensk public service-television. Diss. Stockholm: Symposion.Google Scholar
  15. Ellis, J. (2006). Defining the medium: TV forum and aesthetics. In G. Creeber (Ed.), Tele-visions: An introduction to studying television (pp. 10–19). London, England: BFI.Google Scholar
  16. Expedition Wilderness (Expedition Vildmark), aired on SVT1 21/10/2007, 10.35–11.00. Produced by SVT.Google Scholar
  17. Halldén, G. (Ed.). (2009). Naturen som symbol för den goda barndomen. Stockholm, Sweden: Carlssons.Google Scholar
  18. Halldén, G. (2011). Barndomens skogar: om barn i natur och barns natur. Stockholm, Sweden: Carlsson.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Haraway, D. J. (1992). Primate visions. Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. London, England: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, O. (2002). Naturally not! Childhood, the urban and romanticism. Human Ecology Review, 9(2), 17–30.Google Scholar
  23. Kahn, P. H., Jr. (1999). The human relationship with nature: Development and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahn, P. H. Jr., Friedman, B., Alexander, I. S., Freier, N. G., & Collett, S. L. (2005). The distant gardener: What conversations in the Telegarden reveal about human–telerobotic interaction. Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN ‘05) (pp. 13–18). Piscataway, New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.Google Scholar
  25. Kahn, P. H., Jr., Friedman, B., Gill, B., Hagman, J., Severson, R. L., Freier, N. G., et al. (2008). A plasma display window? The shifting baseline problem in a technologically-mediated natural world. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 192–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kahn, P. H., Jr., & Kellert, S. R. (Eds.). (2002). Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kahn, P. H. Jr., Severson, R. L., & Ruckert, J. H. (2009). The human relation with nature and technological nature. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 37–42.Google Scholar
  28. Kalof, L., & Fitzgerald, A. (2003). Reading the trophy: Exploring the display of dead animals in hunting magazines. Visual Studies, 18(2), 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, N. (2001). Childhood and society: Growing up in an age of uncertainty. Maidenhead, England: Open University.Google Scholar
  30. Lindgren, A. (2006). Från små människor till lärande individer. Föreställningar om barn och barndom i förskoleprogram 1970–2000. Stockholm, Sweden: Stiftelsen Etermedierna i Sverige.Google Scholar
  31. Lindgren, A. (2009). Visualiseringen av naturen i tidig skolfilm. In G. Halldén (Ed.), Naturen som symbol för den goda barndomen (pp. 34–58). Stockholm, Sweden: Carlssons.Google Scholar
  32. Lindgren, A. (2013). Barnkultur och natur i Astrid Lindgren’s värld. Nya och gamla barndomsideal. In K. Helander (Ed.), Nu vill jag prata!: barns röster i barnkulturen (pp. 153–169). Stockholm, Sweden: Centrum för barnkulturforskning.Google Scholar
  33. Linnér, B. (2005). Att lära för överlevnad. Utbildningsprogrammen och miljöfrågorna 1962–2002. Stockholm, Sweden: Stiftelsen Etermedierna i Sverige.Google Scholar
  34. Little News Billboard (Lilla löpsedeln), aired on SVT1, 21/4/1992, 9.15–9.30. Produced by UR.Google Scholar
  35. Lury, K. (2005). Interpreting television. London, England: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  36. Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (1998). Contested natures. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). There are no visual media. Journal of Visual Culture, 4(2), 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Myers, G. (2007). The significance of children and animals: Social development and our connections to other species. (2. rev. ed.) West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Once upon a time there was a summer (Det var en gång en sommar), aired on SVT2, 3/10/1980, 17.30–17.50. Directed by Tomas and Yeng Löfdahl.Google Scholar
  40. Our amazing world (Vår fantastiska värld), aired on SVT1, 8/4/1980, 18.10–19.20. Produced by SVT.Google Scholar
  41. Outka, E. (2009). Consuming traditions: Modernity, modernism, and the commodified authentic. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Pedersen, H. (2007). The school and the animal other. An ethnography of human-animal relations in education. Diss. Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences.Google Scholar
  43. Pettersson Å. (2013). TV for children: How Swedish public service television imagines a child audience. Diss., Linköping, Sweden: Linköpings universitet. http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A620324&dswid=8138
  44. Pettersson, Å. (2017). Chapter 15: The best friend: Exploring the power relations of the child-pet co-construction in children’s TV programs. In A. Feuerstein & C. Nolte-Odhiambo (Eds.), Childhood and pethood in literature and culture: New perspectives on childhood studies and animal studies. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1994). Analyzing discourse. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 47–66). London, England: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prout, A. (2005). The future of childhood: Towards the interdisciplinary study of children. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. London, England: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Rydin, I. (2000). Barnens röster. Program för barn i Sveriges radio och television 1925–1999. Stockholm, Sweden: Stiftelsen Etermedierna i Sverige.Google Scholar
  49. Säljö, R. (2000). Lärande i praktiken. Ett sociokulturellt perspektiv. Stockholm, Sweden: Prisma.Google Scholar
  50. Småungar & medier. (2017). fakta om små barns användning och upplevelser av medier. Stockholm, Sweden: Medierådet.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, A. (2011). Reconceptualizing the “Nature” of childhood. Childhood, 18(4), 420–433.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568211404951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. The brain office (Hjärnkontoret), aired on SVT1, 13/10/2007, 10.15–10.40. Produced by SVT.Google Scholar
  53. The SVT website a. https://www.svt.se/hjarnkontoret/. Retrieved June 11, 2016.
  54. The SVT website b. https://www.svt.se/sommarlov/. Retrieved June 11, 2016.
  55. The Swedish Film Institute website (Svenska filminstitutet). http://www.sfi.se/sv/svensk-filmdatabas/. Retrieved June 11, 2017.
  56. Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dalarna UniversityFalunSweden

Section editors and affiliations

  • Debra Flanders Cushing
    • 1
  • Robert Barratt
    • 2
  • Elisabeth Barratt Hacking
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Design, Creative Industries FacultyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.The Eden ProjectCornwallUK
  3. 3.Department of EducationUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations