Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Wicked Problems and Sustainable Development

  • Lorelei L. Hanson
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_522-1

Synonyms

Definition

Wicked problems are intractable social issues that defy traditional problem-solving approaches because they are characterized by high levels of complexity and ambiguity and involve multiple stakeholder groups with strongly divergent values and perspectives. While initially applied in a social planning context, sustainability researchers have increasingly utilized this lens to explain the multidimensions of many sustainable development issues and explore new ways for addressing these complex issues.

Introduction

In this entry, the origin of wicked problems as a concept and its ten distinguishing properties is discussed. These characteristics are then used to discuss vexing dimensions of sustainable development that are highlighted in the research literature. There is increased attention by sustainability researchers to how traditional decision-making approaches, management strategies, public policy responses, and education are insufficient...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen GM, Gould EM Jr (1986) Complexity, wickedness and public forests. J For 84(4):20–23Google Scholar
  2. Allen JH, Beaudoin F, Lloyd-Pool E, Sherman J (2014) Pathways to sustainability careers: building capacity to solve complex problems. Sustain For 7(1):47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahm AJ (1975) Planners’ failure generates a scapegoat. Policy Sci 6:103–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balint PJ, Stewart RE, Desia A, Walters LC (2011) Wicked environmental problems. Island Press, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organisations and social learning. J Environ Manag 90:1692–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggs R, Westley FR, Carpenter SR (2010) Navigating the back loop: fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management. [online]. Ecol Soc 15(2):9 Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art9/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown VA, Harris JA, Russel JV (eds) (2010) Tackling wicked problems: through the transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Brundiers K, Wiek A (2011) Educating students in real-world sustainability research: vision and implementation. Innov High Educ 36:107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burch S, Shaw A, Dale A, Robinson J (2014) Triggering transformative change: a development path approach to climate change response in communities. Clim Pol 14(4):467–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carcasson M (2013) Tackling wicked problems through deliberative engagement. [on-line]. Retrieved from: https://cpd.colostate.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2014/01/tackling-wicked-problems-through-deliberative-engagement.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2017
  11. Catron BL (1981) On taming wicked problems. Dialogue 3(3):13–16Google Scholar
  12. Churchman CW (1967) Guest editorial: wicked problems. Manag Sci 14(4):B141–B142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conklin J (2005) Dialogue mapping: building shared understanding of wicked problems. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  14. Crowley K, Head BW (2017) The enduring challenge of ‘wicked problems’: revisiting Rittel and Weber. Policy Sci 50:539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dale A, Newman L (2005) Sustainable development, education and literacy. Int J Sustain High Educ 6(4):351–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies KK, Fisher KT, Dickson ME, Thrush SF, Le Heron R (2015) Improving ecosystem service frameworks to address wicked problems. [On-line]. Ecol Soc 20(2):37. Available at.  https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07581-200237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Du Plessis, C., 2009. Urban sustainability science as a new paradigm for planning. Smart building in a changing climate (van den Dobbelsteen, A., van Dorst, M., van Timmeren, A., Techne Press, Amsterdam: 31–46Google Scholar
  18. FitzGibbon J, Mensah KO (2012) Climate change as a wicked problem: an evaluation of the institutional context for rural water management in Ghana. SAGE Open, (April-June): 1–14Google Scholar
  19. Frame B (2008) ‘Wicked’, ‘messy’, and ‘clumsy’: long-term frameworks for sustainability. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 26:113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hartmann T (2011) Clumsy floodplains: responsive land policy for extreme floods. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Head B (2010) Wicked problems in water governance: paradigm changes to promote water sustainability and address planning uncertainty. [on-line]. Urban Water Security Research Alliance Technical Report No. 38. December. Available at: http://www.urbanwateralliance.org.au/publications/UWSRA-tr38.pdf
  22. Head B (2014) Evidence, uncertainty, and wicked problems in climate change decision making in Australia. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 32:663–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Head B, Alford J (2008) Wicked problems: the implications for public management. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228645090_Wicked_Problems_The_Implications_for_Public_Management
  24. Horn RE, Weber RP (2007) New tools for resolving wicked problems: mess mapping and resolution mapping processes. Available at: http://robertweber.typepad.com/strategykinetics/New_Tools_For_Resolving_Wicked_Problems_Exec_Summary.pdf
  25. Lazarus RJ (2009) Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future. [on-line]. Georgetown Law Rev. Available at: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/159
  26. Learmonth GP Sr, Smith DE, Sherman WH, White MA, Plank J (2011) A practical approach to the complex problem of environmental sustainability: the UVa Bay Game. [on-line]. Innov J Public Sect Innov J 16(1):4. https://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/learmonth_sustain_inviroment_v16i1a4.pdfGoogle Scholar
  27. Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G (2012) Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems; constraining our future selves to ameliorate climate change. Policy Sci 45:123–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Metlay D, Sarewitz D (2012) Decision strategies for addressing complex, “messy” problems. Bridge Linking Eng Soc 42(3):6–16Google Scholar
  29. Miller TR, Muñoz Erickson T, Redman CL (2011) Transforming knowledge for sustainability: towards adaptive academic institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ 12(2):177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morelli J (2011) Environmental sustainability: a definition for environmental professionals. [on-line]. J Environ Sustain 1(2):19–27.  https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0002. Available at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/jes/vol1/iss1/2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Norton BG (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environ Manag 34(1):75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmer J, Smith T, Willetts J, Mitchell C (2009) Creativity, ethics and transformation: key factors in transdisciplinary application of systems methodology to resolving wicked problems in sustainability. In: Sheffeld J (ed) Systemic development: local solutions in a global environment. ISCE Publishers, Litchfield Park, pp 69–78Google Scholar
  34. Powys Whyte K, Thompson PB (2012) Ideas for how to take wicked problems seriously. J Agric Environ Ethics 25(4):441–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Redclift M (1989) Sustainable development: exploring the contradictions. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Remington-Doucette S (2013) Sustainable world: approaches to analyzing and resolving wicked problems. DebKendall Hunt Publishing, DebuqueGoogle Scholar
  37. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Salwasser H (2004) Confronting the implications of wicked problems: changes needed in Sierra Nevada National Forest planning and problem solving. In: Murphy DD, Stine, PA (eds.) Proceedings of the Sierra Nevada science symposium: science for management and conservation, general technical report PSW-GTR-193. USDA Forest Service, Kings Beach, pp 7–22Google Scholar
  39. Skaburskis A (2008) The origin of ‘wicked problems’. Plan Theory Pract 9(2):277–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Termeer CJAM, Dewulf A, Breeman G, Stiller SJ (2012) Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Adm Soc XX(X):1–31Google Scholar
  41. Termeer C, Dewulf A, Breeman G (2013) Governance of wicked climate adaptation problems. In: Kneiling J, Filho WL (eds) Climate change governance, climate change management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. UNEP (2011) Geoengineering to combat global warming. Thematic Focus: Climate Change, Environmental Governance. Available at: https://na.unep.net/geas/getUNEPPageWithArticleIDScript.php?article_id=52
  43. Verweij M, Ney S (2015) Messy institutions for wicked problems: how to generate clumsy solutions. Environ Plan C Gov Policy 33:1679–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vos RO (2007) Defining sustainability: a conceptual orientation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82(4):334–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Waddock S, Meszoely GM, Wadell S, Dentoni D (2015) The complexity of wicked problems in large scale change. J Organ Chang Manag 28(6):993–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Webber EP, Khademian AM (2008) Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review 68(2):334–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Westley F, Olsson P, Folke C, Homer-Dixon T, Vredenburg H, Loorbach D, Thompson J, Nilsson M, Lambin E, Sendzimir J, Banerjee B, Galaz V, van der Leeuw S (2011) Tipping toward sustainability: emerging pathways of transformation. AMBIO 40:762–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiek A, Lang DJ (2016) Transformational sustainability research methodology. In: Heinrichs H, Martens P, Michelsen G, Wiek A (eds) Sustainability science: an introduction. Springer, Dordrecht, New York, pp 31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zijp M, Posthuma L, Wintersen A, Devilee J, Swartjes FA (2016) Definition and use of solution-focused sustainability assessment: a novel approach to generate, explore and decide on sustainable solutions for wicked problems. Environ Int 91:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesAthabasca UniversityAthabascaCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Walter Leal Filho
    • 1
  1. 1.World Sustainable Developoment Research and Transfer CentreHamburg University of Applied SciencesHamburgGermany