Skip to main content

Informed Consent

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 17 Accesses

Synonyms

Assessment of consent

Definition

Informed consent is a legal procedure to ensure that a patient or client knows all of the risks and costs involved in an action. It is based on the understanding and appreciation of the facts and possible implications. The subject must be of sound mind and not impaired by intoxication, sleep deprivation, mental retardation, mental illness with impairment of judgment, and other health problems that may affect reasoning. The participant must not be coerced to consent but should do so voluntarily. In instances in which the subject cannot give informed consent, another person legally authorized may give consent on his or her behalf. Examples include legal guardians or caregivers of the mentally ill. In cases where limited information is provided in the informed consent in order to maintain the integrity of the study, ethical issues must be addressed and prevented by an institutional review board. At times, informed consent is implied rather than...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1048–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J. (2006). Private and public protection: Civil mental health legislation. Edinburgh: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. B., Nowrangi, M. A., Palmer, B. W., Jeste, D. V., & Saks, E. R. (2006). Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: A review of instruments. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(8), 1323–1334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. A. (2006). Procedural misconceptions and informed consent: Insights from empirical research on the clinical trials industry. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 16(3), 251–268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes-Rovner, M., & Wills, C. E. (2002). Improving informed consent: Insights from behavioral decision research. Medical Care, 40(Suppl 9), V30–V38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie DeFabrique .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

DeFabrique, N. (2018). Informed Consent. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_994

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics