Children in the Anthropocene: How Are They Implicated?
- 969 Downloads
There has been much debate about where the boundaries lie that would mark the arrival of the new epoch of the Anthropocene. There have been a number of possibilities proposed: the start of the Industrial revolution in the eighteenth century or the beginning in the mid-twentieth century known as the great acceleration of population, carbon emissions, biodiversity loss, plastic production, and the beginning of nuclear age with the first atomic bombs spreading detectable radiation to every stratum of the planet. But for many scholars in the humanities, these arguments are not as relevant as what taking up the premise or challenge of the Anthropocene provides. As an unsettling ontology that disrupts a persistent “humanist” paradigm, the concept of the Anthropocene allows new conversations to happen around human-dominated global change, human exceptionalism, and the nature/culture divide. In this chapter through stories from fieldwork with children in La Paz, I will propose the means for considering the ontological openings of the naming of the Anthropocene for the field of childhoodnature.
KeywordsAnthropocene Sustainability Mobilities Enmeshed Childdogbodies Human exceptionalism Haraway Nonhuman Entanglements
- Aldred, J. (2014). Past movements, tomorrow’s anchors. On the relational entanglements between archaeological mobilities. In J. Leary (Ed.), Past mobilities: Archaeological approaches to movement and mobility (pp. 21–48). Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Andersen, K. (2014). Mind over matter? On decentring the human in human geography. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
- Barad, K. (1996). Meeting the universe halfway: Realism and social constructivism without contradiction. Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, 161–194.Google Scholar
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC/London, England: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
- Chawla, L. (2002). Growing up in an urbanizing world. London: UNESCO/Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Davies, J. (2016). The birth of the Anthropocene. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.).London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Derrida, J. (2005). On touching – Jean-Luc Nancy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Driskell, D. (2002). Creating better cities with children and youth. London: UNESCO/Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Edgeworth, M. (2014). Enmeshments of shifting landscapes and embodied movements of people and animals. In J. Leary (Ed.), Past mobilities: Archaeological approaches to movement and mobility. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Gan, E., Tsing, A., Swanson, H., & Bubandt, N. (2017). Introduction: Haunted landscapes of the Anthropocene. In A. Tsing, H. Swanson, E. Gan, & N. Bubandt (Eds.), Arts of living on a damaged planet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Grosz, E. (2010). Feminism, materialism, and freedom. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency and politics (pp. 139–157), Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Ingold, T. (2010). Bringing things to life: Creative entanglements in a world of materials. Manchester: National Centre for Research Methods, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
- Ingold, T., & Vergunst, J. (2008). Ways of walking: Ethnography and practice on foot. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Leary, J. (Ed.). (2015). Past mobilities: Archaeological approaches to movement and mobility. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lloro-Bidart, T. (2015). A political ecology of education in/for the Anthropocene. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 6(1), 128–148. http://journals.berghahnbooks.com/environment-and-society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Macfarlane, R. (2016). Generation Anthropocene: How humans have altered the planet for ever. The Guardian. 1 April, viewed 15 May 2016. http://www.theguardian.com.
- Milton, K. (2005). Anthropomorphism or egomorphism? The perception of non-human persons by human ones. In J. Knight (Ed.), Animals in person: Cultural perspectives on human-animal intimacies (pp. 255–269). New York, NY: Berg.Google Scholar
- Moore, R. (1986). Childhood’s domain: Play and place in child development. Kent: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
- Nancy, J.-L. (1997). The sense of the world. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Rautio, P. (2017a). Thinking about life and species lines with Pietari and Otto (garlic breath). Trace: Finnish Journal for Human-Animal Studies, 3, 94–102.Google Scholar
- Rose, D. B. (2013). Wild dog dreaming: Love and extinction. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
- Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268.
- Smith, M. (2013). Ecological community, the sense of the world, and senseless extinction. Environmental Humanities, 2, 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3610333.
- Vince, G. (2014). Adventures in the Anthropocene: A journey to the heart of the planet we made. Ottawa, ON: Milkweed Editions.Google Scholar
- Ward, C. (1978). The child in the city. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar