Advertisement

The Nebulous Definition of Slavery: Legal Versus Sociological Definitions of Slavery

  • Silvia ScarpaEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to clarify the contours of the definition of slavery. Special attention is placed in understanding the blurred lines between the international legal definitions of slavery and of other exploitative practices, including the practices labeled as similar to slavery, as well as servitude and forced labor, and their relationship with trafficking in persons. A distinction is subsequently made between the international legal definition contained in the 1926 Slavery Convention adopted by the League of Nations and sociological ones developed by various scholars such as K. Bales, O. Patterson, and A. Honoré. Elements included in these definitions are analyzed and discussed in light of the 1926 definition of slavery. In this respect, the recent reorientation of international attention toward (forms of) contemporary, modern, or modern-day slavery is discussed, thus concluding that it offers a way to avoid careful scrutiny on whether exploitative practices fit the 1926 legal definition of slavery.

Keywords

Slavery Practices similar to slavery Contemporary forms of slavery Servitude Debt bondage Forced labor Trafficking in persons 

References

  1. Ad Hoc Committee on Slavery (1951) Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Slavery. UN Doc. E/1988.Google Scholar
  2. Allain J (2009a) The Definition of Slavery in International Law. HowLJ 52:239–275.Google Scholar
  3. Allain J (2009b) On the Curious Disappearance of Human Servitude from General international Law. J Hist Int’l L 11:303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bales K (2012) Professor Kevin Bales’s Response to Professor Orlando Patterson. In: Allain J (ed) The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 360–372.Google Scholar
  5. Bassiouni C M (1999) Enslavement. In: Bassiouni C M (ed) International Criminal Law: Crimes v. 1, 2nd edn. Transnational Publishers, New York, p 663–704.Google Scholar
  6. Bassiouni C M (1991) Enslavement as an International Crime. JILP 23:445–518.Google Scholar
  7. Belser P, De Cock M, Mehran F (2005) ILO Minimum Estimate of Forced Labour in the World. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@declaration/documents/publication/wcms_081913.pdf.
  8. Cassese A (2005) International Law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Decaux E (2009) Les formes contemporaines de l’esclavage. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallagher A T (2010) The international law of human trafficking. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  11. Hellie R (2018) Slavery. Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/slavery-sociology/The-law-of-slavery.
  12. Honoré A (2012) The Nature of Slavery. In: Allain J (ed) The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Human Rights Committee (1994) General comment No. 24 on issues relating to reservations made upon ratification or accession to the covenant or the optional protocols thereto, or in relation to declarations under article 41 of the Covenant. UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6. Retrieved from https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.6&Lang=en. Accessed 4 Feb 2019.
  14. International Labour Organization (2016) ILO Standards on Forced Labour: The New Protocol and Recommendation at a Glance. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-ed_norm/%2D%2D-declaration/documents/publication/wcms_508317.pdf.
  15. International Law Commission (1963) II Yearbook of the International Law Commission. United Nations Publication Sales 63.V.2.Google Scholar
  16. Lassen N (1988) Slavery and slavery-like practices: United Nations standards and implementation. Nordic Journal of International Law 57(2):197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lenzerini F (2000) Suppressing Slavery Under Customary International Law. IYIL 10:145–180.Google Scholar
  18. Nowak M (2005) U.N. covenant on civil and political rights, CCPR commentary, 2nd edn. N.P. Engel Publishers, Kehl am. Rhein.Google Scholar
  19. Patterson O (1982) Slavery as Social Death: A Comparative Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  20. Patterson O (2012) Trafficking, gender and slavery: Past and present. In Allain J (ed) The legal understanding of slavery: From the historical to the contemporary. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 322–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quirk J (2008) Unfinished Business: A Comparative Survey of Historical and Contemporary Slavery. UNESCO. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/culture/pdf/UnfinishedBusinessReport2008.pdf.
  22. Rassam A Y (1998–1999) Contemporary Forms of Slavery and the Evolution of the Prohibition of Slavery and the Slave Trade Under Customary International Law. Va. J. Int’l L. 39:303–352.Google Scholar
  23. Scarpa S (2008) Trafficking in Human Being: Modern Slavery. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scarpa S (2014) Jean Allain (ed), The Legal Understanding of Slavery: From the Historical to the Contemporary, Oxford University Press Oxford, 2012, xviii + 395 pp., ISBN 9780199660469, $ 115,00. LJIL 27:551–556.Google Scholar
  25. Scarpa S (2018) Contemporary forms of slavery. Study requested by the DROI committee of the European parliament. European Union, Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2018/603470/EXPO_STU(2018)603470_EN.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2019.
  26. Secretary General of the United Nations (1953) Report of the Secretary-General on Slavery, the Slave Trade, and other forms of Servitude. UN Doc. E/2357.Google Scholar
  27. Weissbrodt D and Anti-Slavery International (2002) Abolishing slavery and its contemporary forms. United Nations, New York and Geneva. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/slaveryen.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2019.

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer International Publishing AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and International AffairsJohn Cabot UniversityRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of LawLUISS Guido Carli UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations