Unplanning Research with a Curious Practice Methodology: Emergence of Childrenforest in the Context of Finland
- 957 Downloads
This chapter explores the notion of curious practice and the methodology of its application in the context of primary school education in Finland. The concept of curious practice encourages us – researchers and educators – to ask “How does curious practice help us to address children’s relations to forests beyond the child (in) nature dualism?” Curious practice challenges the existing environmental education methodologies employed in recent years that draw heavily on research planning, the child’s representation of nature, and the results of a completed study. Despret’s (Domesticating practices: The case of Arabian Babblers. In G. Marvin and S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human–animal studies (pp. 23–38). New York: Routledge, 2014) approach of curious practice encourages researchers to unplan and make themselves available to the yet unknown, for every single encounter with the other is a mixture of unpredictability, the researcher’s attentiveness, and imagination. The rationale behind curious practice is in learning more about what is seen and heard via questioning the encounters that accept various absences of a preconceived framework of research. As a necessary complement to such a methodology, the chapter also presents a semiotic approach, employed by Eduardo Kohn (How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013), to inform the method of studying the logic of the world beyond human symbolism. The data used reveal an interdependency of children and forests that will be referred to as childrenforest in that it continuously generates a network of signs which adults and children themselves often are unable to access or represent. These present absences found in curious practice are crucial for our understanding of what we have overlooked while claiming that the other is known. With that, however, childrenforest cannot be fully grasped. Andrew Pickering’s (Natures Sciences Sociétés, 1(21), 77–83, 2013) notion of islands of stability is utilized to elaborate the ways that childrenforests signal the presence of the seemingly stable configurations of their dynamic becoming. The chapter concludes with a short discussion of the potential areas of curious practice application beyond the ethological and childhood research.
KeywordsCurious practice Despret Islands of stability Semiosis of childrenforest Reals Unplanning
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Burman, E. (2007). Deconstructing developmental psychology (Paperback 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Daston, L., & Park, K. (1998). Wonders and the order of nature (pp. 1150–1750). New York, NY/Cambridge, MA: Zone Books; Distributed by the MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson, & G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Despret, V. (2014). Domesticating practices: The case of Arabian babblers. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human–animal studies (pp. 23–38). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process (Vol. 8). Boston, MA: D.C. Heath & Co Publishers. Southern Illinois Up, 1986/2008.Google Scholar
- Evans, R. J. W., & Marr, A. (Eds.). (2006). Curiosity and wonder from the renaissance to the enlightenment. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
- Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuck, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Golden, A. (2013). Preschool children explore the forest – the power of wild places in childhood. In D. R. Meier & S. Sisk-Hilton (Eds.), Nature education with young children: Integrating inquiry and practice (pp. 123–136). Florence, Italy: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Goldman, L. (1998). Child’s play: Myth, mimesis and make-believe. New York, NY: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gordon, A. F. (2008). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Griebling, S. (2015). “Trees and things that live in trees”: Three children with special needs experience the project approach. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 17(1). Retrieved 10 April 2017 from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v17n1/griebling.html.
- Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Holton, G. (2016). Our puzzling universe: From a promising beginning to forbidden knowledge. Social Research, 83(4), 905–916.Google Scholar
- Karhunkorva, R. (2005). “Kuulin metsän tarinan”: kulttuurisesti ymmärretyn metsän merkitykset kuudesluokkalaisten Olipa kerran metsä –kirjoituksissa. [“I heard the story of the forest”: Culturally understood meanings of the forest in the six-graders’ “Once upon a time there was a forest” scripts]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylä University Digital Archive.Google Scholar
- Korhonen, P. (2008). Lasten TV-ohjelmiin liittyvät pelot, painajaisunet ja pelonhallinta. [Children’s TV-included fears, nightmares, and coping with fears] (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, Vol. 1332) Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.Google Scholar
- Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2015). Reconceptualizing qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Leask, N. (2002). Curiosity and the aesthetics of travel-writing, 1770–1840: ‘From an antique land’: From an antique land’. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lorimer, J. (2007). Nonhuman charisma. Environment and planning D. Society and Space, 25(5), 911–932.Google Scholar
- McMillan, M. (1904). Education through the imagination. S. Sonnenschein & Co., Lim. Retrieved from: https://archive.org/details/educationthroug01mcmigoog.
- Munita, J. M., & Arias, C. A. (2016). Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Microbiology Spectrum, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0016-2015.
- Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. (2013). Frictions in Forest Pedagogies: Common Worlds in Settler Colonial Spaces. Global Studies of Childhood, 3(4), pp. 355–365.Google Scholar
- Reid, L., & Salonen, E., curators. (2016). Thinking like a forest. Retrieved 26 Feb 2017, from http://laurenkreid.com/Thinking-like-a-forest.
- Rudkowski, M. (2015). The complexity of understanding: Young children’s experiences in a forest program (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from SFU Summit institutional repository (Identifier: etd9305).Google Scholar
- Russell, C. L., Sarick, T., & Kenelly, J. (2002). Queering environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(1), 54–66.Google Scholar
- Snaza, N., Appelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., … Weaver, J. (2014). Toward a posthumanist education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 39–55.Google Scholar
- Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. A. (Eds.). (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Stengers, I. (2011). Cosmopolitics II (R. Bononno, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Stolberg, T. L. (2008). W(h)ither the sense of wonder of pre-service primary teachers’ when teaching science?: A preliminary study of their personal experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1958–1964. https://doi-org.libproxy.helsinki.fi/10.1016/j.tate.2008.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Taylor, N. (2012). Animals, mess, method: Post-humanism, sociology and animal studies. In L. Birke & J. Hockenhull (Eds.), Crossing boundaries. Investigating human-animal relationships (pp. 37–50). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar