Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology

2018 Edition
| Editors: Jeffrey S. Kreutzer, John DeLuca, Bruce Caplan

Multilingual Aphasia Examination

  • Janet P. PattersonEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_900




The Multilingual Aphasia Examination (MAE) (3rd edition; 1994) was designed to “evaluate the presence, severity, and qualitative aspects of aphasic disorders” (Benton et al. 1994). The MAE contains 11 subtests in five categories: Oral Expression (I. Visual Naming, II. Sentence Repetition, and III. Controlled Oral Word Association), Spelling (IV. Oral Spelling, V. Written Spelling, and VI. Block Spelling), Oral Verbal Understanding (VII. MAE Token Test, VIII. Aural Comprehension of Words and Phrases), Reading (IX. Reading Comprehension of Words and Phrases), and Rating Scales(X. Rating of Articulation and XI. Rating of Praxis Features of Writing). Subtests in the categories of Oral Expression, Spelling, Oral Verbal Understanding, and Reading are scored for accuracy of individual items. Some subtests (i.e., Visual Naming) use a 3- point scoring system (0-1-2) to represent the level of correct response on an item; the score for the subtest is the sum for all...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References and Readings

  1. Benton, A. L. (1969). Development of a multilingual aphasia battery: Progress and problems. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 9, 39–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Benton, A. L., Hamsher, K. D., & Sivan, A. B. (1994). Multilingual aphasia examination. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  3. Jones, R. D., & Benton, A. L. (1995). Use of the multilingual aphasia examination in the detection of language disorders. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1, 364.Google Scholar
  4. LaRue, A., Swan, G. E., & Carmelli, D. (1999). Cognition and depression in a cohort of aging men: Results from the Western Collaborative Group Study. Psychology and Aging, 10, 30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lucas, J., Ivnik, R., Willis, F., Ferman, T., Smith, G., Parfitt, F., et al. (2005). Mayo’s older African Americans normative studies: Normative data for commonly used clinical neuropsychological measures. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 19, 162–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rey, G., & Benton, A. L. (1991). Examen de Afasia Multilingue [Multilingual aphasia examination]. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  7. Spreen, O., & Benton, A. L. (1969). Neurosensory centre comprehensive examination for aphasia. Victoria: Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria (Rev. 1977).Google Scholar
  8. Spreen, O., & Risser, A. H. (2003). Assessment of aphasia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Strauss, E., Sherman, E. M. S., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG (outside the USA) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology ServiceVA Northern California Health Care SystemMartinezUSA