Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Aesthetics and Sustainability

  • Aaron S. Allen
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_403-1

Introduction

Common current English usage of “aesthetics” usually means “pretty” and almost always relates to visual perception. With this simplistic understanding, the idea of aesthetics is evident in connection with many disciplines. Anthropologists are often called upon to curate museum displays of cultural artifacts, dance and theater rely on visual elements of costume and sets, maps are fundamental in geography, and the study of history may rely on illuminations and handwriting in manuscripts. Even the sciences have a role for aesthetics: the visual representation of molecules helps make sense of the otherwise inaccessibly microscopic world of atoms in chemistry and physics, while biology and natural history have long relied on artistic representations of life forms of all types to explain concepts and disseminate findings. Even in the more abstract worlds of data and statistics, in disciplines such as sociology and mathematics, the elegant, logical, and truthful display of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. “Aesthetic” (n.d.) OED online. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcamo J, Bennett EM, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Program (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Alkon AH, Agyeman J (2011) Cultivating food justice: race, class, and sustainability. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen AS (2012) ‘Fatto Di Fiemme’: Stradivari’s violins and the musical trees of the Paneveggio. In: Auricchio L, Cook EH, Pacini G (eds) Invaluable trees: cultures of nature, 1660–1830. Voltaire Foundation, Oxford, pp 301–315Google Scholar
  5. Allen AS, Dawe K (eds) (2016) Current directions in ecomusicology: music, culture, nature. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Callicott JB (1994) The wilderness idea revisited: a sustainable development alternative. In: Chapple CK (ed) Ecological prospects: scientific, religious, and aesthetic perspectives. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 37–63Google Scholar
  7. Carlson A, Lintott S (2008) Nature, aesthetics, and environmentalism: from beauty to duty. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Cubitt S (2017) Finite media: environmental implications of digital technologies. Duke University Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  9. Devine K (2015) Decomposed: a political ecology of music. Pop Music 34(3):367–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edgell DL Sr (2016) Managing sustainable tourism: a legacy for the future. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eldridge R (2005) Aesthetics and ethics. In: Levinson J (ed) The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 722–732Google Scholar
  12. Fisher JA (2005) Environmental aesthetics. In: Levinson J (ed) The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Garrard G (2004) Ecocriticism. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrard G (ed) (2014) The Oxford handbook of ecocriticism. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Hosey L (2012) The shape of green: aesthetics, ecology, and design. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Krznaric R (2010) Empathy and climate change: proposal for a revolution of human relationships. In: Skrimshire S (ed) Future ethics: climate change and apocalyptic imagination. Continuum, London, pp 153–172Google Scholar
  17. Leopold A (1989) A sand county almanac, and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Philippon DJ (2012) Sustainability and the humanities: an extensive pleasure. Am Lit Hist 24(1):163–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Romm JJ (2012) Language intelligence: lessons on persuasion from Jesus, Shakespeare, Lincoln, and Lady Gaga. CreateSpace, North CharlestonGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomashow M (2014) The nine elements of a sustainable campus. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tucker ME, Grim J (2007) Daring to dream: religion and the future of the earth. Reflections. 2007Google Scholar
  22. Tufte ER (2001) The visual display of quantitative information, 2nd edn. Graphics Press, CheshireGoogle Scholar
  23. University of North Carolina Greensboro (n.d.) UNCG sustainability. Accessed 28 June 2018. https://sustainability.uncg.edu/
  24. Viladesau R (2014) Aesthetics and religion. In: Brown FB (ed) The Oxford handbook of religion and the arts. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Weintraub L (2012) To life!: eco art in pursuit of a sustainable planet. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environment & Sustainability ProgramUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ingrid Molderez
    • 1
  1. 1.KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium