Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

How Worldview Development Influences Knowledge and Beliefs About Sustainability

  • Abigail LynamEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_22-1

Synonyms

Definition

How individuals perceive and makes meaning of sustainability, including their knowledge and beliefs, is significantly shaped by worldview and psychological development. Research in adult developmental psychology applied to sustainability education and leadership development supports knowledge and skill development for sustainability educators and change agents.

Introduction

Sustainability, defined as the reciprocal flourishing of human and planetary systems, calls for change in all dimensions of society – changes in individual and collective behaviors, systems, culture, and worldviews, knowledge, and beliefs. Working toward this kind of transformative and systemic change requires collaboration and coordination at every scale of human society. To do so educators and leaders need the skills and capacities to creatively...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adomssent M, Godemann J, Michelsen G (eds) (2008) Sustainable university [special issue]. Int J Sustain High Educ 8(4):486Google Scholar
  2. Beck D, Cowan C (1996) Spiral dynamics: mastering values, leadership, and change. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Beringer A, Adomssent M, Scott WA (eds) (2008) Sustainability in higher education research. Environ Educ Res 14(6):607Google Scholar
  4. Boiral O, Cayer M, Baron CM (2008) The action logics of environmental leadership: a developmental perspective. J Bus Ethics 85:479–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown BC (2005) Theory and practice of integral sustainable development: part 2 – values, developmental levels, and natural design. AQAL: J Integr Theory Pract 1(2):386–448Google Scholar
  6. Brown BC (2011) Conscious leadership for sustainability: how leaders with a late-stage action logic design initiatives. Dissertation, Fielding Graduate UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. Burns H (2011) Teaching for transformation:(re) designing sustainability courses based on ecological principles. J Sustain Educ 2:p.1Google Scholar
  8. Clayton S, Myers G (2009) Conservation psychology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook-Greuter SR (1999) Postautonomous ego development: a study of its nature and measurement. Diss Abstr Int 60:06B (UMI No. 993312)Google Scholar
  10. Cook-Greuter SR (2004) Making the case for a developmental perspective. Ind Commer Train 36(6/7):275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook-Greuter SR (2013) Ego development: nine levels of increasing embrace. http://www.cook-greuter.com/9%20levels%20of%20increasing%20embrace%20update%201%2007.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2017
  12. Cress C (2004) Critical thinking development in service-learning activities: pedagogical implications for critical being and action. Inq Crit Think Across Discip 23:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Esbjorn-Hargens S, Zimmerman ME (2009) Integral ecology: uniting multiple perspectives on the natural world. Integral Books, BostonGoogle Scholar
  14. Hedlund-de Witt A (2013) Worldviews and the quest for sustainable societies: an exploration of the cultural and psychological dimensions of our global environmental challenges. Dissertation, VU UniversityGoogle Scholar
  15. Heifetz RA, Grashow A, Linsky M (2009) The practice of adaptive leadership: tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Hulme M (2009) Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kegan R (1982) The evolving self: problem and process in human development. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Kegan R (1994) In over our heads: the mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Kegan R (2002) Epistemology, fourth order consciousness, and the subject-object relationship (Interview with Robert Kegan). What is Enlightenment? Fall/Winter, pp 144–154Google Scholar
  20. Leonard AB (2004) Integral communication. Master’s Thesis, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  21. Loevinger J, Wessler R (1970) Measuring ego development: vol. 1. Construction and use of a sentence completion test. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynam A (2012) Navigating a geography of sustainability worldviews: a developmental map. J Sustain Educ 3. http://www.jsedimensions.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/LynamJSE2012.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2016
  23. Lynam A (2014) Embracing developmental diversity: developmentally aware teaching, mentoring, and sustainability education. Dissertation, Prescott CollegeGoogle Scholar
  24. Martineau S (2007) Humanity, forest ecology, and the future in a British Columbia valley: a case study. Integral Rev 4:26–43Google Scholar
  25. McCauley CD, Drath WH, Palus CJ, O’Connor PMG, Baker BA (2006) The use of constructive-developmental theory to advance the understanding of leadership. Leadersh Q 17(6):634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McEwen CA, Schmidt JD (2007) Leadership and the corporate sustainability challenge: mindsets in action. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1118071. Accessed 15 Dec 2016
  27. Myers OE, Jr. Beringer A (2010) Sustainability in higher education: Psychological research for effective pedagogy. Canadian J Hig Educ 40(2), 51–77Google Scholar
  28. Nicolaides AI (2008) Learning their way through ambiguity: explorations of how nine developmentally mature adults make sense of ambiguity. Dissertation, Columbia UniversityGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Brien K, Hochachka G (2010) Integral adaptation to climate change. J Integral Theory Pract 5(1):89–102Google Scholar
  30. O’Fallon T (2010) The evolution of the human soul: developmental practices in spiritual guidance. Master’s thesis. http://www.pacificintegral.com. Accessed 15 Dec 2016
  31. O’Fallon T (2013) STAGES: growing up is waking up – interpenetrating quadrants, states and structures. http://www.pacificintegral.com/docs/StAGES_OFallon.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2016
  32. O’Riordan T, Voisey H (1998) The politics of agenda 21 in Europe. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid A, Podger DM, Mustakova-Possardt E (2010) A whole-person approach to educating for sustainability. Int J Sustain High Educ 11(4):339–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Riddell D (2005) Evolving approaches to conservation: integral ecology and Canada’s. Great Bear Rainforest World Futur 61:63–78.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02604020590902362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers K (2012) Exploring our ecological selves within learning organizations. Lear Organ 19(1):28–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saunders CD (2003) The emerging field of conservation psychology. Human Ecol Rev 10(2):218–229Google Scholar
  37. Schein S (2015) A new psychology for sustainability leadership: the hidden power of ecological worldviews. Greenleaf Publishing, VermontGoogle Scholar
  38. Sharma S (2000) Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad Manag J 43(4):681Google Scholar
  39. Sterling S (2001) Sustainable education – re-visioning learning and change, Schumacher society briefing no. 6. Green Books, DartingtonGoogle Scholar
  40. Sterling S (2007) Riding the storm: towards a connective cultural consciousness. In: Wals A (ed) Social learning towards a sustainable world: principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 63–82Google Scholar
  41. Taylor K (2000) Teaching with developmental intention. In: Mezirow J (ed) Learning as transformation: critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey Bass, San Francisco, pp 151–180Google Scholar
  42. Torbert WR (2013) Listening into the dark: an essay testing the validity and efficacy of collaborative developmental action inquiry for describing and encouraging transformations of self, society, and scientific inquiry. Integral Rev 9:264–299Google Scholar
  43. Torbert WR, Cook-Greuter SR, Fisher D, Foldy E, Gauthier A, Keeley J et al (2004) Action inquiry: the secret of timely and transformational leadership. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  44. Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Leadership Studies, Human and Organizational Development PhD ProgramFielding Graduate UniversitySanta BarbaraUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Luciana Brandli
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Passo FundoPasso FundoBrazil