Encyclopedia of Signaling Molecules

2018 Edition
| Editors: Sangdun Choi

E-Cadherin

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67199-4_101598

Synonyms

 Arc-1;  CD324;  CDHE;  ECAD;  LCAM;  UVO

Historical Background

E-cadherin is a member of the cadherin family, a family of transmembrane glycoproteins responsible for calcium-dependent cell adhesion that are the key structural components of adherens junctions (AJs). E-cadherin is encoded by CDH1 gene that localizes at 16q22.1 and composes of 18 exons. E-cadherin protein presents in epithelial tissues and composes of a single-pass transmembrane region, a cytoplasmic region, and an ectoregion that consisted of five tandemly repeated subdomains, each harboring two conserved regions representing the putative calcium binding sites (van Roy and Berx 2008). The extracellular domain of E-cadherin within one cell formed X-shaped cis dimmers, and the trans dimmer “Zipper” formed between multiple X-shaped cis dimmers of adjacent cells is the molecular basis of cell-cell adhesion (van Roy and Berx 2008). The intracellular domain of E-cadherin contains a highly phosphorylated region vital to β-catenin binding. β-catenin then binds to α-catenin, which results in the formation of stable bonds between the complex and the actin cytoskeleton. P120, a cadherin-like molecule, is demonstrated to play critical role in modulation of the stability of the cadherin complex (van Roy and Berx 2008) (Fig. 1).
E-Cadherin, Fig. 1

The schematic of E-cadherin mediated cell-cell adhesion

An Emerging Function of E-Cadherin: Gene Transcriptional Regulation

Recently, reports have described other functions of E-cadherin beyond its role in mediating AJs. In particular, E-cadherin was found to regulate gene expression (Du et al. 2014). Sasaki et al. first reported that a loss of E-cadherin in invasive breast cancer cells resulted in an increase of Bcl-2 expression, contributing to chemotherapy resistance in tumor cells. Wang et al. found an inverse correlation between E-cadherin and EGFR expression in tissue specimens of head and neck sarcoma, further demonstrating that EGFR signaling activation inhibited the expression of E-cadherin, and knockdown of E-cadherin resulted in the elevation of EGFR transcription. Strumane et al. found an inverse correlation between E-cadherin and human Nanos1 expression in various cell lines and showed that the re-expression of E-cadherin in a human breast cancer cell line decreased hNanos1 expression. The first systematic study on the role of E-cadherin in global gene transcription was performed by Onder et al. in 2008 (Onder et al. 2008). They inhibited the function of E-cadherin through either siRNA-mediated knockdown or expression of a truncated form of E-cadherin (cytoplasmic region) in human mammary epithelial cells and found that the expression of many genes had been altered significantly as a result. Indeed, they showed that it was the loss of E-cadherin itself and not the loss of cell-cell contacts or the subsequent activation of β-catenin that contributed mostly to this alteration. This was the first time to show that a loss of E-cadherin resulted in the transcriptional elevation of Twist and ZEB1, two well-known transcriptional repressors of E-cadherin. Recently, Francesca et al. compared global transcript expression in E-cadherin null (E-cad-/-) embryonic stem (ES) cells and E-cadherin wide-type ES cells, showing that E-cadherin depletion led to the altered expression of 2,265 genes. Notably, they did not detect an elevation of β-catenin activity after E-cadherin depletion in their model. However, they did observe an enhancement of FGF signaling activity due to the increase of FGF5 transcription in E-cad-/- ES cells.

These results implied that E-cadherin was a novel regulator of gene transcription, even though the molecular mechanisms involved had not yet been fully detailed. Analysis of the available E-cadherin data, particularly in regards to its regulation of cell signaling pathways, may help to shed some light on this issue (Du et al. 2014).

E-Cadherin Regulates the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway

E-cadherin-based AJs share a key component with the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway – β-catenin. Β-catenin can be found in the membrane, cytoplasm, or nucleus depending on the status of Wnt signals and the expression and distribution of E-cadherin (Fig. 2). In normal epithelial cells, β-catenin interacts with and binds to the cytoplasmic tail of E-cadherin and is sequestered at the membrane. When Wnt signals are absent, free β-catenin forms a complex with GSK3β, APC, and Axin in the cytoplasm and is phosphorylated by CK1 and GSK3β. Phosphorylated β-catenin is subsequently degraded through the ubiquitination-proteasome degradation system. While Wnt signaling is active due to Wnt ligand binding to Frizzled receptor, however, GSK3β is displaced from the regulator APC/Axin/GSK3β complex and thus its activity is inhibited, thereby liberating β-catenin, allowing it to accumulate in the cytoplasm and translocate to the nucleus where it can then regulate target gene transcription through an interaction with TCF/LEF family transcription factors and Legless family docking proteins.
E-Cadherin, Fig. 2

E-cadherin inhibitsWnt/β-catenin signaling β-catenin can be located in the membrane, cytoplasm, or nucleus depending on the status of Wnt signals and the expression and distribution of E-cadherin

Over the past few decades, some reporters have surmised that a loss of E-cadherin may elevate the activity of β-catenin, having evaluated its activity through luciferase reporter systems and determination of TCF/β-catenin target gene expression. However, it was commonly accepted that E-cadherin loss alone was not sufficient to activate β-catenin signaling, requiring instead the presence of other effectors, such as Wnt and FGFR signaling activity (Kuphal and Behrens 2006). With the combined use of time-lapse microscopy and image analysis, the cadherin-bound pool of β-catenin was shown to accumulate at the perinuclear endocytic recycling compartment (ERC) upon AJ dissociation and then translocate into the nucleus upon Wnt signaling pathway activation, which suggests that the ERC may be a site of residence for β-catenin following its liberation from the membrane cadherin complex and prior to entering the nucleus. In most cases, restoration or overexpression of E-cadherin inhibited β-catenin activity by sequestering cytoplasmic β-catenin (Orsulic et al. 1999). Notably, overexpression of the cytoplasmic region of E-cadherin was sufficient to achieve this response (Orsulic et al. 1999). Additionally, a recent research demonstrated that the aberrant nuclear localization of E-cadherin is a potent inhibitor of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in cancer stem cells (Su et al. 2015). These results imply that E-cadherin may be a negative regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. However, Sara et al. recently showed that the ability to bind E-cadherin was necessary for β-catenin’s transcriptional activity, and E-cadherin was required for augmented activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in vivo, which suggests that E-cadherin could be a positive regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in certain models. In yet another study, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway seemed to regulate E-cadherin expression. The E-cadherin gene promoter contains TCF/β-catenin binding sites, and Wnt signaling activation represses the expression of E-cadherin in a TCF/β-catenin-dependent manner, which suggests that a feedback circuit may exist between E-cadherin and Wnt/β-catenin signaling (Jamora et al. 2003).

E-Cadherin Regulates RTK Signaling Pathway

Growth factors, such as EGF, FGF, TGF, and HGF, are known to promote cell proliferation and prevent apoptosis through binding to their receptors in the cell membrane, inducing dimerization of the receptors and concomitant activation of the intracellular tyrosine kinase domains. The activated receptor tyrosine kinases can then phosphorylate their substrates, resulting in the activation of multiple downstream signaling pathways, including MAPK, PI3K/AKT, and STAT signaling pathways.

As early as 1994, the E-cadherin-β-catenin complex was shown to interact with Erb-B2, a member of the EGF receptor family of receptor tyrosine kinases, in the cancer cell membrane (Ochiai et al. 1994). Soon after, several other groups demonstrated that E-cadherin could bind the EGF receptor (EGFR). In one study, interaction of the extracellular domain of E-cadherin with EGFR was required for the transient activation of EGFR signaling in mammary cells (Fedor-Chaiken et al. 2003). In another, Pece et al. showed that E-cadherin interacted with EGFR and activated EGFR-mediated MAPK signaling in a ligand-independent manner. More recently, the extracellular domain of soluble E-cadherin was shown to interact with EGFR and activate EGFR-mediated PI3K/AKT and ERK1/2 signaling in breast cancer cells and squamous cell carcinoma (Du et al. 2014).

E-cadherin has also been shown to inhibit EGFR signaling in some experimental contexts. Qian et al. demonstrated that E-cadherin could bind EGFR and inhibit the ligation-dependent activation of EGFR signaling in breast cancer and melanoma cells. Using microsphere-embedded recombinant E-cadherin protein to form homophilic bonds with E-cadherin at the cell surface, Perrais et al. showed that E-cadherin directly transduced growth inhibitory signals and that E-cadherin ligation inhibited EGFR-mediated transphosphorylation and activation of STAT5. In NCI-H292 cell lines, E-cadherin was demonstrated to activate EGFR-mediated cell differentiation but inhibit EGFR-mediated cell proliferation. In normal human urothelial cells, E-cadherin inhibited EGFR-mediated MAPK signaling and activated PI3K/AKT signaling. However, direct binding may not be the only way how EGFR-mediated signaling is modulated by E-cadherin. In fact, knockdown of E-cadherin in head and neck tumor cells was shown to elevate EGFR transcription. Notably, EGFR signaling has also been found to regulate E-cadherin expression and function in tumor cells through inhibiting its transcription and promoting its cleavage, degradation, and endocytosis (Du et al. 2014), suggesting a feedback regulation between E-cadherin and EGFR signaling. Taken together, these results suggest that the regulation of EGFR signaling by E-cadherin is indeed complex (Fig. 3).
E-Cadherin, Fig. 3

Effects of E-cadherin on RTK signalings a. E-cadherin or the soluble E-cadherin interacts with EGFR and activates MAPK signaling pathway in cancer cells; b. E-cadherin interacts with EGFR or ERBB4 and activates PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in cancer cells; c. In normal human urothelial cells, E-cadherin inhibited EGFR-mediated MAPK signaling and activated PI3K/AKT signaling

In addition to EGFR, E-cadherin is also shown to interact with FGFR. In MCF-7 breast cancer cells, treatment with FGF induced the endocytosis of E-cadherin and FGFR. The interaction of E-cadherin with FGFR was required for the nuclear translocation of FGFR and subsequent activation of FGF-induced MAPK signaling. Overexpression of E-cadherin blocked the endocytosis of both molecules, the nuclear translocation of FGFR, and the activation of FGFR-mediated MAPK signaling (Bryant et al. 2005). In Ewing tumor cells, under anchorage-independent growth conditions, E-cadherin was upregulated and correlated with the formation of multicellular spheroids and the suppression of anoikis. The mechanism study showed that E-cadherin activated the Erb-B4 receptor tyrosine kinase coupled with the activation of PI3K/AKT signaling.

E-cadherin may also directly regulate PI3K activity. Indeed, PI3K was recruited to the site of cell-cell contact by the ligation of homophilic E-cadherin, resulting in the activation of PI3K signaling (Kovacs et al. 2002). Recently, the p85 subunit of PI3K was shown to be directly targeted by the E-cadherin complex and activated in ovarian cancer cells (De Santis et al. 2009).

E-Cadherin Regulates the GTPase Signaling Pathway

GTPases are molecular switches that control multiple processes in eukaryotic cells while cycling between a GTP-bound active state and a GDP-bound inactive state. GTPases consist of five major groups: Rho, Ras, Rab, Ran, and Arf. Rho GTPases are primarily known for regulating the actin cytoskeleton and cell polarity (De Santis et al. 2009). Recently, Rho GTPases were also found to regulate gene transcription. For example, in mid-G1 phase of the cell cycle, Rho GTPases inhibited the expression of cyclin/CDK inhibitor P21 but induced the expression of cyclin D1 through promoting the sustained activation of MAPK signaling (Olson et al. 1998). E-cadherin was found to regulate the activity of Rho, Rac, and Cdc42, the three most well-characterized members of the Rho GTPases, implying that E-cadherin may regulate transcription through regulating GTPase signaling activity.

Rac activation was observed as an early-immediate response of E-cadherin adhesion formation (Nakagawa et al. 2001), and PI3K seemed to play a critical role in the E-cadherin-mediated activation of Rac (Coniglio et al. 2001). Furthermore, inhibition of PIK3 activity prevented the E-cadherin-mediated activation of Rac (Nakagawa et al. 2001). As mentioned earlier, E-cadherin recruits and activates PI3K at sites of cell-cell contact (Kovacs et al. 2002). Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), which activate Rho GTPases by promoting the exchange of GDP for GTP, were found to recognize activated PI3K through their pleckstrin homology (PH) domains (Hawkins et al. 1995). These results suggest that PI3K may be an upstream activator of Rac in E-cadherin-mediated cell signaling.

In addition to Rac, E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell contact also activated Cdc42 and Rho (Kim et al. 2000). Interestingly, activation of Rac and Cdc42 appears critical for inducing the formation of AJs in cooperation with E-cadherin (Kovacs et al. 2002). E-cadherin is known to undergo endocytosis upon disruption of AJs. Notably, the activation of Rac and Cdc42 GTPases was demonstrated to inhibit the endocytosis of trans-interacting E-cadherin in epithelial cells (Leibfried et al. 2008). Rac and Cdc42 were also necessary to correctly regulate the post-Golgi transport of E-cadherin and the maintenance of cell polarity. Recently, Cdc42 was reported to promote ubiquitination and lysosomal degradation of E-cadherin through the upregulation of EGFR signaling and subsequent activation of Rac in breast cancer cells. Furthermore, the activation of RhoA or RhoC inhibited the expression of E-cadherin in metastatic prostate cancer cells (Du et al. 2014). Collectively, these data suggest that the complex bilateral regulation of E-cadherin and Rho GTPases may be affected by a number of factors (Fig. 4).
E-Cadherin, Fig. 4

Effects of E-cadherin on the GTPase signaling E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell contacts activates Rac through activating PI3K, and the activated Rac prevents endocytosis of E-cadherin and promotes the post-Golgi transport of E-cadherin

E-Cadherin Regulates the NF-κB Signaling Pathway

In most cases, E-cadherin negatively regulates NF-κB activation. Studies showed that the loss of E-cadherin and the loss of cadherin-mediated cell-cell contacts activated NF-κB signaling, while the overexpression of E-cadherin suppressed its activity (Kuphal et al. 2004; Cowell et al. 2009). In melanoma cells, the loss of E-cadherin promoted the activation of cytoplasmic β-catenin, which subsequently induced P38-mediated NF-κB activation (Kuphal et al. 2004). In epithelial cells, the dissociation of cell-cell contacts led to the activation of RhoA, which subsequently activated protein kinase D1 (PKD1), a downstream target of RhoA, ultimately inducing the activation of NF-κB (Cowell et al. 2009). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that restoring E-cadherin expression in colon cancer cells decreased the expression of mesenchymal genes, such as those encoding fibronectin and LEF1, through the inhibition of β-catenin and NF-κB signaling (Du et al. 2014). (Fig. 5) However, E-cadherin activity also leads to the expression of tumor suppressors through the upregulation of NF-κB activity. For example, the decrease of E-cadherin due to the activation of MAPK signaling resulted in the downregulation of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), a tumor metastasis suppressor that blocks invasion and angiogenesis, through inhibition of NF-κB activation in pancreatic cancer cells. Overexpressing E-cadherin subsequently elevated NF-κB activity and restored the expression of NGAL (Tong et al. 2011). Notably, activated NF-κB inhibited the expression of E-cadherin by elevating transcriptional repressors of E-cadherin, such as Snail and ZEB1/2, in multiple cancer types. These data suggest the existence of feedback regulation between E-cadherin and NF-κB signaling.
E-Cadherin, Fig. 5

Effects of E-cadherin on the NF-κB signaling The loss of E-cadherin elevates NF-κB signaling through activating β-catenin and Rho GTPase

E-Cadherin Regulates the HIPPO Signaling Pathway

It has been revealed that E-cadherin also regulates the HIPPO signaling pathway by inhibiting the activity of Yap, one of the key effectors of this pathway. The status of Hippo pathway usually varied according to cell density. At the edge of a colony of cells grown in culture, cells display a greater proportion of nuclear Yap but less mature E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell contacts, with higher proliferative and migratory ability, when compared with cells toward the center of the colony. This observation implies that Hippo signaling activity is sensitive to the E-cadherin-mediated junction status of cells. A recent research also found that maintenance of quiescence required E-cadherin extracellular engagement, which facilitates the Yap1 nuclear exclusion (Benham-Pyle et al. 2015). Kim et al. found that Yap is predominantly located in the nuclear in E-cadherin-deficient cancer cell line, whereas restored the expression of E-cadherin, Yap moved to the cytoplasm and lost its transcriptional activity. Gumbiner et al. recently also reported that hemophilic ligation of E-cadherins between cells in trans prevent Yap’s nuclear location. The mechanisms about E-cadherin mediating its effects upon Yap is not clear; even some researchers suggested that it may be associated with α-catenin (McCrea et al. 2015).

E-Cadherin Proteolytic Fragments as Nuclear Signaling

E-cadherin can be proteolysis by numerous enzymes. The ectodomain of E-cadherin can be cleaved by ADAMs and MMPs and then binds with EGFP and activates MAPK signaling pathway. This has been discussed in the “E-Cadherin Regulates the RTK Signaling Pathways” section. The E-cadherin cytodomaincleavage occurs via presenilins or caspases, and the cytodomain fragment mediates nuclear signaling (McCrea et al. 2015). For example, the cytodomain fragment of E-cadherin generated by presenilin enters the nucleus to bind CBP (Creb-binding protein) and degrade CBP. This in turn attenuates the transactivation ability of CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein), a transcription factor and partner of CBP. Additionally, a fragment of E-cadherin arising as a consequence of presenilin 1 activity is reported to enhance β-catenin nuclear activity (McCrea et al. 2015). Interestingly, p120, one of the components of cadherin complex, appears to enhance the nuclear entry of an E-cadherin cytodomain fragment, with the fragment enhancing p120-facilitated relief of Kaiso-mediated target-gene repression (McCrea et al. 2015).

Mediation of Cross-Talk Between Signaling Pathways by E-Cadherin

P120 catenin (p120ctn or p120), a member of the catenin family, binds to the cytoplasmic region of E-cadherin and helps maintain cell-cell contact by preventing the endocytosis of E-cadherin and stabilizing the cadherin-catenin complex (Fukumoto et al. 2008). P120 has been found to play an important role in the cross-talk between members of E-cadherin-mediated cell signaling. On the one hand, certain signaling pathways have been shown to regulate the expression and function of E-cadherin through p120. For example, EGF promoted the endocytosis of E-cadherin through regulating p120 activity and, thus, decreasing E-cadherin levels in the cell membrane (Du et al. 2014). Additionally, Wnt signaling pathway activation resulted in Frodo-mediated stabilization of p120 (Park et al. 2006). These results suggest that diverse signaling pathways might affect E-cadherin-mediated signaling through regulating the activity of p120. On the other hand, E-cadherin also affected the distribution and function of p120 (Soto et al. 2008); thus E-cadherin itself may regulate other signaling activity through p120. Indeed, p120 has been documented to regulate both GTPase and β-catenin activity (Fig. 6).
E-Cadherin, Fig. 6

Mediation of cross-talk between signaling pathways by E-cadherin and p120 P120 binds to the cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin and helps maintain cell-cell contact by preventing the endocytosis of E-cadherin and stabilizing the cadherin-catenin complex. The loss of E-cadherin and the activation of Wnt signaling stabilize p120 and inhibit Kaiso translocation to the nucleus by forming a p120-Kaiso complex in cytoplasm

The role of p120 in the regulation of Rho GTPase was extensively reviewed previously. In summary, p120 was found to directly interact with and regulate Rho GTPase and indirectly modulate Rho activity through interacting with and regulating Rho GEFs. Additionally, p120 was able to promote or suppress the activation of Rho GTPases in different situations. For example, p120 dominantly inhibited Rho activity but consistently activated Rac and Cdc42 (Anastasiadis and Reynolds 2001). Furthermore, GTPase regulation could occur either at the site of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell contacts or in the cytoplasm. When associated with E-cadherin, p120 modulated local GTPases and affected cytoskeletal structures; once dissociated from E-cadherin, p120 could diffuse into the cytoplasm and activate GTPases, thereby affecting the expression of genes involved in a variety of cellular processes, including cell-cycle regulation (Anastasiadis and Reynolds 2001).

Alternatively, liberated p120 could enter the nucleus to regulate gene transcription directly. Like β-catenin, p120 has an Arm-repeat domain, and proteins with this domain may have dual localization at cell-cell junctions and in the nucleus. In the nucleus, p120 was reported to interact with the zinc finger transcriptional repressor Glis2 and induce its C-terminal cleavage, though the mechanism of action for this process is unknown (Hosking et al. 2007). Nuclear p120 was also shown to interact with the BTB/POZ transcriptional repressor Kaiso, inhibiting Kaiso transcriptional activity (Kim et al. 2004). Kaiso is an inhibitor of the Wnt signaling pathway, directly inhibiting the transcription of Wnt11 (Kim et al. 2004) and the expression of Wnt signaling targets, such as c-Myc, cyclin D1, and matrilysin (MMP-7), through competitive binding of TCF/LEF with β-catenin (Spring et al. 2005). The inhibitory role of Kaiso on Wnt signaling and Wnt signaling targets can be attenuated by p120, suggesting that p120 may play a positive role in activation of the Wnt signaling pathway (Spring et al. 2005). Interestingly, it was demonstrated that Wnt signaling activation stabilized p120, which in turn promoted Kaiso sequestration or removal from the nucleus and elevated Wnt signaling (Park et al. 2006). These data therefore suggest the existence of a possible positive feedback circuit between p120 and Wnt signaling activity.

Summary

Over the past decade, E-cadherin has been reported to function as a gene transcriptional regulator, but further studies are needed to more clearly define its likely numerous modes of action in this process. The well-known associations of E-cadherin-mediated AJs with multiple signaling pathways leaves little room for doubt that altering E-cadherin would also affect gene transcription through impacting cell signaling. This hypothesis provides a model that signals originating from E-cadherin relay ultimately to the nucleus by molecules that play a central role in the associated signaling pathways. Given the complexity of interaction between E-cadherin-mediated AJs and cell signaling and the existence of cross-talk among different pathways, however, the discrete contribution of each pathway to E-cadherin-mediated gene transcriptional modulation is currently difficult to ascertain. The combined knockdown of E-cadherin and relevant pathway-related molecules may be a useful strategy for tackling this issue.

Nuclear translocation of E-cadherin has also been observed in numerous cancer cell lines and tissues (Du et al. 2014), which raises the following questions: What is the function of nuclear E-cadherin, and does it directly regulate gene transcription? Ferber et al. reported that a cleaved cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin could enter the nucleus, form a complex with DNA via p120, and regulate gene transcription (Ferber et al. 2008). This data implies the possibility that E-cadherin itself may function in the nucleus as a novel transcriptional regulator, which is definitely an interesting topic and deserving of further systematic study.

References

  1. Anastasiadis PZ, Reynolds AB. Regulation of Rho GTPases by p120-catenin. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001;13:604–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benham-Pyle BW, Pruitt BL, Nelson WJ. Cell adhesion. Mechanical strain induces E-cadherin-dependent Yap1 and beta-catenin activation to drive cell cycle entry. Science. 2015;348:1024–7. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4559.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryant DM, Wylie FG, Stow JL. Regulation of endocytosis, nuclear translocation, and signaling of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 by E-cadherin. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:14–23. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-09-0845.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coniglio SJ, Jou TS, Symons M. Rac1 protects epithelial cells against anoikis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:28113–20. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102299200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowell CF, Yan IK, Eiseler T, Leightner AC, Doppler H, Storz P. Loss of cell-cell contacts induces NF-kappaB via RhoA-mediated activation of protein kinase D1. J Cell Biochem. 2009;106:714–28. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22067.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Santis G, Miotti S, Mazzi M, Canevari S, Tomassetti A. E-cadherin directly contributes to PI3K/AKT activation by engaging the PI3K-p85 regulatory subunit to adherens junctions of ovarian carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2009;28:1206–17. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Du W, Liu X, Fan G, Zhao X, Sun Y, Wang T, et al. From cell membrane to the nucleus: an emerging role of E-cadherin in gene transcriptional regulation. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:1712–9. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12340.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fedor-Chaiken M, Hein PW, Stewart JC, Brackenbury R, Kinch MS. E-cadherin binding modulates EGF receptor activation. Cell Commun Adhes. 2003;10:105–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferber EC, Kajita M, Wadlow A, Tobiansky L, Niessen C, Ariga H, et al. A role for the cleaved cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin in the nucleus. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:12691–700. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708887200.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fukumoto Y, Shintani Y, Reynolds AB, Johnson KR, Wheelock MJ. The regulatory or phosphorylation domain of p120 catenin controls E-cadherin dynamics at the plasma membrane. Exp Cell Res. 2008;314:52–67. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.07.024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawkins PT, Eguinoa A, Qiu RG, Stokoe D, Cooke FT, Walters R, et al. PDGF stimulates an increase in GTP-Rac via activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase. Curr Biol. 1995;5:393–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hosking CR, Ulloa F, Hogan C, Ferber EC, Figueroa A, Gevaert K, et al. The transcriptional repressor Glis2 is a novel binding partner for p120 catenin. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:1918–27. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-10-0941.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jamora C, DasGupta R, Kocieniewski P, Fuchs E. Links between signal transduction, transcription and adhesion in epithelial bud development. Nature. 2003;422:317–22. doi: 10.1038/nature01458.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim SH, Li Z, Sacks DB. E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell attachment activates Cdc42. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:36999–7005. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003430200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim SW, Park JI, Spring CM, Sater AK, Ji H, Otchere AA, et al. Non-canonical Wnt signals are modulated by the Kaiso transcriptional repressor and p120-catenin. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:1212–20. doi: 10.1038/ncb1191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kovacs EM, Ali RG, McCormack AJ, Yap AS. E-cadherin homophilic ligation directly signals through Rac and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to regulate adhesive contacts. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:6708–18. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109640200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuphal F, Behrens J. E-cadherin modulates Wnt-dependent transcription in colorectal cancer cells but does not alter Wnt-independent gene expression in fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 2006;312:457–67. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.11.007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuphal S, Poser I, Jobin C, Hellerbrand C, Bosserhoff AK. Loss of E-cadherin leads to upregulation of NFkappaB activity in malignant melanoma. Oncogene. 2004;23:8509–19. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leibfried A, Fricke R, Morgan MJ, Bogdan S, Bellaiche Y. Drosophila Cip4 and WASp define a branch of the Cdc42-Par6-aPKC pathway regulating E-cadherin endocytosis. Curr Biol. 2008;18:1639–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.09.063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCrea PD, Maher MT, Gottardi CJ. Nuclear signaling from cadherin adhesion complexes. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015;112:129–96. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2014.11.018.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakagawa M, Fukata M, Yamaga M, Itoh N, Kaibuchi K. Recruitment and activation of Rac1 by the formation of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion sites. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:1829–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ochiai A, Akimoto S, Kanai Y, Shibata T, Oyama T, Hirohashi S. c-erbB-2 gene product associates with catenins in human cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;205:73–8. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.2631.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olson MF, Paterson HF, Marshall CJ. Signals from Ras and Rho GTPases interact to regulate expression of p21Waf1/Cip1. Nature. 1998;394:295–9. doi: 10.1038/28425.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Onder TT, Gupta PB, Mani SA, Yang J, Lander ES, Weinberg RA. Loss of E-cadherin promotes metastasis via multiple downstream transcriptional pathways. Cancer Res. 2008;68:3645–54. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-07-2938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orsulic S, Huber O, Aberle H, Arnold S, Kemler R. E-cadherin binding prevents beta-catenin nuclear localization and beta-catenin/LEF-1-mediated transactivation. J Cell Sci. 1999;112(Pt 8):1237–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Park JI, Ji H, Jun S, Gu D, Hikasa H, Li L, et al. Frodo links Dishevelled to the p120-catenin/Kaiso pathway: distinct catenin subfamilies promote Wnt signals. Dev Cell. 2006;11:683–95. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.09.022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soto E, Yanagisawa M, Marlow LA, Copland JA, Perez EA, Anastasiadis PZ. p120 catenin induces opposing effects on tumor cell growth depending on E-cadherin expression. J Cell Biol. 2008;183:737–49. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200805113.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spring CM, Kelly KF, O’Kelly I, Graham M, Crawford HC, Daniel JM. The catenin p120ctn inhibits Kaiso-mediated transcriptional repression of the beta-catenin/TCF target gene matrilysin. Exp Cell Res. 2005;305:253–65. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2005.01.007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Su YJ, Chang YW, Lin WH, Liang CL, Lee JL. An aberrant nuclear localization of E-cadherin is a potent inhibitor of Wnt/beta-catenin-elicited promotion of the cancer stem cell phenotype. Oncogenesis. 2015;4:e157. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2015.17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tong Z, Chakraborty S, Sung B, Koolwal P, Kaur S, Aggarwal BB, et al. Epidermal growth factor down-regulates the expression of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) through E-cadherin in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer. 2011;117:2408–18. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Roy F, Berx G. The cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65:3756–88. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8281-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PathologyHarbin Medical UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.Center of Translational MedicineHarbin Medical UniversityHarbinChina