Skip to main content

Expert Witness

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 2 Accesses

Definition

First and foremost, one must distinguish between a “fact witness” and an “expert witness.” A fact witness only provides testimony regarding direct knowledge of the facts related to the issue at hand (e.g., an “eye witness” account of things). In contrast, an expert witness can provide facts but can also offer opinions and report hearsay. Since the decision rendered in Jenkins v. United States (1962), psychologists have been allowed to offer expert witness testimony in civil and criminal proceedings. Still, the admissibility of expert witness testimony is a critical issue. This determination is guided by a series of rules from the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) Article VII (“Opinions & Expert Testimony”). Specifically, FRE rule 702 states, “If scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Daubert v. Merrell Dow, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Rules of Evidence (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye v. U.S. (D.C. Cir. 1923). 293 F. 1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. M. (2003). Overview of forensic psychology. In A. Goldstein (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (Forensic psychology, Vol. 11). New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiffenstein, M. F., & Cohen, L. (2005). Neuropsychology and the law: Principles of productive attorney neuropsychologist relations. In G. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins v. U.S., 307 F. 2d 637 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moira C. Dux .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dux, M.C. (2018). Expert Witness. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_976

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics