Advertisement

Wild Hope: The Transformative Power of Children Engaging with Nature

  • Cheryl CharlesEmail author
  • Richard Louv
Reference work entry
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

The international movement to connect children with nature continues to grow. While thoughtful and concerned people, including scholars, have written and worried about children’s disconnect from nature in their everyday lives for decades, the recent growth of the children and nature movement is heartening. With that growth come some positive results as well as challenges. One example of positive change is the increase in research related to nature deficit and the benefits of nature connection. While the number of studies with methodological improvements increases, important questions remain to be addressed. Even so, a review of the literature yields significant evidence-based insights and recommendations. Our chapter focuses especially on examples of evidence-based actions people are taking in all of the major settings where children live, learn, work, and play – that is, in their home environments, schools, and communities. We focus especially on those actions being taken to create positive, transformative experiences; support children’s healthy physical, mental, and social development; strengthen communities through nature connection; and benefit the health of the Earth itself. Such experiences and actions are the foundation for achieving what we are calling wild hope – a way of being and living that is rooted in nature-based experiences and contributes to a healthy present and future for today’s children and generations to come.

Keywords

Nature-deficit disorder Nature-based experiences Hope 

References

  1. Albrecht, G. (2005). Solastalgia: A new concept in human health and identity. Philosophy Activism Nature, 3, 41–44.Google Scholar
  2. American Institutes for Research. (2005). Effects of outdoor education programs for children in California. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research. Available on the Sierra Club web site. http://www.sierraclub.org/youth/california/outdoorschool_finalreport.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, A. C., & Dyment, J. E. (2006). Grounds for action: Promoting physical activity through school ground greening in Canada. Toronto, ON: Evergreen. http://www.evergreen.ca/en/lg/pdf/PHACreport.pdf.Google Scholar
  4. Bodin, M., & Hartig, T. (2003). Does the outdoor environment matter for psychological restoration gained through running? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(2), 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burdette, H. L., & Whitaker, R. C. (2005). Resurrecting free play in young children – Looking beyond fitness and fatness to attention, affiliation, and affect. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159(1), 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control. (2006). Kids walk-to-school: Then and now – Barriers and solutions. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. This information is available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/kidswalk/then_and_now.htm.
  7. Charles, C. (2007). Children & Nature Network Research and Studies (Vol. 1). Minneapolis, MN: Children & Nature Network.Google Scholar
  8. Charles, C. (2012). All children need nature – Worldwide. Minneapolis, MN: Children & Nature Network.Google Scholar
  9. Charles, C., & Senauer-Loge, A. (2012a). Children’s contact with the outdoors and nature: A focus on educators and educational settings. Minneapolis, MN: Children & Nature Network.Google Scholar
  10. Charles, C., & Senauer-Loge, A. (2012b). Health benefits to children from contact with the outdoors & nature. Minneapolis, MN: Children & Nature Network.Google Scholar
  11. Charles, C., & Wheeler, K. (2012). Children & nature worldwide: An exploration of children’s experiences of the outdoors and nature with associated risks and benefits. Minneapolis, MN: Children & Nature Network.Google Scholar
  12. Chawla, L. (2006). Learning to love the natural world enough to protect it. Barn, 2, 57–58. Norsk senter for barneforskning.Google Scholar
  13. Chawla, L. (2009). Growing up green: Becoming an agent of care for the natural world. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(1), 6–23.Google Scholar
  14. Chawla, L. (2015). Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chawla, L., & Derr, V. (2012). Development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. In D. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Children & Nature Network. (2016). Science of nature based learning collaborative research network: Report of project launch and first network retreat (p. 14). Minneapolis, MN: Children & Nature Network.Google Scholar
  17. Children & Nature Network. (2017). Retrieved 25 Sept 2017 from web site: https://www.childrenandnature.org/research-library/.
  18. Clements, R. (2004). An investigation of the status of outdoor play. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 5(1), 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Common Sense Media. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America 2013. Retrieved 26 Sept 2017 from the web site: www.commonsensemedia.org/research.
  20. Copeland, K. A., Sherman, S. N., Kendeigh, C. A., Kalkwarf, H. J., & Saelens, B. E. (2012). Societal values and policies may curtail preschool children’s physical activity in child care centers. Pediatrics, 129(2), 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. D’Amore, C. (2015). Family nature clubs: Creating the conditions for social and environmental connection and care. Ann Arbor: Proquest LLC.Google Scholar
  22. Daniels, S. R., & Hassink, S. G. (2015). The role of the pediatrician in primary prevention of obesity. Pediatrics, 136(1), e275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Depenbrock, J. (2017). At ‘Nature preschools,’ Classes are outdoors. Education Week. Retrieved 28 Sept 2017 at web site: http://edweek.org/ew/articles/2017/01/18/at-nature-preschools-classes-are-outdoors.html.
  24. Diette, G. B., Lechtzin, N., Haponik, E., Devrotes, A., & Rubin, H. R. (2003). Distraction therapy with nature sights and sounds reduces pain during flexible bronchoscopy: A complementary approach to routine analgesia. Chest, 123(3), 941–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dyment, J. E., & Bell, A. C. (2008). Grounds for movement: Green school grounds as sites for promoting physical activity. Health Education Research, 23(6), 952–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Faber Taylor, A., & Kuo, F. E. (2006). Is contact with nature important for healthy child development? State of the evidence. In C. Spencer & M. Blades (Eds.), Children and their environments: Learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Faber Taylor, A., & Kuo, F. E. (2008). Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. Journal of Attention Disorders. OnlineFirst.Google Scholar
  28. Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings. Environment & Behavior, 33(1), 54–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Faber Taylor, A., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2002). Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from Inner City children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1–2), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Faber Taylor, A., & Kuo, F. E. M. (2011). Could exposure to everyday green spaces help treat ADHD? Evidence from Children’s play settings. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(3), 281.Google Scholar
  31. Frumkin, H. & Louv, R. (2007). The powerful link between conserving land and preserving health. Retrieved 25 Sept, 2017 from the web site: http://atfiles.org/files/pdf/FrumkinLouv.pdf.
  32. Ginsburg, K. R. (2007). The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent-child bonds. Pediatrics, 119(1), 182–191. This paper is available online at: http://www.aap.org/pressroom/playFINAL.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hofferth, S. L., & Curtin, S. C. (2006). Changes in Children’s time, 1997–2002/3: An update, 2006. This study can be accessed online at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2939468/.
  34. Hofferth, S. L., & Sandberg, J. F. (2001). Changes in American Children’s Time, 1981–1997. In S. L. Hofferth & T. J. Owens (Eds.), Children at the millennium: Where have we come from, where are we going? (pp. 1–7). New York, NY: JAI.Google Scholar
  35. Illich, I. (n.d.). AZQuotes.com. Retrieved 23 Sept, 2017, from AZQuotes.com web site: http://azquotes.com/author/7156-Ivan_Illich.
  36. IUCN. (2010). “Love, not loss.” Retrieved 23 Sept, 2017, from IUCN.org web site: www.iucn.org/content/love-not-loss-communicating-biodiversity.
  37. Kahn, P. H. (2002). Children’s affiliations with nature: Structure, development, and the problem of environmental generational amnesia. In P. H. Kahn Jr. & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 93–116). Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Karsten, L. (2005). It all used to be better? Different generations on continuity and change in urban Children’s daily use of space. Children’s Geographies, 3(3), 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kellert, S. R. (2005). Nature and childhood development. In Building for life: Designing and understanding the human-nature connection. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kuo, F. (2010). Parks and other green environments: Essential components of a healthy human habitat. Washington, DC: National Recreation and Park Association.Google Scholar
  43. Kuo, F., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Environment and crime in the Inner City: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior, 33(3), 343–367.Google Scholar
  44. Kuo, F. E., & Faber Taylor, A. F. (2004). A potential natural treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from a national study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), 1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leiberman, G. A., & Hoody, L. L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrating context for learning. Poway, CA: SEER.Google Scholar
  46. Leiberman, G. A., & Hoody, L. L. (2000). California student assessment project. Poway, CA: SEER.Google Scholar
  47. Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin.Google Scholar
  48. Louv, R. (2012). The nature principle: Reconnecting with life in a virtual age. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin.Google Scholar
  49. Louv, R. (2016). Vitamin N: 500 ways to enrich the health & happiness of your family & community. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin.Google Scholar
  50. Moore, R. C. (2014). Nature play & learning places: Creating and managing places where children engage with nature. Raleigh, NC: Natural Learning Initiative and Reston: National Wildlife Federation.Google Scholar
  51. O’Brien, C. (2006). A footprint of delight: Exploring sustainable happiness (Article 10-1-06). Retrieved from National Center for Bicycling and Walking Forum web site: www.bikewalk.org/pdfs/forumarch1006footprint.pdf.
  52. Pretty, J., Hine, R., Sellens, M., South, N., & Griffin, M. (2007). Green exercise in the UK countryside. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(2), 211–231.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560601156466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15(5), 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rideout, V., & Hamel E. (2006). The media family: Electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers, preschoolers, and their parents. Kaiser Family Foundation. This study is available online at: http://www.kff.org/entmedia/entmedia102803pkg.cfm.
  55. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  56. Russonello, B., & Stewart Research and Communications. (2003). Americans’ attitudes toward walking and creating better walking communities. Surface transportation policy project report. Washington, DC: Beldon Russonello & Stewart Research and communications. This report is available online at: www.transact.org/report.asp?id=205.Google Scholar
  57. Salzburg Global Seminar. (2017). The Salzburg statement on the child in the City: Health, Parks and Play. Available from web site: www.salzburgglobal.org/go/574.
  58. Senauer, A. (2007). Children & Nature Network Research and Studies (Vol. 2). Minneapolis, MN: Children & Nature Network.Google Scholar
  59. Senauer, A. (2008). Children & Nature Network Research and Studies (Vol. 3). Minneapolis, MN: Children & Nature Network.Google Scholar
  60. Senauer Loge, A. (2009). Children & Nature Network Research and Studies (Vol. 4). Minneapolis, MN: Children & Nature Network.Google Scholar
  61. Senauer Loge, A. (2011). Children & Nature Network Research and Studies (Vol. 5). Minneapolis, MN: Children & Nature Network.Google Scholar
  62. Singer, D. G., Singer, J. L., D’Agostino, H., & DeLong, R. (2009). Children’s pastimes and play in sixteen nations. American Journal of Play, 1(Winter), 283.Google Scholar
  63. Snyder, G. (1990). The practice of the wild. San Francisco, SF: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  64. Sobel, D. (2008). Childhood and nature: Design principles for educators. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.Google Scholar
  65. Tandon, P. S., Saelens, B. E., & Christakis, D. A. (2015). Active play opportunities at child care. Pediatrics, 135(6), e1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tandy, C. (1999). Children’s diminishing play space: A study of intergenerational change in Children’s use of their neighborhoods. Australian Geographical Studies, 37(2), 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tanner, T. (1980). Significant Life Experiences: A new research area in environmental education. Retrieved at  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1980.9941386.
  68. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). Ulrich RS. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. University of Sheffield. (2007). There’s much more to a walk in the park. Science daily. Retrieved 26 Apr 2010, From http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/05/070516095212.htm.
  70. Veitch, J., Bagley, S., Ball, K., & Salmon, J. (2006). Where do children usually play? A qualitative study of Parents’ perceptions of influences on Children’s active free play. Health & Place, 12(4), 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of ‘greenness’ on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Children and Nature NetworkMinneapolisUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sean Blenkinsop
    • 1
  • Peter Kahn
    • 2
  1. 1.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  2. 2.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations