Skip to main content

M’Naghten Rule

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 28 Accesses

Synonyms

M’Naghten test

Definition

Historically, insanity was not considered a defense, but was a way to be acquitted from a crime as a result of a mental illness. The test was named after Daniel M’Naghten, a British man who was a defendant in a murder case in 1843. He was acquitted due to being found insane. The M’Naghten test or M’Naghten rule states that a person may be insane if at the time of committing the crime, the accused person was under the effect of mental illness and did not know the nature or quality of the act he was doing. If the person accused did know what he was doing, the M’Naghten test assesses whether the person knows what he did was wrong.

Cross-References

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • American Law Institute. (1955). Model penal code. Philadelphia: American Law Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, J. T. (2006). The case of Daniel McNaughton: Let’s get the story straight. American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 27, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denney, R. L. (2005). Criminal responsibility and other criminal forensic issues. In G. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • M’Naughten’s Case, 10 Clark & Finnelly 200 (1843).

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., & Shuman, D. (2000). Conducting insanity evaluations (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, D. L. (1999). Criminal responsibility evaluations: A manual for practice. Sarasota: Professional Resource Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, K. F., & Denney, R. L. (2008). Neuropsychology in the assessment of mental state at the time of the offense. In R. Denney & J. Sullivan (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie DeFabrique .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

DeFabrique, N. (2018). M’Naghten Rule. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_839

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics