Advertisement

English Learners with Disabilities: Linguistic Development and Educational Equity in Jeopardy

  • Sara E. N. KangasEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

This chapter outlines current equity issues that surround the teaching of English learners (ELs) with disabilities. Drawing upon U.S. K-12 schools as the focal context, this chapter critically discusses how ELs with disabilities are often disadvantaged by policies and practices that are misaligned to their educational needs. Compounding this disadvantage are the persistent misconceptions that bilingualism is beyond the cognitive capacity of ELs with disabilities and that special education services are more critical than language services. As a consequence, these language learners are often deprived of opportunities for their linguistic development, which has significant ramifications for their academic trajectories. Thus, this chapter argues that English language teaching for ELs with disabilities is laden with social justice issues at every juncture. The chapter concludes with implications for safeguarding the bilingual development of language learners with disabilities.

Keywords

English learners with disabilities Equity K-12 education 

References

  1. Abedi J (2006) Psychometric issues in the ELL assessment and special education eligibility. Teach Coll Rec 108:2282–2303.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00782.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abedi J (2010) English language learners with disabilities: classification, assessment, and accommodation issues. J Appl Test Technol 10:1–30. http://www.jattjournal.comGoogle Scholar
  3. Albers CA, Martinez RS (2015) Promoting academic success with English language learners: best practices for RTI. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. American Institute for Research (n.d.) Essential components of RTI. http://www.rti4success.org/essential-components-rti. Accessed 12 July 2017
  5. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 § 12101 (1990)Google Scholar
  6. Artiles AJ, Rueda R, Salazar JJ, Higareda I (2005) Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts. Except Child 71:282–300.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baca LM, Cervantes HT (2004) The bilingual special education interface, 4th edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker C, Wright WE (2017) Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism, 3rd edn. Multilingual Matters, ClevedonGoogle Scholar
  9. Burke AM, Morita-Mullaney T, Singh M (2016) Indiana emergent bilingual student time to reclassification: a survival analysis. Am Educ Res J 53:1310–1342.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216667481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Center for Applied Linguistics (2006) The two-way immersion toolkit. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/twi/toolkit/index.htm
  11. Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq (1964)Google Scholar
  12. Collier C (2011) Seven steps to separating difference from disability. Corwin, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. Univ Chic Leg Forum 138–167Google Scholar
  14. De Valenzuela JS, Copeland SR, Qi CH (2006) Examining educational equity: revisiting the disproportionate representation of minority students in special education. Except Child 72(4):425–441.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Valenzuela JS, Kay-Raining Bird E, Parkington K, Mirenda P, Cain K, MacLeod AAN, Segers E (2016) Access to opportunities for bilingualism for individuals with developmental disabilities: key informant interviews. J Commun Disord 63:32–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq (1974)Google Scholar
  17. Esparza Brown J, Doolittle J (2008) A cultural, linguistic, and ecological framework for response to intervention with English language learners. Teach Except Child 40(5):66–72.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990804000509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S.C. §6301 et seq (2015)Google Scholar
  19. Flores N, Rosa J (2015) Undoing appropriateness: raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harv Educ Rev 85:149–171.  https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Genesee F (2009) Early childhood bilingualism: perils and possibilities. J Appl Res Learn 2(2):1–21. http://www.ccl-cca.caGoogle Scholar
  21. Genesee F (2015) Myths about early childhood bilingualism. Canadian Psychology 56(1):6–15.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grosjean F (2010) Bilingual: life and reality. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grosjean F (2016) The bilingual advantage: where do we go from here? Psychol Today. Accessed 23 Mar 2018Google Scholar
  24. Hamayan E, Marler B, Sánchez-López C, Damico J (2013) Special education considerations of English language learners: delivering a continuum of services, 2nd edn. Caslon, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Hibel J, Jasper AD (2012) Delayed special education placement for learning disabilities among children of immigrants. Soc Forces 91(2):503–530.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq (1975)Google Scholar
  27. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1412 (2004)Google Scholar
  28. Jamgochian EM, Ketterlin-Geller LR (2015) The 2% transition: supporting access to state assessments for students with disabilities. Teach Except Child 48(1):28–35.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915594781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kangas SEN (2014) When special education trumps ESL: an investigation of service delivery for ELLs with disabilities. Crit Inq Lang Stud 11(4):273–306.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2014.968070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kangas SEN (2017a) A cycle of fragmentation in an inclusive age: the case of English learners with disabilities. Teach Teach Educ 66:261–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kangas SEN (2017b) “That’s where the rubber meets the road”: the intersection of special education and bilingual education. Teach Coll Rec 119(7):1–36. http://www.tcrecord.orgGoogle Scholar
  32. Kangas SEN (2018) Breaking one law to uphold another: service provision for English learners with disabilities. TESOL Q.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kremer-Sadlik T (2005) To be or not to be bilingual: Autistic children from multilingual families. Paper presented at 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism. Somerville, MAGoogle Scholar
  34. Kay-Raining Bird E, Trudeau N, Sutton A (2016) Pulling it all together: the road to lasting bilingualism for children with developmental disabilities. J Commun Disord 63:63–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim WG, García SB (2014) Long-term English language learners’ perceptions of their language and academic learning experiences. Remedial Spec Educ 35(5):300–312.  https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klingner JK, Eppollito AM (2014) English language learners: differentiating between language acquisition and learning disabilities. Council for Exceptional Children, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  37. Klingner JK, Artiles AJ, Kozleski E, Harry B, Zion S, Tate W, Durán GZ, Riley D (2005) Addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through culturally responsive educational systems. Educ Policy Anal Arch 13(38):1–43.  https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n38.2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klingner JK, Boelé A, Linan-Thompson S, Rodriguez D (2014) Essential components of special education for English language learners with learning disabilities: position statement of the division for learning disabilities of the council for exceptional children. Learn Disabil Res Prac 29(3):93–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kraus L (2017) 2016 Disability statistics annual report. University of New Hampshire, DurhamGoogle Scholar
  40. Lau v. Nichols. 414 U.S. 563. (1974)Google Scholar
  41. Linquanti R, Cook HG (2015) Re-examining reclassification: guidance from a national working session on policies and practices for exiting students from English learner status. Available via Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.ccsso.org. Accessed 20 May 2017
  42. Lippi-Green R (2012) English with an accent: language, ideology, and discrimination in the U.S., 2nd edn. Routledge, AbingdonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu KK, Ward JM, Thurlow ML, Christensen LL (2013) Voices from the field: state assessments for ELLs with disabilities. Available from National Center on Educational Outcomes. https://nceo.info/Assessments/general_assessment/participation. Accessed 20 July 2017
  44. MacSwan J, Rolstad K (2006) How language proficiency tests mislead us about ability: implications for English language learner placement in special education. Teach Coll Rec 108(11):2304–2328.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00783.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moore BA, Klingner JK (2012) Considering the needs of English language learner populations an examination of the population validity of reading intervention research. J Learn Disabil 47(5):391–408.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412466702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. New Mexico Public Education Department (n.d.) ELs and special education FAQ. Available via bilingual multicultural education bureau. http://ped.state.nm.us/ped/Bilingual_EL_FAQ.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2017
  47. Olsen L (2014) Meeting the unique needs of long term English language learners: a guide for educators. Accessed via National Education Association. https://www.nea.org. 20 June 2017
  48. Orosco MJ, Abdulrahim NA (2017) Culturally responsive evidence-based practices with English language learners with learning disabilities: a qualitative case study. Educ Borderlands 1:27–45. http://journals.sagepub.com/home/ldxGoogle Scholar
  49. Orosco MJ, Klingner J (2010) One school’s implementation of RTI with English language learners: “referring into RTI”. J Learn Disabil 43(3):269–288.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Orosco MJ, O’Connor R (2014) Culturally responsive instruction for English language learners with learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 47(6):515–531.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413476553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ortiz AA, Robertson PM, Wilkinson CY, Liu Y, McGhee BD, Kushner MI (2011) The role of bilingual education teachers in preventing inappropriate referrals of ELLs to special education: implications for response to intervention. Biling Res J 34(3):316–333.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.628608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paradis J, Genesee F, Crago MB (2011) Dual language development and disorders: a handbook on bilingualism and second language learning, 2nd edn. Paul H. Brookes Publishing, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  53. Park S (2014) Bilingualism and children with autism spectrum disorders: issues, research, and implications. NYS TESOL J 1(2):122–129. http://journal.nystesol.orgGoogle Scholar
  54. Park S, Magee J, Martinez MI, Willner LS, Paul P (2016) English language learners with disabilities: a call for additional research and policy guidance. Available via Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.ccsso.org. Accessed 15 May 2017
  55. Ruiz R (1984) Orientations in language planning. NABE: The Journal for the National Association for Bilingual Education 8(2):15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Samson JF, Lesaux NK (2009) Language-minority learners in special education: rates and predictors of identification for service. J Learn Disabil 42(2):148–162.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schissel J, Kangas SEN (2018) Reclassification of emergent bilinguals with disabilities: the intersectionality of improbabilities. Lang Policy 17(4):567–589.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9476-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Simon-Cereijido G, Gutiérrez-Clellen VF (2013) Bilingual education for all: Latino dual language learners with language disabilities. Int J Biling Educ Biling 17(2):235–254.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.866630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Skutnabb-Kangas T (1981) Bilingualism or not: the education of minorities. Multilingual Matters, ClevedonGoogle Scholar
  60. Sullivan AL (2011) Disproportionality in special education identification and placement of English language learners. Except Child 77(3):317–334.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107700304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thomas WP, Collier V, Collier C (2010) English language learners in North Carolina. Available via Inquiry systems: Thomas and Collier Research. http://www.thomasandcollier.com. Accessed 18 July 2017
  62. Thompson KD (2015a) English learners’ time to reclassification: an analysis. Educ Policy 31(3):1–34.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815598394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thompson KD (2015b) Questioning the long-term English learner label: how classification and categorization can blind us to students’ abilities. Teach Coll Rec 117(12):1–50. http://www.tcrecord.orgGoogle Scholar
  64. Thurlow ML, Shyyan VV, Lazarus SS, Christensen LL (2016) Providing English language development services to English learners with disabilities: approaches to making exit decisions. Available via National Center on Education Outcome. https://nceo.info/Assessments/alternate_elp_assessment. Accessed 24 June 2017
  65. U.S. Department of Education (2011) Early intervention program for infants and toddlers with disabilities. Available via U.S. Government Publishing Office. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-09-28/pdf/2011-22783.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2017
  66. U.S. Department of Education (2016) English learner toolkit for state and local agencies. Available via Office of English Language Acquisition. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/oela/english-learner-toolkit/index.html. Accessed 18 July 2017
  67. U.S. Department of Education (2018) Fast facts: English language learners. Available via National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=96. Accessed 13 December 2018
  68. U.S. Department of Education (n.d.) Our nation’s English learners. https://www2.ed.gov/datastory/el-characteristics/index.html. Accessed 26 Mar 2018
  69. U.S. Department of Justice, Department of Education (2015) English learner (EL) dear colleague letter. http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/edu/documents/elsguide.php. Accessed 18 July 2017
  70. Umansky IM, Thompson KD, Díaz G (2017) Using an ever–English learner framework to examine disproportionality in special education. Except Child 84(1):76–96.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917707470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Valencia RR (1997) Conceptualizing the notion of deficit thinking. In: Valencia RR (ed) The evolution of deficit thinking: educational thought and practice. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  72. Zehler A, Fleischman HL, Hopstock PJ, Pendzick ML, Stephenson TD (2003) Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities. Special topic report #4. Available via National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. http://ncela.net/files/rcd/BE021199/special_ed4.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2017
  73. Zong J, Batalova J (2015) The limited English proficient population in the United States. Available via Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/limited-english-proficient-population-united-states

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationLehigh UniversityBethlehemUSA

Personalised recommendations