Finite Differences and Finite Elements in Nonlocal Fracture Modeling: A Priori Convergence Rates
In this chapter we present a rigorous convergence analysis of finite difference and finite element approximation of nonlinear nonlocal models. In the previous chapter, we considered a differentiable version of the original bond-based model introduced in Silling (J Mech Phys Solids 48(1):175–209, 2000). There we showed, for a fixed horizon of nonlocal interaction 𝜖, that well-posed formulations of the model can be developed over Hölder spaces and Sobolev spaces. In this chapter we apply these formulations to show a priori convergence for the discrete finite difference and finite element methods. We show that the error made using the forward Euler in time and a finite difference (i.e., piecewise constant) discretization in space with time step Δt and spatial discretization h is of the order of O( Δt + h∕𝜖2). For a central difference approximation in time and piecewise linear finite element approximation in space, the approximation error is of the order of O( Δt + h2∕𝜖2). We point out these are the first such error estimates for nonlinear nonlocal fracture formulations and are reported in Jha and Lipton (2017b Numerical analysis of nonlocal fracture models models in holder space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.02818. To appear in SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2018) and Jha and Lipton (2017a, Finite element approximation of nonlocal fracture models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.07661). We then go on to prove the stability of the semi-discrete approximation and show that the energy of the discrete approximation is bounded in terms of work done by the body force and initial energy put into the system. We look forward to improvements and development of a posteriori error estimation in the coming years.
KeywordsPeridynamic modeling Finite differences Finite elements Stability Convergence
This material is based upon work supported by the US Army Research Laboratory and the US Army Research Office under contract/grant number W911NF1610456.
- D.N. Arnold, Lecture notes on numerical analysis of partial differential equations (2011), http://www.math.umn.edu/~arnold/8445/notes.pdf
- E. Askari, F. Bobaru, R. Lehoucq, M. Parks, S. Silling, O. Weckner, Peridynamics for multiscale materials modeling. J Phys Conf Ser 125, 012078 (2008). IOP PublishingGoogle Scholar
- P. Diehl, R. Lipton, M. Schweitzer, Numerical verification of a bond-based softening peridynamic model for small displacements: deducing material parameters from classical linear theory. Institut für Numerische Simulation Preprint, (2016)Google Scholar
- P.K. Jha, R. Lipton, Finite element approximation of nonlocal fracture models (2017a). arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.07661Google Scholar
- P.K. Jha, R. Lipton, Numerical analysis of nonlocal fracture models models in holder space (2017b). arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.02818. To appear in SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2018Google Scholar
- P.K. Jha, R. Lipton, Numerical convergence of nonlinear nonlocal continuum models to local elastodynamics (2017c). arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00398. To appear in International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2018Google Scholar
- R. Lipton, S. Silling, R. Lehoucq, Complex fracture nucleation and evolution with nonlocal elastodynamics (2016). arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.00247Google Scholar
- R. Lipton, E. Said, P. Jha, Free damage propagation with memory. Journal of Elasticity, 1–25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10659-018-9672
- D.J. Littlewood, Simulation of dynamic fracture using peridynamics, finite element modeling, and contact, in Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE) (2010)Google Scholar