Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Houston Conference

  • Robert D. JonesEmail author
  • Daniel TranelEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_9259

The Houston Conference on Specialty Education and Training in Clinical Neuropsychology was held at the University of Houston from September 3 through September 7, 1997 (Hannay et al. 1998). Although there had been previous outlines of training in clinical neuropsychology (e.g., Meier 1981), the Houston Conference grew out of a shared perception that the field had matured to the extent that an integrated and comprehensive model of training was needed (Bieliauskas 1998). As noted in the preamble of the guidelines, clinical neuropsychology had recently been recognized as a specialty by the American Psychological Association and the Canadian Psychological Association, but there had been no widely recognized and accepted description of a training model for the specialty. Appropriate to the goal of filling this gap, the stated aim of the Houston Conference was to “advance an aspirational, integrated model of specialty training in clinical neuropsychology” (Hannay et al. 1998).

Delegates for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ardilla, A. (2002). Houston conference: Need for more fundamental knowledge in neuropsychology. Neuropsychology Review, 12, 127–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belar, C. D., & Perry, N. W. (1992). National conference on scientist – Practitioner education and training for the professional practice of psychology. American Psychologist, 41, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bieliauskas, L. (1998). History and background of the conference. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13, 167–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bieliauskas, L. A., & Steinberg, B. A. (2005). The evolution of training in clinical neuropsychology: From hodgepodge to Houston. In G. Lamberty, J. Courtney, & R. Heilbronner (Eds.), The practice of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 17–30). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  5. Hannay, J., Bieliauskas, L. A., Crosson, B. A., Hammeke, T. A., Hamsher, K. d S., & Koffler, S. P. (1998). Proceedings of the Houston conference on specialty education and training in clinical neuropsychology, September 3–7, 1997, University of Houston. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13, 157–250.Google Scholar
  6. Meier, M. J. (1981). Education for competency assurance in human neuropsychology: Antecedents, models, and directions. In S. B. Filskov & T. J. Boll (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 754–781). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Reitan, R. M., Hom, J., Van De Voorde, J., Stanczak, D. E., & Wolfson, D. (2004). The Houston conference revisited. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 375–390.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Reynolds, C. (2002). An essay of the Houston conference policy statement: Static yet incomplete or a work in progress? Neuropsychology Review, 12, 143–145.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Sweet, J. J., Benson, L. M., Nelson, N. W., & Moberg, P. J. (2015). The American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology, National Academy of Neuropsychology, and Society for Clinical Neuropsychology (APA Division 40) TCN professional practice and “salary survey”: Professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. neuropsychologists. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 1069–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurologyThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA