Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho

Blended Learning and Sustainable Development

  • Sally Caird
  • Robin Roy
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_197-1

Synonyms

Definition

Blended learning may be defined as the design of learning experiences that draw on a combination of face-face, distance, or online delivery methods, learning technologies, delivery multimedia, and pedagogical methodologies to achieve a mix of learning outcomes in educational or training contexts. Blended learning designs can support sustainable development, including the social, economic, and environmental dimensions of sustainability and protect global environmental resources to meet the needs of the present and future generations.

Introduction

The concept of blended learning has its origins in the 1960s when new options for technology-mediated education became available to complement conventional approaches to face-to-face teaching in higher education (HE) and other contexts. There are several synonyms for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alharthi AD, Spichkova M, Hamilton M (2018) Sustainability requirements for eLearning systems: a systematic literature review and analysis. Requirements Engineering 18(3):1–21. Available via https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00766-018-0299-9. Accessed 30 October 2018.
  2. Adams Becker S, Cummins M, Davis A, Freeman A, Hall Giesinger C, Ananthanarayanan V (2017) NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. The New Media Consortium, Austin. Available via http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2017-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf
  3. Allen IE, Seaman J (2003) Sizing the opportunity: the quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002 and 2003. Sloan Consortium (NJ1). Available via https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED530060.pdf
  4. Caird S, Lane A (2013) The environmental impact of teaching and learning, OpenLearn unit. Available via http://www.open.edu/openlearn/nature-environment/the-environment/the-environmental-impact-teaching-and-learning/content-section-0
  5. Caird S, Lane A (2015) Conceptualising the role of information and communication technologies in the design of higher education teaching models used in the UK. Br J Educ Technol 46(1) 58–70. Available via  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caird S, Roy R (2018) Sustainable higher education systems. In: Leal Filho W, Velazquez L (eds) Encyclopedia of sustainability and higher education: campus greening, design, operations and carbon impacts. Springer, Heidelberg (in review)Google Scholar
  7. Caird S, Lane A, Swithenby E, Roy R, Potter S (2015a) Design of higher education teaching models and carbon impacts. Int J Sustain High Educ 16(1): 96–111. Available via  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2013-0065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caird S, Swithenby E, Lane A (2015b) The SusTEACH methodology: assessment of the environmental impacts of higher education teaching models and development of an environmental appraisal toolkit. The Open University, 63pp. Available via http://oro.open.ac.uk/42478/
  9. Davies J (2015) An analysis of the sustainability of different methods of delivering higher education. In: Leal Filho W, Brandli L, Kuznetsova O, Paço A (eds) Integrative approaches to sustainable development at university level. World sustainability series. Springer, Cham, pp 67–79. Available via http://www.springer.com/la/book/9783319106892Google Scholar
  10. Elkington J (1999) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business, New edition. Capstone, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Garrison DR, Kanuka H (2004) Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet High Educ 7(2):95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham CR (2012) Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In: Moore MG (ed) Handbook of distance education. Routledge, London, pp 333–350Google Scholar
  13. Halverson LR, Graham CR, Spring KJ, Drysdale JS (2012) An analysis of high impact scholarship and publication trends in blended learning. Distance Educ 33(3):381–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harlow S (2016) The carbon-based environmental impact of learning at the University of Waikato. In: DEANZ2016: conference proceedings, 17–20 Apr. The University of Waikato, New Zealand, pp 49–53. Available via http://flanz.org.nz/flanzorg/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/DEANZ16-Conference-proceedings11-April.pdf
  15. Jones N (2006) E-college Wales, a case study of blended learning. In: Bonk CJ, Graham CR (eds) Handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, pp 182–194Google Scholar
  16. Kalbar PP, Birkveda M, Karmakar S, Nygaarde SE, Hauschilda M (2017) Can carbon footprint serve as proxy of the environmental burden from urban consumption patterns? Ecol Indic 74:109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lane A, Caird S, Weller M (2014) The potential social, economic and environmental benefits of MOOCs: operational and historical comparisons with a massive ‘closed online’ course. Open Praxis 6(2):115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. López-Pérez MV, Pérez-López MC, Rodríguez-Ariza L (2011) Blended learning in higher education: students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Comput Edu 56(3):818–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Norberg A, Dziuban CD, Moskal PD (2011) A time-based blended learning model. Horizon 19(3):207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oliveira JH, Giannetti BF, Agostinho F, Almeida CMVB (2017) Decision making under the environmental perspective: choosing between traditional and distance teaching courses. J Clean Prod 172:4303–4313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oliver M, Trigwell K (2005) Can “blended learning” be redeemed? e-Learning 2(1):17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Roy R, Potter S, Yarrow K, Smith M (2005) Towards Sustainable Higher Education: environmental impacts of conventional campus, print-based and electronic distance/open learning systems, Final report DIG-08. Design Innovation Group, The Open University, Milton KeynesGoogle Scholar
  23. Roy R, Potter S, Yarrow K (2008) Designing low carbon higher education systems: environmental impacts of campus and distance learning systems. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(2):116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharma P (2010) Blended learning. ELT J 64(4):456–458. Available via https://doi-org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/10.1093/elt/ccq043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharples M, Adams A, Alozie N, Ferguson R, FitzGerald E, Gaved M, McAndrew P, Means B, Remold J, Rienties B, Roschelle J, Vogt K, Whitelock D, Yarnall L (2015) Innovating Pedagogy 2015: (Open University Innovation Report 4). The Open University, Milton Keynes. Available via http://proxima.iet.open.ac.uk/public/innovating_pedagogy_2015.pdf
  26. Spring KJ, Graham CR, Hadlock CA (2016) The current landscape of international blended learning. Int J Technol Enhanc Learn 8(1):84–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stewart B, Khare A (2015) eLearning and the sustainable campus. In: Leal Filho W (eds) Transformative approaches to sustainable development at universities. World sustainability series. Springer, Cham, pp 291–305. Available via https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-08837-2_20. Accessed 30 October 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08837-2_20Google Scholar
  28. Tseng H, Walsh E (2016) Blended versus traditional course delivery: comparing students' motivation, learning outcomes, and preferences. Q Rev Dist Edu 17(1):43–52Google Scholar
  29. UNESCO (2014) Shaping the future we want UN decade of education for sustainable development 2005–2014, (Final report) by United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Available via https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1682Shaping%20the%20future%20we%20want.pdf
  30. United Nations (UN) (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development A/RES/70/1. Available via https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
  31. Versteijlen M, Perez Salgado F, Janssen Groesbeek M, Counotte A (2017) Pros and cons of online education as a measure to reduce carbon emissions in higher education in the Netherlands. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 28:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our common future. In: Brundtland GH (ed) Report of the world commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Available via http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, School of Engineering and InnovationThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ingrid Molderez
    • 1
  1. 1.KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium