Skip to main content

Knowledge Sharing and Sustainable Development

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Definition

Knowledge sharing is an activity through which knowledge as information, skills, or expertise (both tacit and explicit) is exchanged among people, friends, families, communities or organizations (Serban and Luan 2002; Bukowitz and Williams 1999; Hasmath and Hsu 2016).

Introduction

In an increasingly globalized and competitive world, with huge demands on sustainable solutions, we all have to face extremely a complex reality, rapidly changing technologies, and an exponential growth of knowledge. Against this background, it becomes more and more unlikely that a single individual, research group, or organization possesses all of the knowledge required (Howells et al. 2003). In this context, knowing and understanding the drivers and barriers of knowledge sharing becomes an absolute prerequisite for the success of any collaborative effort, particularly in regard to issues of sharing knowledge about and for sustainability. Information technology experts have developed highly...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Abrahamsson B, Andersen JA (2005) Organisation: att beskriva och förstå organisationer. Liber-Hermods, Malmö

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum SH, Calcagno R, Magarell SM, Saliba M (2016a) A relationship between corporate sustainability and organizational change (part two). Ind Commer Train 48(2):89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum SH, Calcagno R, Magarelli SM, Saliba M (2016b) A relationship between corporate sustainability and organizational change (part three). Ind Commer Train 48(3):133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizationl learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Beynon-Davies P (2011) Significance, exploring the nature of information, systems and technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire. ISBN 978-0-230- 27519-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Billet S (1996) Towards a model of workplace learning: The learning curriculum.Studies in Continuing Education 18(1):43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037960180103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackler F (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation. Organ Stud 16(6):1021–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boisot MH (1995) Information space: a framework for learning in organizations. Institutions and culture. Routledge, London. ISBN 0-415-11490-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Boisot MH (1998) Knowledge assets. Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. Oxford University Press, New York. ISBN 0-19-829607-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens M (1998) The quest for responsibility. Accountability and citizenship in complex organisations. University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee K (1993) Collaborative learning. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 28–51. Organisational change management: A

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowitz WR, Williams RL (1999) The Knowledge Management

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheetham G, Chivers G (2001) How professionals learn in practice: an investigation of informal learning amongst people working in professions. J Eur Ind Train 25(5): 248–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo CW (1998) Knowing organization. Oxford University Press, New York. ISBN 0-19-511012-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook SDN, Brown JS (1999) Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ Sci 10(4):381–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross R, Baird L (2000) Technology is not enough: improving performance by building organizational memory. Sloan Manag Rev 41(3):69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan M, Lane H, White R (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev 24(3):522–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg P (1999) Collaborative learning: cognitive and computational approaches. Advances in learning and instruction series. Elsevier Science, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A (2008) Nature (and politics). Environ Values 17:285–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döös M, Wilhelmson L (2005) Kollektivt lärande. Om betydelsen av interaktion i handling och gemensam handlingsarena. Pedagogisk forskning Sverige 10(3/4):209–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Döös M, Wilhelmson L (2011) Collective learning: interaction and a shared action arena. J Work Learn 10:487–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döös M. Wilhelmson L, Backlund T (2001) Kollektivt lärande på individualitstiskt vis – ett lärdilemma för praktik och teori. In: T. Backlund, Hansson H (eds) Lärdilemman i arbetslivet, Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Granberg O (1997) Lärande i organisationer: professionella yrkesutövares strategier vid organisatorisk förändring. Pedagogiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Granberg O, Ohlsson J (eds) (2016) Kollektivt lärande. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullikson H, Holmgren U (2015) Hållbar utveckling: livskvalitet, beteende, teknik. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurteen D (1999) Creating a knowledge sharing culture. Knowl Manag Mag 2(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1996) Kommunikativt handlande. Texter om språk, rationalitet och samhälle. Daidalos, Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn T, Preuss L, Pinkse J, Figge F (2014) Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: managerial sense making with paradoxical and business case frames. Acad Manag Rev 39(4):463–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasmath R, Hsu JYJ (2016) Communities of Practice and the NGO 28-July 1: 1. SSRN 2612686

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth P, Kimble C (2002) The duality of knowledge. Inf Res 8(1): 8. October 2002. http://www.informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper144.html. 30 June 2005

  • Howells J, James A, Malik K (2003) The sourcing of technological knowledge: distributed innovation processes and dynamic change. R&D Manag 33(4):395–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber GP (1991) Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literature. Organ Sci 2(1):88–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden R (1970) Der Streit um die Existenz der Welt, Bd. I, II/I, II/2. MaxNiemeyer, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden R (1983) Man and value. The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen J, Olaisen J, Olsen B (2001) Mismanagement of tacit knowledge: the importance of tacit knowledge, the danger of information technology, and what to do about it. Int J Inf Manag 21(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Holubec E (2008) Cooperation in the classroom. Interaction Book Company, Edina

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernell L-Å (2002) Att hitta balanser. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Suh, Hwang H (2003) Building the knowledge map: an industrial case study. J Knowl Manag 7(2):34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B, Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organ Stud 3(3):383–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb D (1984) Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson P (2004) Förändringens villkor. En studie av organisatoriskt lärande och förändring inom skolan. Doktorsavhandling vid Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas JR (1995) Responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie J (1990) Ethics. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess A (1995) The deep ecological movement – some philosophical aspects. In: Sessions G (ed) Deep ecology for the 21st century. Shambala, Boston, pp 225–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Nationalencyklopedin (NE) (1998) Multimedia CD-ROM. Höganäs

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(2):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Konno N (1998) The concept of “Ba”. Building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif Manag Rev 40(3):40–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York. ISBN 0-19-509269-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson J (1996) Kollektivt lärande: lärande i arbetsgrupper inom barnomsorgen. Rapport/Seminariet om miljöpedagogik och kunskapsbildning, Pedagogiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet (Journal Article)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson J (ed) (2004) Arbetslag och lärande. Lärarens organiserande av samarbete i organisationspedagogisk belysning. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski W (2000) Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci 11(4):404–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxenswärdh A (2011) Relations of responsibility in school development. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxenswärdh A (2017a) Processes for understanding sustainability as a goal and practice. J Geogr, Polit Soc 7(3):5–11. https://doi.org/10.4467/24512249JG.17.021.7177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxenswärdh A (2017b) Students’ learning processes for sustainable knowledge. Published in Millennium – Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health. Series 2(4), n.°4, p 33–43. Best paper award. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0204.03.00153

  • Oxenswärdh A (2017c) Collective learning towards sustainable tourism. An article in Studia Periegetica Journal nr 2(18)/2017. ISSN 1897-92

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxenswärdh A (2018) Co-creation of values between some bed and breakfast providers and their guests. J Res Bus Manag 05(07):13–26. ISSN (Online): 2347–3002

    Google Scholar 

  • Permer K, Permer L-G (1994) Begreppet ansvar: en litteraturgenomgång och en empirisk studie I skolan, Pedagogisk metodisk utveckling nr 128, Kristianstad

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Millar VE (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harv Bus Rev 63(3):149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambaud A, Richard J (2015) ‘The triple Depreciation Line’ instead of the ‘Triple Bottom Line’: towards a genuine integrated reporting. Crit Perspect Account 33:92–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robey D, Boudreau M, Rose GM (2000) Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research. Account Manag Inform Technol 10:125–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez R, Heene H (1997) Reinventing strategic management: new theory and practice for competence-based competition. Eur Manag J 15(3):303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1995) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Arena, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Serban AM, Luan J (2002) An Overview of Knowledge Management

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday, New York. ISBN 0-385-26094-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaper TF, Hall TJ (2011) The triple bottom line: what is it and how does it work? Indiana Bus Rev 2011:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby KE (1997) The new Organizational Wealth. Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco. ISBN 1-57675-014-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Väärälä R (1995) Ammattikoulutus ja kvalifikaatiot. Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis 9. ISBN 951-634-434-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh JJ, Ungson GR (1991) Organizational memory. Acad Manag Rev 16(1):57–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Westerholm H (2007) Tutkimusmatka pienyrittäjän työvalmiuksien ytimeen. Kirjallisuuteen ja DACUUM – analyysiin perustuva kartoitus. Jyväskylä studies in business and economics, vol 55. Jyväskylän yliopisto, Jyväskylä. ISBN 978-951-39- 2813-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky A (1986) Responsibilities are allocated by cultures. Mimeo, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelmson L (1998) Lärande dialog. Samtalsmönster, perspektivförändring och lärande i gruppsamtal. Stockholm University, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson TD (2002) The nonsense of “knowledge management”. Inf Res 8(1). http://www.informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper144.html. 30 June 2005

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anette Oxenswärdh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Oxenswärdh, A. (2019). Knowledge Sharing and Sustainable Development. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_320-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_320-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63951-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63951-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics