The NGO Response to Human Trafficking: Challenges, Opportunities, and Constraints

Reference work entry


The support sector for victims of human trafficking within a British context is dictated by a contract culture in which services are commissioned and funded against a backdrop of governmental policy and legislation around human trafficking and modern slavery. British policy and legislative contexts around trafficking have been couched within the discourse of “modern slavery” since the introduction of the Modern Slavery Act in April, 2015. Lawyers, policy makers, and support providers have highlighted how such a shift in approach from using the language of “trafficking” (which is codified within international law) to “modern slavery” (which is not) has muddied the framing of the concept as a whole, exacerbated by the “hostile environment” on (illegal) immigration. This chapter highlights some of the challenges for nongovernmental organizations that provide support to victims of trafficking (herein after trafficked persons) within such a political and legislative environment. The discussion is based on ethnographic observations over a period of 10 years of the author working within the trafficking support sector and semi-structured interviews with staff working with trafficked people in England and Wales. Some discussion is devoted to how the sector has changed and matured over this period of 10 years.


Trafficking Modern slavery Nongovernmental Charity Support 


  1. Coy M. (2006). This morning I’m a researcher, this afternoon I’m an outreach worker: ethical dilemmas in practitioner research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, pp. 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hoolachan J. (2016). Ethnography and homelessness research. International Journal of Housing Policy, 16(1), pp. 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Munro G. (2017). Health and wellbeing of refugees and migrants within a politically-contested environment. In: A. Bonner, ed., Social determinants of health: An interdisciplinary approach to health and wellbeing. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Taylor G. (2005). Evaluation of the victims of trafficking pilot project – POPPY: Summary findings. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics. Available at: [Accessed 14 September 2018].
  5. The Anti-Trafficking Monitoring Group. (2010). Wrong kind of victim? One year on: An analysis of UK measures to protect trafficked persons. London: Antislavery. Available at: [Accessed 15 September 2018].
  6. The Anti-Trafficking Monitoring Group. (2013). Hidden in Plain Sight. Three Years On: Updated analysis of UK measures to protect trafficked persons. London: Antislavery. Available at: [Accessed 29 April 2018].Google Scholar
  7. The Salvation Army. (2017). The Salvation Army Supporting Adult Victims of Modern Slavery: Update on the sixth year of The Salvation Army’s victim care and coordination contract. London: Salvation Army. Available at: [Accessed 29 April 2018].

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer International Publishing AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Children’s BureauLondonUK

Personalised recommendations