Numerical Tools for Improved Convergence of Meshfree Peridynamic Discretizations
Peridynamic models have been employed to simulate a broad range of engineering applications concerning material failure and damage, with the majority of these simulations using a meshfree discretization. This chapter reviews that meshfree discretization, related issues present in peridynamic convergence studies, and possible remedies proposed in the literature. In particular, we discuss two numerical tools, partial-volume algorithms and influence functions, to improve the convergence behavior of numerical solutions in peridynamics. Numerical studies in this chapter involve static and dynamic simulations for linear elastic state-based peridynamic problems.
KeywordsPeridynamics Meshfree discretization Partial volumes Influence functions Convergence Statics Dynamics
This study was supported in part by the Householder Fellowship which is jointly funded by: the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Applied Mathematics program, under award number ERKJE45, and the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), which is operated by UT-Battelle, LLC., for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-00OR22725; and by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development program at Sandia National Laboratories, which is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525.
- E. Askari, F. Bobaru, R.B. Lehoucq, M.L. Parks, S.A. Silling, O. Weckner, Peridynamics for multiscale materials modeling, in SciDAC 2008, 13–17 July, Seattle, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 125, IOP Publishing, 2008. 012078Google Scholar
- F. Bobaru, Y.D. Ha, W. Hu, Damage progression from impact in layered glass modeled with peridynamics. Centr. Eur. J. Eng. 2, 551–561 (2012)Google Scholar
- Q. Du, X. Tian, Asymptotically compatible schemes for peridynamics based on numerical quadratures, in Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Montreal, 2014. Paper No. IMECE2014-39620Google Scholar
- W. Hu, Y. D. Ha, F. Bobaru, Numerical integration in peridynamics, Technical report, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Sept. 2010Google Scholar
- D.J. Littlewood, A nonlocal approach to modeling crack nucleation in AA 7075-T651, in Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Denver, 2011. Paper No. IMECE2011-64236Google Scholar
- D.J. Littlewood, K. Mish, K. Pierson, Peridynamic simulation of damage evolution for structural health monitoring, in Proceedings of the ASME 2012 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Houston, 2012. Paper No. IMECE2012-86400Google Scholar
- E. Oterkus, E. Madenci, Peridynamics for failure prediction in composites, in 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Honolulu, 2012Google Scholar
- M.L. Parks, P. Seleson, S.J. Plimpton, S.A. Silling, R.B. Lehoucq, Peridynamics with LAMMPS: a user guide v0.3 beta, Report SAND2011-8523, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque and Livermore, 2011Google Scholar
- M.L. Parks, D.J. Littlewood, J.A. Mitchell, S.A. Silling, Peridigm users’ guide v1.0.0, Report SAND2012-7800, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque and Livermore, 2012Google Scholar
- P.D. Seleson, Peridynamic Multiscale Models for the Mechanics of Materials: Constitutive Relations, Upscaling from Atomistic Systems, and Interface Problems, PhD thesis, Florida State University, 2010. Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations. Paper 273Google Scholar
- J. Xu, A. Askari, O. Weckner, S. Silling, Peridynamic analysis of impact damage in composite laminates. J. Aerosp. Eng. Spec. Issue Impact Mech. Compos. Mater. Aerosp. Appl. 21, 187–194 (2008)Google Scholar